![]() |
Do you mark Indian? I didn't know that was a choice
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
At the rate we are going, how long will it be before possession of items containing these “offensive” words become illegal? Sounds crazy but what we’re doing now would have sounded crazy 20 years ago.
|
Ironic that white liberals think they need to tell Native Americans what's best for them. That's wokest part of all.
|
We should probably get rid of the Padres name to appease the atheists too.
|
Quote:
The Los Angeles Agnostics of Anaheim |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
I know it may be hard to believe but there are almost no original names in sports. Even in the examples given, Ole Miss was known as the Flood until 1936. Time has a way of moving forward and after a while nobody even remembers there was a different name.
|
Lol! and the Providence Friars!
This silly discussion shows just how ridiculous this whole thing is. Quote:
|
Quote:
Perhaps people have too much time and pent up frustration from sitting at home and feel they "need to make a difference"? |
If I call someone from France a Frenchman, it's fine. Oh, you hail from Sweden? You're a Swede. No problem. Down under? Hello, Aussie. But if I call someone from Mexico City a Mexican, the social justice d*bag warriors scream, "Racist!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!"
Sure it all makes perfect sense. |
2 Attachment(s)
Jeez, is this supposed to be Chief Wahoo or John Wayne Gacy?
|
I think this one has gone the full course. I'm guessing Leon will have this locked in the not-so-distant future.
|
Quote:
|
Name change
I think this was mainly a company (owner's of the Cleveland Indians), deciding to do something that they thought would be good for their business. There had been no outcry recently about the name, it wasn't anything anybody had been talking about recently. It was just something the owners decided to do. Perhaps they felt it would be good public relations.
Of course we love sports, and we also love card collecting, but we often make it out to be something more important than it really is. Teams used to change names very often. It didn't used to be a big thing. As Bob Dylan famously said "the times they are a changing". My favorite saying is that "the only thing that never changes is that everything changes". So, was I surprised to hear the name changed ? Yes. Is it a big deal to me ? No. I'm not an Cleveland Indian fan. If I were, I guess I would feel different. |
The owners have decided to get rid of the offensive portion of their name. Their new name will now be:
Ohio Indians *rimshot* My local minor league team is the Spokane Indians. They have partnered with the actual Spokane tribe ("The Spokane Tribe of Indians" being the official name) and seek to honor the tribe with the team name, logos, and the stadium. The logo has "Spokane" written in Salish, for example. That's the right way to do things. I think the problem with Cleveland is that they have a loooooooong history of, well, being racist with their team name, logos, and mascots. Yes, they dropped Chief Wahoo but the legacy of all the garbage is still there. Personally, I think it's a wise decision of them to change. I don't consider this a sign of the apocalypse or even "bad" in any way. As baseball fans, we should all know that nearly every team has had a ton of nicknames through the years. What's one more? A suggested name I heard from someone else: Cleveland Admirals, in honor of Cleveland native Admiral Isaac Kidd, who was killed at Pearl Harbor and awarded the Medal of Honor. |
How about the "Cuyahoga Fire"?
|
Quote:
|
Cleveland ? ? ? ? ?
Seriously, my advice to the owners is....re-name the team the Cleveland LAKERS....since the Stadium is situated next to Lake Erie.
Then, we can watch (and laugh) how the "politically correct" crowd struggles to change the name Lakers.....for they will try, as they have no respect for anything traditional. . |
Quote:
I feel that celebrating "Pirates" is a terrible thing to do because Pirates were thieves and murderers. Why do we as a society allow that to happen? What about the KC Chiefs? Is that the next sports franchise name that is being targeted? Redskins - gone, Indians-gone. Chiefs can't be far behind. Sorry about that mini-rant - |
As I mentioned in my last post, this has been going on for 50 years. Get over it and stop whining.
|
I get very tired of the argument that’s this type of action is “woke” white people deciding what offends someone. I feel that this argument fails for two main reasons
1. It puts the burden on the aggrieved minority group to fight ever battle. These groups have enough burden and cannot be expected to fight every slight and injustice. These groups should not be expected to explain every insult and educate about ever wrong. 2. It misses the point that we as the majority group should be offended by the action. We may not have taken the original action but that doesn’t mean we should turn a blind eye to the wrong and not act. We should be embarrassed about what has been done and fix it. Let’s all stop pretending that Indian names were historically meant to honor in a real way. Most of these names were created on the teens- the thirties. They were not meant to honor real people struggling to prosper. They were put in place to recognize the image of the Indian as the noble savage, the cowboys and Indians view, the dime novel image. This is caricature not reality, and you can never honor with caricature. This was not a country respecting its native inhabitants. This was a country that was sending young Indian children to school to “save the man, kill the Indian. ” We tried to destroy their language and their culture. We did not take these actions but we need to stop misrepresenting what the actions really meant. I am not imposing offense on others, I am offended at what has been done in our name. |
Cleveland Baseball Players
|
Quote:
With an all time franchise low team batting avg of .225 last year that might be offensive to baseball players. |
Quote:
|
If you look and search deep enough with any topic or name of anything, you will find something that offends the 2020 generation. It doesn't have to even be sports related. It could be the name of a vehicle, or even the name of a power tool. Lately I find it's easier to just accept the fact that I'm wrong and they are right. Kinda like "the customer is always right" even when they are not. It's just more simple to agree lately, and move on and get things done. I know how to do many things. Sometimes these people come around needing something done. Sometimes my amnesia acts up and I forget how to do something. Simple rule in life. Be kind to each other, and others will be kind to you. I know this went a little off track from a team name change, but at some point you won't be able to say anything to anyone without the possibility of offending someone or someone just hearing what you said the wrong way because they are programmed to take everything as a negative remark.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
You are way over-analyzing this, going back in history, finding grievances, and trying to say that now the very word "Indians" shouldn't be used. Do you want to cut it out of books too? |
Unless I missed it, I'm surprised that no one on the board suggested "Cleveland Spiders"(in homage to the 1800s team of the same name).
But I'm sure that a group of arachnophobes would find it offensive. |
The whole concept of baseball is personally offensive. I identify as a basketball.
|
Quote:
|
All the sports teams should be named after animals. At least they don't complain. Not yet anyway
|
The only two teams to change their names were the Redskins and the Indians, two teams who have been at the center of controversy over their names for decades. I don't really see this knee jerk reaction to change everything and anything that you guys are talking about.
|
Maybe its been around for so many decades because there wasn't much controversy. But in 2020, its time to make a difference. Forget the people getting sick and hospitals running out of beds. We should worry about 100-year old baseball team names and pancake syrup. I dont think the perspective is necessarily wrong, but the timing is suspect.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
They are not Indians. An Indian is a person from India. |
Personally I* think changing the name of the Indians is a crock of sh!@. There is no way that is offensive to anyone unless they are looking to be offended. Always the victim, should be the motto for 2020.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Or if not offended by that just give me a few minutes to find something else to be offended by. Crock of crap if you ask me. |
There's a certain amount of power to be had if you can consistently move the goal posts. Societies always think they've finally go things figured out, only to have later generations gasp in abhorrence to their barbaric perspectives.
Fifty years from now, they'll be burning our cards in a pile due to these idols being womanizers, bigots', communists, capitalists, etc... Hide your Ruths, hide your Hornsbys, hide your Cobbs.....they're coming for you!!!!!!!! |
Quote:
|
I think they should change the name of the state Indiana while they're at it.
I get offended every time I drive thru that state. Mostly 'cuz of the odor. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
“Hearing firsthand the stories and experiences of Native American people, we gained a deep understanding of how tribal communities feel about the team name and the detrimental effects it has on them,” team owner Paul Dolan said in a statement. “While Indians will always be a part of our history, it is time to move forward and work to unify our stakeholders and fans through a new name.” This was the response from the National Congress of American Indians: “Today’s announcement represents a monumental step forward in Indian Country’s decades-long effort to educate America about what respect for tribal nations, cultures, and communities entails, and how sports mascots like the ‘Indians’ prevent our fellow Americans from understanding and valuing who Native people are today, what makes us unique, and the many contributions we make to this country,” |
Quote:
After all, Indians are from India. |
Quote:
That idea is not incorrect. Historically speaking, Columbus thought he was in India when he discovered what are now known as Native Americans. But it's really not an argument that is necessary to oppose. If your name is Ed and I insist on calling you Dave, won't it rub you the wrong way? |
Cleveland BBC (Baseball Club)
San Diego BBC Kansas City FBC That makes it pretty generic. Nothing to bitch about with those titles. |
Quote:
|
I am a left-leaning moderate, so fall in the middle of the debates. I see both sides to the argument.
Though I can say the illiberal, ultra-woke, cancel culture far left is as obnoxious to me, and to many people I know left to me, as it is to anyone on the right. I am against it as much as anyone else. The right should know that they annoy most people on the left too. And, in fact, illiberal by definition is not liberal. Cancel culture and trying to stop freedom of expression is not liberalism. My argument is it's up to the Indians, but that means it's really up to the Indians not some small vocal group of activists. As someone else said, I don't think the issue is political but about respect-- with respect being both a liberal and a conservative value. |
Lots of comments about what Native Americans think, but I posted what Native American representative groups think.
In case the NCAI is not as well known as most other organizations, I thought I'd share how they describe themselves: The National Congress of American Indians, founded in 1944, is the oldest, largest and most representative American Indian and Alaska Native organization serving the broad interests of tribal governments and communities. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Tradition?
It was traditional to enslave black people for centuries. To subjugate women and minorities. To deny basic rights to groups that differ from the mainstream. Just because it's a tradition doesn't mean it's OK and shouldn't be changed. Just because it's a tradition doesn't mean it isn't harmful to others, even if it's a tradition you are particularly fond of, and personally benefit from. "America has rolled by like an army of steamrollers. It's been erased like a blackboard, rebuilt, and erased again. But baseball has marked the time." Looking forward to seeing what the change will be. Onward to a better future! |
Quote:
Or would you, in your enlightenment, also tell Native Americans that they should not refer to themselves as Indians? I wish more people would go about their lives with a "live and let live" attitude, rather than a superior, "everybody has to change as I decree" attitude. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Would people be offended if they renamed them the Cleveland Buckeyes? |
Quote:
|
Quote:
This was the response from the National Congress of American Indians: “Today’s announcement represents a monumental step forward in Indian Country’s decades-long effort to educate America about what respect for tribal nations, cultures, and communities entails, and how sports mascots like the ‘Indians’ prevent our fellow Americans from understanding and valuing who Native people are today, what makes us unique, and the many contributions we make to this country,” That should quell any general notions about the Native American response or preference. I'm going to post the NCAI's description for their organization again as well: The National Congress of American Indians, founded in 1944, is the oldest, largest and most representative American Indian and Alaska Native organization serving the broad interests of tribal governments and communities. |
I'm amazed that so many here criticize Native Americans for being offended by Cleveland's nickname. Easy to pass judgement when it is the other guy.
Imagine if the Tigers changed their name to the Detroit Douchebags? Plenty of folks here would take it as a personal affront. |
1 Attachment(s)
I like the idea of returning to Cleveland baseball legacy...
|
classy post
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
All right all right, from now on it`s the Cleveland Redskins. Problem solved !
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Not particularly - just not cloaked in judgmental entitlement as some others I've read. |
Quote:
If they take offense at Wahoo Sam, that's a whole different discussion. |
Quote:
|
3 Attachment(s)
Quote:
Again, it's not the term "Indian" that's questionable to us. We've been referring to ourselves as Indians for years. It's the fact that we are not a mascot. It is not alright for you to dress up in Native gear, paint your faces yelling out war whoops to mock us. We are not fine with you putting offensive cartoon caricatures on your clothing and wearing it around demeaning our appearances. We've been fighting that battle for many years, so don't pin this on anyone else. This has been the Indian, Native American, American Indian agenda for many years ... have you been listening?. This is not what Native culture is, nor has it ever been that. Many Native cultures to this day are still fighting for basic survival. The simple fact that Native children are still seeing these depictions should make most people say, enough is enough. It's time for this shit to go. When it comes down to it, it's really a questions of power. When minority groups rise up against the majority, the standard line is "I don't get why you are so offended, we've been doing it this way for years. Why are you playing the victim card? If we give you this, what are you going to ask for next." I'm calling bullshit. 2020 was a shitty year, but one thing it did do was get rid of those racist mascots. Were you fine with the Redskins name? What other minority race would you be ok with this happening to? Please, fill in the blank for me... The Cleveland ___________ |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
I do have a question for you, Tony: What's your take on the Spokane Indians team name? |
Change it to the Spokane Native Americans
|
Give me a break
Quote:
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:45 AM. |