![]() |
Quote:
|
Quote:
I think there was a story arc in Peanuts, where Pigpen spends his Halloween trick or treating with his best friend, Detritus Mays. |
Peanuts was a great strip.
|
1 Attachment(s)
Great thread! I've heard the word detritus in the past but I don't think I ever took the time to look it up. I learned something today.
|
After further examination Bobby, I don't think that is undesirable detritus... it looks like the infamous Mays swoosh autograph. You may actually now have a signed Mays Red Man!
|
Quote:
|
First thing that jumped out at me, other than the shadow play, was the absolutely straight ends of the black interloper. That is something that would never occur in the natural marker-using world...unless, perhaps, some highly skilled medieval scribe (with proper pen nib attachments) was recently employed by SGC?? :D
|
Quote:
|
Did you even loupe it before concluding it was marker?
|
Quote:
Edited to add - it looks like foreign material from the black insert that is lodged in with the card. Magic marker? probably not. |
Interesting and amusing thread. Being an IT guy, with my logical outlook, I keep wondering why anyone would think the SGC graders would be armed with a sharpie in the first place. I'll bet a T206 Hal Chase there isn't a marker anywhere inside any of the grading rooms, and therefore it's impossible that black streak isn't detritus.
|
The Red Man Willie without the rubber worm sure looks better than a 3 to me. The offending plastic must have happened. during encapsulation, I am guessing.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
That’s actually a very reasonable line of thinking, and this example below is a different company…but did this BGS grader evaluate the card and then run to the secured sharpie room to draw his Xs and the outline of the trimmed areas from memory? There are probably more dangers in the grading rooms than we know. I don’t know for sure what the issue is on the OP’s card, but the SGC scan makes it look a little different than the scan on this thread. Eagerly awaiting the final determination. https://uploads.tapatalk-cdn.com/202...782b75cbd1.jpg |
Quote:
|
I am amused that the OP is getting more flack for confusing a marker mark and detritus than SGC is for screwing up another card. At least it’s not somebody’s pube this time? The standards people have for SGC are incredibly low or nonexistent.
|
Someone will try and pass it off as a late stage Mays signed Red Man.
|
No offense but if anyone thinks that it's a sharpie mark you need a new monitor or phone or whatever device you're looking at the image with.
When Bobby first posted the thread I thought he was joking about the sharpie mark. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
1 Attachment(s)
Definitely not a marker. Actually looks like a thin piece of black wire.
|
Correct.....My original thought has been corrected. It is a foreign object. Hopefully it hasn't damaged the card.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Quote:
That's a sharp looking card! :) |
Quote:
They are a necessary evil in the hobby...which we have to live with. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Told dad when I saw him a few weeks later, and pretty much the same read the paper fine one day, next day couldn't find a good place to hold it where he could see clearly. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Quote:
It has made a huge difference in my collecting habits. I loved the cards with several variations like the 89 Fleer Bill Ripken and Randy Johnson cards. Now that my vision isn't as good I just don't have the passion for them that I used to have. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
. |
Quote:
This happened before Christmas, and yes - I was royally pissed. Total lack of QC, someone should have seen that on the scan if not in hand if any QC had been done at all. I emailed Brent at SGC in a tizzy and told him to refund me (which he did) because I was popping the card. I spent the next few days being pissy on social media and generally disavowing everything about TPG's. (The fact that they also sent me back a '54 Jackie as trimmed did nothing to improve my mood). What's the moral here? I really don't know. At the end of the day, though I am increasingly more into raw lower grade vintage - there are a few cards like that Mantle that I want in a slab. SGC despite their all too human faults - still does this kind of thing less often and has better customer service in general than PSA does. So yeah, I'm trying to be more patient and forgiving here in the new year - and obviously, I'm eating my words right now on my pubed up, Peter Griffin-worthy '63 Mantle. Sorry to the OP that this happened to you on what looks like an otherwise very nice Red Man Mays. To me, that looks like what I see even more often floating around in SGC slabs - it's like a piece of the molding that is used in the inserts? That is hands down the hugest one I've ever seen that got encapsulated and somehow made it past them, if that is what it is. Sad yes, and no excuse. But they are human. And I'm trying to look at things like my own patience, etc. a bit different here in the new year. I have no idea how long it will last, but I'm hopeful... And PS - yeah, you can bang on and rattle SGC slabs all day long if there is something sealed up in there you don't like. It doesn't work. I've never been able to get lint or the black insert shards that you sometimes see to move even a fraction by doing that. The only alternatives seem to be to pop the slab or send back to them for a re-holder. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
This is the only business type I’ve encountered where people have truly 0 expectations and get an instant free pass no matter what. It’s strange. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Have you contacted SGC yet Bobby? |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
You must play the game by "their" rules. |
1 Attachment(s)
So . . . . . on the subject of detritus in the slab . . .
Maybe 3 years ago I bid on the card below. I could tell from the auction house picture that there was something on the slab, either a stray hair or maybe a scratch on the case. Worst case, I figured, was detritus in the slab, and I thought in that event I could then send the card in for re-holdering. The card got a clean grade from PSA (as you can see) so I wasn't worried the card was actually defaced. Well, I won the card, and when it arrived it was not detritus, but pencil scribbles on the card. (It loops around the K in MICKEY and down through the f in outfield.) I contacted PSA, sent them pictures of the scribbles and then sent the actual card in for review. Amazingly enough, they confirmed the unqualified grade. Their reasoning was that it was "the grader's judgement" whether to qualify the card. I pushed back, saying their written policy required a qualified grade in the event a card is marked, it is not a judgement call. Their written response, which the customer service rep said came from their "head grader" was that the pencil scribbles were "not in the nature of a mark" and that even if they were, were "not significant enough to warrant a qualified grade". I called the CS rep to make sure I understood what she was saying and she told me she had gotten that specific language from Reza for her response. These are the facts and only the facts. I leave it up to you to decide what is and is not a mark, because I cannot make sense of it. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
The worst thing that has ever happened to me personally with a slab probably was a '55 Topps Jackie Robinson in a BVG slab. There was a hunk of wood, almost like a splinter - sealed up inside the inner bag on top of the card. I cracked it almost immediately. Miraculously the wood detritus just slid right off, and the card inside - though not high grade to begin with - was no worse for the wear. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:14 AM. |