Net54baseball.com Forums

Net54baseball.com Forums (http://www.net54baseball.com/index.php)
-   Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions (http://www.net54baseball.com/forumdisplay.php?f=2)
-   -   O/T - Juan Soto - 15 years/$765M with the Mets (http://www.net54baseball.com/showthread.php?t=355938)

Balticfox 12-10-2024 10:35 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jingram058 (Post 2480184)
No I don't. And more importantly, I don't care. All I know for sure is I hope it blows up in his face.

Hopefully you're not just saying that because you're a bitter Yankee fan. The Yankees (whom I hate incidentally) are better off without Soto and his lackadaisical play anyway.

Not that I care about how Steve Cohen wastes his money either of course.

;)

Balticfox 12-10-2024 10:44 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BRoberts (Post 2480198)
Steve Cohen collects only graded cards, by the way.

Ahhhh, now I understand. He's trying to hype up the "value" of his Juan Soto rookie cards!

;)

Peter_Spaeth 12-10-2024 10:46 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Balticfox (Post 2480213)
Ahhhh, now I understand. He's trying to hype up the "value" of his Juan Soto rookie cards!

;)

Kidding aside, isn't he part of Nat Turner's ownership group?

BobbyStrawberry 12-10-2024 10:54 AM

I actually LOL'd at the headline. I guess this is what passes for Yankee pride these days...

https://www.espn.com/mlb/story/_/id/...o-regret-trade

JollyElm 12-10-2024 02:23 PM

Cohen isn't paying that obnoxious amount of money, WE ARE!!!!

Tickets, souvenirs, TV and streaming services, and f*cking hot dogs, etc., are basically already unaffordable for a normal family of fans, and up, up and away the prices shall continue to go to cover the salary of this guy...

John1941 12-10-2024 03:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JollyElm (Post 2480257)
Cohen isn't paying that obnoxious amount of money, WE ARE!!!!

Tickets, souvenirs, TV and streaming services, and f*cking hot dogs, etc., are basically already unaffordable for a normal family of fans, and up, up and away the prices shall continue to go to cover the salary of this guy...

Not really. In 2006 Neil deMause of Baseball Prospectus wrote an article called "Do High Salaries Lead to High Ticket Prices?" He found that the data showed that higher salaries do not lead to higher ticket prices: "in the first dozen years of free agency, as salaries more than tripled, ticket prices actually went down in inflation-adjusted dollars." Increased ticket prices after that point were due more to changes in stadiums than salaries.

deMause explained that tickets are priced for maximize revenue - if raise them above the optimal price, fewer people will buy tickets, and overall revenue will be reduced. "The price point you select for your tickets, then, shouldn't change [after signing some big-$ free agent]: If you're already charging the price that will bring in the most money, then raising ticket prices in response to increased player costs would be foolish. Conversely, if you think you can get away with charging more for tickets, you'd be foolish not to do so, regardless of what you're paying your players."

Of course, ticket prices can rise after big-$ free agents are signed- but that's because of increased demand, not because "those contracts must be paid for!"

The BP article only focuses on ticket prices, but the same reasoning is applicable to souvenirs, concessions, etc.

Whether real world ticket pricing is as straight-forward as all that is debatable, but those are the economic fundamentals at least.

Peter_Spaeth 12-10-2024 03:28 PM

Right. You would need a very inelastic demand curve to just pass along increased expenses in the form of higher ticket prices.

jayshum 12-10-2024 03:59 PM

Not 100% sure, but I think teams get more money from TV broadcast rights than they do from ticket sales.

packs 12-10-2024 04:30 PM

I think more than money spent it's the quality of the team that raises prices. The Yankees are a high quality team and everything in the stadium is expensive. Hypothetically, if the A's had the same payroll as the Yankees but performed the way the A's perform, I don't think they'd be able to charge the same prices for concessions, parking, etc. because it would drive away even the last remaining fans.

jingram058 12-10-2024 06:51 PM

Well, it didn't take the Yankees long to get over the heartbreak of Soto walking, did it? And they aren't through...

Gary Dunaier 12-10-2024 08:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BRoberts (Post 2480198)
Steve Cohen collects only graded cards, by the way.

Steve Cohen owns the Mookie Ball.

Gary Dunaier 12-10-2024 08:15 PM

Obviously we don't know what kind of an effect Juan Soto will have on the Mets' performance next year. But I think it's safe to say there are going to be a number of Soto-related giveaways for fans attending games at the Citi Field stadium.

I just hope the Mets don't repeat one promotion the Yankees had back in August... :D

https://live.staticflickr.com/65535/...c93500b5_b.jpg

Carter08 12-10-2024 08:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jingram058 (Post 2480323)
Well, it didn't take the Yankees long to get over the heartbreak of Soto walking, did it? And they aren't through...

Yanks were embarrassed by Soto so they had to try something to gun for that elusive second WS in the last 25 years.

jingram058 12-10-2024 09:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Carter08 (Post 2480340)
Yanks were embarrassed by Soto so they had to try something to gun for that elusive second WS in the last 25 years.

They have 27. All the wannabees have far less. No one will equal that in my lifetime, no matter how much they spend.

darwinbulldog 12-10-2024 09:15 PM

I suppose a person could do a lot of good with that kind of money. Congratulations to the man, and I look forward to seeing what he does with the opportunity.

G1911 12-10-2024 11:54 PM

$765,000,000 to hit a baseball and provide some entertainment. Wow. I suppose that's a little more sensible than $20,000,000,000 to have a hedge fund. It is a little difficult to not conclude that there is something off with this system. Good for the winners of that system who have a talent for something it values, but wow.

Seven 12-11-2024 07:16 AM

Everyone already knows my feelings about how too much money has entered the game. It's ridiculous that players are being paid this much, but I digress. Soto is a spectacular hitter, there's little denying that. He's a decent runner from as far as I know, but I do not think that outfield in Citi field will do him any favors. The Mets also have many holes on their team, that Cohen needs to address as Juan Soto does not fix all of their problems. That being said, I am happy for Mets fans. They got the guy they wanted, it will be interested to see if he lives up to the contract.

I don't think anyone is worth 800 Million. Maybe you can justify it with Ohtani, because of his broad appeal to Japan and also due to the fact that he can pitch. But fact of the matter is, that's a gigantic financial commitment for someone who we have no idea how he will perform. He could very well continue to be the Soto of old, or turn into Mike Trout where he constantly gets hurt, these are the risks that the owner takes. It's not my money though. To quote another member, the fans will pay for this deal. I'm sure the Citi Field ticket prices are getting jacked up higher and higher as I type this.

I'd feel comfortable giving 800 Million to Mickey Mantle, Willie Mays or Ted Williams. That of course assumes they manage to put up the same numbers they did in their respective primes :D

clydepepper 12-13-2024 10:01 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by D. Bergin (Post 2479921)
Wish the Yanks would have been able to keep him. He certainly made things easier for Judge, but the line had to be drawn somewhere.

I think Scott Boras had more of a say in where Juan Soto was going, then Juan Soto did. I don't think Soto really cared where he ended up.


I disagree...

I never agreed with the Yanks batting Soto in front of Judge- as it had Judge in the 'protecting slot' - thereby actually putting more pressure on Judge whose protection became Stanton, a far streakier hitter than Soto.

Judge did get a lot more RBI opportunities, but, IMO, the order would have been stronger in Judge-Soto-Stanton order.

Soto is disciplined enough to get his walks regardless of position in the order, though hitting in front of Judge was better than hitting in front of Stanton.

.

.

Huysmans 12-13-2024 10:18 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Carter08 (Post 2480340)
Yanks were embarrassed by Soto so they had to try something to gun for that elusive second WS in the last 25 years.

When you're the most storied, dominant, successful, popular and valuable team in all of Major League Baseball... you have absolutely nothing to be embarrassed about lol

nwobhm 12-13-2024 10:29 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Seven (Post 2480367)
I'd feel comfortable giving 800 Million to Mickey Mantle, Willie Mays or Ted Williams. That of course assumes they manage to put up the same numbers they did in their respective primes :D

So it’s no longer about reaching the top of the mountain?

Mantle = 7 WS wins
Mays = 1 WS wins
Williams = 0 WS wins

In 1930 Ruth made $80,000. Adjusted to 2024 $’s that’s $1,500,000 for playing a game. Damn good money from any perspective. Most of these guys wouldn’t make anything close in the real world.



Quote:

Originally Posted by John1941 (Post 2480270)
Not really. In 2006 Neil deMause of Baseball Prospectus wrote an article called "Do High Salaries Lead to High Ticket Prices?" He found that the data showed that higher salaries do not lead to higher ticket prices: "in the first dozen years of free agency, as salaries more than tripled, ticket prices actually went down in inflation-adjusted dollars." Increased ticket prices after that point were due more to changes in stadiums than salaries.

Will all due respect…. What a bunch of horse shit.

Balticfox 12-13-2024 10:45 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by calvindog (Post 2480189)
Why do you want it to fail?

Quote:

Originally Posted by Peter_Spaeth (Post 2480192)
Why so hostile? It's just sports.

Probably because he perceives a direct correlation between skyrocketing payrolls and skyrocketing ticket prices,

:(

Balticfox 12-13-2024 10:57 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by John1941 (Post 2480270)
Quote:

Originally Posted by JollyElm (Post 2480257)
Cohen isn't paying that obnoxious amount of money, WE ARE!!!!

Tickets, souvenirs, TV and streaming services, and f*cking hot dogs, etc., are basically already unaffordable for a normal family of fans, and up, up and away the prices shall continue to go to cover the salary of this guy...

Not really. In 2006 Neil deMause of Baseball Prospectus wrote an article called "Do High Salaries Lead to High Ticket Prices?" He found that the data showed that higher salaries do not lead to higher ticket prices: "in the first dozen years of free agency, as salaries more than tripled, ticket prices actually went down in inflation-adjusted dollars." Increased ticket prices after that point were due more to changes in stadiums than salaries.

deMause explained that tickets are priced for maximize revenue - if raise them above the optimal price, fewer people will buy tickets, and overall revenue will be reduced. "The price point you select for your tickets, then, shouldn't change [after signing some big-$ free agent]: If you're already charging the price that will bring in the most money, then raising ticket prices in response to increased player costs would be foolish. Conversely, if you think you can get away with charging more for tickets, you'd be foolish not to do so, regardless of what you're paying your players."

Of course, ticket prices can rise after big-$ free agents are signed- but that's because of increased demand, not because "those contracts must be paid for!"

The BP article only focuses on ticket prices, but the same reasoning is applicable to souvenirs, concessions, etc.

Whether real world ticket pricing is as straight-forward as all that is debatable, but those are the economic fundamentals at least.

Two things:

1. I wonder if deMause's research would still hold up now eighteen years later?

2. Moreover the perception that higher salaries lead to higher prices for fans is still there. This leaves a bad taste in the mouths of many fans. It's "Why should I support those multi-millionaires at the ball park out of my meager earnings? I'll leave that to somebody else." I'm that way. As ticket prices for big league sports have exploded, my attendance has dropped precipitously. I'm much more inclined now to attend junior and other minor league games instead.

:(

brian1961 12-13-2024 10:59 AM

Juan believed he was entitled to a free suite at Yankee Stadium, whilst Derek Jeter and Aaron Judge pay for theirs. I guess that was the final straw that Brian Cashman decided was not going to fly. In essence, with all the money you'll be making, you can afford to pay for your own suite. Well said, and well decided, Mr. Cashman. If that's the state of Juan Soto's mentality, I say to the Mets, "YOU CAN HAVE 'EM!!!!!!!"

As for Soto, from now on, to me, he'll be known as

SEMI-SUITE SOTO.:mad: -- Brian Powell

BobbyStrawberry 12-13-2024 11:04 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Huysmans (Post 2480929)
When you're the most storied, dominant, successful, popular and valuable team in all of Major League Baseball... you have absolutely nothing to be embarrassed about lol

Quote:

Originally Posted by brian1961 (Post 2480939)
Juan believed he was entitled to a free suite at Yankee Stadium, whilst Derek Jeter and Aaron Judge pay for theirs. I guess that was the final straw that Brian Cashman decided was not going to fly. In essence, with all the money you'll be making, you can afford to pay for your own suite. Well said, and well decided, Mr. Cashman. If that's the state of Juan Soto's mentality, I say to the Mets, "YOU CAN HAVE 'EM!!!!!!!"

As for Soto, from now on, to me, he'll be known as

SEMI-SUITE SOTO.:mad: -- Brian Powell

Whatever you need to tell yourself to feel better, Yankee fans... :D

Balticfox 12-13-2024 11:09 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by brian1961 (Post 2480939)
Juan believed he was entitled to a free suite at Yankee Stadium, whilst Derek Jeter and Aaron Judge pay for theirs. I guess that was the final straw that Brian Cashman decided was not going to fly. In essence, with all the money you'll be making, you can afford to pay for your own suite. Well said, and well decided, Mr. Cashman.

I agree! A pox on Juan Soto, but a pox on the Yankees as well.

;)

Quote:

Originally Posted by Balticfox (Post 2480208)
Incidentally, will the Mets still be on the hook for roughly $51 million per year if they cut Soto or send him down to the minors?

But can anyone answer my question?

:confused:

brian1961 12-13-2024 11:15 AM

Yeah, Bobby, I feel much better for saying to Mets fans, "YOU CAN HAVE 'EM!!!!!!!!" His thinking he deserved a free Yankee suite REALLY turned me off. It was not as if the Yanks' offer was a low-ball, chintzy amount. Semi-suite Soto really showed the inter-workings of his character during these negotiations. Sure, the Yanks will need to find someone to bat before Mr. Judge, but I think they eventually will.

So, Bobby, if your a Mets fan, I am happy for you. Be that as it may, with several King's ransoms to pay, the perceived expectations upon Semi-suite Soto will be off-the-charts. Semi-suite Soto got nothing but love and respect at Yankee Stadium, and this is how he returns it? Not to be a voice of doom, but Mets fans are not quiet and sheepish when they decide to voice their unhappiness...... --- Brian Powell

Carter08 12-13-2024 11:25 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Huysmans (Post 2480929)
When you're the most storied, dominant, successful, popular and valuable team in all of Major League Baseball... you have absolutely nothing to be embarrassed about lol

Pretty sure they were more focused on trying to sign Soto than thinking about how it doesn’t matter in light of their 1920s World Series wins.

D. Bergin 12-13-2024 11:59 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by clydepepper (Post 2480926)
I disagree...

I never agreed with the Yanks batting Soto in front of Judge- as it had Judge in the 'protecting slot' - thereby actually putting more pressure on Judge whose protection became Stanton, a far streakier hitter than Soto.

Judge did get a lot more RBI opportunities, but, IMO, the order would have been stronger in Judge-Soto-Stanton order.

Soto is disciplined enough to get his walks regardless of position in the order, though hitting in front of Judge was better than hitting in front of Stanton.

.

.


Yeah, I stand by the statement that he made things easier for Judge... wherever he sat in the lineup.

Maybe they didn't win it all, but they don't make the World Series without Soto last year. Just like every other year before, when Judge, with a few occasional spurts from D.J. Lemahieu, Gleyber and Stanton and a few fly by nighters (Luke Voit, Matt Carpenter, etc..), had to carry the offense all by himself for the most part.

BobbyStrawberry 12-13-2024 12:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by brian1961 (Post 2480946)
Yeah, Bobby, I feel much better for saying to Mets fans, "YOU CAN HAVE 'EM!!!!!!!!" His thinking he deserved a free Yankee suite REALLY turned me off. It was not as if the Yanks' offer was a low-ball, chintzy amount. Semi-suite Soto really showed the inter-workings of his character during these negotiations. Sure, the Yanks will need to find someone to bat before Mr. Judge, but I think they eventually will.

So, Bobby, if your a Mets fan, I am happy for you. Be that as it may, with several King's ransoms to pay, the perceived expectations upon Semi-suite Soto will be off-the-charts. Semi-suite Soto got nothing but love and respect at Yankee Stadium, and this is how he returns it? Not to be a voice of doom, but Mets fans are not quiet and sheepish when they decide to voice their unhappiness...... --- Brian Powell

You can also easily say that it's Yankees that were being cheap by not giving him a suite...Would George have given him the suite?

I have heard that Soto was turned off from the Yankees by an incident where stadium security kicked his family out of the clubhouse.

On the plus side, at least they're spending. Even though they're using the money for pitchers that they don't really need...

D. Bergin 12-13-2024 12:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by brian1961 (Post 2480946)

So, Bobby, if your a Mets fan, I am happy for you. Be that as it may, with several King's ransoms to pay, the perceived expectations upon Semi-suite Soto will be off-the-charts. Semi-suite Soto got nothing but love and respect at Yankee Stadium, and this is how he returns it? Not to be a voice of doom, but Mets fans are not quiet and sheepish when they decide to voice their unhappiness...... --- Brian Powell


I dislike the Mets, love the Yanks.

However.

Soto may have received nothing but love and respect at Yankee Stadium. Mostly because he's not really a streaky hitter, and is a picture of consistency at what he does good.

but...

In his first (and only) year in Yankee Stadium, he witnessed Aaron Judge regularly getting mercilessly booed at Yankee Stadium for the 1st month of the season, when Judge was mired in a slump, before he broke out of it, and ended up having a somewhat historical regular season.

That's Aaron Judge! The most beloved figure in New York since Derek Jeter and Mark Messier.

What happens when the guy now getting paid MORE than Judge, and was NOT a homegrown hero, takes a statistical downturn or goes into a slump? Mets fans aren't any more acerbic then Yankees fans.

Also, the suite had nothing to do with nothing.

Cohen was going to outbid whoever, and that's what Scott Boras was whispering into Soto's ear. Leverage the Yankees, Dodgers and whoever else, and prove I'm the superstar agent everybody thinks I am...whether it makes me or you seem like a villain or not.

D. Bergin 12-13-2024 12:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Balticfox (Post 2480945)



But can anyone answer my question?

:confused:


Like most baseball contracts, it is guaranteed, unless he opts out himself after 5 years to try and chase more money.

So yes, if he steps into a gopher hole in the outfield, runs head first into the dugout steps, falls into a bottomless sink hole, or develops a Rick James level coke habit or gets DFA'd down the the minors due to non-performance, the Mets are on the hook for it all (unless of course there's some type of sink hole or coke exception written into the contract that we don't know about yet).

D. Bergin 12-13-2024 12:38 PM

Oh....and owners raise the price of tickets. Not players.

Thought I needed to state the obvious. ;)

Balticfox 12-13-2024 05:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BobbyStrawberry (Post 2480966)
I have heard that Soto was turned off from the Yankees by an incident where stadium security kicked his family out of the clubhouse.

What's the standard clubhouse policy of the Yankees? Are family members allowed?

:confused:

BobbyStrawberry 12-13-2024 06:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Balticfox (Post 2481026)
What's the standard clubhouse policy of the Yankees? Are family members allowed?

:confused:

I'm not sure. Perhaps a question for one of our resident Yankee fans...

Gorditadogg 12-13-2024 07:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BRoberts (Post 2480198)
Steve Cohen collects only graded cards, by the way.

LOL

Sent from my SM-S906U using Tapatalk

Gorditadogg 12-13-2024 07:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Balticfox (Post 2480938)
Two things:



1. I wonder if deMause's research would still hold up now eighteen years later?



2. Moreover the perception that higher salaries lead to higher prices for fans is still there. This leaves a bad taste in the mouths of many fans. It's "Why should I support those multi-millionaires at the ball park out of my meager earnings? I'll leave that to somebody else." I'm that way. As ticket prices for big league sports have exploded, my attendance has dropped precipitously. I'm much more inclined now to attend junior and other minor league games instead.



:(

1. Of course it would.

2. Your behavior supports deMause. You are not willing to pay more just because owners' expenses are higher.

Sent from my SM-S906U using Tapatalk

calvindog 12-14-2024 01:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BobbyStrawberry (Post 2480966)
You can also easily say that it's Yankees that were being cheap by not giving him a suite...Would George have given him the suite?

I have heard that Soto was turned off from the Yankees by an incident where stadium security kicked his family out of the clubhouse.

On the plus side, at least they're spending. Even though they're using the money for pitchers that they don't really need...

I’m a Dodgers fan first and Mets second, so I look at this wanting to dislike the Yankees; I thought trading Cortes for Williams and signing Fried were some nice moves. Getting rid of Cortes after that Game 1 GS has some added value.

Balticfox 12-14-2024 04:33 PM

Some of the Youtube comments are telling:

Quote:

Originally Posted by d-man 117
soto is a punk, a thug, a bad attitude villain, and he sucks as an outsider. What in the heck are the Mets thinkin?

Quote:

Originally Posted by peterrak9554
My buddy was head of security for the Padres and told me Soto’s family and entourage was the worst to deal with. Ridiculous demands and 100% catered treatment which is not in the slightest bit a priority. If they didn’t get it they through fits

I do the VIP executive protection at Raiders games and we don’t get that level of entitlement from high net worth VIPs who needless to say, have more value.

That kind of player, that kind of stuff, is a cancer in the locker room and steadily destroys a team. More MLB managers should have the gumption that Bobby Cox had when he took over the Toronto Blue Jays in 1982 and put an end to the silly contract perks. Cox was reported to have told Cliff Johnson and others "I don't care what your contract says. That horsecrap (personal limousine to the game rather than the team bus) ends right now if you want to play for this team."

:cool:

calvindog 12-14-2024 04:57 PM

By all accounts, Soto was a model teammate with the Yankees and wherever he’s played. It’s a historic signing for the Mets and I just pray it doesn’t work out like most of the Mets’ big signings.

Peter_Spaeth 12-14-2024 06:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Balticfox (Post 2481243)
Some of the Youtube comments are telling:





That kind of player, that kind of stuff, is a cancer in the locker room and steadily destroys a team. More MLB managers should have the gumption that Bobby Cox had when he took over the Toronto Blue Jays in 1982 and put an end to the silly contract perks. Cox was reported to have told Cliff Johnson and others "I don't care what your contract says. That horsecrap (personal limousine to the game rather than the team bus) ends right now if you want to play for this team."

:cool:

I'd like to see data backing up the oft asserted claims about locker room dissension impacting on field performance and, vice versa, the claims about players adding value because they were great "clubhouse leaders." There have certainly been dysfunctional winning teams.

John1941 12-14-2024 06:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Balticfox (Post 2481243)
Some of the Youtube comments are telling:





That kind of player, that kind of stuff, is a cancer in the locker room and steadily destroys a team. More MLB managers should have the gumption that Bobby Cox had when he took over the Toronto Blue Jays in 1982 and put an end to the silly contract perks. Cox was reported to have told Cliff Johnson and others "I don't care what your contract says. That horsecrap (personal limousine to the game rather than the team bus) ends right now if you want to play for this team."

:cool:

So you're getting your news from YouTube comments?

Tabe 12-14-2024 09:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Balticfox (Post 2481243)
That kind of player, that kind of stuff, is a cancer in the locker room and steadily destroys a team. More MLB managers should have the gumption that Bobby Cox had when he took over the Toronto Blue Jays in 1982 and put an end to the silly contract perks. Cox was reported to have told Cliff Johnson and others "I don't care what your contract says. That horsecrap (personal limousine to the game rather than the team bus) ends right now if you want to play for this team."

:cool:

How'd that work out for Bobby? A rep for Toronto underperforming while he was there and a 1st round exit the year they made the playoffs where they blew a 3-1 lead.

Seems weird to admire a guy who believes contracts shouldn't be honored.

Writehooks 12-14-2024 10:02 PM

$1 million per week. Every week. For 15 years. Nice.

Balticfox 12-14-2024 10:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by John1941 (Post 2481262)
So you're getting your news from YouTube comments?

Preferable to certain others!

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tabe (Post 2481304)
How'd that work out for Bobby? A rep for Toronto underperforming while he was there and a 1st round exit the year they made the playoffs where they blew a 3-1 lead.

A cheap and ill informed shot at Bobby Cox who took over the Blue Jays in 1982. He turned a sad sack club into a contender. Here are the Jays' numbers before, during and after the Cox era:

1981: 37-69 (7th)

1982: 78-84 (6th)
1983: 89-73 (4th)
1984: 89-73 (2nd)
1985: 99-62 (1st)

1986: 86-76 (4th)

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tabe (Post 2481304)
Seems weird to admire a guy who believes contracts shouldn't be honored.

While the Blue Jays were obligated to honour the terms of the written contract and they would have, a manager fills out the lineup card. Cliff Johnson could have chosen to continue getting his limousine rides to Exhibition Stadium where his position would have been on the end of the bench. Or in Syracuse of the International League. His choice.

;)

packs 12-15-2024 06:03 AM

I don't think managers are seen as the saviors they once were and I don't think they wield the kind of influence they once did either. If a manager wanted to attempt to assert their dominance and bench Soto for a family suite they would be shown the door the next day.

darwinbulldog 12-15-2024 07:31 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Peter_Spaeth (Post 2481261)
I'd like to see data backing up the oft asserted claims about locker room dissension impacting on field performance and, vice versa, the claims about players adding value because they were great "clubhouse leaders." There have certainly been dysfunctional winning teams.

I'm not the first to say it, but the statisticians can confirm baseball is an individual sport disguised as a team sport.

cgjackson222 12-15-2024 08:14 AM

Only found a couple of studies on the subject and both say clubhouse chemistry is too subjective to measure: Baseball Therapy: How to Measure Clubhouse Chemistry by Russell A. Carleton in 2013 concluded that "Right now, we don't know, but I think we as sabermetricians do ourselves a disservice if we assume that chemistry doesn't matter"

Another study: "Can We Measure Clubhouse Chemistry?"
by Sky Andrecheck in 1999 stated: "So, if we assume that each player has a clubhouse contribution, with the mean centered at zero and a small standard deviation of about 0.2 wins, how much can clubhouse chemistry really affect the team's overall performance? Multiplying the SD by the square root of 25, we see that clubhouse chemistry would have a standard deviation of 1 win, meaning that the team with the worst chemistry in baseball will lose about 2 extra games because of it, while teams with the best chemistry gain about 2 extra wins. At least, that's the best estimate we have from looking at teams' behavior with regard to their personnel decisions.

The true value of chemistry is probably so difficult to determine, that it cannot be ascertained directly. If teams are under or over valuing clubhouse chemistry, then theoretically a team could take advantage by assembling an all-jerk team or an all good-guy team to take advantage of the inefficiency. However, by looking at teams' behavior, we have attempted to estimate at least what clubhouse attitude is currently valued at among major league teams. Is it valued correctly? For that, perhaps an even more subjective view is needed.

I always wondered if Cobb, Bonds, Albert Belle and others never winning World Series pointed to cancers in the clubhouse affecting performance. And by the way, I don't think Cobb was an evil person like some, but I believe Sam Crawford said he was not a great teammate.

Balticfox 12-15-2024 09:51 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by calvindog (Post 2481252)
By all accounts, Soto was a model teammate with the Yankees and wherever he’s played.

Oh?!

No Contact with Yankees Teammates

Plus evidently his relationship with Manny Machado of the Padres was "difficult".

:eek:

Balticfox 12-15-2024 09:54 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by packs (Post 2481333)
If a manager wanted to attempt to assert their dominance and bench Soto for a family suite they would be shown the door the next day.

To the detriment of the game.

:(

Soto better be opening up that suite to teammates' families as well.

Tabe 12-16-2024 08:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Balticfox (Post 2481313)
Preferable to certain others!



A cheap and ill informed shot at Bobby Cox who took over the Blue Jays in 1982. He turned a sad sack club into a contender. Here are the Jays' numbers before, during and after the Cox era:

1981: 37-69 (7th)

1982: 78-84 (6th)
1983: 89-73 (4th)
1984: 89-73 (2nd)
1985: 99-62 (1st)

1986: 86-76 (4th)

Fun fact: a team can improve and underperform at the same time.

Also, winning 99 and then blowing a 3-1 lead is underperforming.

And it's not like his Braves teams had a rep for overachieving.

Balticfox 12-16-2024 10:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tabe (Post 2481763)
Fun fact: a team can improve and underperform at the same time.

And what then would be your objective measure for "underperformance"?

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tabe (Post 2481763)
Also, winning 99 and then blowing a 3-1 lead is underperforming.

Fun fact. When two baseball teams play, one has to lose. And that's even when they're not two relatively evenly matched teams playing in the ALCS.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tabe (Post 2481763)
And it's not like his Braves teams had a rep for overachieving.

Like I say, it's tough to measure overachievement vs. underachievement. All that can be said is that Bobby Cox took over as the manager of the Atlanta Braves after they compiled a miserable 63-97 record and finished dead last in the National League in 1989. Under his management the Braves then compiled an enviable fourteen divisional championships plus a second place finish in the 1991-2005 period.

Look, are you just a Bobby Cox or an Atlanta Braves hater? If so, take it somewhere else. I haven't liked the Braves since they moved from Milwaukee and I'm therefore not inclined to defend them. Moreover I don't have the patience to deal with silliness.

:rolleyes:

YankeeCollector 12-17-2024 09:07 AM

He will be a DH in less than 3 years. They can have him!

Huysmans 12-17-2024 10:11 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BobbyStrawberry (Post 2480941)
Whatever you need to tell yourself to feel better, Yankee fans... :D

Nothing I said was untrue.... absolutely nothing. Yankee haters... lol

BobbyStrawberry 12-17-2024 12:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Huysmans (Post 2481850)
Nothing I said was untrue.... absolutely nothing. Yankee haters... lol

You said the Yankees "have nothing to be embarrassed about"...losing Soto to the Mets (after you gave up a haul of prospects for him and he carried you to the WS) is nothing if not embarrassing

Hxcmilkshake 12-17-2024 01:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BobbyStrawberry (Post 2481890)
You said the Yankees "have nothing to be embarrassed about"...losing Soto to the Mets (after you gave up a haul of prospects for him and he carried you to the WS) is nothing if not embarrassing

Haul? Who Michael King? Hope they enjoy him he's gone after this year. Pooping on that trade shows you're just a hater. That was perfectly fine to give up that "haul" lol



Sent from my SM-S928U using Tapatalk

packs 12-17-2024 01:12 PM

I agree. That trade put the Yankees in the World Series. Michael King is a nice player but I think you trade him for a chance at a title every time.

Huysmans 12-17-2024 01:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BobbyStrawberry (Post 2481890)
You said the Yankees "have nothing to be embarrassed about"...losing Soto to the Mets (after you gave up a haul of prospects for him and he carried you to the WS) is nothing if not embarrassing

Hardly. lol Things like this happen to all teams at times, but no teams have the accolades I mentioned that the Yankees do.... no teams.
So AGAIN, they have nothing to be embarrassed about.

packs 12-17-2024 01:39 PM

The Yankees very rarely trade someone who is actually good. The only player in recent memory I can think of who began their career as a Yankees prospect and went on to have a solid career after they traded him is Alfonso Soriano, and they traded him for A-Rod.

The Yankees have traded a ton of hyped prospects over the years, guys like Nick Johnson, Jesus Montero, Austin Jackson, etc. They are typically players it was wise to trade.

BobbyStrawberry 12-17-2024 02:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hxcmilkshake (Post 2481891)
Haul? Who Michael King? Hope they enjoy him he's gone after this year. Pooping on that trade shows you're just a hater. That was perfectly fine to give up that "haul" lol Sent from my SM-S928U using Tapatalk

You missed my point. The trade itself was fine, but we both know the Yankees wanted badly for him to stay. In fact, the trade worked out almost as well as it could have for them, and he still chose to leave. Their embarrassment is why they went and massively overpaid Max Fried right afterwards.

Also, I can do without the ad hom attacks: "you're a this, you're a that." Grow up

packs 12-17-2024 02:29 PM

Come on now. They did not overpay Max Fried and Max Fried's signing was not related to Soto walking. The Yankees needed a starter with or without Soto, just like they need a first baseman.

A reminder that the Red Sox gave Aroldis Chapman 10.75 million to not even close out games.

BobbyStrawberry 12-17-2024 02:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Huysmans (Post 2481894)
Hardly. lol Things like this happen to all teams at times, but no teams have the accolades I mentioned that the Yankees do.... no teams.
So AGAIN, they have nothing to be embarrassed about.

The championships from decades ago don't matter to anyone except Yankees employees and fans. Losing Soto under the circumstances to your crosstown rival (whose roster isn't even as good) would be embarrassing to any franchise, but it's especially so for the Yankees, who fancy themselves the top franchise in NY.

BobbyStrawberry 12-17-2024 02:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by packs (Post 2481907)
Come on now. They did not overpay Max Fried and Max Fried's signing was not related to Soto walking. The Yankees needed a starter with or without Soto, just like they need a first baseman.

A reminder that the Red Sox gave Aroldis Chapman 10.75 million to not even close out games.

8 years and $200 million to a 30-year old pitcher? I can't believe that will work out well. Also, it's left handed hitting that they need, not more starters...

I'm not going to defend that Chapman signing either...but at least it's only one year.

packs 12-17-2024 02:50 PM

Nathan Eovaldi is 5 years older than Fried and will make 25 million a year for the next three years.

It is not overpaying in this market. If you want to sign a starter, that is the price.

BobbyStrawberry 12-17-2024 02:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by packs (Post 2481913)
Nathan Eovaldi is 5 years older than Fried and will make 25 million a year for the next three years.

It is not overpaying in this market. If you want to sign a starter, that is the price.

Were they bidding against anyone else?

packs 12-17-2024 02:57 PM

Were there other teams who wanted to sign a 30 year old lefty coming off an All Star season? Why wouldn't there be?

Kikuchi signed a three year deal for 63 million all because he pitched 60 good innings for the Astros last year after pitching 115 bad ones with Toronto.

Whether or not Fried is good for the next 8 years doesn't really come into play when you're talking about what the market is for a starter. You will pay near his price to sign even mediocre pitchers who are older than him.

Hxcmilkshake 12-17-2024 03:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BobbyStrawberry (Post 2481909)
8 years and $200 million to a 30-year old pitcher? I can't believe that will work out well. Also, it's left handed hitting that they need, not more starters...



I'm not going to defend that Chapman signing either...but at least it's only one year.

I'm not even sure you watch baseball after these last few comments but I urge you to do so this season.

Sent from my SM-S928U using Tapatalk

BobbyStrawberry 12-17-2024 03:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hxcmilkshake (Post 2481916)
I'm not even sure you watch baseball after these last few comments but I urge you to do so this season.

Sent from my SM-S928U using Tapatalk

I watch more baseball than I care to admit! I saw Max Fried pitch several times in person this past year. He's very good. I still think they Yankees overpaid for him. And I think Eovaldi is overpaid too.

BobbyStrawberry 12-17-2024 03:30 PM

Speaking of their need for left handed hitting...

https://x.com/JeffPassan/status/1869136879406510591

jingram058 12-17-2024 04:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BobbyStrawberry (Post 2481926)
Speaking of their need for left handed hitting...

https://x.com/JeffPassan/status/1869136879406510591

They just resolved that problem.

As others have said, Soto's departure is a blessing for the Yankees.

sports-cards-forever 12-26-2024 03:32 AM

Hard to believe that Soto left the Yankees just because Mets offered him a suite for his family and the Yankees didn't

jimtodd 12-26-2024 09:32 PM

Wow Yankees fans are really salty about this. Not even wishing well the only player that performed well for you in the World Series?
Also, did anyone watch how good the Mets were this year after May? Best record in baseball. They swept the Yankees head to head 4-0, and played better against the dodgers in the NLCS than the Yanks did in the series.
You could easily say the Mets were the better team this year, so is the result that much of a surprise for a very similar contract offer?
Throw in the fun-loving, relaxed, family-oriented clubhouse, that also offered a suite to him (it wasn’t that he demanded it, Cohen offered it along w many other unmatched family benefits). Would you pass that up just because of “storied franchise”?

Balticfox 12-26-2024 10:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jimtodd (Post 2483966)
Would you pass that up just because of “storied franchise”?

That "storied franchise" thing means nothing to calculating players and agents these days.

I just think the Mets way overpaid and they'll soon be holding the bag, an empty one, after this signing.

:(

Hxcmilkshake 12-27-2024 10:18 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jimtodd (Post 2483966)
Wow Yankees fans are really salty about this. Not even wishing well the only player that performed well for you in the World Series?

Also, did anyone watch how good the Mets were this year after May? Best record in baseball. They swept the Yankees head to head 4-0, and played better against the dodgers in the NLCS than the Yanks did in the series.

You could easily say the Mets were the better team this year, so is the result that much of a surprise for a very similar contract offer?

Throw in the fun-loving, relaxed, family-oriented clubhouse, that also offered a suite to him (it wasn’t that he demanded it, Cohen offered it along w many other unmatched family benefits). Would you pass that up just because of “storied franchise”?

Not really. Have you seen what they've done since they lost Soto? Not bad and they aren't done yet. They'll be fine.

Sent from my SM-S928U using Tapatalk

SyrNy1960 12-27-2024 11:37 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hxcmilkshake (Post 2484043)
Not really. Have you seen what they've done since they lost Soto? Not bad and they aren't done yet. They'll be fine.

Sent from my SM-S928U using Tapatalk

Agree! I’m glad it didn’t work out. Way too much money for one player. Yankees are making moves in the right direction. Looking forward to next season⚾️

BobbyStrawberry 12-27-2024 11:58 AM

Bellinger and a washed up Goldschmidt do not a Juan Soto make

D. Bergin 12-28-2024 08:45 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BobbyStrawberry (Post 2484067)
Bellinger and a washed up Goldschmidt do not a Juan Soto make


Yeah, I like the pitching moves they made, but both these guys OBP has tanked as of late. They feel like Anthony Rizzo 2.0 and 3.0. Hope I'm wrong.

Balticfox 12-28-2024 10:03 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by D. Bergin (Post 2484244)
Hope I'm wrong.

I hope you're right!

;)

jingram058 12-28-2024 10:17 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BobbyStrawberry (Post 2484067)
Bellinger and a washed up Goldschmidt do not a Juan Soto make

Washed up? I do not think so. Not yet. Mini Boss and Cashman would not have made the 1 year deal if that was their belief.

And for all the Kumbaya joy and $$$, I think the Mets are in over their heads with Mr. Wonderful Saviour Soto. Remember Cano? Let's see, how many World Series have the Mariners won? Can't (won't) win it all with one guy.

Balticfox 12-28-2024 10:36 AM

Well I certainly hope the Yankees sewer next year but I'm afraid the Mets will as well. But then again there are at least a couple of National League teams I prefer to the Mets.

;)

BobbyStrawberry 12-28-2024 07:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by D. Bergin (Post 2484244)
Yeah, I like the pitching moves they made, but both these guys OBP has tanked as of late. They feel like Anthony Rizzo 2.0 and 3.0. Hope I'm wrong.

I immediately thought the same.. It's like they replaced Rizzo with....another Rizzo!


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:28 AM.