Let's again debate Cobb's real 1st card ?
 

Posted By: <b>Josh K.</b><p>I stand corrected on the dating.

Let's again debate Cobb's real 1st card ?
 

Posted By: <b>Frank Evanov</b><p>Devil's Advocate time:<br /><br />Is this Mickey's true rookie card?? The number on his back is "6" not "7". He wore #6 in 1951.<br /><br /><img src="http://images1.collectors.com/psa/set_registry/m514804/47ExMMpinstripes.jpg"><br /><br />Frank

Let's again debate Cobb's real 1st card ?
 

Posted By: <b>howard</b><p>Even if a postcard was purchased and mailed it does not necessarily mean that the buyer was not collecting them. It was not uncommon many years ago for travellers to send postcards to themselves at their home address. My dad has such a collection (no baseball postcards, though).

Let's again debate Cobb's real 1st card ?
 

Posted By: <b>Josh K.</b><p>Frank, <br /><br />If you could show that the card was distributed pre-1951, than I'd say yes. I dont think you can though.

Let's again debate Cobb's real 1st card ?
 

Posted By: <b>Anson</b><p>my vote<br /><br /><img src="http://www.network54.com/Realm/tmp/1144516671.JPG">

Let's again debate Cobb's real 1st card ?
 

Posted By: <b>Anonymous</b><p>W600 wins!

Let's again debate Cobb's real 1st card ?
 

Posted By: <b>Ted Zanidakis</b><p>Anson<br /><br />I do appreciate that you are the E101 guy. But, there is no way<br /> that the E101 cards were issued in 1909 as the SGC label on your<br /> Cobb card indicates.<br /> The E101 set, like it's "cousins" (E92, E102, E104, E105 & E106),<br /> was issued during 1910. They are all basically the same cards that<br />were probably produced at the same printing facility, but with dif-<br />ferent backs which advertise either Candy or Gum.<br /><br />I have provided factual data in an earlier post on this Thread to<br />confirm my "1910 Theory" regarding these sets. <br />