adding the 62 Williams in an 8 and t210 Jackson back to the original post.


thanks peter and jesse




edit: and i think we have a clear case w/ the most recent 71 munson sale @ $30K

Here is a same-company example--Monte Irvin 1951 Topps Red Back vs 1952 Topps.

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G900A using Tapatalk

http://www.ebay.com/itm/1976-TOPPS-1...p2047675.l2557

Some one explain this. I'm missing something.

error in the listing.

it's properly back....

$350

I always thought the 41 Play Ball Ted Williams should be the leader card for him over the 39 Play Ball true rookie. The 41 card is a gorgeously colored portrait and the 39 is such a blah black and white card with absolutely nothing on the front. The 41 is definitely diproportionately valued for what it is in sequence - but I hope in the future that card actually surpasses the rookie based on the love that clearly went into it. Ditto for the 48 lead. Unlikely though...

Disclosure - I have both and my 39 is in a higher grade.

Agreed on the 41 Williams. I purchased a few of his other cards before I bought his 39.

In an attempt to bring this thread in the pre-war forum around to, you know, pre-war: Bill Terry.

Tris Speaker's E-90 Caramel is always going to outsell his T206

The 1903-04 E107 Breisch Williams cards of virtually any player who was also issued in the 1902 W600 Sporting Life set.

Those Sporting Life cabinets are amazing.

It's modern but at least in PSA 10 and presumably elsewhere there are a couple of 1992 Pedros worth more than his 1991 Upper Deck Final edition.

lemme know the verbage on the pre war cards you guys are referencing and i'd like to add them to cover the full spectrum...

if not, no worries.


and pete, got specifics?

if so, will add those to the top as well.

With that 52 Mays PSA 9 sale of 480k it may be worth more than the 51 Bowman in a 9. Although I haven't heard of any recent 51 sales in a comparable grade.

92 Bowman for sure.

Yeah, the 92 Bowman for sure.

Plus, this pre rookie of Joe Jackson shown below. I might add Cy Young to the list to. He Has an 1891/2 JA Rogers cabinet card in street clothes and his Just So 1893 card would be greater.

As a set collector these popped into my head...after McClain and Stanley the others may be a bit lame, but certainly fall into the criteria...:D I do think the first two though are significant...especially if your looking to buy those two in NM for your sets...




1965 Topps Denny McClain RC #236
1966 Topps Denny McClain #540

(66 High Number)


1966 Topps Mickey Stanley RC #198
1967 Topps Mickey Stanley #607

(67 High Number)


1965 Topps Gary Kroll RC #449
1966 Topps Gary Kroll #548

(66 High Number)

1965 Topps George Smith RC #483
1966 Topps George Smith #542

(66 High Number)

1962 Topps Tom Tresh RC #31
1963 Topps Tom Tresh #470

(63 SP)

1962 Topps Don Clendenon RC #86
1963 Topps Don Clendenon #477

(63 SP)