![]() |
Quote:
|
SGC should be ashamed at giving the BN Babe a 3, particularly with their supposed new grading standards. IMO it should be a 1.5, maybe a 2 on a sunny day. Me thinks there were serious political forces at play when Ruth was in the grading room.
|
Quote:
|
Buy the card not the grade
But someone with the money will be buying the Card with that grade. And super rare but a 3 will sell more than a lower grade on that same exact card slab |
Quote:
https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/d...ii.htm#ab_006) https://collectable.com/offerings/ba...sgc-3-buy-out/ |
I am surprised at the mainstream attention. There was even an article in The NY Times about it
As an aside I was looking for the Go Fund Me Page for Leon so he can purchase it and put it in the Net54 Museum but I did not see it |
From what I heard, the owner sold a approx 10% interest to the Collectible group and had an option to buy back. It was a $6mm valuation. It happened before Collectible went down.
|
I'm thinking Steve Cohen will want to buy it & bring it to display in New York.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Steve_Cohen_(businessman) |
5.5 million as of Monday, November 27. Not much increase since the first day of bidding.
|
Quote:
|
5.75 million as of 1100 EST on Sunday.
I am surprised that there wasn’t movement yesterday. Feeling more and more confident that this card will go under the Rosen mantle. |
Quote:
|
Babe card
At the risk of being viewed as a heretic, I’ll go back to the actual topic (I know, I know, such a horrible thing)…Card sits at 5.75 million with no bids since the 29th of November. I still think it tops the Mick:). Trent King
|
Quote:
Many items in this auctions raced to fast strong starts that thought were already at strong full market value. So I wondering if many of them will pop off the charts and just stay as is since it reached its value already Will be interesting to see on the Ruth and other cards |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
30 minutes until extended, we shall see. |
|
Quote:
|
Another interesting question worth pondering is what would the SGC 9.5 Mantle sell for today if it were on the block?
|
Quote:
|
Welp!
$7.2M, with the juice. The crash is here!! |
Quote:
|
I don't think it's a sign of a crash - the estimate of over $10m never made sense to me. Prices are down from 21/22 and the seller paid $6m supposedly to buy it back in 2021. $7.2m isn't bad. Not sure why it would have sold for 2x a price when cards were peak covid heights...
|
I thought that not selling the other BN lots was an odd choice (high reserves not met). It seems unlikely that they'll get more in an auction without the star attraction to carry them along. The reserve does help to explain why they were sold in a lot, I think. The seller was not prepared to sell the non-Ruths for what they saw as "low" final bids.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
While $7.2mm is much less than all the hype, it is a very solid price and a solid profit compared to what it was acquired for not too long ago. Also, I believe this exact card was recently available for sale on (the artist formally known as) Collectible for $8mm, and it never sold. If correct, I am not surprised that it sold for south of $8mm.
I wish it had gone for a zillion, billion million dollars. But $7.2mm is a very solid result in the real world. |
Does anyone think the cards will show up as individual lots in a future REA (or other auction)? And will average less than the $9K per card that they ended up at? I am leaning in this direction at the moment.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
It's not possible to grade cards with the type of scans that PSA uses. No matter how high-def the images are. You need to have a machine that takes numerous images from every different angle with light reflected at different angles as well, and then convolve those images to create a topographic map like TAG Grading does in order to even begin to grade cards. And it's just too big of a hill to climb when it comes to vintage cards because of the surfaces. |
Quote:
Brian |
7.2 million is the final number. Hey, I actually picked a winner.
My takeaway is that while this is a great card, the high end bidders simply weren’t there for this card. It never moved in extended bidding. |
Quote:
My reasoning is that I do not believe any of the 3 psa 10s are coming to sale anytime soon. This was the best of the best in a sale forum. |
Based on what happened with the Ruth card last night, the next ultra high grade 52T Mantle price should be way down as well as the next T206 Wagner. Thoughts on this?
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Strong price regardless if even many of us expected higher
Just got surprised and a little disappointed to see no slugfest or bidding in extended time. |
Curious to when the next one will be offered for sale
I cannot find the pictures, but there was a nice blue example photographed next to this red SGC 3 example at the Babe Ruth museum. That one was a lower grade but looked quite nice. |
I wish my retirement accounts jumped 44% in two years!
|
Quote:
|
...and the onslaught of reasons why it didn't sell for as much...at the top of the toppiest market in history.
I don't usually look for investment ideas around cardboard..but when I do, I use the collective brains of net54! A private sale 2 years ago does not a market make. |
Quote:
|
I promise you, and you can take this to the bank, those serious vintage sports card collectors that can afford one of these will rue the day that they did not bid at least one increment higher in last night’s REA auction. Maybe the winner was going to be willing to spend whatever it would take to get that card but we’ll never know as they ended up getting it at a huge bargain price.
If I am wrong here, I really feel sorry for the owners of T206 Wagners and ultra high grade 52T Mantles as they will surely be in for drops in value along the lines of PSA 10 Jordans. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Second, some part of the $7.2M is going to the AH, and not to the seller. Even if it’s only 5% of the hammer, that’s $300K, which reduces the seller’s take a bit. Again, especially if the purchase price was $6M. Third, $7.2M is only a disappointment when most of the talk in the press was for $10M+. Whether the consignor really expected to get that much is anyone’s guess. But if he bought into the National hype and publicity machine, then I’m guessing he feels like $7.2M is on the low end. Finally, compared to everyone else who has been banking 100% to 300%+ gains over the last few years, 44% (or possibly less) probably feels like losing money. |
I just realized that the Dunn also did not meet its reserve. The high bid was $24.6K (with the premium) and (as others pointed out about the 13-card lot) the only thing special about this card was the association with Ruth, so the best way to sell it was at the same time. It will be interesting to see if the 14 unsold cards show up soon in another auction or if they just disappear for awhile.
|
Quote:
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:07 AM. |