![]() |
I think voided contracts will stop it
Of course the owners would have the stones to do it. |
There need to be conditions to make them voidable. Owners cannot just go around deciding they dont want to pay anymore.
|
I laughed when he said I made a mistake. No a mistake happens once or twice and you learn from it what he did over a course of a couple years is considered a habit not a mistake. douche bag
|
Again,
Voiding contracts for PED use might be problematic. The athlete can then declare an addiction which is a protected class and cannot be fired under the ADA as they are not "at will" employees and if they seek treatment...lawyers help me out here... Many of the contracts now employed by the MLB teams and the CBA do allow the void of contracts due to moral issues including lying which is rather easy to prove because if you are using a banned substance when you negotiated (or re-negotiated) your contract, you were not bargaining in good faith. It is very complicated and I am just a teacher but I do have some familiarity with some of the cases here and know a bunch about ADA, Hippa, and CBAs. Joshua |
IMO, Braun maybe the only suspension out of this fracas. It is tough to believe that MLB would want the PR nightmare of spreading out these less than favorable announcements of these image shattering PED suspensions...if anything, they would want to make all the suspension announcements at one time in order to be minimize the PR nightmare/fallout.
Ironically, they even announced Braun's suspension on the same day that England's newest Prince was born(an easily predictable event). While Braun's suspension is quite news worthy (for all of the wrong reasons), the story was completely minimized by the birth of the Prince. This is likely just want MLB wanted...it appears to be no coincidence that MLB waited for a busy news day where the Braun story could be buried by another huge (worldwide) media event. Three of the names mentioned with this scandal included Braun, Cabrera, and Colon. All three have failed PED tests, while only the latter two have served 50 game suspensions. Likely, MLB did not further penalize either of these two as they had already served 50 gamers. IMO, without negative test results for the other players linked to the scandal, MLB will be hardpressed to prove anything about these players alleged use of PEDs or involvement with Biogenesis. Braun was simply lowhanging fruit for MLB because he did have a failed PED test (that likely linked him to Biogensis) as evidence and had not served a suspension. |
Quote:
He's about to get a lifetime ban.....they will announce that when the prince's name is revealed.. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
.
|
While they're getting better, MLB should make it a no nonsense, no tolerance policy. Get caught and you'll be banned for life from baseball, banned from the Hall of Fame, banned from attending a game, you'll have all of your awards and titles removed, and your contract instantly is revoked. Heck, throw in a rule that states you have to pay a $10 million fine as well for tarnishing the game's reputation.
I'm tired of these cheaters ruining baseball. Have we not heard enough about PEDs? Didn't Bonds and McGuire ruin baseball enough by breaking coveted records only by cheating? Now we have another round of big name players getting caught. They'll NEVER learn unless getting caught equates to a lifetime ban. |
I guess nobody read that post I spent some time on:(
Basically, Some drug tests are prone to positives from things besides cheating. So an automatic lifetime ban is not warranted. Even the WADA - A bunch of complete hardcases when it comes to doping- recognize mitigating factors and often use reduced bans for negligent use. Lifetime bans WILL NOT STOP DOPING. In cycling doping is common, even with a 2 year ban for a first offence and an insanely stringent testing plan. Pro riders need to file a whereabouts form months ahead of time for the offseason so the testers can find them. Missing a test is a positive Being seen by certain doctors is a positive. And the riders still take stuff. EPO thickens the blood. For a person fit enough to have a resting heartrate around 40 and also usually a large heart, that means a huge risk of the blood pooling in the heart and clotting, leading to strokes that are almost always fatal. A number of young riders died unexpectedly at absurdly young ages. Insanely fit guys that are 22-23 don't normall just die. That's right- EPO CAN BE FATAL. That's as serious a lifetime ban as you can think of, and people still doped with it and still do. Steve B |
I understand that levels could be inconsistent, but when you find a synthetic testosterone in a urine sample I don't see how lab error could come into play regardless of how much synthetic testosterone was detected. If it's detected at all that's cheating.
|
Quote:
|
Any time I start to feel swindled over all the vacations we provide for ALL of our Presidents I think of the saps that have to fund the monarchy.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
|
Quote:
Many things currently banned were ok at one time, blood doping was controversial in the 80's and is banned now. (Train at altitude, have blood taken while it's rich in red cells, then just prior to competition have that blood put back in. - Instant improvement in oxygen capacity) That was relatively safe, EPO does the same thing but isn't. The 1880's case in cycling involved a mix of cocaine, caffeine and strychnine. It apparently was neither unusual or illegal at the time. In the 30's many athletes smoked, holding the belief that it would open up the lungs. It's simply not stoppable no matter what penalty is involved. That's not to say there shouldn't be penalties, WADA typically issues a 2 year suspension for the first offense. Now if people want to retroactively take away awards and records...... Illegal substances are banned right? And Alcohol was illegal from 1920-1933. So I'm thinking a ton of records need to be reassessed. Welcome our new HR record holders! Roger Connor and Gavvy Cravath. (Ok, maybe Gherig instead of Connor) Steve B (My edge in softball was being a swing for the fences pull hitter in BP, and a singles hitter to all fields in the game. I think it was legal, and worked great till people caught on to it.) |
Comments from Zack Greinke on Ryan Braun this week as reported by Dylan Hernandez of the LA Times...
"The main thing is, yeah, he lied to us. He forced us to lie for him, threw people under the bus in order to help himself out and didn't care, blamed others for his mistakes and it’s just a lot of things you don’t expect from people...Everything was so convincing. He had people to blame. He seemed like a really good guy. He was a good teammate at the time. You don’t know the guys that he was pinning it on. I'm not positive, but I think everyone 100% believed him at the time. Especially the next year, he looked just as good as the year before. His numbers his whole career, Hall of Fame numbers. How could you not believe him? He was so convincing...Not even talking about the player. It’s just the person. Just the fact that he was willing to use anyone that got in his path. The closer you were to him, the more he would use you. It's just disappointing that a human being could be like that." The players and the Players Union are finally distancing themselves from those who would cheat by using PEDs. |
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:33 AM. |