![]() |
Quote:
Hey, we played outdoors here last year and this year, didn't you see how awesome Blair Walsh is kicking outdoors? [emoji6] It's not that Manning had HOF receivers and Favre didn't. Manning made them HOF receivers. Just like Brady made Welker one. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
Quote:
Ummmm, yeah there is. Didn't win as many rings as he would have liked clearly, but you simply cannot just ignore his regular season numbers because of what happened in the playoffs. That is ridiculous. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
Cobb -baseball
Jim Brown- football but takes care of lacrosse as well Jordan- 2nd place Pistol Pete Richard- for hockey. Don't like Gretzky and Howe is too obvious |
One thing that puzzles me about Ruth...I think it was in my 1955 Sports Illustrated with Alston on the cover that a bunch of old baseball men were asked to name the best baseball player ever. I remember Cobb chose Wagner, as did a couple other guys. A few guys chose Cobb. And I think only one guy chose Ruth.
I suppose you could argue these guys were purists who thought the home run ruined baseball, but it did make me wonder. |
OT: Who would you put on your sports Mt. Rushmore. This is harder than it sou...
Quote:
Or maybe because they were all better overall players than Ruth except in the HR/power dept and pitching category. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
You absolutely have to have Jackie Robinson. After that we can argue.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Oh so sorry, guess I should have made it clearer he can hit. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
Quote:
Sure he absolutely can. You going to put Bumgarner in the HOF or call in the greatest pitcher of all time cause he was good in the postseason. Or any player for that matter who has a good postseason track record but did nothing in the regular season. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
Babe Ruth
Here's an interesting fact: In a span of 25 years, modern statisticians measured the distance of every MLB home run and discovered that there was only one instance in which a batter hit a homer that traveled 500 feet. In 1920, the first year that Ruth became a full-time batter for the Yanks, he hit a 500+ foot home run in EVERY single ball park he played in! There never has been and never will be another batter with more power than Ruth.
|
Quote:
Very cool! Do you have a link to that source? Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
Quote:
Joe Montana and Steve Young made Jerry Rice a Hall of Famer. :rolleyes: By the way, Reggie Wayne, at age 34, had 106 catches for 1,355 yards in 2012 after Manning was already gone. |
Quote:
Don't kid yourself. You could say that, but you would be wrong. Some receivers are made from the system they are in. That's why Welker was a flop everywhere until he went to the Pats. Harrison was nothing special and did nothing before Manning. And please, one season. What did Wayne do in 2011? 2013? 2014? And where is he now? Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
Welker played all of three seasons pre Pats and the third one had 67 receptions for a 10 yard average. And all but one game was for Miami (flop "everywhere" lol). You are just spouting nonsense for the hell of it, it seems.
You want an interesting stat on Welker, look at the decline in production going from Brady to the great Manning. |
Quote:
Nonsense? You just do not get it do you or you don't know what you're talking about, it seems. I'll go with you don't know what you're talking about, in terms of football. Didn't realize this was so difficult for you to comprehend. So Welker being cut and limited to special teams in the early part of his career doesn't mean anything to you? Hmmmm I wonder if it's because he didn't have a good quarter back...or a good system...or coaches...sure as hell looks that way if you look up 2007, first year with the Pats. I'm done with this thread. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
In chaos theory, we would say the dynamical system that is this thread has made its way toward the two attractors of "Manning v Brady" and "Ruth v Mays." We could come back in 30 more posts and see the same debates in their same unresolved states...or just recognize that ALL these folks already have a HOF to enshrine their legacies. So if we're building an alternate shrine, how about Rose, Shoeless Joe, Bonds, and Clemens?
|
OT: Who would you put on your sports Mt. Rushmore. This is harder than it sou...
Quote:
Just stop talking, you're making yourself look like an idiot with things you don't know. 2013: you have DT as your number 1, not Welker. He had a smaller role. Welker scored more TD'S in that one year than he ever did with the great Tom Brady for a single season. Interesting to say the least. 2014: Idk, maybe if you knew what you were talking about you would have known he had concussion problems. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
What don't you understand? By his third season, very early in his career, he had 67 receptions and a very respectable 10 yard average, similar to the rest of his career. ON MIAMI. Sorry the facts don't fit your narrative.
|
OT: Who would you put on your sports Mt. Rushmore. This is harder than it sou...
Quote:
You still don't get it. Yep, you keep researching Welker and editing your posts after the fact when you look up more stats and numbers because you don't have the slightest clue what you're talking about. Just quit replying so the thread can continue. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
Quote:
|
Here's a headline of the future:
"Billionaire sports fan creates Mt Rushmore of sports greats; Jordan sues over use of his likeness." |
Quote:
|
OT: Who would you put on your sports Mt. Rushmore. This is harder than it sou...
Quote:
Flop may have been harsh, I'll admit that. But he was a special teamer struggling to stay on the roster and almost got cut (again) before his magical 2006 season. Let me ask you this, do you think Welker would have become a HOF player in Miami? No. Most likely a far cry from it. Brady made him a HOF'er. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
Brent, we're certainly on the same page that playing on a great team with a great QB will help any receiver. But of course it can work the other way too, a great receiver can improve any QB. So it's really hard to say in almost any case who made who better. I suspect Welker was on his way to being very very good, but beyond that it's hard to know.
|
i think
we can all say these 3 - RUTH, GRETZKY, JORDAN....
the tough one is # 4???????:confused: |
Quote:
Hard to argue with that my friend, well said. Heck, Welker could have killed it in Miami for all we know. I would say it's more difficult to have a great receiver make a decent qb great. Didn't work with Moss is Oakland, but then again he didn't seem to care nor try lol. Some players are made from the systems they are put in, and if you remove them from that, they may not succeed. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
I haven't made a list yet, but I see a lot of Gretzky. Would this be an "American Monument" like we actually have? Or can we include the likes of Gretzky?
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
Quote:
|
Quote:
He sure did! Lol Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
Quote:
|
Quote:
For me, I am leaning towards Ali, Ruth for sure. Others, don't know.. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
john l Sullivan
ty cobb jim Thorpe Michael phelps |
Quote:
|
Ruth
Very cool! Do you have a link to that source?
The source is a book called "The Home Run Encyclopedia," MacMillan publishing. The information is found on pages 25-26 in a chapter titled, "Longest Home Runs." It should be noted that my memory was a bit faulty in two aspects, one of which is the 25-year time frame. The computerized measuring equipment first instituted in MLB parks in 1982 was broadened to include every ball park by 1991. It was within that 10-year time frame that only one major leaguer, Cecil Fielder, hit a 500-foot homer. His was measured at 502 feet. And the second correction is the year Ruth hit 500+ home runs in all eight A.L. ball parks he visited. It was 1921, not 1920. Although home run measuring technology wasn't developed until the '80s, we do have enough footage of Ruth's 1921 homers to ascertain with computer analysis the fact that they traveled such historic distances. He was truly a freak! |
Quote:
I was thinking close to that, if I were to stick with the 4 major US sports, football is where I'm struggling. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
Ruth
[QUOTE=robw1959;1469810]
Quote:
|
Quote:
Thanks! yes Ruth was something special. Any research or studies done on his bat speed or exit velocity? Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Very interesting.
I'd pick Ruth - There will always be arguments that he had areas of his game that were weak. But when it's all set aside his strengths changed baseball almost permanently. Mays may have had better overall skills, but without Ruth making power a major part of the game he might not have ever played. And Baseballs popularity in the years Ruth played changed the country in some subtle ways. Before and even after Ruth there was a stigma to professional sports especially in football and other sports that were big at colleges. It could be said that persists today in the rules of the NCAA. But there's no general thing against pro sports in the mind of the public. Ali - Not for his stance against the war. But for showing possibly for the first time that an athlete could use his popularity to improve things for people in general. That was the reasoning behind picking all those out of the way places for his fights. And doing it in a way that actually made a bit of difference for the locals. Pele - A huge star internationally, he spent what should have been the first few years or retirement playing for the Cosmos. His final game against his old club team sold out Giants stadium something that in the US in the 70's should have been impossible for soccer. I think it's fair to say that without Pele there would be very little soccer in the US. Considering how well our teams have done lately especially the womens team, he had a major impact on the sport overall the last spot I'll leave open, with a few possibilities. I'm expecting them to be more than a bit controversial. :D Many of the players already mentioned would be worthy choices but I like the less obvious ones. Lance Armstrong - yes, disgraced and not generally all that good of a guy. But another whose popularity really made a difference for his sport in the US. I'd say probably not because of the cheating, but barely. Bill France Sr. - founded Nascar. How different things would be without it. Glen Curtis - Bicycle racer, motorcycle racer, aviation pioneer. Using ailerons instead of wing warping was a major advance just after the Wrights. Planes still use them today, so while his largest contribution was away from sports, He is a sports figure who made a major contribution the world in general. (Many aviation pioneers and automotive pioneers were bicycle or motorcycle racers. Curtis is simply the most famous of the bunch. The Wrights raced as well, but briefly and weren't much good. They moved on to building bikes quickly) Howard Cosell - Like him or not- and many didn't - he was a large part of making sports a major part of television. Where is the NFL without TV and Monday Night Football? Where are any of the fringe sports without wide world of sports? Kraft and/or Bellichick - it's hard to separate the two. I'm becoming more convinced every year that the success isn't about Brady, isn't about who is there or not there. The team did go 11-5 with Matt Cassel as QB. So much of what they do is more about using a players abilities rather than trying to force them into a particular role or style of play. I can't recall any team using so many players who are either late round picks or undrafted. I do see other teams passing over good players in favor of guys they spent bonus money on who can't quite pull themselves together. Without a load of support from an owner a coach can't do that sort of thing. In many cities Bill would have been gone after his first season being 5-11. And to be sure he was a very mediocre coach with Cleveland. But I also think it's too early for rushmore. If their methods become more the norm in the NFL and if that changes the game, then maybe. If it simply becomes a historic anomaly then no. There's a rather large crowd of "others" who could be in. People who advanced the equipment in major sports, or altered the public perception of a sport. Many of them perhaps too obscure to be solid nominees. Steve B |
On the Welker discussion, while he was with Miami he totally killed the Pats. Especially on kick returns. I would always wonder why they didn't use him more as a receiver.
It was a very happy day for me when the Pats traded for him. Steve B |
Quote:
Steve B |
Quote:
Steve B |
Quote:
|
Who else has an army?
Arnold Palmer |
Pioneers
Jack Johnson
Jackie Robinson Arthur Ashe Wilt Chamberlain |
Quote:
Kiss. |
Quote:
Pat Tillman |
Babe Ruth
Jackie Robinson Jesse Owens Jimmy Clark or Ayrton Senna strong consideration for either Gretzky or Bobby Orr I think athletes that changed the direction of their respective sport or society in general should be recognized not just those with statistical accomplishments.Rushmore has four presidents, a sports Rushmore would definitely need more being there are so may sports. |
Mt. Rushmore
1 Attachment(s)
Rumor has it that Mt. Rushmore ain't all it's cracked up to be.
|
Quote:
How could I have forgotten Senna ?! He was a tremendous driver and outspoken about his sports problems where others simply kept quiet and cashed their checks. Racing as a whole is far safer because of him. Steve B |
Babe Ruth
Jackie Robinson Muhammad Ali The fourth one I'd leave open for the athlete who basically becomes the Jackie Robinson for the LGBT community. |
Quote:
Every sport has already had a LGBT person play. If you are worried about inequality in sports look at women. I would love to see if Chelsea Baker ever gets a chance with a pro baseball team. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Unfortunately, Michael Sam didn't work out. His draft reaction was pretty cool to see. To add, no opinion on whether it compares to Jackie etc. Just commenting on someone who was a huge headliner for not only sports news, but national news. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
Eddie Gaedel
|
Secretariat or American Pharoah should get some discussion. Athletes and non-human.
For the backside (busts): Todd Marinovich, Quincy Carter, Sam Bowie (picked before Jordan). |
Quote:
|
Quote:
I had a whole paragraph typed up to push Secretariat but deleted it because I thought I'd get laughed at. There's not a single event that gives me bigger goosebumps than seeing him open up and just run at the Belmont. |
My Mount Rushmore
Ali, Ruth, Jordan and Gretzky
|
Cool topic. My interpretation for Rushmore heavily values character and the person's life, whether they are a source of inspiration, iconic status, etc...
Lou Gehrig, Michael Jordan, Joe Montana...and the fictional Rocky Balboa. Who doesn't love Rocky :) Those first two movies get me every time! |
Four Athletes representing five sports
Babe Ruth, Jim Thorpe, Bill Russell and Gordie Howe in Baseball, Track & Field-Football, Basketball and Hockey, respectively.
|
Tough call, obviously, but I will go with Wilt, Cobb and Bobby Jones.
|
Ruth
Ali Jackie Robinson Jordan |
Quote:
|
Jesse Owens
Jackie Robinson Jim Thorpe Babe Ruth Steve |
Quote:
Franco Harris Steve |
jim otto
dave dravecky marv throneberry |
The on court heroics of basketball wouldn't be possible if traveling wasn't allowed.It's all about the "show", the NASCAR of stick & ball sports. Jordan was a tremendous athlete though. He was the NBA in his era, he received the benefit of doubt from the officials. I have a tough time putting him on the list.
|
|
Mount rushmore
Quote:
That said, my top 4 sports icons are: Ruth, Ali, Jordan and Secretariat. All 4 have the perfect combination of incredible feats for their respective sports, coupled with an "unearthly" stature versus their peers. Whether an animal should be considered an Athlete will always be open for discussion, but for my money, Big Red's unprecedented performances have earned him the right to join this iconic list. If ESPN can classify him as an athlete, that's good enough for me. Regards, JoeT |
How's this one?
Jim Thorpe (may be best athlete of 1st half of 20th century).
Bo Jackson (may be best athlete of 2nd half of 20th century). Abby Wambach (one of leading female athletes of recent history, inspired millions of girls, and, since LGBT was mentioned in an earlier post, is openly married in a same sex relationship). Secretariat (sheer dominance that's hard to compare others to). Also considered Pele, Ali, Jim Brown, Tiger, Wilt, Kareem, Serena, Gretzky, Ruth, Cobb, Aaron, Unitas, Montana, Tyson, MJ, Oscar, Owens, Lewis, Phelps, Jenner, and probably several others. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
I know the history of Owens and love the Berlin story, but Owens isn't the measure by which all sprinters gauge themselves. Records are typically meant to be broken...especially timed events. Secretariat lives on, and Owens has been passed by long ago. |
Mount Rushmore
Quote:
|
Saw this in a current auction
|
Going outside the idea of influence outside of sports, and running with the current theme of dominance in a sport.
Eddy Merckx - 525 pro cycling victories, far more than anyone else. And not just in little races, 11 wins came in the big tours, 26 in major races, and 4 world championships 1 amateur and 3 pro. Many wins were by huge margins. Beryl Burton - British time trial specialist, she won seven world championships, 90 British titles, and set a 12 hour record that remained better than the mens record for 2 years. And won the best all-round competition in the UK every year from 1959-1983. Steve B |
Babe Ruth
Jackie Robinson Jim Brown Michael Jordan |
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:57 AM. |