Net54baseball.com Forums

Net54baseball.com Forums (http://www.net54baseball.com/index.php)
-   Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions (http://www.net54baseball.com/forumdisplay.php?f=2)
-   -   Poll: Final Hammer Price - 1914 BN Babe Ruth vs the 1952 Rosen Topps Mantle (http://www.net54baseball.com/showthread.php?t=342722)

Peter_Spaeth 11-16-2023 12:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Snowman (Post 2389267)
Ya. Now PSA is lumping in POOR, FAIR, GOOD, AND VG cards all into PSA 1 holders in order to make room for the EXMT cards they're slabbing as 4s. I honestly thought they would have corrected this by now. It's really baffling.

I have heard, and no idea of truth, that they are using machine grading in the first instance on larger subs which I guess grades low because it deducts for trivial specks and the like on vintage; and that some graders don't bother with an independent assessment.

Yoda 11-16-2023 12:09 PM

SGC should be ashamed at giving the BN Babe a 3, particularly with their supposed new grading standards. IMO it should be a 1.5, maybe a 2 on a sunny day. Me thinks there were serious political forces at play when Ruth was in the grading room.

Peter_Spaeth 11-16-2023 01:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Yoda (Post 2389298)
SGC should be ashamed at giving the BN Babe a 3, particularly with their supposed new grading standards. IMO it should be a 1.5, maybe a 2 on a sunny day. Me thinks there were serious political forces at play when Ruth was in the grading room.

I am sure Dave had his reasons, but we can only guess what they were.

mrreality68 11-16-2023 01:30 PM

Buy the card not the grade

But someone with the money will be buying the Card with that grade.

And super rare but a 3 will sell more than a lower grade on that same exact card slab

gunboat82 11-17-2023 12:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Touch'EmAll (Post 2388966)
I wonder what the likelihood is that a major serious bidder may actually represent a group of investors collectively going in on this card, or even a corporation.

Frankly, I wouldn't be surprised if Collectable gets it and tosses it right back into the ol' Collectable25 portfolio.

https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/d...ii.htm#ab_006)

https://collectable.com/offerings/ba...sgc-3-buy-out/

mrreality68 11-17-2023 12:59 PM

I am surprised at the mainstream attention. There was even an article in The NY Times about it

As an aside I was looking for the Go Fund Me Page for Leon so he can purchase it and put it in the Net54 Museum but I did not see it

Schlesinj 11-17-2023 07:58 PM

From what I heard, the owner sold a approx 10% interest to the Collectible group and had an option to buy back. It was a $6mm valuation. It happened before Collectible went down.

Jewish-collector 11-17-2023 10:54 PM

I'm thinking Steve Cohen will want to buy it & bring it to display in New York.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Steve_Cohen_(businessman)

parkplace33 11-27-2023 11:15 AM

5.5 million as of Monday, November 27. Not much increase since the first day of bidding.

raulus 11-27-2023 01:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by parkplace33 (Post 2392124)
5.5 million as of Monday, November 27. Not much increase since the first day of bidding.

That's pretty typical. Most of the action (once everyone gets in their initial bids) arrives in the final 24-48 hours. Particularly when you're talking about this price point.

parkplace33 12-03-2023 09:02 AM

5.75 million as of 1100 EST on Sunday.

I am surprised that there wasn’t movement yesterday. Feeling more and more confident that this card will go under the Rosen mantle.

BobbyStrawberry 12-03-2023 09:08 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by parkplace33 (Post 2393781)
5.75 million as of 1100 EST on Sunday.

I am surprised that there wasn’t movement yesterday. Feeling more and more confident that this card will go under the Rosen mantle.

I imagine that everyone who will be trying to win it has their first bid in already.

ClementeFanOh 12-03-2023 09:29 AM

Babe card
 
At the risk of being viewed as a heretic, I’ll go back to the actual topic (I know, I know, such a horrible thing)…Card sits at 5.75 million with no bids since the 29th of November. I still think it tops the Mick:). Trent King

mrreality68 12-03-2023 11:50 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BobbyStrawberry (Post 2393783)
I imagine that everyone who will be trying to win it has their first bid in already.

+1 agreed on those high end items everyone gets their initial bid and that waits until extended bidding to make their moves

Many items in this auctions raced to fast strong starts that thought were already at strong full market value. So I wondering if many of them will pop off the charts and just stay as is since it reached its value already

Will be interesting to see on the Ruth and other cards

BobbyStrawberry 12-03-2023 12:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mrreality68 (Post 2393812)
+1 agreed on those high end items everyone gets their initial bid and that waits until extended bidding to make their moves

Many items in this auctions raced to fast strong starts that thought were already at strong full market value. So I wondering if many of them will pop off the charts and just stay as is since it reached its value already

Will be interesting to see on the Ruth and other cards

Definitely should be interesting! I'll be watching because I actually have a chance to win a couple of items in this one :D

raulus 12-03-2023 06:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BobbyStrawberry (Post 2393827)
Definitely should be interesting! I'll be watching because I actually have a chance to win a couple of items in this one :D

Good luck on the Ruth!

BobbyStrawberry 12-03-2023 06:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by raulus (Post 2393907)
Good luck on the Ruth!

LOL not for me unless someone wants to gift me 6 million bucks in the next half hour :D

parkplace33 12-03-2023 06:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BobbyStrawberry (Post 2393783)
I imagine that everyone who will be trying to win it has their first bid in already.

True but still no additional bids.

30 minutes until extended, we shall see.

Jewish-collector 12-03-2023 09:22 PM

I still think he might want it.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Steve_Cohen_(businessman)

Snowman 12-03-2023 10:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Peter_Spaeth (Post 2389295)
I have heard, and no idea of truth, that they are using machine grading in the first instance on larger subs which I guess grades low because it deducts for trivial specks and the like on vintage; and that some graders don't bother with an independent assessment.

This isn't actually true. It's just a rumor going around Blowout from people who don't understand the capabilities. They're not using Genamint to grade cards at all.

Snowman 12-03-2023 10:04 PM

Another interesting question worth pondering is what would the SGC 9.5 Mantle sell for today if it were on the block?

Peter_Spaeth 12-03-2023 10:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Snowman (Post 2393981)
This isn't actually true. It's just a rumor going around Blowout from people who don't understand the capabilities. They're not using Genamint to grade cards at all.

Your source?

raulus 12-03-2023 10:16 PM

Welp!

$7.2M, with the juice.

The crash is here!!

Peter_Spaeth 12-03-2023 10:20 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by raulus (Post 2393988)
Welp!

$7.2M, with the juice.

The crash is here!!

Let the spin begin.

MACollector 12-03-2023 10:23 PM

I don't think it's a sign of a crash - the estimate of over $10m never made sense to me. Prices are down from 21/22 and the seller paid $6m supposedly to buy it back in 2021. $7.2m isn't bad. Not sure why it would have sold for 2x a price when cards were peak covid heights...

chadeast 12-03-2023 10:25 PM

I thought that not selling the other BN lots was an odd choice (high reserves not met). It seems unlikely that they'll get more in an auction without the star attraction to carry them along. The reserve does help to explain why they were sold in a lot, I think. The seller was not prepared to sell the non-Ruths for what they saw as "low" final bids.

Peter_Spaeth 12-03-2023 10:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MACollector (Post 2393990)
I don't think it's a sign of a crash - the estimate of over $10m never made sense to me. Prices are down from 21/22 and the seller paid $6m supposedly to buy it back in 2021. $7.2m isn't bad. Not sure why it would have sold for 2x a price when cards were peak covid heights...

I think some people feel elite cards are their own submarket and just keep going up independent of the overall card market.

Hankphenom 12-03-2023 10:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Peter_Spaeth (Post 2393992)
I think some people feel elite cards are their own submarket and just keep going up independent of the overall card market.

10M wasn't a bad estimate as it turned out. A million here, a million there, and pretty soon you're talking about real money!

Rhotchkiss 12-03-2023 10:49 PM

While $7.2mm is much less than all the hype, it is a very solid price and a solid profit compared to what it was acquired for not too long ago. Also, I believe this exact card was recently available for sale on (the artist formally known as) Collectible for $8mm, and it never sold. If correct, I am not surprised that it sold for south of $8mm.

I wish it had gone for a zillion, billion million dollars. But $7.2mm is a very solid result in the real world.

molenick 12-03-2023 11:01 PM

Does anyone think the cards will show up as individual lots in a future REA (or other auction)? And will average less than the $9K per card that they ended up at? I am leaning in this direction at the moment.

oldjudge 12-03-2023 11:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rhotchkiss (Post 2394003)
While $7.4mm is much less than all the hype, it is a very solid price and a solid profit compared to what it was acquired for not too long ago. Also, I believe this exact card was recently available for sale on (the artist formally known as) Collectible for $8mm, and it never sold. If correct, I am not surprised that it sold for south of $8mm.

I wish it had gone for a zillion, billion million dollars. But $7.4mm is a very solid result in the real world.

Ryan—Why $7.4MM? Did REA raise their BP? Solid night for the consignor; kind of a gut punch for REA, especially with the other BN cards not selling. No need to hold a bake sale for them, but still somewhat of a black eye.

Rhotchkiss 12-03-2023 11:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by oldjudge (Post 2394011)
Ryan—Why $7.4MM? Did REA raise their BP? Solid night for the consignor; kind of a gut punch for REA, especially with the other BN cards not selling. No need to hold a bake sale for them, but still somewhat of a black eye.

Oops -- $7.2mm. Too late for math!!

Snowman 12-03-2023 11:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Peter_Spaeth (Post 2393987)
Your source?

Experience from my line of work and hearing Nat Turner expressly state that they are not using it to grade cards in multiple podcast interviews.

It's not possible to grade cards with the type of scans that PSA uses. No matter how high-def the images are. You need to have a machine that takes numerous images from every different angle with light reflected at different angles as well, and then convolve those images to create a topographic map like TAG Grading does in order to even begin to grade cards. And it's just too big of a hill to climb when it comes to vintage cards because of the surfaces.

brianp-beme 12-03-2023 11:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by molenick (Post 2394009)
Does anyone think the cards will show up as individual lots in a future REA (or other auction)? And will average less than the $9K per card that they ended up at? I am leaning in this direction at the moment.

I am guessing that the reserve bid amount was $100,000, and the consigner made a mistake in requesting this amount. The top bid possibly came this close to the reserve, and in my mind it is unlikely that these cards, as a group lot or as individual cards, will approach the amount that was (unsuccessfully) bid tonight...the connection with the Ruth card will no longer be physically present at any future auctions.

Brian

parkplace33 12-04-2023 03:57 AM

7.2 million is the final number. Hey, I actually picked a winner.

My takeaway is that while this is a great card, the high end bidders simply weren’t there for this card. It never moved in extended bidding.

parkplace33 12-04-2023 03:59 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Snowman (Post 2393983)
Another interesting question worth pondering is what would the SGC 9.5 Mantle sell for today if it were on the block?

Good question. I think 10-13 million, not much of a drop if at all.

My reasoning is that I do not believe any of the 3 psa 10s are coming to sale anytime soon. This was the best of the best in a sale forum.

bcbgcbrcb 12-04-2023 05:25 AM

Based on what happened with the Ruth card last night, the next ultra high grade 52T Mantle price should be way down as well as the next T206 Wagner. Thoughts on this?

rjackson44 12-04-2023 05:41 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rhotchkiss (Post 2394003)
While $7.2mm is much less than all the hype, it is a very solid price and a solid profit compared to what it was acquired for not too long ago. Also, I believe this exact card was recently available for sale on (the artist formally known as) Collectible for $8mm, and it never sold. If correct, I am not surprised that it sold for south of $8mm.

I wish it had gone for a zillion, billion million dollars. But $7.2mm is a very solid result in the real world.

Hi agree 100 pct . Many folks were saying 15 million plus ,oh well

Rhotchkiss 12-04-2023 05:44 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bcbgcbrcb (Post 2394055)
Based on what happened with the Ruth card last night, the next ultra high grade 52T Mantle price should be way down as well as the next T206 Wagner. Thoughts on this?

This card was purchased for about $5mm less than two years ago. Last night it sells for $7.2mm - a $2.2mm (44%) increase in two years, which is 22% per year. How on god’s green earth is that result a “failure”? It isn’t. Instead, there was a ton of hype and the result did not meet the hype. But the result was very good. The hype was BS. The BN Ruth was worth $5mm two years ago. Now it’s worth $7.2mm. Seems to me, that is pretty darn positive

mrreality68 12-04-2023 05:50 AM

Strong price regardless if even many of us expected higher

Just got surprised and a little disappointed to see no slugfest or bidding in extended time.

theshowandme 12-04-2023 05:52 AM

Curious to when the next one will be offered for sale

I cannot find the pictures, but there was a nice blue example photographed next to this red SGC 3 example at the Babe Ruth museum. That one was a lower grade but looked quite nice.

theshowandme 12-04-2023 05:53 AM

I wish my retirement accounts jumped 44% in two years!

BobbyStrawberry 12-04-2023 06:10 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by theshowandme (Post 2394069)
I wish my retirement accounts jumped 44% in two years!

Cash them all out and 🔥INVE$T!!!🔥

Republicaninmass 12-04-2023 06:31 AM

...and the onslaught of reasons why it didn't sell for as much...at the top of the toppiest market in history.

I don't usually look for investment ideas around cardboard..but when I do, I use the collective brains of net54!

A private sale 2 years ago does not a market make.

Rhotchkiss 12-04-2023 06:45 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Republicaninmass (Post 2394077)
A private sale 2 years ago does not a market make.

An SGC 3 sold in REA in May of 2008 for $517k. Last night, in another public auction, an SGC 3 sold $7.2mm. That is a 13x multiple in 15 years. No justifications needed, only facts. 44% over 2 years in a private sale or 13x over 15 years in a public sale is a great result.

bcbgcbrcb 12-04-2023 06:53 AM

I promise you, and you can take this to the bank, those serious vintage sports card collectors that can afford one of these will rue the day that they did not bid at least one increment higher in last night’s REA auction. Maybe the winner was going to be willing to spend whatever it would take to get that card but we’ll never know as they ended up getting it at a huge bargain price.

If I am wrong here, I really feel sorry for the owners of T206 Wagners and ultra high grade 52T Mantles as they will surely be in for drops in value along the lines of PSA 10 Jordans.

BobbyStrawberry 12-04-2023 07:03 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bcbgcbrcb (Post 2394085)
I promise you, and you can take this to the bank, those serious vintage sports card collectors that can afford one of these will rue the day that they did not bid at least one increment higher in last night’s REA auction. Maybe the winner was going to be willing to spend whatever it would take to get that card but we’ll never know as they ended up getting it at a huge bargain price.

If I am wrong here, I really feel sorry for the owners of T206 Wagners and ultra high grade 52T Mantles as they will surely be in for drops in value along the lines of PSA 10 Jordans.

Yes, my heart also aches for those with $7-10 million to spend on a piece of cardboard. Perhaps if we all pray for them they'll make it through OK.

raulus 12-04-2023 08:04 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rhotchkiss (Post 2394063)
This card was purchased for about $5mm less than two years ago. Last night it sells for $7.2mm - a $2.2mm (44%) increase in two years, which is 22% per year. How on god’s green earth is that result a “failure”? It isn’t. Instead, there was a ton of hype and the result did not meet the hype. But the result was very good. The hype was BS. The BN Ruth was worth $5mm two years ago. Now it’s worth $7.2mm. Seems to me, that is pretty darn positive

I’m not familiar with the terms of the private sale, but some of the other posts around here are quoting $6M for that private sale. Not sure which one is accurate or if any of us know for sure. But it seems like it would make a big difference in the gain to the seller, particularly if it was really $6M.

Second, some part of the $7.2M is going to the AH, and not to the seller. Even if it’s only 5% of the hammer, that’s $300K, which reduces the seller’s take a bit. Again, especially if the purchase price was $6M.

Third, $7.2M is only a disappointment when most of the talk in the press was for $10M+. Whether the consignor really expected to get that much is anyone’s guess. But if he bought into the National hype and publicity machine, then I’m guessing he feels like $7.2M is on the low end.

Finally, compared to everyone else who has been banking 100% to 300%+ gains over the last few years, 44% (or possibly less) probably feels like losing money.

molenick 12-04-2023 08:27 AM

I just realized that the Dunn also did not meet its reserve. The high bid was $24.6K (with the premium) and (as others pointed out about the 13-card lot) the only thing special about this card was the association with Ruth, so the best way to sell it was at the same time. It will be interesting to see if the 14 unsold cards show up soon in another auction or if they just disappear for awhile.

calvindog 12-04-2023 09:43 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by raulus (Post 2394108)
I’m not familiar with the terms of the private sale, but some of the other posts around here are quoting $6M for that private sale. Not sure which one is accurate or if any of us know for sure. But it seems like it would make a big difference in the gain to the seller, particularly if it was really $6M.

Second, some part of the $7.2M is going to the AH, and not to the seller. Even if it’s only 5% of the hammer, that’s $300K, which reduces the seller’s take a bit. Again, especially if the purchase price was $6M.

Third, $7.2M is only a disappointment when most of the talk in the press was for $10M+. Whether the consignor really expected to get that much is anyone’s guess. But if he bought into the National hype and publicity machine, then I’m guessing he feels like $7.2M is on the low end.

Finally, compared to everyone else who has been banking 100% to 300%+ gains over the last few years, 44% (or possibly less) probably feels like losing money.

Which part of the $7.2M is going to the auction house? The $0 part?


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:07 AM.