Net54baseball.com Forums

Net54baseball.com Forums (http://www.net54baseball.com/index.php)
-   Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions (http://www.net54baseball.com/forumdisplay.php?f=2)
-   -   SGC - New in 2022 (http://www.net54baseball.com/showthread.php?t=312642)

parkplace33 01-25-2022 12:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Zan (Post 2189351)
Heard the news through an SGC group.

Bulk sub prices are dropping from $25/card to $24/card

A $50/card 5 day submission is being implemented. Not sure how this will conflict with their service that takes 1-2 days, imo it pretty much makes it obsolete.

Idk, not that's excited about this one

A $50/card 5 day submission is being implemented. This one intrigues me and how much action they get. The knock on grading companies recently is turnaround times.

BobbyStrawberry 01-25-2022 04:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by parkplace33 (Post 2189486)
A $50/card 5 day submission is being implemented. This one intrigues me and how much action they get. The knock on grading companies recently is turnaround times.

Makes sense that they did this. The difference in turnaround time was not worth the $220 per card price difference, imo.

Republicaninmass 01-25-2022 04:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by YankeeHotelFoxtrot (Post 2188549)
Accurate grading? Compared with the other two of the BIG 3, SGC is by far the most accurate.


Just curious, did you notice they went literally from NOT including centering in their grade to using centering as one of the dominant factors in grading?

I just cant see how that's accurate grading. It's an opinion anyhow, but they've changed how they do opine, mind you without telling anyone, their entire method.

vthobby 01-27-2022 03:06 PM

Recent sub....
 
4 Attachment(s)
Less than 30 days and $30 each! Amazing as always!

Attachment 499660

Attachment 499661

Attachment 499662

Attachment 499663

npa589 01-27-2022 06:35 PM

Guess the grade?
 
4 Attachment(s)
On the topic of people wondering if SGC has employed stricter standards towards vintage - here are two I just got back from SGC. Bought them about 7 years ago raw on eBay, and just got them graded. Can you guess their grades?

swarmee 01-27-2022 06:38 PM

5.5 and 6

T205 GB 01-27-2022 06:49 PM

Hopefully they go bankrupt this year:rolleyes:

Marslife 01-27-2022 06:51 PM

guess
 
6 and a TRM

T205 GB 01-27-2022 06:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BobC (Post 2188500)
One of the biggest problems in this hobby is that no TPG should have been allowed to determine their own grading standards, and then go even further and to then change them as they saw fit over time. One single set of agreed upon standards should have been set by the people in the hobby, and the TPGs should have had to seek approval and accreditation from whatever group spoke for the people in the hobby. Not the TPGs, not the dealers, and not the people/companies originally printing out price guides and other hobby publications years ago that often included their ideas of what the grading standards should be. And each and every TPG certified and accredited by the overriding hobby group setting the standards should have to adhere to those standards, be transparent in all they do in regards to grading (in other words, when a customer paying for grading asks why a card got a lower grade than expected, they should be given a complete, full answer), certainly not be able to charge grading fees based on a contingent percentage of a card's perceived value (doing so can cause the grading service to not be viewed as independent and unbiased, and it should take about the same time and effort to grade a '52 Topps Mantle as it does to grade an '87 Topps common, so why the difference in grading fees), and also be required to undergo some type of independent, periodic, third-party review of their grading, and if found to be deficient, their certification as an approved TPG should be subject to suspension, or even forfeiture.

Our great country started eerily similar to this description and..... well you know that all went.

npa589 01-27-2022 07:15 PM

I was actually very confident they weren't trimmed once I got them in hand a long time ago.

I don't know the answer to if it's stricter or not. I understand arguments both for and against slightly easier standards for a 1909 T206 card as well, given limited printing capabilities of the time inhabitance in a pack of tobacco.

I thought the Schlei could have graded even higher to be honest.

https://i.ibb.co/4YmKrFP/1910-Sweet-...8137-Front.jpg
https://i.ibb.co/4ZMDM4X/1910-Sweet-...18137-Back.jpg
https://i.ibb.co/fk6JJ8k/1910-Sweet-...07-a-Front.jpg
https://i.ibb.co/yqrR2z3/1910-Sweet-...06507-Back.jpg


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 07:58 PM.