What flaws do you spot on this Ruth?
 

Posted By: <b>Matt</b><p>"It is not here to "attack" Matt."<br /><br />from one Matt to another; I have found the purpose of some posters on this forum is indeed to "attack Matt."<br /><br /><img src="/images/happy.gif" height=14 width=14>

What flaws do you spot on this Ruth?
 

Posted By: <b>leon</b><p>I am not really agreeing or disagreeing with you. No need to. I am only saying what is permitted and not permitted on this board. Even if what you say is the truth you would need to be known to say these kinds of things. We'll let it go for now. I appreciate your understanding and participation on the board....<br />Very many folks on this board have similar issues with PSA.....although I don't think there is any conspiracy of any type they do seem to make a few more errors than SGC in the vintage space...imo...(yes, SGC is an advetiser here so there is that bias from me....but what I say I would say anyway)....and SGC, most auction company advertisers, and myself have all been taken to task on Net54. That is ok but the anonymity rule comes into play. regards

What flaws do you spot on this Ruth?
 

Posted By: <b>Jay Adair</b><p><B>Leon</B> -<br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br />The text I am bolding next is a prime example of what Matt (Plifter) has done on other boards, resulting is his being banned, and was only a matter of time before he did here. Threatening other members with what he thinks are slick, cute little remarks ........<br /><br />---------------------------------------------------------------------<br /><br />Matt Ranson <br />(Login plifter) Re: What flaws do you spot on this Ruth? April 23 2008, 4:50 PM <br /><br /><br /><b>Are you going to the National Convention this year? If so, perhaps we can meet up and discuss this face to face. I would really enjoy that. <br /><br />By the way, how old are you?</b><br /> <br />--------------------------------------------------------------------- <br /><br /><br />It's pathetic that he actually thinks his "Internet tough guy" routine works. I'm just glad that one forum saw through his veiled threats and banned him.<br /><br />Granted, some people have harsher words for him than others. But it's obvious that he is not here to take anyone's advice. He simply wants people to agree with his conspiracy theories. And is you don't? The threats start rolling.<br /><br />Matt, you are a pathetic little man. That is my honest opinion of you. Sorry if that hurts you're pride. Please, take your card and enjoy it. While you're at it please take the time to reflect on the things that are truly important in life. Embrace that which makes you a better person and turn away from the things that have obviously skewed your ability to rationally process information.<br /><br /><br /><br />Good day to you,<br />Jay <br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br />Edit: Bold tags

What flaws do you spot on this Ruth?
 

Posted By: <b>Tim</b><p>So when do you just accept the fact that the card may have already received the highest grade it is going to get?<br /><br />If grading is subjective as most of us agree than why shouldn't your opinion be as potentially flawed as the professional graders you disagree with? Especially considering your admitted lack of grading knowledge.<br /><br />I do feel that for the money most people pay the grading services and the time they are supposed to take inspecting a card, a brief write up of the cards condition and reasons for receiving a particular grade is little to ask.<br /><br />With that said, if you bought the card in its current slab be happy with the card itself. I have several cards that I can't understand why they didn't receive higher grades and when and if I decide to sell them I may submit them for regrading. But for the time being the grade on the slab doesn't take away from the card itself or my enjoyment of it.<br /><br />*Edited for spelling.

What flaws do you spot on this Ruth?
 

Posted By: <b>leon</b><p>I think there are some older arguments going on here and I would prefer to keep them off of Net54. I agree that plifter needs to either take the advice given or not and move on, on this issue. Bullying on Net54 is not going to be allowed either but when I look up in the posts and see some antagonizing to get to that point then I am not as quick to step in. I have had emails from certain other members about this issue on this board but the person usually complaining has brought it on themselves....and I tell them I am reluctant to step in due to that fact. Each situation is different so there is no set rule. Overall I would expect this to be as friendly of a place as possible....with a 1000 addicts things can sometimes go south though. Lets all please play nicely together. It's supposed to be a fun hobby...regards

What flaws do you spot on this Ruth?
 

Posted By: <b>Matt R</b><p>No Jay, the "threats" (if that's what you want to call it) started when the insults became personal. You continue to say I'm not taking advice. Several people said to call GAI for an explanation. I did that. It was not helpful. I posted on this forum to see if others could spot something I missed. There were no problems on this thread until the PSA trolls came over.<br /><br />The fact that you followed me over to this board to continue your verbal abuse makes YOU a pathetic little man. I don't post on the PSA board any longer. Why do you care any more? Why do you keep coming here? GIVE IT UP! ENOUGH! STOP IT! CAN YOU UNDERSTAND ANY OF THESE WORDS! YOU are the one that needs to move on (or stay where you were).

What flaws do you spot on this Ruth?
 

Posted By: <b>leon</b><p>This thread is done and I would not expect the arguing to spill over into other threads.....please...thanks