Net54baseball.com Forums

Net54baseball.com Forums (http://www.net54baseball.com/index.php)
-   Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions (http://www.net54baseball.com/forumdisplay.php?f=2)
-   -   This will be my 12th to the last post on the main board! (http://www.net54baseball.com/showthread.php?t=116585)

calvindog 10-07-2009 09:55 AM

I was just one year old then...but I know I had heard that song before so somehow, someway it must have had some shelf-life (God only knows why). I love the video, however. Different, non-politically correct era.

Jim VB 10-07-2009 10:04 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by calvindog (Post 754315)
I love the video, however. Different, non-politically correct era.

Of course, videos had no footprint back in 1966, but that song took incredible heat. I think it climbed to a Top 5 hit but then radios stations started getting pressure not to play it. I lived in NY back then and I think both WABC and WMCA took it off their playlists and the record company (BMI ???) withdrew it.

calvindog 10-07-2009 10:06 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jim VB (Post 754317)
Of course, videos had no footprint back in 1966, but that song took incredible heat. I think it climbed to a Top 5 hit but then radios stations started getting pressure not to play it. I lived in NY back then and I think both WABC and WMCA took it off their playlists and the record company (BMI ???) withdrew it.

Sounds like a conspiracy to me. Were there many 'bankers' living in NYC back then?

timzcardz 10-07-2009 10:11 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by calvindog (Post 754315)
Different, non-politically correct era.

Yeah, Back then it was was considered acceptable for dog catchers to secure loose dogs and take them away.

barrysloate 10-07-2009 10:23 AM

I was in a camp in Maine that summer of 1966 and remember the song well. It was really popular but a lot of people felt it was just too strange...and for good reason. I believe the flip side of the 45 was a song recorded backwards, perhaps that very tune.

murcerfan 10-07-2009 10:27 AM

...but played on a homophone it was the same ?

Bob Lemke 10-07-2009 03:19 PM

I've got the album
 
Back in 1966 I was working a real job at Mickey D's and had a lot of that $1.10/hr. burning a hole in my pocket.

I bought the Napoleon XIV album (in Mono) and still have it. The entire album is in the same vein: The Nuts on My Family Tree, I'm in Love with My Little Red Tricycle, Bats in My Belfry, etc.

ChrisStufflestreet 10-07-2009 08:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jim VB (Post 754317)
Of course, videos had no footprint back in 1966, but that song took incredible heat. I think it climbed to a Top 5 hit but then radios stations started getting pressure not to play it. I lived in NY back then and I think both WABC and WMCA took it off their playlists and the record company (BMI ???) withdrew it.

But it was good enough to be "revived" in 1973. It only hit #87 on the national charts, but it's interesting that it could get re-issued seven years after it was supposedly blacklisted.

I was only a year old in '73 but maybe somebody here can answer: was the song's re-emergence brought on by Dr. Demento? Perhaps he was playing the song on his radio show and a populace that had lived through what happened between '66 and '73 could appreciate it better.

Matt 10-07-2009 08:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ChrisStufflestreet (Post 754514)
But it was good enough to be "revived" in 1973. It only hit #87 on the national charts, but it's interesting that it could get re-issued seven years after it was supposedly blacklisted.

I was only a year old in '73 but maybe somebody here can answer: was the song's re-emergence brought on by Dr. Demento? Perhaps he was playing the song on his radio show and a populace that had lived through what happened between '66 and '73 could appreciate it better.

"The original single was re-issued by Warner Bros. Records (#7726) in 1973, and eked onto the Billboard Hot 100 at number 87. The song appeared on disk releases by Dr. Demento in 1975 as part of Dr. Demento's Delights, then in subsequent Dr. Demento LP's released in 1985, 1988 and 1991."

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/They%27..._Away,_Ha-Haaa!

calvindog 10-07-2009 08:20 PM

Ahhh...that's when I must have heard it. Dr. Demento was great. Not sure why, but he was great.

Publius 10-07-2009 10:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by docpatlv (Post 754066)
JimVB,

It wasn't the Freddy Mercury photo, it was the red sticker next to him that says "12-inch Maxi single". ;)


Now THATS funny

FrankWakefield 10-08-2009 09:38 PM

From the Merriam-Webster online dictionary:

Homonym- one of two or more words spelled and pronounced alike but different in meaning.

Homophone- one of two or more words pronounced alike but different in meaning or derivation or spelling.


Calmly, now.... the words have to be spelled alike and pronounced alike to be homonyms; but need only be pronounced alike to be homophones.

That allaboutspelling site is incomplete and a bit ambiguous. Admittedly, some definitions for homonyms allow an "or" instead of an "an" for the spelling and pronunciation, and therein is the confusion. Wikipedia explains the too better, as does the Merriam Webster awn lion dictionary. To give precision to the meaning of homonym, and in looking at its origin, it seems that heat and heat would be homonyms, heat (to make hot) and heat (a grouping of contestants in a race), and also they would be homophones. While meat, meet, and mete would only be homophones....

With this attempt at explaining the too, I'm now dun.

murcerfan 10-08-2009 10:35 PM

sew..too plus too makes fore? oar are we getting know wear hear?

FrankWakefield 10-08-2009 10:36 PM

love it !

Bamacollection 10-09-2009 02:39 AM

The funniest post in years! What a complete waste of brain waves...fantastic! It is good to stop and laugh now and again! I just can't wait for "now" to end...it hurts!

(note: complete misuse of the ! intended!)


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:09 PM.