![]() |
Quote:
Maybe we're in agreement here. I guess my point is just that rarest is not a relative term. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
I wish the article included verbiage of the undeniable tampering, as documented on BO over and over again. Was there even one reference to the "before and after" photos on BO? I would think that a general audience would be interested to see examples of just how these cards were identified as altered. Well at least it's a start. :o |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Props to Peter! Now if only we could get that quote on a net54 t-shirt. I'd totally buy it.
|
To me this is article is all about the Vast Differences
Alteration/Fraud Why Because Cards Are made By a Machine not a Human!! Art is a done by human being, restoration is acceptable if disclosed .... That’s the point I wish people would get through their heads .... |
Quote:
|
The Times story was reprinted today in the Houston Chronicle, apparently. As well as the Sunday edition of the Times. So whatever our disagreements or disappointments with the focus, presumably more collectors will know there are issues.
https://www.pressreader.com/ |
Quote:
Well done Peter |
Quote:
|
Quote:
How many collectors and investors are going to continue to be ignorant to PSA’s ability to accurately grade cards ? |
Quote:
|
2 Attachment(s)
Originally, the movie was called "4.5"...
Attachment 356656 But then the Moser/PWCC film company got a hold of the project and used all sorts of filters and editing in post-production to turn her into something to look at... Attachment 356657 |
Excellent!
And I think Shallow Hal would agree. Rumor has it that he's now a grader for PSA. (Hopefully someone here remembers that movie :o ) |
Quote:
Hats off to the people who did the investigative work. PWCC eneds to go. PSA needs ...to....i don't know? I'm done buying cards over 6! |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
New York Slimes actually wrote a factual article?
Must be snowing hell right now. Joe Brennan |
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:21 AM. |