Net54baseball.com Forums

Net54baseball.com Forums (http://www.net54baseball.com/index.php)
-   Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions (http://www.net54baseball.com/forumdisplay.php?f=2)
-   -   The worst baseball card picture ever? (http://www.net54baseball.com/showthread.php?t=347905)

brianp-beme 04-01-2024 04:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by metroac (Post 2423843)
I think this one started out a little differently.

Nice! I haven't seen the photo this card was based upon. It explains why there is such a radioactive green field surrounding Williams.

It is also a relief to know Ted is not succumbing to either quicksand or quicksilver deposits.


Brian

JollyElm 04-01-2024 06:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by brianp-beme (Post 2423703)
Once I done found out about this 1959 Fleer, I'd be snockered if I didn't get me one.

Yup, that's right, them there's Teddy Ballgame foolin' around down by the ol' tailings pond.

Brian


Guess this is pertinent...

454. Mocknee Accent
The curious inclusion of the photographer’s leg in the picture on Dick Allen’s 1971 Topps card.

See also: Massachusetts Blobster Roll - the 1959 Fleer Ted Williams #34 “1947 - Ted Sets Runs-Scored Record” card.

See also: Say-Hey Krud - the oft-ridiculed fact that Topps surreptitiously snuck a sliding Willie Mays into Hank Aaron’s 1956 card.

jimtodd 04-01-2024 10:41 PM

1 Attachment(s)
The entire 1995 fleer set is a hideous abomination

HercDriver 04-02-2024 08:59 AM

1977 Reuschel Brothers
 
I don't have one handy, but the 1977 Reuschel Brothers card looks like two high school chemistry teachers won a day on the field before the game, presumably for Teacher of the Year awards.

Eggoman 04-02-2024 09:11 AM

1 Attachment(s)
If Memory Serves - Kent Tekulve would not even sign this card of him...

KCRfan1 04-02-2024 09:48 AM

The 1971 Topps Dick Allen card always makes me laugh. So many problems.

Would post an image but I do not have a scanner....

brianp-beme 04-02-2024 09:53 AM

1 Attachment(s)
Quote:

Originally Posted by HercDriver (Post 2423993)
I don't have one handy, but the 1977 Reuschel Brothers card looks like two high school chemistry teachers won a day on the field before the game, presumably for Teacher of the Year awards.

I always make sure I have this scan handy for just these occasions.

Brian

brianp-beme 04-02-2024 09:59 AM

1 Attachment(s)
Quote:

Originally Posted by KCRfan1 (Post 2424006)
The 1971 Topps Dick Allen card always makes me laugh. So many problems.

Would post an image but I do not have a scanner....


Now I have this scan ready for future action as well...thanks!

Brian

Brick442 04-02-2024 10:56 AM

Not Baseball, but an all-time stinker:

https://i0.wp.com/puckjunk.com/wp-co...ish_f_zoom.jpg


As for the 1973-1975 Topps photos, Topps had strict film-type requirements and they were not friendly to action shots nor were the lenses of the day.

Also, Topps requested photographer not use a flash, in fact, they preferred shadows under the cap and on the face?!?! I think they felt this gave the posed subjects a tougher look.

G1911 04-02-2024 01:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Brick442 (Post 2424028)
Not Baseball, but an all-time stinker:

This one is such a bad photo, I need to get a copy.

G1911 04-02-2024 01:05 PM

2 Attachment(s)
Two more modern stinkers

BillyCoxDodgers3B 04-02-2024 01:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Brick442 (Post 2424028)
Not Baseball, but an all-time stinker:

https://i0.wp.com/puckjunk.com/wp-co...ish_f_zoom.jpg


As for the 1973-1975 Topps photos, Topps had strict film-type requirements and they were not friendly to action shots nor were the lenses of the day.

Also, Topps requested photographer not use a flash, in fact, they preferred shadows under the cap and on the face?!?! I think they felt this gave the posed subjects a tougher look.

How odd, I was just admiring this one yesterday! I think it's great! So bad its good, or just weirdly good?!

The '78T Minton, though; that thing is fugly!

brianp-beme 04-02-2024 01:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Brick442 (Post 2424028)
Not Baseball, but an all-time stinker:

https://i0.wp.com/puckjunk.com/wp-co...ish_f_zoom.jpg

Hockey is not my thing, but I assume he is in the penalty box, and perhaps he is looking up at the arena clock counting down the time until his penalty is over? If so, a brilliant idea, unfortunately in the end a failure because only a portion of his head is visible, and that unsightly blank glass reflection that fills the right side.

Brian

brianp-beme 04-02-2024 01:41 PM

1 Attachment(s)
Football players should have flattops and sociopath stares.

Brian

paulmolive 04-02-2024 02:14 PM

1 Attachment(s)
My all time fave

Eric72 04-02-2024 03:42 PM

1 Attachment(s)
Beauty is in the eye of the beholder. Nothing against anyone who likes them; however, I’m not a fan of most strip cards.

G1911 04-02-2024 04:18 PM

2 Attachment(s)
2 that were totally fine pictures to use - until the Topps art department got their hands on them and removed essential parts of the picture for it to not look stupid.

irv 04-02-2024 05:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Brick442 (Post 2424028)
Not Baseball, but an all-time stinker:


As for the 1973-1975 Topps photos, Topps had strict film-type requirements and they were not friendly to action shots nor were the lenses of the day.

Also, Topps requested photographer not use a flash, in fact, they preferred shadows under the cap and on the face?!?! I think they felt this gave the posed subjects a tougher look.

Quote:

Originally Posted by G1911 (Post 2424056)
This one is such a bad photo, I need to get a copy.

Have you ever checked out the 1991 Ultimate hockey card set? If not the worst set ever produced, I'm not sure what was?
https://shoeboxlegends.blogspot.com/...-set-ever.html
https://www.comc.com/Cards/Hockey/1991_Ultimate

G1911 04-02-2024 06:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by irv (Post 2424125)
Have you ever checked out the 1991 Ultimate hockey card set? If not the worst set ever produced, I'm not sure what was?
https://shoeboxlegends.blogspot.com/...-set-ever.html
https://www.comc.com/Cards/Hockey/1991_Ultimate

I don't really know Hockey, I have some 60's and 70's vintage and a few Score/Pro Set/Topps sets that I came into pretty much at a whim or randomly and had fun with. After looking these over and seeing they are worth the price of shipping, I just bought a set - like a third of the photos are contenders for this thread lol.

whitehse 04-02-2024 07:07 PM

1 Attachment(s)
I know its modern but I always thought this was a dopey looking card

Attachment 616755

CobbSpikedMe 04-02-2024 08:11 PM

1 Attachment(s)
Well, the reactions to this post ought to be good. But whenever I see this card named as a favorite card on this board, I always cringe. I just can't stand this card or image for some reason. I think maybe I'm just so sick of so many people drooling over it that when I see it I get annoyed now. But to each their own as several cards already called out as terrible cards in this thread I actually like.



.

seanofjapan 04-02-2024 08:26 PM

3 Attachment(s)
Japanese cards are legendary for some bad photography. These are from my collection.

1. 1988 Calbee Bill Gullickson. Calbee didn't have photos of all the players for their set for some reason and, being on a tight deadline, they solved this problem by literally pointing a camera at a TV during a game broadcast and taking pictures of the players that way. Its fun to spot which cards in the set fall into this category as they are easily identifiable by the blurry images like Gullickson's.

2. 1977 Calbee #17. This card features the Giants celebrating after winning the pennant. They cropped the photo so that most of the heads of the two players in the middle are cut completely off. Those two players? Sadaharu Oh (all time home run leader) and Isao Harimoto (all time hit leader). What did they crop their heads off to accomodate? More of the backs of the photographers on the bottom. This card is interesting because only on badly off-centred ones you can actually see Oh and Harimoto's faces.

3. 1975 NST Shigeo Nagashima. I just love how they cut the tip of his nose off in that unnecessarily zoomed in photo.

jetsetr1 04-17-2024 02:26 AM

1 Attachment(s)
Can't remember if posted already: 1948 Elephant man Phil Rizzuto

molenick 04-17-2024 07:50 AM

1 Attachment(s)
I always thought this card of Jerry Garvin made him look like a bit of a wanker.*

* a Britishism for someone who "wanks off"

Facilitypro 04-17-2024 08:27 AM

1 Attachment(s)
Attachment 618439

This photo is so bad that I love it and it's one of my favorite cards of all time.

h2oya311 04-17-2024 10:10 AM

1 Attachment(s)
This card of coach, and HOFer, Hoyt Wilhelm is one of the worst I’ve ever seen. 1979 TCMA:

familytoad 04-18-2024 08:00 PM

Babe or Jonathan Winters
 
I think Jonathan Winters was a genius improv comedian.
He even played a “reverse baby” in Mork and Mindy.
But I didn’t realize his first card was a 35G

Quote:

Originally Posted by packs (Post 2423586)
The cropping on the 35 Goudey left Babe with a similar look:

https://live.staticflickr.com/65535/...0ea16e47_c.jpg


Leon 04-21-2024 07:26 PM

1 Attachment(s)
By the looks of Ruth's face (1935 Goudey 4 in 1), he might be constipated!

Quote:

Originally Posted by familytoad (Post 2427746)
I think Jonathan Winters was a genius improv comedian.
He even played a “reverse baby” in Mork and Mindy.
But I didn’t realize his first card was a 35G

Some of these Z's have interesting poses.

ronniehatesjazz 04-21-2024 09:10 PM

3 Attachment(s)
A few favorites of mine… Paul Pierce furious with making it to the NBA, Dirk introduced to American fans as a zombie, and Mariano looking more like some teenage pipsqueak taking a break from busing tables at a tacky seafood restaurant for a quick snapshot than the future greatest closer of all time… 92 Bowman is IMO one of the worst sets ever made but sadly it’s slowly becoming iconic in large part due to this card.

Attachment 618961

Attachment 618962

Attachment 618963

G1911 04-24-2024 06:08 PM

1 Attachment(s)
This one always struck me as a pretty bad one.

Leon 04-27-2024 08:12 PM

1 Attachment(s)
Dude has no mouth or nose.

h2oya311 04-28-2024 10:24 AM

Leon - there’s probably a perfect image of Frank Chance under that button! Looks like a pre-cursor to the 1916-20 “Big Heads”.

thatkidfromjerrymaguire 04-28-2024 03:48 PM

1 Attachment(s)
I was just sorting my 1975 Topps cards and came across Len Randle and I immediately thought of this thread.

Sure, he wasn't a household name, but this is the BEST Topps could do for poor Len?

Attachment 619826

refz 04-28-2024 04:17 PM

1 Attachment(s)
I always despised this strip set & the Cobb especially. Reminded me of the joker or Mr burns from the Simpson’s. Complete Yuck..

BillyCoxDodgers3B 04-28-2024 04:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by thatkidfromjerrymaguire (Post 2429943)
I was just sorting my 1975 Topps cards and came across Len Randle and I immediately thought of this thread.

Sure, he wasn't a household name, but this is the BEST Topps could do for poor Len?

Attachment 619826

If you find any stories about Randle, you might have a change of perspective and consider it an awesomely fitting photo! Randle is assuredly one of baseball's eccentrics. 2 a.m. phone calls to fans and collectors are not out of the question. The last update was that he's currently hospitalized. Hope he's faring better.

Leon 04-29-2024 09:40 AM

1 Attachment(s)
This Tarzan Bread card of Munns, I used to own, looks like he might be a bit constipated.

BillyCoxDodgers3B 04-29-2024 10:28 AM

Munns either liked that photo, or it's perhaps one of the few shots of him in Dodgers garb, because he sent me a signed copy many years ago. Guess he used to Xerox the image and send to collectors. Funny, I always thought it was more of a "GRRRR!" expression.

Yoda 04-29-2024 11:48 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Brick442 (Post 2424028)
Not Baseball, but an all-time stinker:

https://i0.wp.com/puckjunk.com/wp-co...ish_f_zoom.jpg


As for the 1973-1975 Topps photos, Topps had strict film-type requirements and they were not friendly to action shots nor were the lenses of the day.

Also, Topps requested photographer not use a flash, in fact, they preferred shadows under the cap and on the face?!?! I think they felt this gave the posed subjects a tougher look.

My impression is that Farrish is an unemployed goalie who is asking a passerby if he has $50 for a cup of coffee.

bocca001 04-29-2024 01:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by thatkidfromjerrymaguire (Post 2429943)
I was just sorting my 1975 Topps cards and came across Len Randle and I immediately thought of this thread.

Sure, he wasn't a household name, but this is the BEST Topps could do for poor Len?

Attachment 619826

Len Randle makes me automatically think of this awesomeness:

https://youtu.be/AJPpTXzPxFs?si=i5Skt8aCXs-8K2rC

JollyElm 04-29-2024 03:03 PM

1 Attachment(s)
If we're talking about hockey, then I think it's time to quote a little Rush to describe Topps' WTF efforts with Keith Magnuson:

"Living in a fisheye lens
Caught in the camera eye"



Attachment 619928

Eggoman 04-30-2024 09:19 AM

THAT Keith Magnuson CARD was the LAST card I needed to complete my 1972-73 Topps Set as an 11-year-old kid!

When I FINALLY got it, I thought that THIS was the COOLEST card EVER MADE!

BillyCoxDodgers3B 04-30-2024 10:11 AM

Yeah, I've always loved the Magnuson card. Not sure why this type of photo was uesd for it, but reminds me of album photos for Neil Young's Harvest and Ragged Glory.

Yoda 04-30-2024 12:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by thatkidfromjerrymaguire (Post 2429943)
I was just sorting my 1975 Topps cards and came across Len Randle and I immediately thought of this thread.

Sure, he wasn't a household name, but this is the BEST Topps could do for poor Len?

Attachment 619826

Len looks like he just took a pitched ball in the nuts.

brunswickreeves 05-01-2024 10:29 AM

1 Attachment(s)
A top contender…

thatkidfromjerrymaguire 05-01-2024 10:38 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bocca001 (Post 2430110)
Len Randle makes me automatically think of this awesomeness:

https://youtu.be/AJPpTXzPxFs?si=i5Skt8aCXs-8K2rC

I've seen that clip a hundred times but didn't put it together that was the same guy on my 1975 Topps card.

Thanks to your post (and the post from BillyCox up above) I spent some time Googling Len Randle. Quite a character.

Here's another Len Randle highlight (blowing a ball foul) that I've seen a million times that I didn't associate with that Topps card until now:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JLroDoPFdWY

BillyCoxDodgers3B 05-02-2024 11:23 AM

1 Attachment(s)
There was something reeeaaaallly interesting going on up there.

G1911 05-02-2024 01:28 PM

1 Attachment(s)
You can see how little Topps cared in the 70's with this one:

Leon 05-04-2024 07:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by brunswickreeves (Post 2430556)
A top contender…

The ole uni-brow. Nice.

.

brianp-beme 05-10-2024 11:54 AM

10 Attachment(s)
Overall the 1923 WG7 Walter Mails Game cards have lower quality photo images of the players. I like the look of my full sized type card of Heinie Groh (I also have a few others that are cut down to just the photo), but the images and wildly inconsistent graphic design on a quite a few of the 56 cards are humorous, horrible and head-scratching (which of course is the coveted 3 'H' designation), as seen in the sampling below.

Brian (non-Groh images are from the Old Cardboard website)

ValKehl 05-10-2024 12:39 PM

2 Attachment(s)
Quote:

Originally Posted by brianp-beme (Post 2433076)
Overall the 1923 WG7 Walter Mails Game cards have lower quality photo images of the players. I like the look of my full sized type card of Heinie Groh (I also have a few others that are cut down to just the photo), but the images and wildly inconsistent graphic design on a quite a few of the 56 cards are humorous, horrible and head-scratching (which of course is the coveted 3 'H' designation), as seen in the sampling below.

Brian (non-Groh images are from the Old Cardboard website)

Hey Brianp-beyou, the WG7 images of Sam Rice & WaJo are gorgeous! :D


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:00 PM.