Net54baseball.com Forums

Net54baseball.com Forums (http://www.net54baseball.com/index.php)
-   Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions (http://www.net54baseball.com/forumdisplay.php?f=2)
-   -   rarest backs (http://www.net54baseball.com/showthread.php?t=192333)

Bliggity 05-06-2016 07:31 AM

How about the T209-2 B.A. Thompson back? I think it fits your criteria, although it's a bit different in that Thompson is the only card in the set with that back, and Thompson can only be found with that back.

Not my card.

http://i1383.photobucket.com/albums/...psipsqkgdf.jpg


ETA: Looks like there are actually four different versions of the Thompson back: (A) no factory number; (B) stamped factory number; (C) printed factory number; (D) black border. Each one may be unique, or close to it. (Courtesy of t209-contentnea.com)

http://i1383.photobucket.com/albums/...psw4fnhkgt.png

Al C.risafulli 05-06-2016 12:13 PM

Quote:

I have seen some fake Henry Johnson backs but that green one looks real. I don't think I have seen that variety before. We will have to get Al C's take on it.
I'd consider the purple Henry Johnsons pretty rare, and the green ones REALLY rare. I own a couple and have never seen any others, and Val, yours is AMAZING. I'm confident in their authenticity, and the fact that there's a WaJo out there is incredible to me.

-Al

ValKehl 05-06-2016 01:31 PM

Al & Leon, thanks for your input and kind words. I picked up this green (actually, I like to call it turquoise, which is one of my favorite colors) HAJ WaJo roughly 20 years ago, before TPG became big time and before WaJo cards became as expensive as they are today. I'm confident this card is legit, but I'd hesitate to buy it today if it wasn't already graded.
Val


Quote:

Originally Posted by Al C.risafulli (Post 1535896)
I'd consider the purple Henry Johnsons pretty rare, and the green ones REALLY rare. I own a couple and have never seen any others, and Val, yours is AMAZING. I'm confident in their authenticity, and the fact that there's a WaJo out there is incredible to me.

-Al


MMarvelli 05-07-2016 09:16 AM

9 Attachment(s)
the early '20's was a good time for cards...



Attachment 230305

Attachment 230306

Attachment 230307

Attachment 230308

Attachment 230309

Attachment 230310

Attachment 230311

Attachment 230312

Attachment 230313

darwinbulldog 05-16-2016 11:03 AM

Updated Rarest Backs List
 
1 Attachment(s)
For those who haven't read through from the beginning of the thread, what I have been trying to compile here is a list of exceptionally rare backs on ACC-cataloged issues. There have to be fewer than 50 total examples of the type (so a T215 Pirate, for example, is too common) and the total number, whatever it may be, has to comprise less than 1% of the total population of the set (so an E107 with the "Breisch, Williams" stamp is too common).

Here, then, is the updated list with changes in bold. I continue to seek input on this.

D310 Aldon Candy, Pacific Coast Biscuit Co. stamp
E92 Croft’s (red)
E94 Your Out, Close's Oppie Dildock, Three Strikes, Pennant Winners, A Base Hit!, Your Safe! If..., Your Safe! Have..., Home Run!, Oh You Fan!
E98 Old Put
E101 D355*
E121 Kings, Gertenrich
E135 Merchant's
M101-4 Haserot's, Mall Theater, Everybody's type 1, Everybody's type 2, Everybody's type 3, Everybody's type 4
R316 Douglas Park, Morton, Rialto, Community
S74-1 Helmar
T205 Hindu, Drum
T206 Old Mill (brown), Lenox (brown), Cobb**
T207 Red Cross
T209-2 B.E. Thompson
T213-3 Factory 8 overprint
W461 Playland
W502/F50 Greiner's
W514 Hendler's, Barker, Mother's, Robinson
W515 Fleer, Jersey
W516-1-1 Sandow
W517 Piercy's
W551 Wool's
W554 Lucky Yo-Yo, Lukcy Deal, 40 Winners, Bonemery
W573/E120 Cafe du Monde, Cream Nut, Kings, Leader Theatre
W575-1 Johnson, Henry Johnson green, Henry Johnson and Howard P Bo***, Haffner's, Clark's, Gassler's, Leader Theatre, Queen City, Shotwell, Service Candy, Witmor horizontal, Witmor vertical


*The Niagara Baking back is certainly rare enough to qualify, but Burdick classified it as its own set; so you could say of these cards either that 100% of D355s have the same back ad or that < 1% of E101s are found with the Niagara stamp.
**The T206 Ty Cobb back is included in the list only because Burdick called it a T206. The card would not otherwise be considered a T206, but then again, nothing would, now would it?
*** This:

Bigb13 05-16-2016 11:56 AM

How about the E97 Blank backs?

ullmandds 05-16-2016 11:58 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bigb13 (Post 1539936)
How about the E97 Blank backs?

they're not that rare

Bigb13 05-16-2016 12:00 PM

There's only one Austin that's not rare?

ullmandds 05-16-2016 12:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bigb13 (Post 1539938)
There's only one Austin that's not rare?

if one is looking for an e97 blank back for a type...it is not hard to find one. If one is looking for a particular player...that can be a challenge.

There are no e97 blanks banks that are anywhere near unique.

Bigb13 05-16-2016 12:09 PM

The proofs are not rare? With only one showing in PSA?

ullmandds 05-16-2016 12:09 PM

think what u want...you have a history of overvaluing your cards.

they are not proofs and they are not that rare.

darwinbulldog 05-16-2016 12:11 PM

a) I don't know if there are fewer than 50 of them, but
b) I don't think they actually are E97s, and
c) I'm excluding all blank backs from the list anyway.

Bigb13 05-16-2016 12:14 PM

I don't over value my cards in the first place I was asking because I only see one on the PSA population report. Why do you have a hardon for me?

ullmandds 05-16-2016 12:15 PM

check sgc as more people use sgc for vintage than psa

Bigb13 05-16-2016 12:16 PM

Only one there also check for yourself

ullmandds 05-16-2016 12:18 PM

honestly I really dont care...all I know is over the years I have seen a handful of partial sets of e97 b/w's sold as well as many singles. They are tough...no doubt. but there are way more than 1-2 examples of each.

Bigb13 05-16-2016 12:21 PM

Maybe raw but not on the reports. I did not want t get into a pissing match with anyone just wanted to ask the question.

x2drich2000 05-16-2016 12:41 PM

Have to agree with Pete on the E97, difficult but not rare, especially compared to others on the list. In order for it to make this list I would expect to see an example, regardless of player, to come up for sale 2-3 times a year at most (not counting the same card being sold more than once). If I counted correctly there are at least 15 of the e97s on ebay right now and I know a board member has sold a few more earlier this year.

DJ

Bigb13 05-16-2016 12:50 PM

Hi DJ you show me 15 E97 Blank back proofs because I don't see them

brianp-beme 05-16-2016 12:54 PM

I think the E121 Gertenrich cards are borderline for inclusion on this because of a large individual listing of about 30(?) on ebay about 15 years ago, each with some paper loss on the back. I imagine there were enough other examples before this find to possibly exclude it from the list. Possibly Rhett would be a good source for all the E121 backs currently on/not on your list.

Brian

x2drich2000 05-16-2016 01:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bigb13 (Post 1539965)
Hi DJ you show me 15 E97 Blank back proofs because I don't see them

Ask and you shall receive...http://www.ebay.com/sch/i.html?_odkw...proof&_sacat=0

Plus 2 on ebay that recently sold (http://www.ebay.com/sch/i.html?_from...p2045573.m1684)

Plus 2 more in the recent REA (http://bid.robertedwardauctions.com/...tledescription)

Another listed in h& S (http://www.hugginsandscott.com/cgi-b...l?itemid=95142)

And 2 more in clean sweep (http://www.cleansweepauctions.com/listview.cgi - search for e97s)

So I count over 20 now that are either currently for sale or recently sold in the past couple months and I've barely started looking.

DJ

Bigb13 05-16-2016 01:57 PM

Talking about number 1 Austin, 1 SGC and 1 PSA that's only two cards that's not rare? What is your definition of rare then?

ullmandds 05-16-2016 02:04 PM

i believe there are 3 listed sgc sales on vcp of austin

Bigb13 05-16-2016 02:08 PM

There population report shows one

x2drich2000 05-16-2016 02:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bigb13 (Post 1539983)
Talking about number 1 Austin, 1 SGC and 1 PSA that's only two cards that's not rare? What is your definition of rare then?

The point of this thread is not to find a particular player with a specific back, but rather to list rare backs regardless of who the player is on the front.

and just to get a little more back on topic. Here are my 2 red crofts :)

http://i1065.photobucket.com/albums/...%20bescher.jpg
http://i1065.photobucket.com/albums/...ed%20bemis.jpg

tedzan 05-16-2016 05:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by darwinbulldog (Post 1309735)
Thank you.

A T215 Pirate is almost as common as a T215 Red Cross, isn't it? That's why I left them off.

T213-3 overprint might be a good addition, depending on whether the comparison set is T213 altogether or just T213-3, but my inclination would be to use T213-3 since it was issued so much later, as opposed to just being a different style printed in the same year.

It absolutely is NOT !

Just ask anyone on this forum if they have a BB subject with a PIRATE back ?

You may be quite surprised how few responses you get.



http://i603.photobucket.com/albums/t...atecigpack.jpghttp://i603.photobucket.com/albums/t...atecigpack.jpg


http://i603.photobucket.com/albums/t...t215pirate.jpg




TED Z
.

ullmandds 05-16-2016 06:05 PM

there can't be more than 100-120 t215 pirates known...eh ted?

Sean 05-16-2016 07:20 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ullmandds (Post 1540079)
there can't be more than 100-120 t215 pirates known...eh ted?

And 96 of them are in Richard Masson's collection. Which leaves 15 - 20 for everyone else.

oldjudge 05-16-2016 07:48 PM

1 Attachment(s)
Only three 1886 Hancock Clothing backs (or fronts) known, one each of Tomney, Buckley and Crothers.

ullmandds 05-16-2016 08:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sean (Post 1540114)
And 96 of them are in Richard Masson's collection. Which leaves 15 - 20 for everyone else.

exactly

ullmandds 05-16-2016 08:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by oldjudge (Post 1540130)
Only three 1886 Hancock Clothing backs (or fronts) known, one each of Tomney, Buckley and Crothers.

those are rare alright!

ValKehl 05-16-2016 09:19 PM

Hancock Clothing cards don't meet the OP's criterion of being ACC cataloged.

There are several American Caramel back types for the E121/80 set. I would guess that at least one of them might qualify. Rhett, what say you?
Val

oldjudge 05-16-2016 10:55 PM

Burdick never knew about the Hancock Clothing cards--too rare for even him.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:39 PM.