![]() |
1 Attachment(s)
lolz
|
Quote:
Everyone knows that cardboard only goes up. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
This recent explosion fueled by sneakerheads and fashion-flippers was heavy in on football and basketball. It's been a harder drop than in the past. We did get some neat/weird stuff attempting to cater to that crowd, though. I am a fan some of the Topps Project 70 (and similar) issues to appeal to that demographic's sense of style. |
Quote:
https://photos.imageevent.com/exhibi...hing%20gif.gif https://photos.imageevent.com/exhibi...denfreude.jpeg |
Quote:
He said OK and started to look for items, going on about Kobe Bryant, and it became apparent he had no idea what the Showtime era Lakers were. I added "Magic and Big Game James." He said "you mean like Orlando Magic?" I said "No. Magic Johnson." He said, "oh, sure, everyone likes him. I have some Shaq cards." Which are 20 years later. I logged off. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Sent from my SM-S906U using Tapatalk |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Meanwhile, I get emails daily from Probstein about their investment worthy cards for sale. Mostly the predictable modern.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
A classic of the genre. It may be better than any of the altered card posts. https://www.blowoutforums.com/showthread.php?t=1297069 |
It's just a hobby
|
My vintage brain (which squeaks when I move too quickly) tells me that the Kobe card shown still is 50 to 100x too much.
Brian |
If you think some of these folks got slaughtered on modern cards, take a look at what has gone on with those idiotic NFTs. I'm stunned to learned that a little cartoon image of an ape smoking a cigar that you have no copyright or other legal rights in is not worth a million dollars. Shocked.
Vintage cards holding up like prime Beverly Hills real estate compared to some of this other dreck. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
NFTs remind me of pet rocks. LOL . |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
I have both.
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
The way I look at it I traded paper with a president’s picture on it (that I had duplicates of) for cardboard with a baseball player’s picture on it that I didn’t have. Always a win in my book.
Downturns just mean cards I thought I could never afford I might be able to get. |
30 years from now, a 15 year old kid who buys packs and goes to card shows with his dad today will be 45. He'll have some disposable income and will feel nostalgic at some point. He has the "collectors itch" again so what is he going to buy? In 2052, a 2010 Trout RC will be considered vintage. Will he go the "blue chip" route with a Trout RC or will he consider trying to complete a 2020 Topps Chrome "color run" of some random player he researched on the internet? Is that really any different than deciding to buy Mantle RC or trying to complete a "back run" of a T206 common? Or will he try and find his own unique way to collect like our members here who collect vintage catchers or Howe McCormick stamped cards?
Who knows. Collectors will always collect in their own way. I think the hobby will be just fine. It's the so-called investors or flippers who will always get screwed and I think that's a good thing for us collectors. |
There are always 2 sides to a transaction.
Dude is getting hammered selling the Kobe card he bought on 3/8/2021 for $ 1,752,000. and sold on 8/28/2022 for $ 795,000. What about the dude who SOLD it on 3/8/2021 for $ 1,752,000. ? Now we're talking headline record gains. I honestly don't know, but it's possible this seller is up way over $ 1.M on this Kobe card. Think he isn't happy? I don't want to bash Modern, it can be cool, fun and profitable but more risky. A lot of folks go for it. My preference is for Pre-War and Vintage. It is much more cool, fun, and luckily has been profitable. |
Quote:
|
Ha...no, I meant that the kid is 15 and going to card shows with his dad today in 2022. He'll be 45 in 2052. I have no idea how he'll be buying cards then.
|
To be honest, in 2052 I think a card show will be how a stamp show and collecting is today.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
Modern is a cesspool compared to vintage. It’s no surprise to see it implode the way it has in terms of prices. Also the scammer quotient is off the charts with modern, ergo the “cesspool” comment. If you ever check out a Facebook scammer page, in addition to being an incredibly depressing scene, a high % of the posts relate to modern cards not to mention people not paying for “razzes” whatever the hell those things are.
That YouTube station has some good content on occasion. However they get people to click with headlines of pending disaster, economic collapse, sell everything etc. It’s the same strategy employed by many news outlets. Red ticker tape. BREAKING NEWS, that sort of thing. If it’s in all caps then it’s especially important. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
I don't know, but thought the exact same thing you did. I guess breaks have been around long enough now that the new people entering the hobby want their own slang term to differentiate them from the older, previous generation. |
Quote:
|
I don’t think the sky is falling anytime soon.
I do 100% think that the pandemic pricing was a freak anomaly. I fully expect prices to return to 2019 levels more or less by the end of 2023. I also do not see that as a loss just a return to sanity and people who had nothing to do with it and were there for the quick buck going back to their previous whatever’s. |
As slang continuously evolves, perhaps it is time for a new term for those who engage in these modern card 'razzes'? How about "sucker"?
|
Quote:
I would think so to a lot of them. |
just keep buying
|
Quote:
|
Breaks refers to the process of breaking open unopened card product. The process is a person/number of persons buys all the cards of a certain team while the seller person "breaks" open a box or case of cards. So the buyer is gambling that there will be some expensive cards in whatever is being broken open.
A razz, razzle, waffle, and raffle are all slang for the same thing. A seller sells a raffle slot to win an item. I have seen cards, autos, and memorabilia items all sold this way. So a seller will list something like "10 spots @$30". Buyers put their name on the list by which specific number they want. Once all slots are full, everyone will pay and then an online random number raffle generator is used to choose a winner. Over the past couple years, people would run them before everyone paid, but recently there have been a lot of non payers, so now, if anyone doesn't not pay they raffle does not go forward. These 2 things seem to be mostly Facebook driven, with some breaks happening on Instagram as well. I think the new stuff is in trouble because a lot of the new people to the hobby were internet content creators who drummed up followings by creating excitement. Buying and holding vintage stuff is not exciting in an immediate sense for many. They want the immediate gratification of the flip. Buy it today, wait for the player to have a good game or two, and flip for a profit. It was all about the adrenaline rush at a time when boredom was an issue. Now that real life is starting to return, the rush is no longer as needed. Now that there are less buyers, the flipper/investor has far fewer people to flip to. Sent from my SM-G998U using Tapatalk |
but really tho...just keep buying
|
How are breaks not illegal lotteries?
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
1. Everyone wins. Some win more than others, but everyone gets something, so it’s a genuine quid pro quo transaction 2. The winners are not getting cash. They are getting a piece of personality. Maybe lotteries are limited to cash 3. The break pool may be too small. Is it a lottery if only 20-30 people participate 4. The “payout” is not derived by the the number of people paying in. For example, the more people who buy lottery tickets, the more the winning pot. That is not the case here, as the winning pot is finite and fixed before the event begins |
Quote:
Not sure if that somehow skirts around the legal definition of a lottery or not. While I am not an attorney, I did stay at a Holiday Inn Express last night. |
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:08 PM. |