Net54baseball.com Forums - PSA 5 Evers....I don't think so....DO YOU ?

Page 2 of 3

Show 80 post(s) from this thread on one page

Net54baseball.com Forums (http://www.net54baseball.com/index.php)

- Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions (http://www.net54baseball.com/forumdisplay.php?f=2)

- - PSA 5 Evers....I don't think so....DO YOU ? (http://www.net54baseball.com/showthread.php?t=84643)

Archive

03-15-2007 04:17 PM

PSA 5 Evers....I don't think so....DO YOU ?

Posted By: T206CollectorGiven that GAI is a more permissive grader of T206 cards than PSA and SGC, I suspect there is a reason that GAI did not go to 5 on this one. I also have never had a 'tweener GAI bumped up by SGC in a crossover. My feeling is this card has a wrinkle that is hard to see -- and definitely not visible in the scan. It probably cost Ted about $185....

Archive

03-15-2007 06:23 PM

PSA 5 Evers....I don't think so....DO YOU ?

Posted By: Frank EvanovGiven GAI's poor track record, I would say $150 for that one. Any paper loss on the top border? Frank

Archive

03-15-2007 07:24 PM

PSA 5 Evers....I don't think so....DO YOU ?

Posted By: Frank Wakefield$80, US currency....

Archive

03-16-2007 07:51 AM

PSA 5 Evers....I don't think so....DO YOU ?

Posted By: Ted ZanidakisAt 215, I think most would agree it was a nice purchase.

Archive

03-16-2007 07:51 AM

PSA 5 Evers....I don't think so....DO YOU ?

Posted By: Ted ZanidakisAfter reviewing all the responses in this thread (some 80+ posts), I have these observations.... 1....By a factor of 12-1, agreed that the Evers card was overgraded by PSA 2....But, according to most of you, the 410 I paid for it is about right 3....Many agree that the Cicotte card is undergraded 4....But, you Graded card guys guess its purchase price to be only 150 - 275 Given that both these cards have Sovereign backs....and, one is a highly sought after Black Sox player....while, the other is a HOFer and a T206 "super-print"....can you "Graded Guys" explain to me why you are saying that the Cicotte should be approx. 1/2 the value of the Evers ? This does not make any logical sense, guys. And, I will not accept the argument that the Cicotte is graded by an "inferior" Grading Co (GAI). Basically, all Grading Company's are the same.....it's the "human factor" that differs. However..... T206Collector says...."Given that GAI is a more permissive grader of T206 cards than PSA and SGC". Is that a commonly held opinion by most of you ? I don't understand that statement ? Finally, in this hobby you WIN some, and you LOSE some.... I won with the Cicotte card and I lost with the Evers card. T-Rex TED

Archive

03-16-2007 08:34 AM

PSA 5 Evers....I don't think so....DO YOU ?

Posted By: barrysloateTed- I don't feel you completely lost on the Evers card, because you wanted it for your set and you got it. That is worth something.

Archive

03-16-2007 08:44 AM

PSA 5 Evers....I don't think so....DO YOU ?

Posted By: T206Collector"I will not accept the argument that the Cicotte is graded by an "inferior" Grading Co (GAI)." Then you do not accept logic. GAI 5's sell for less than PSA 5's. There is no one else on this Board that would disagree with that statement. Moreover, here's the last GAI 4.5 Cicotte that sold on ebay --- $181.00. <a href="http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=150022660866" target="_new" rel="nofollow">http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=150022660866</a> Why would yours sell for more than twice that? Because of a Sovereign back? I doubt that. Indeed, this Evers, off-center top to bottom, with evidence of some back damage was a PSA 5 that sold for $415 in November on ebay -- with a common Piedmont back. How can yours be considered over priced in comparison to this one: <a href="http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=170051373599" target="_new" rel="nofollow">http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=170051373599</a>

Archive

03-16-2007 09:01 AM

PSA 5 Evers....I don't think so....DO YOU ?

Posted By: Al C.risafulliI understand some of your points, Ted, but there are a couple of variables here. First and foremost, you bought the Evers in a public auction with a huge viewing audience. You bout the Cicotte at a regional card show from a dealer table. You didn't have to bid against people in a 7-day auction for the Cicotte. The collecting public did not set the value of the it the way they did for the Evers. Second, Evers is a Hall of Famer and Cicotte is not. While I understand the appeal of a Black Sox player, I would bet there are more HOF collectors than Black Sox collectors. Third, all grading companies most definitely are not the same. When I see an important card that's not in an SGC or PSA holder, I automatically question WHY it's not in an SGC or PSA holder, unless the card is raw and offered by a seller that I trust or by a collector that I know collects raw cards. If a graded card is not in an SGC or PSA holder, I assume there's a reason. $215 is a very nice price for the Cicotte. I wouldn't have bought it, though. From the T206 set, I only buy HOFers, and usually not in EX condition - I generally stick with cards that are slightly lower-grade than that from a popular set like T206. The good thing about collecting sets, I think, is that if you're patient you can get good deals on a majority of the cards, that enable you to overpay for others without having it affect your overall cost too badly. -Al

Archive

03-16-2007 10:01 AM

PSA 5 Evers....I don't think so....DO YOU ?

Posted By: DaveI definately agree not all card graders are the same. I'm a PSA guy, that hasn't been a secret. I would also however buy from SGC...because "generally" speaking they will usually cross over for me. GAI, I've never had them cross over...in fact the three GAI cards I submitted to PSA all came back trimmed after being encased in GAI slabs. That definately plays a factor in what GAI cards sell for...and is the reason that Cicotte that would go for $175-$200 in a GAI holder would go for $275-$300 in a PSA or even SGC holder.

Archive

03-16-2007 12:33 PM

PSA 5 Evers....I don't think so....DO YOU ?

Posted By: Ted ZanidakisIn the past 6 years, I have had PSA rejected "Evidence of Trimmed" (EoT) cards get graded by SGC. And, SGC (EoT) rejected cards graded by PSA....And GAI (EoT) rejected cards graded by both PSA and SGC. It is just one big "musical card" game being played here; and, you wonder why us guys, who aren't ardent supporters of the Grading card industry, are critical of it. TED Z

Archive

03-16-2007 12:35 PM

PSA 5 Evers....I don't think so....DO YOU ?

Posted By: Ted ZanidakisPAUL I have two responses to your comments. 1st.....you said: "Then you do not accept logic." "GAI 5's sell for less than PSA 5's. There is no one else on this Board that would disagree with that statement." "Moreover, here's the last GAI 4.5 Cicotte that sold on ebay --- $181.00." OK....explain this current Cicotte (Sov back) on ebay selling for $700.... <a href="http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=250077225081" target="_new" rel="nofollow">http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=250077225081</a> Is he posted for more than 3 X what I paid for mine since he was graded by PSA, instead of GAI ? Are you guys (since your above statement seems to speak for all) going to tell me that GAI is that inferior (to PSA and SGC), that it's graded cards sell for 1/3 the value of the other Grading Co. ? If so.....this Graded card business is in big trouble going forward. Fluctuations in prices such as this, as a function of Grading Cos....does not bode well for this industry. 2nd..... The Evers link......this card is not a typical of what Ever usually sells for. I have followed this seller, and his BIN prices are considerably higher than what similar cards go for on ebay or at Shows. TED Z

Archive

03-16-2007 12:38 PM

PSA 5 Evers....I don't think so....DO YOU ?

Posted By: DaveFor one...if he gets $700 for that card I'll be shocked...it's not a $700 card. Is it hard to hide the fact though Ted that graded cards do command a premium...and GAI is at the tail end of the money machine. Of course your going to find examples of each company rejecting the grades of others...GAI included. Still, the facts are the facts...your going to get GAI cards cheaper than you are PSA or SGC overall.

Archive

03-16-2007 12:59 PM

PSA 5 Evers....I don't think so....DO YOU ?

Posted By: Ted ZanidakisI appreciate what you are saying......and, I guess I was lucky finding Cicotte in a GAI plastic. I have "freed" Mr Cicotte from the GAI plastic and I am very pleased to tell you that this card is in EX+ condition. He is now in a 15-page plastic sheet next to Chesbro in the 150 Series section in my Sovereign set album. TED Z

Archive

03-16-2007 01:16 PM

PSA 5 Evers....I don't think so....DO YOU ?

Posted By: RCTed For a newcomer to the forum, this has been quite the topic to follow. As far as grading of cards, it is obvious how big it is today compared to when I last collected, early '80's. Can't say that I like it because it appears prices are much higher, but on the flip side, a novice can be much more confident in his/her purchase when buying a graded card. Do you have a link or scans to your cards? Would love to see them. RC

Archive

03-16-2007 01:21 PM

PSA 5 Evers....I don't think so....DO YOU ?

Posted By: T206CollectorTed, I am a little surprised by your posts. If you give some of the concepts you are arguing about a little more thought, I think you will see that your reasoning is seriously flawed. "Explain this current Cicotte (Sov back) on ebay selling for $700.... <a href="http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=250077225081" target="_new" rel="nofollow">http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=250077225081</a> Is he posted for more than 3 X what I paid for mine since he was graded by PSA, instead of GAI ?" An untriggered BIN as a relevant sale is totally irrelevant. As Dave said, the seller will not get that price, unless a rogue collector goes for it without regard to condition and value. This price is not being set by the market, but by a seller hoping he can get way above-market for this card. "This Graded card business is in big trouble going forward." Your theory that grading is in trouble because GAI is less respected than PSA or SGC is irrational. If I start Paul's Lame-Ass Grading company tomorrow, and give your Cicotte an 8, do you think anyone will pay PSA 8 prices for it? People pay for grading consistency and value. GAI has neither. "This card is not a typical of what Evers usually sells for." While there are fluctuations in every card's value, and this card can be found with a common back in the low to mid-$300 range, here are three additional sales in the past 9 months, all with common backs, that sold at or above your price threshold: <a href="http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=150093588667" target="_new" rel="nofollow">http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=150093588667</a> <a href="http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=250064727221" target="_new" rel="nofollow">http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=250064727221</a> <a href="http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=8828374526" target="_new" rel="nofollow">http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=8828374526</a> "I guess I was lucky finding Cicotte in a GAI plastic. I have 'freed' Mr Cicotte from the GAI plastic and I am very pleased to tell you that this card is in EX+ condition." You will have a huge amount of trouble convincing anybody who follows GAI graded cards that a card they slabbed as a 4.5 is, in actuality, EX+ condition. Again, I suspect you have not seen the wrinkle keeping it from a 5. Those of us with significant experience trying to cross GAI cards into SGC holders have routinely found that GAI is over grading its cards, not undergrading them. If you sell the card as EX+, and SGC or PSA grade it a 4, you will have very disappointed buyers. This is precisely why people like purchasing cards like your Evers in graded form -- to avoid disappointment based on a seller's representation, which, though well-intended and honest, is not entirely accurate. Paul

Archive

03-16-2007 01:50 PM

PSA 5 Evers....I don't think so....DO YOU ?

Posted By: T206CollectorI do want to add that there really is nothing to the grading vs. raw debate. I 100% respect the ideals of the collectors like Frank and Ted who crack open the cases of their PSA, SGC and GAI cards to slot the cards into sheets or whatever. That takes a lot of class and, frankly, a pure joy of the card itself. But I think it is important to recognize that, myself as an example, I have a pure joy of collecting baseball cards, too. My reason for purchasing graded cards over the internet and then not cracking them out is purely a function of obtaining the most objective information about a potential acquisition as possible and then, having obtained the card, keeping it in the most valuable form as possible for possible sale or trade down the road. In my opinion, (a) someone that purchases cards over the internet that are not graded runs a huge risk of disappointment based on a seller's representations and a .jpeg scan that cannot show you the true nature of the card's condition; and (b) if you purchase a graded card and then crack it out of its case, you are essentially moving a large part of the value for that card from the resale value to the joy you receive from cracking it out and placing it in a plastic sheet. I simply get joy putting my SGC cards into my SGC boxes and, thankfully, that practice also retains the resale value of the card. Of course, if you buy GAI 4.5's and are able to convince potential buyers that the card is really EX+, then you might actually make a profit -- it is not always against one's financial interest to crack out cards. Indeed, quite the opposite is often true.

Archive

03-16-2007 01:52 PM

PSA 5 Evers....I don't think so....DO YOU ?

Posted By: Ted ZanidakisPAUL.....you amaze me....you are no where near where I live, yet you keep telling me about this "mysterious, creepy, crawly, wrinkle" in my card. I will repeat....the Cicotte card now exists removed from its former plastic encapsulation; and, I have very closely looked at it under magnification. And, it is a clean Ex+ card. If you cannot accept this fact, then there is no-way I am going to convince you. Why do you find this impossible ? I have cracked open 100's of cards from their plastics. And, I have seen card conditions all over the place. If you are going to tell me that there is consistency in the Grading Industry, then you are only fooling yourself....you certainly are not fooling me. TED Z

Archive

03-16-2007 02:06 PM

PSA 5 Evers....I don't think so....DO YOU ?

Posted By: T206CollectorYou're absolutely right -- I have no idea what is wrong with that Cicotte. Just because GAI routinely overgrades cards does not mean that in this instance they didn't undergrade the card. Since it is cracked out, the only thing a future buyer will be able to go on is your view of the card. In my experience, GAI gives 'tweener grades -- 4.5 is a grade that is not recognized by SGC or PSA -- in situations where SGC or PSA would stick with a 4 or lower. I have not seen many -- if any -- that have received a bump up from a 'tweener GAI from either SGC or PSA. Yet, here we have a Cicotte that you would bump to a 5.5. If that's the case, congratulations -- you did very well. All I am saying is that you will have a hard time convincing a potential purchaser that your GAI 4.5 is really EX+. Sellers try to do this all the time on ebay, and their puffery is usually unrewarded by potential buyers. I could try to sell this Devlin as VG-EX, because the 3 sets of spider wrinkles are hard to see in a scan and the card looks beautiful -- but SGC's 30 signals to the buyer that there is something going on that the scan doesn't show: <a href="http://www.sgccardregistry.com/images.asp?cardid=28217&usetid=1015" target="_new" rel="nofollow">http://www.sgccardregistry.com/images.asp?cardid=28217&usetid=1015</a> Finally, based on your statements, I believe your feelings about grading card consistency are based on the substantial differences between how you define a card's grade and how PSA/SGC would. It is precisely this substantial difference which makes 3rd-party grading so important -- again, especially because of the inability to inspect cards first hand on ebay. "If you are going to tell me that there is consistency in the Grading Industry, then you are only fooling yourself....you certainly are not fooling me." There is much more consistency in the grading industry than in the absence of the grading industry. And, frankly, I am telling you there is less consistency with GAI than with PSA or SGC, though, again, the only company I trust for consistency of grading is SGC.

Archive

03-16-2007 02:28 PM

PSA 5 Evers....I don't think so....DO YOU ?

Posted By: Ted ZanidakisI really hate to ask you this question.....but, I am going to, anyhow.....how did you collect BB cards, prior to the advent of the card Grading industry ? You stated.... "Since it is cracked out, the only thing a future buyer will be able to go on is your view of the card." This is pure "hogwash"....it's not the way the game is played in the real world. The buyer looks closely at the card he is interested in, and between us we arrive at a pretty accurate assement of its grade. I don't know why I have to tell you this, it's obvious. I've been operating this way going back to the late 1970's. But, if you are worried that I might "force" my Ex+ grade of this card on some unsuspecting buyer, then let me allay your fears.....this card is in my collection to stay, along with the almost 400 other Sovereign T206's. TED Z

Archive

03-16-2007 03:11 PM

PSA 5 Evers....I don't think so....DO YOU ?

Posted By: T206CollectorYou said on March 13 in this thread: "I certainly won't risk buying an un-graded card via mail that is very expensive." We, two, are not so un-a-like, it would seem. That is, I could ask you the same question -- what did you do before third party grading? I'm sure your collection grew through in person meet and greets at shows and otherwise; and via mail deals with trusted confidants. Well, ebay and 3rd party grading evened the playing field and opened the market to everyone at all times. Prior to ebay/PSA, while I had a modest collection of vintage baseball cards (a 33 Grove; a Matty white cap and a Bender portrait), my collecting of T206 cards grew exponentially after ebay and the advent of 3rd party grading made internet collecting preferable to purchasing cards at shows -- cheaper, more variety, better condition -- my best cards are ebay/internet purchases. I was drawn to ebay, which is a 24/7 internet card show -- allowing me to add to and sell from my collection in a nano-second. PayPal has sped the process up even further -- I can sell a card today and purchase another card with those funds in the same day, and the actual card hasn't even been mailed yet. This is an exciting time to be collecting baseball cards. 3rd party grading and ebay are huge components of that. To suggest otherwise does not recognize the massive and positive influence that both have had on the hobby. The increases in price reflect the health of the hobby, not the opposite.

Archive

03-16-2007 03:22 PM

PSA 5 Evers....I don't think so....DO YOU ?

Posted By: T206CollectorLook, it's obvious you do not respect my opinion. But I think you must respect Scot Reader's opinion. And he said in Inside T206: "Like them or not, professional authentication and grading services will increase longterm demand for T206 cards. This seems unavoidable for at least two reasons. First and foremost is that T206 cards slabbed by reputable services are substantially less likely to be fakes relative to ungraded examples. The reduced risk of "getting had" by unscrupulous sellers will enlarge the buyer pool and increase the prices paid for T206 specimens over the long haul. Second, reputable services will largely eliminate problems of grade inflation and deflation. Gone will be the days when a collector will buy a card advertised as "mint" from one dealer only to be told later that the card is merely "excellent" by another (or worse, the same) dealer. While imperfect, the more objective grading system afforded by professional authentication and grading services will reduce risks for prospective T206 buyers and thereby spur demand. Set registration promoted by authentication and grading services also adds a competitive dimension to collecting that was previously absent. The desire to have "the best" or a "top ten" set on the T206 set registry hosted by any of the major services may drive an ever-increasing number of collectors into an acquisition frenzy, stimulating demand." My biggest point is his second point -- grade inflation/deflation. That is all I have been trying to say all along here.

Archive

03-16-2007 04:14 PM

PSA 5 Evers....I don't think so....DO YOU ?

Posted By: PCPaul -- you've fallen in to the trap of trying to deal squarely with Ted. The mistake is made when someone expects Ted to be consistent in his views, opinions or the way he talks to or treats people. Ted asks questions, but he doesn't really want to hear your views. He only wants you to agree with him, or to argue with you if you do not. Reasonable, civil explanations of one's position are pretty much a waste of time and energy.

Archive

03-16-2007 05:08 PM

PSA 5 Evers....I don't think so....DO YOU ?

Posted By: T206Collector...if true.

Archive

03-16-2007 05:59 PM

PSA 5 Evers....I don't think so....DO YOU ?

Posted By: Ted ZanidakisPAUL Do you know this guy...."PC" (PC-T206)....I don't, but he thinks he knows me. Is he the token Net54 "resident amateur psychologist" ? Hey look, whatever your name is...... Paul and I have our differences in our collecting habits. He likes his cards in plastic; and, I prefer mine "naked". Paul and I have made some really nice T206 trading and selling between us these past few years, despite our differences. So, if you have nothing positive to contribute....stay off this Thread. TED Z

Archive

03-16-2007 06:03 PM

PSA 5 Evers....I don't think so....DO YOU ?

Posted By: JoannI don't think it is true. I think this thread has been a great example of a civil and respectful exchange of differing views, with both Paul and Ted being very courteous in their views - at least the later parts of the thread. I haven't gone back to reread the earlier parts, but the exchange today has been just what this forum is about. Joann

Archive

03-16-2007 06:17 PM

PSA 5 Evers....I don't think so....DO YOU ?

Posted By: barrysloatePC- while you are entitled to your opinion we have a board rule that you can't do that type of thing anonymously. You attacked Ted without revealing your name. That's kind of a cheap shot.

Archive

03-16-2007 06:22 PM

PSA 5 Evers....I don't think so....DO YOU ?

Posted By: denniswith the oc and the rounded corner this card should grade VG+. it is a fair statement that a graded slabbed card graded ex should have 4 square cornes,wear on them but still square,no creases and centering at least 25/75 all the way around. a buyer should be able to purchase an ex 5 slab sight unseen and EXPECT this. this is what slabbing should be. i find it funny that anyone who buys only slabbed cards and pays a premium for them would expect any less.

Archive

03-16-2007 06:33 PM

PSA 5 Evers....I don't think so....DO YOU ?

Posted By: T206Collector"a buyer should be able to purchase an ex 5 slab sight unseen and EXPECT this" One should NEVER buy an ex 5 slab sigh unseen. As I have said before, grading is like a pyramid -- all 10's should look alike, but the further down the scale you go, you have lots of variation about what a card could look like. Indeed, a 1 could be a 1 for a zillion different reasons. Two 5's could be quite different -- i.e., graded 5's for different reasons. This card looks like a 5 to me for reasons that I think other people don't want their 5's to look -- oc and with mild corner wear. I still think the Evers card's corners come to a point and the OC is within acceptable for the 5 grade. Is it a blazer? Of course not. Is it consistent within the grade of 5 or 60 by SGC? I think quite so.

Archive

03-16-2007 06:44 PM

PSA 5 Evers....I don't think so....DO YOU ?

Posted By: dennisif you took that card out of that holder,i don't think anyone would grade it ex......i would imagine if it were cracked out and resubmitted (to psa)it would grade vg. imo

Archive

03-16-2007 06:47 PM

PSA 5 Evers....I don't think so....DO YOU ?

Posted By: T206CollectorNow that's just being silly. An OC T-206 card with mildly rounded corners would reasonably qualify for VG-EX, to be sure, but VG? C'mon now. I'll pay you VG prices for every creaseless T206 card you have with corners like that Evers. Tell me where to send the check...

Archive

03-16-2007 06:49 PM

PSA 5 Evers....I don't think so....DO YOU ?

Posted By: Ted ZanidakisI really appreciate your judgement and ability to understand a situation. Earlier in this Thread, your post (3/10....noon) accurately and succintly summarized my initial com- ments regarding the unexpected pitfalls of acquiring graded cards over the Internet. Most of the graded card purchases are satisfactory. But, there are those occasional ones, that....as you said.... can be quite frustrating. And, the Evers card was one of the instances. Anyhow, I then tried to be "fair and balanced" in this thread by noting the Cicotte card and how pleased I was with that purchase. However, as much as I hate to say it there are some who strictly live by graded cards; and, show no tolerance for those who prefer un-graded cards. I still haven't gotten an answer to my question.....how did these guys collect BB cards, prior to the Grading Card Era ? Thank you, Joann TED Z

Archive

03-16-2007 06:53 PM

PSA 5 Evers....I don't think so....DO YOU ?

Posted By: dennisthat card has 3 mildly worn corners and 1 round corner. if it had 4 mildly worn corners i would agree it would grade ex (the oc is ok)but that 1 corner is round. maybe ted could scan just that corner,maybe it's not as round as i think it appears.

Archive

03-16-2007 06:56 PM

PSA 5 Evers....I don't think so....DO YOU ?

Posted By: PCBarry -- I disagree. I don't think any cheap shot was thrown here. I've had run-ins with Ted on this forum before on at least two prior occassions. Nothing new here. And I do not think there's anything controversial going on in this thread that requires posting differently, unless the mods tell me otherwise.

Archive

03-16-2007 07:03 PM

PSA 5 Evers....I don't think so....DO YOU ?

Posted By: T206Collector...in my post entitled "Just listen to yourself." In light of this, it is unbelievable to me that you would state you have not gotten an answer to your question -- especially since I have posted numerous questions to you that have gone completely unanswered. It would be helpful if you would read my responses to your questions and answer my questions as well. If you cannot address my points then there is no discussion, just two people writing text. Your arguments have been wholly unpersuasive in the face of the evidence of graded cards and auction links I have provided. Scot Reader's Inside T206 section that I quoted above is sufficient for me on the graded card inquiry -- indeed, he answered your question much more eloquently than I could. I'll rest on those statements and the ones I've made above that have heretofore been totally ignored by Ted.

Archive

03-16-2007 07:07 PM

PSA 5 Evers....I don't think so....DO YOU ?

Posted By: barrysloatePC- I think you missed my point. You just need to identify yourself if you have a personal issue with someone. Once you do that, you are free to express any opinion you wish.

Archive

03-16-2007 07:34 PM

PSA 5 Evers....I don't think so....DO YOU ?

Posted By: Ted ZanidakisPerhaps I haven't responded to all your points. After a while all this "verbiage" becomes quite tedious. Too much talk and little action. I rather be talking trades or T206 deals, like we have transacted in the past. Did you know that T206 "Bull" Durham card you traded me with the Sweet Cap 350/25 back has never been seen since ? I have Durham with all the possible backs....except HINDU. I don't think anyone knows if it exists. TED Z

Archive

03-16-2007 07:46 PM

PSA 5 Evers....I don't think so....DO YOU ?

Posted By: T206Collector...but SGC wouldn't grade it. (-;

Archive

03-16-2007 07:54 PM

PSA 5 Evers....I don't think so....DO YOU ?

Posted By: Frank EvanovI still haven't gotten an answer to my question.....how did these guys collect BB cards, prior to the Grading Card Era ? Ted, of course my cards were raw then. I had a fantastic [I thought], complete near-mint 1957 Topps Baseball set that I had built over the years from reputable dealers and card shows. Unfortunately, as I learned more about my cards, I found that many of them had flaws, defects and subtle areas of alteration. That really bothered me. My beautiful Mickey Mantle card had rebuilt corners and my sharp Bob Clemente was really sharp...as in trimmed. I thought a magnifying glass and a bright light were enough...they weren't. As a collector, I prefer high end items and I learned a very expensive lesson from that set. Now I limit my purchases to PSA and SGC cards. They offer me the best chance of having an authentic item which has not been altered and bears a rating which [in most cases] accurately reflects the condition of the card. I collect for fun, not investing. I won't sell my cards. Someday, however, my daughter will own my collection and she will sell it. I don't want her to have any problems when she sells. For that reason too, I only buy graded cards. Frank

Archive

03-16-2007 07:54 PM

PSA 5 Evers....I don't think so....DO YOU ?

Posted By: Ted ZanidakisPAUL I think you told me.....but, I don't recall....why ? TED Z

Archive

03-16-2007 11:42 PM

PSA 5 Evers....I don't think so....DO YOU ?

Posted By: cmokingA test needs to be made to bring closure to this thread. Ted should send both the Cicotte and the Evers to SGC...and the results will bring closure to this whole discussin. Ted, send them to SGC, and then let us know what grades you got, and then crack them out again for your collection. How much is that going to cost? $30? I'll pony up $3 to fund Ted's experiment. I'm sure 10 other guys would pony up $3 each just to see the results. Maybe the Evers comes back a 60 and the Cicotte a 30. Wow, would that be interesting? Or maybe the Evers comes back a 40 and the Cicotte a 60. That would be even more interesting.

Archive

03-17-2007 04:39 AM

PSA 5 Evers....I don't think so....DO YOU ?

Posted By: Ted ZanidakisI agree....this thread has gone beyond its usefulness. As I have noted, I "freed" Cicotte....and, in my humble opinion this card is at least, an Ex card. Which happens to be a grade better than GAI gave it. The Evers I will leave in its plastic for now. Should I find another (Vg to Ex) in the near future, graded or naked....I'll then sell this one. While, I appreciate your suggestion, I'm tired of playing this game. I didn't acquire these cards to prove a point. These 2 cards are "milestones" 370 & 371 of a long journey to mile-marker 404..... to complete a T206 set comprised of all Sovereign's. TED Z

Archive

03-17-2007 06:52 AM

PSA 5 Evers....I don't think so....DO YOU ?

Posted By: T206Collector...is also a trimmed Durham. Top border, if I recall correctly...

Archive

03-17-2007 07:22 AM

PSA 5 Evers....I don't think so....DO YOU ?

Posted By: Ted ZanidakisPAUL Thanks for reminding me about the Durham SC 350/25 card. It is inserted in a nice comfortable mylar (15-pocket) sheet of plastic in my T206 "subset" Album containing all my Durham cards. TED Z

Archive

03-17-2007 07:35 AM

PSA 5 Evers....I don't think so....DO YOU ?

Posted By: T206Collector...will always (until I get an upgrade) available for your viewing pleasure here: <a href="http://www.sgccardregistry.com/images.asp?cardid=28538&usetid=1015" target="_new" rel="nofollow">http://www.sgccardregistry.com/images.asp?cardid=28538&usetid=1015</a>

Archive

03-17-2007 08:20 AM

PSA 5 Evers....I don't think so....DO YOU ?

Posted By: Al C.risafulliI realize this thread is winding down, but I thought I'd just respond to the question of how I bought vintage cards before grading, since it's a relevant question and a good one. I've been collecting on and off since the late 70s. I discovered vintage cards and began buying T206s in the early 80s. At that time I was young, and bought all my cards from shows and card shops. I managed to accumulate whatever vintage cards I could that way, which, due partially to my budget and partially to a lack of supply, amounted to a few dozen T206s and M116s. As my budget started to grow a little, I started finding ways to buy cards online. Initially I rejected the concept of third-party grading, because it seemed absolutely silly to me to send a card I owned to a company who would then tell me what condition it was in. I already KNEW what condition my cards were in. But I started to see a pattern: I'd buy a card described as EX, and receive a VG card. Then I'd bring an EX card to a dealer to try and sell it or make a trade, and be told it was only VG. It seemed like my cards were one condition when I was buying them, and another condition when I was selling them. Furthermore, I made a few purchases over eBay where I received cards in the mail that were distinctly different from the way they were described. I still remember paying for a large lot of 1953 Topps cards that were described as Near Mint, and receiving six Near Mint cards and a pile of VG-EX cards - the scan was very artfully done so that the Near Mint cards were visible, but all the others were not as clear. The internet was a mixed blessing. It was great, because it gave me access to cards that would previously take months - or years - to find. Something like building a T205 set would have been something I'd NEVER have tried before the internet, because I would have had to search forever to find the cards. Last year I started a T205 set, and I'm about 40% done - and I probably could have had it complete if I wasn't working on so many other card-related projects at the same time, and trying to balance my expenses between them all. The internet also gave me the ability to SELL my cards for a much higher price than before. Before, if I wanted to sell a card, I'd either have to bring it to a dealer and have him downgrade the condition of my cards and then offer me 50% of "book", or I'd have to try and find someone who was willing to buy it at a higher price. At one point I needed money quickly, and I sold a giant binder of cards from my childhood collection for $400 - cards that would have sold for ten times that if eBay existed at the time. Now, I could sell my cards to actual collectors who were willing to pay a price that was closer to what I paid in the first place. Sometimes even more. At the same time, the internet made it easy for me to buy overgraded - or altered - or fake - cards, with very little recourse. If someone sold me a trimmed T206 or a fake N card, all I could really do was leave negative feedback for the seller- IF I bought the card on eBay. And when I had a seller tell me "That's not the card I sold you - I sold you an authentic card, and the card you're showing me is an obvious reprint," I basically stopped buying cards. With grading, I've now got a third-party opinion. I know that if I buy an SGC 40, I can feel reasonably confident that most of the time I'm getting a card that I would describe as VG. Sure, there will be times I disagree - once in a while I get an overgraded card, and once in a while I get an undergraded card. But I can also buy a lot more cards than I could before because they're more available, and I can feel more comfortable buying higher-dollar cards based only on a scan. More importantly, I can build a type card set - something I've always wanted to do - without having to learn everything there is to know about every card issue BEFORE I buy one. In other words, I don't have to learn all about how to tell if an N28 is authentic and unaltered just so I can buy ONE for my type set. Grading also gives me a serial number. So nobody can ever claim that the card I'm showing them is not the one they sold me. If the cert numbers match, it's the same card. Grading also prevents - most of the time - someone from telling me that although the card was "EX" when they sold it to me, it's now "VG" when I'm trying to sell it back, or make a trade. And if I decide to sell a card, the buyer can also feel reasonably confident in what he's getting from me. As ancillary benefits, the slab also gives me a way of protecting my cards that's much more durable than a card saver or a binder. I'm clumsy. I have shaky hands. I've dinged corners of cards just by holding them. When they're in a slab, I can't do that. I also like the way cards look in slabs. The slabs look like frames. With my type card set, they're all different shapes and sizes - small, skinny T and E cards; fat, square R cards, large rectangular Topps issues. When I display them raw, it looks like a mess. Now, I have them all in SGC holders, lined up on shelves in order of when they were inducted in the HOF. When I sit in my office, I'm sitting right in the middle of my cards, and I can look at a few hundred of them up on my wall - they're all different shapes and sizes, but the holders tie them all together and they look great. I even started a few registry sets - and met some dynamite people who collect the same sets as me as a result. So that's the long and drawn-out story of what I did before grading, and why grading has made the hobby far more enjoyable for me. It has nothing to do with investing, value, or anything like that. It has everything in the world to do with consumer confidence, a more level playing field, accountability, and to a lesser extent, protection and display. Sure, I had to change some of my own grading habits. I had to accept the fact that a card couldn't be "Near Mint" if it had paper loss on the back. I had to accept that one soft corner or a minor wrinkle had a major impact on the grade. And I also had to accept the fact that I still can't be 100% confident, because once in a while the graders miss something. But for me, grading has solved WAY more problems than it's created. -Al

Archive

03-17-2007 08:43 AM

PSA 5 Evers....I don't think so....DO YOU ?

Posted By: T206CollectorThose are my sentiments exactly.

Archive

03-17-2007 08:54 AM

PSA 5 Evers....I don't think so....DO YOU ?

Posted By: Ted ZanidakisPAUL Here are some of my Durhams. You'll recognize the leftmost card as the one you traded me. I am surprised you are saying that it was rejected due to trimming......as it is slightly larger than my other two (which I know are not). <img src="http://www.freephotoserver.com/v001/tedzan/a3durhams.jpg"> <img src="http://www.freephotoserver.com/v001/tedzan/b3durhams.jpg"> TED Z collection

Archive

03-17-2007 08:59 AM

PSA 5 Evers....I don't think so....DO YOU ?

Posted By: Ted ZanidakisThanks for your response to my question. I guess, I have been more fortunate than you, in that I have had very few bad experiences all these years collecting un-graded cards. It has not just been a matter of luck, though, as I have developed certain practices to minimize some of the problems you encountered. Thanks again, TED Z

Archive

03-17-2007 09:05 AM

PSA 5 Evers....I don't think so....DO YOU ?

Posted By: T206CollectorJust for the other readers here, they should know that this card was identified to you as rejected by SGC for trimming along the top prior to making our deal. That was why I traded it for the beater I got in return from you. I even said it was a tough call for me to make when I purchased it in a group of other T206 cards, but I thought I'd pay the $8 and let SGC confirm that it was trimmed. Here's the lousy scan I sent you from my camera phone (my scanner was down at the time.) As you can see, I included the SGC slip in my picture. <img src="http://www.network54.com/Realm/tmp/1174058069.JPG"> The size of the T206 is, of course, not determinative of trimming -- far from it. Rather, even from the scan you provide it is evident that the top border has a slight wave to it. Moreover, if you compare the four edges of the card, you will see that the top is different from the other three edges -- looking directly at the edge perpedicularly. If we were trading these cards in person, and I did not disclose the trimming, to this day you would never know. And, maybe that's your point all along -- if unsuspecting buyers never know they're buying trimmed cards, then there is no harm, no foul. But grading takes that out of the equation. SGC merely confirmed my suspicions that the card was trimmed at the top. The Lindaman, of course, is not trimmed.... <img src="/images/happy.gif" height=14 width=14>

Archive

03-17-2007 09:30 AM

PSA 5 Evers....I don't think so....DO YOU ?

Posted By: Ted ZanidakisPlease do not misconstrue me......I had no problems with this card when we made the deal, and I have no problem with it now. I have closely examined it....and besides the fact that it is equal to, or slightly larger (1/32 inch) than most other Durham's I have....I question the SGC opinion that it is "trimmed". And, I only bring this up, to emphasize an ongoing complaint that I have heard from others....and, that is the Grading Company's inconsistency with the rejection of cards due to "trimming". There are many of us with stories (told and untold) of Grading Co. "A" rejecting a card, that was subsequently graded by Grading Co. "B". This is a fact that cannot be refuted. TED Z

Archive

03-17-2007 09:48 AM

PSA 5 Evers....I don't think so....DO YOU ?

Posted By: barrysloateTed- SGC published a detailed article about card trimming in their recent collector magazine, and measurement is just one test they use. They also study the edges of the card, to see if they appear to be original. A card cut in the factory will have a kind of convex edge (if that's the right term) that can't be duplicated by an amateur. While I found the article fascinating, I'm not sure I could identify an original edge every time. You need good magnification, good eyesight, and some practice. edited to add if a card is already in a holder, you can no longer see the edges and would have to break it out.

Archive

03-17-2007 09:54 AM

PSA 5 Evers....I don't think so....DO YOU ?

Posted By: T206Collector....is also that the card was trimmed. SGC only confirmed my opinion. These are only two opinions. But if you'd like to consider it not trimmed, that's cool, too. I am not sure why someone would trim a VG Durham with rounded corners. It doesn't seem to make much sense. As Barry said, SGC Collector magazine has a very in depth article about how to spot trimming in T206 cards. It is quite informative. As I'm sure you know, given your years of experience holding T206 cards, trimming simply cannot be determined by stacking T206 cards on top of each other and seeing which ones run short. Check the Durham against the following checklist provided by SGC in that article -- none of which are outcome determinative, but must be used collectively to form an opinion as to the card. I have found that learning about trimming is done most easily when you are comparing a card that you 100% know to be trimmed against the following standards: 1) Wavy edges. Which, from your scan above and my own recollection, is pretty clear the top has a wavy edge. 2) Uneven corner wear. This one has even corner wear, so this would suggest no trimmed. 3) Parallel edges test. This one, more or less, has parallel edges, so another suggesting no trimmed. 4) Toning of the grain on the four borders of the card. My recollection is that the top toning is lighter (i.e., exposed to the elements more recently) than the other three borders -- suggesting trimmed. 5) Edge "roll." The top border of each card has a slight etching, appearing to be the top of a "roll" running across the card. This card does not have that, if memory serves me. Instead, the edges along the top form right angles on both sides of the card, whereas the remaining three borders do not. 6) Quality of Grain along the edge. The grain should be flat with no graininess or fluffiness to it. Upon close inspection, very faint striations or diagonal lines may be present. Fluffy grain can have a rough look to it and tiny holes may be seen in the edge. I do not recall the top of this card's grain quality. 7) Chipping along the edges upon inspection on the reverse of the card. When a card has been trimmed, the chipping disappears. I do not recall whether this card has chipping along the reverse top edge.

Archive

03-17-2007 10:00 AM

PSA 5 Evers....I don't think so....DO YOU ?

Posted By: Ted ZanidakisI use a Black Light and high magnification to examine cards. Furthermore, the guys at one Grading Co. (name witheld) took me inside their curtain and showed me exactly what to look for on the card edges to determine if trimmed. Barry, this Durham card is just anectdotal, the much "bigger picture" is that one Grading Co's "trimmed" card is another Grading Co's "5 - 6 - 7 or even 8" graded card. TED Z

Archive

03-17-2007 10:01 AM

PSA 5 Evers....I don't think so....DO YOU ?

Posted By: T206Collector...sadly, one of my best PSA 5 T206 cards was an obvious trim job.

Archive

03-17-2007 10:50 AM

PSA 5 Evers....I don't think so....DO YOU ?

Posted By: barrysloateTed- you hit on the most important point, and that is how will the grading services improve to the level that they are virtually right every time (no one can expect perfection). At this stage there is simply too much inconsistency in the whole system. I agree in theory that professional grading is perhaps the most important hobby innovation of the last decade, but I still think there is a long way to go. It is not yet at a point where collectors have blind faith in it (no Eric Clapton jokes, please).

Archive

03-17-2007 11:48 AM

PSA 5 Evers....I don't think so....DO YOU ?

Posted By: Frank Wakefieldand I can't find my way home...

Archive

03-17-2007 12:11 PM

PSA 5 Evers....I don't think so....DO YOU ?

Posted By: barrysloateFair enough...one Eric Clapton joke. But that's it! <img src="/images/happy.gif" height=14 width=14>

Archive

03-17-2007 02:16 PM

PSA 5 Evers....I don't think so....DO YOU ?

Posted By: Ted ZanidakisThe inconsistency between Grading Co's will only increase with the increasing volume of cards submitted. And, I don't agree with your 2nd statement...."I agree in theory that professional grading is perhaps the most important hobby innovation of the last decade". The most significant innovation in the hobby since the mid-1990's is the Internet. The success of the Grading industry is essentially a consequence of Ebay. If you recall, prior to Ebay, the grading of cards was limited to PSA and ASA and the population of naked cards far outnumbered the graded cards. TED Z

Archive

03-17-2007 02:22 PM

PSA 5 Evers....I don't think so....DO YOU ?

Posted By: peter chaoTed, I agree that the internet has changed everything. However, it is the grading companies which brought the hobby to the next level. Cards are no longer just for children. They have become serious collectibles like coins and stamps. Peter

Archive

03-17-2007 02:23 PM

PSA 5 Evers....I don't think so....DO YOU ?

Posted By: barrysloateMaybe it's fair to say that without graded cards, there wouldn't be as much baseball card activity on the internet...so in a sense they go hand and hand.

Archive

03-17-2007 08:39 PM

PSA 5 Evers....I don't think so....DO YOU ?

Posted By: identify7I believe that many collectors are uncertain regarding card authentication and trimming identification without outside help. And this is the portion of the grading company's service which is most valued. I hope that most collectors can determine card quality according to their own criteria, as well as the criteria used by the various third party graders. But there is often a disproportionate premium associated with the price of graded cards.

Archive

03-17-2007 08:56 PM

PSA 5 Evers....I don't think so....DO YOU ?

Posted By: Frank WakefieldAre you saying it is like asking an auto mechanic to check out a used car before you buy it?? Then the old days were 'before mechanics', and we developed trust with dealers who dealt fairly with us. Maybe the 'modern' way would be improved if collectors took a Yuppie approach, like checking things out with Consumer Reports... or learning about the cards themselves to develop independence from grading services.

Archive

03-17-2007 09:00 PM

PSA 5 Evers....I don't think so....DO YOU ?

Posted By: peter chaoGil, Look at this way, I've been in the hobby for 20 years and have looked at probably 500,000 cards. I know most of the Topps cards by the color of their borders. I know which cards come centered often and which cards are commonly found off-centered. The only advantage a card grader would have over me is maybe they a black light or some other instrument that would allow them to look at a card more closely. But it is unlikely that the typical grader would have my hobby experience in grading a card. In my situation it makes little sense for me to rely on their opinion as to the grade of a card. The only reason I'm not grading cards is that I make $400/hr. practicing law. I doubt if the grading companies can afford to hire me to grade cards. Peter

Archive

03-17-2007 09:04 PM

PSA 5 Evers....I don't think so....DO YOU ?

Archive

03-17-2007 09:12 PM

PSA 5 Evers....I don't think so....DO YOU ?

Posted By: Frank WakefieldMusta thought he was billing instead of posting.

Archive

03-17-2007 09:50 PM

PSA 5 Evers....I don't think so....DO YOU ?

Posted By: Todd Schultznothing like a lawyer posting his billing rate to make me feel like taking a shower.

Archive

03-17-2007 10:09 PM

PSA 5 Evers....I don't think so....DO YOU ?

Posted By: Frank WakefieldHe said he makes it, not bills it. Billing minus nonpayment, staff, supplies, insurance, premises, benefits... what's left equals "makes" in my mind.

Archive

03-18-2007 11:37 AM

PSA 5 Evers....I don't think so....DO YOU ?

Posted By: AnonymousWow--$400 an hour and he knows more than the graders(such as the color of the cards borders) except for that black light or other instruments that they use. We not only have an expert on our board but a rich expert--or at least one who makes a lot per hour when he works--I am very impressed!

Archive

03-18-2007 11:54 AM

PSA 5 Evers....I don't think so....DO YOU ?

Posted By: DaveCareful Jim.

Archive

03-18-2007 11:59 AM

PSA 5 Evers....I don't think so....DO YOU ?

Posted By: Al C.risafulliWell, the only reason I'm not a $400 an hour lawyer is because I'm the piano player in a brothel. -Al

Archive

03-18-2007 12:11 PM

PSA 5 Evers....I don't think so....DO YOU ?

Posted By: Bob Pomilla"Musta thought he was billing instead of posting." Just in case you didn't notice how much he makes, the first time.

Archive

03-18-2007 12:16 PM

PSA 5 Evers....I don't think so....DO YOU ?

Posted By: peter chao...Stop it. I'm sorry I mentioned my billing rate. Look at it this way I spend time in the hobby and posting because I love it just like you guys. We're all on the same playing field. I like to find a great prewar card at a reasonable price, just like you. At least I'm not a New York attorney, those guys really charge a lot. Peter

Archive

03-18-2007 12:21 PM

PSA 5 Evers....I don't think so....DO YOU ?

Posted By: Frank WakefieldI was thinking that double posting might stem from double billing...

Archive

03-18-2007 12:46 PM

PSA 5 Evers....I don't think so....DO YOU ?

Posted By: Frank EvanovGood one Frank! Frank

Archive

03-18-2007 02:03 PM

PSA 5 Evers....I don't think so....DO YOU ?

Posted By: JimCrandellPeter, Forget the billing rate--I am sure there are many guys on this board who make at least as much you per hour. I consider Dave Forman a personal friend and I know he would gladly pay someone with your expertise $400 per hour. I think he would even show you how to use that funny black light that greaders use...or if you do better without it I am sure he would be just as happy saving the cost of buying another one. He has said often to me "I wish my damn graders knew the color of their borders"...."if I could find someone who knew that 1971 Topps had black borders I would hire them in a heartbeat and they could name their price. Peter--say the word and I will make the call.

Archive

03-18-2007 02:05 PM

PSA 5 Evers....I don't think so....DO YOU ?

Posted By: AnonymousJim....once again trying to be a little controversial. Don't get too repetitive.

Archive

03-18-2007 05:19 PM

PSA 5 Evers....I don't think so....DO YOU ?

Posted By: Frank EvanovThis whole thread has been controversial.....yet Jim makes two posts and gets two rebukes. Not cool. Frank

Archive

03-18-2007 05:39 PM

PSA 5 Evers....I don't think so....DO YOU ?

Posted By: DaveThe reason the comments to Jim is it seems that is the only time he decides to post...

Archive

03-18-2007 06:15 PM

PSA 5 Evers....I don't think so....DO YOU ?

Posted By: Jeff LichtmanCompletely unrelated but since we're talking about SGC--do they do crossovers while still in the case?

Archive

03-18-2007 06:23 PM

PSA 5 Evers....I don't think so....DO YOU ?

Posted By: Frank EvanovFrom their site: Q.) Does SGC accept cards graded by another company to be crossed over? A.) We do offer a crossover service that reviews cards graded by other grading companies. The cost is $7.00 for the card to be reviewed, and possibly an additional amount based on the value of the card if the grade is going to meet the requirement you are looking for or if you want a quicker turnaround time on the cards. Make sure to put credit card information on the bottom of the invoice. Frank

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:33 AM.

Page 2 of 3

Show 80 post(s) from this thread on one page