Net54baseball.com Forums
Page 3 of 3 12 3
Show 80 post(s) from this thread on one page

Net54baseball.com Forums (http://www.net54baseball.com/index.php)
-   Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions (http://www.net54baseball.com/forumdisplay.php?f=2)
-   -   Best Looking set of all time (http://www.net54baseball.com/showthread.php?t=170953)

ullmandds 09-10-2013 11:30 AM
poll has some weird options..55 bowman...REALLY?

auggiedoggy 09-10-2013 12:25 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by ullmandds (Post 1182891)
poll has some weird options..55 bowman...REALLY?
Ya, I know. C46 is not even on the list! An obvious oversight. :D:rolleyes::D

ElCabron 09-10-2013 12:26 PM
The correct answer is, of course, N162.

By country:

United States: N162
Cuba: 1923-24 Billiken
Mexico: 1945 issue (unnamed for now)
Nicaragua: 1957 Cocibolca
Puerto Rico: 1951-52 Denia
Venezuela: 1931 Diana

That's how my eyes see it, anyway.

-Ryan

JasonL 09-10-2013 12:29 PM
Stache...
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by the 'stache (Post 1182655)
+1. The best example of how simplicity can be beautiful. No typography whatsoever to distract you...just gorgeous color photographs of players from baseball's golden age. Old-time uniforms, stadiums long gone. It doesn't get any better than this.

http://img560.imageshack.us/img560/9627/57d3.png
drooling over your PSA 8 53Bowman Campy and Mathews cards! awesome stuff.

PolarBear 09-10-2013 12:35 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by VoodooChild (Post 1182868)
I'm going to go a little "outside the box" here. I know this is not a pre-war set, but I have a background in photography. There are cards that I collect strictly for the photo regardless of the player. For me, baseball card photography started to turn the corner with the 1973 Topps set. There a many cards in that set where the photographers got creative with the action shots:

I love the 73's for the same reason. The Luis Alvarado is my favorite card in the set.

dabigyankeeman 09-10-2013 12:50 PM
I love it when an interesting background or colorful background is in focus and really part of the picture. It makes the card way more attractive to me.

the 'stache 09-10-2013 01:04 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by VoodooChild (Post 1182868)
I'm going to go a little "outside the box" here. I know this is not a pre-war set, but I have a background in photography. There are cards that I collect strictly for the photo regardless of the player. For me, baseball card photography started to turn the corner with the 1973 Topps set. There a many cards in that set where the photographers got creative with the action shots:
Jason C, you forgot the best looking card of the set. :D

http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-Y-K6rtlHIC...400/img108.jpg

Quote:
Originally Posted by JasonL (Post 1182903)
drooling over your PSA 8 53Bowman Campy and Mathews cards! awesome stuff.
Jason L.,

Unfortunately those are not mine. I found those on the web. I have the Kiner, but it's a PSA 6. I'll upgrade that and add the rest in time. This is one set I plan on finishing.

Here's my Ralph:

http://img194.imageshack.us/img194/9205/kqrj.png

It has nice eye appeal, but I'd like a 7 that's a little more centered.

VoodooChild 09-10-2013 01:17 PM
Bill.....The best part about the '73 Clemente is the back - Showing exactly 3,000 hits!

ZenPop 09-10-2013 01:22 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by VoodooChild (Post 1182890)
Hey John, I hear you on the '73's, but I think there might have been some limitations with lenses and film speed back then. I don't think there were large aperture 800mm lenses and 3200 speed film back then to make focused stopped action and "blurred" backgrounds possible. I'm just giving props for the effort for actually thinking about camera angles, composition, capturing different game situations, and playing with depth-of-field (slightly out of focus foreground/in focus background). It's the fist time I saw that with baseball card photography was the point I was trying to make.
That makes sense to me... I'm probably spoiled by the Conlon photography (the Cobb sliding shot comes to mind) of dynamic photography...

Maybe I'll take a look at the '73 set again...

Cheers!

ZenPop 09-10-2013 01:30 PM
Although not even in the Top 20 of Best Looking Sets Of All Time... I do like the '72 set (people either love it or hate it)... but I think it's excellent design for its time... There's some cool things in there... including this beautiful idea... Billy Cowan with a halo provided by the Big A in the background. This is what happens when you get a photographer that's going a bit extra and not just lazy shooting in traditional ways...

I also love how the Alex Johnson is perfect framed by the card design... Nice touches, both.

http://i295.photobucket.com/albums/m...gels_Cowan.jpg http://i295.photobucket.com/albums/m...ns_Johnson.jpg

the 'stache 09-10-2013 01:31 PM
Jason, ya, you're right. Thank you, Jon Matlack!

Roberto's 3,000th hit came 1 year and 7 days after I was born. On that day, he tied Honus Wagner's team record for games played, and broke it on October 3rd when he came out for the 9th inning.

I really like the '58 Topps set, too, and this might be my favorite Roberto card:

http://img855.imageshack.us/img855/5912/a2yu.png

I'm going to add the '58 to my collection next, I think.

VoodooChild 09-10-2013 01:35 PM
1 Attachment(s)
John....yeah the Conlon Cobb Sliding is an awesome shot, but was really cropped. Here's the original. I bet it was taken a few feet away from the 3rd base line. You could probably get a similar shot today with a cheap digital camera from good seats in the stands. Those guys really had skills back then. He had one shot at it with a manual focus large format camera. Not like today where cameras auto focus multiple frames per second.

nsaddict 09-10-2013 01:52 PM
Wow, quite a variety of choices and some strange choices in the poll? Not to go along with the crowd but it has to be T3 closely followed by N162. If you had a large showcase of every card choice in this thread in the same condition I believe my 2 choices would stand out. While I agree the 53B is a beauty of a set , I don't see how any set with actual photo's could even compete with actual artwork.

ZenPop 09-10-2013 01:54 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by VoodooChild (Post 1182935)
John....yeah the Conlon Cobb Sliding is an awesome shot, but was really cropped. Here's the original. I bet it was taken a few feet away from the 3rd base line. You could probably get a similar shot today with a cheap digital camera from good seats in the stands. Those guys really had skills back then. He had one shot at it with a manual focus large format camera. Not like today where cameras auto focus multiple frames per second.
Well... I guess that's my argument in a nutshell for good design. I know that shot was pretty wide... but if it was placed in the context of a card design, you MUST know how to crop a photo that results in the best possible design. It doesn't matter if it's an illustration or a photo... the design of the image is a key to create a beautiful result... I've seen a lot of amazing design ruined by bad crops (among other reasons...). Cropping is a pretty important element that figures in the final outcome.

esd10 09-10-2013 01:54 PM
my favorite sets have to be the t206, t3 and 1934-36 diamond stars


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:42 AM.
Page 3 of 3 12 3
Show 80 post(s) from this thread on one page