Exactly. The idea is very appealing - I would like to believe that some of these are real (in terms of the vintage timeframe). But I'm not sure that I do.

Again, my mistake then as I thought there were some that still weren't sure if these were Topps issued or not, and wasn't confining that to just the people posting in this thread.

And I am actually curious, like yourself and some others, as to who was doing these repacks, when they did start, and how they were being distributed (retail stores, flea markets, etc.), as well. And though it may be a reach, did anyone think to contact Topps about these on the off chance that they actually may know something about them? Though not especially likely, it is possible that whoever started doing these had contacted Topps to see if they would have an issue with what they ended up doing. Or upon finding out about these Christmas and other packs and seeing them out there for sale, someone from Topps may have been charged with investigating who was doing this to make sure no lines were being crossed in regard to the Topps name or products. Would have thought that would be a rather obvious source to at least question if someone were truly and very seriously investigating this issue. I'm only curious, and not that concerned to contact Topps myself. Just wondering if someone else may have thought to contact and ask Topps though, and if so, what they found out.

And I go along with the majority in thinking these aren't likely "vintage" either. What throws me though are the claims that some people have opened these and actually found some valuable cards in them. One would tend to think that by the 80's, the more valuable cards from the much earlier vintage sets would be well known, and therefore very unlikely to have been included by scammers putting together these then sham packs. Or is it possible the people making statements about finding valuable cards in one of the repacks, or supposedly showing it on a video of one of these repacks being opened, are also party to the sham? It is also possible that a scammer putting these together may not have known every valuable card in the sets, and mistakenly missed and included a few that some very lucky person(s) found. Honestly don't know, and realize this is something we may never truly know.

While I do not recall any sellers claiming these were Topps originated packs, I do think some sellers imply that Topps sold or gave some excess inventory to a specific 3d party to repackage and sell at retail. I have never seen any specific documentation or substantiation of that

Here’s a flyer for 1969 Topps stockings. I’m fairly certain that any Xmas stockings produce by Topps or in conjunction with Topps had cards packaged inside a wax or cello wrapping then inserted in the stocking, not loose like the current ebay Xmas stockings.

John

And I seem to remember hearing that as well somewhere. And another reason I'd asked about anyone having contacted Topps regarding this to see what they may know or remember. If Topps was selling excess inventory to a specific 3rd party for retail sale, one would think Topps should have some kind of record of that, and who the 3rd party was. But you don't know unless you try asking!

My recollection from the very early 60s (maybe 61/62/63 in MA) was that there were rack packs, likely repackaged from Topps overstock at end of year, and that I would receive a couple of packs each Christmas as a 6/7/8 year old. I believe that they were sold at a local Woolworth's 5 & 10 (similarly, bundles of repackaged comic books were also sold there). The text in the blog at the following URL seems to support that:

https://sabrbaseballcards.blog/author/statsfax/

The story (set in MI I think) proceeds chronologically so scroll down to 1963 to see the rack pack reference if you're not wanting to read the entirety.

Also check out the posting at this URL where the author recounts his Woolworth's experience (in CA) from 1959.

https://ladodgertalk.com/2020/12/27/...hings-dodgers/

Neither of these authors seem to have any agenda with respect to repackaged rack packs... they're just telling their story.

Thanks for sharing Jim

Lol, no worries. :)

I feel that old’ Sy seemed to have an internal hustle most of the time and while he may have sold overstock at a discount it just seems weird that the repacker removed them all from the packs first. The documented example had them in the pack. I am sure he had overstock but I doubt he let store owners return it like is done now. I would like to know how those early years dumped.

When the late 70s and early 80s came along they used fun packs to dump overstock. The Halloween fun packs were repacked in the rainbow wrappers, but that seemed like more of a money hustle so they could shrink the packs down to 4 cards and have more packs with less cards.

After those, I remember my LCS would get the overstock cheap and sell them for 5 bucks a box. Those were the boxes that I still see with the big paint marker slash across the lid.

I feel these are going to remain a hobby mystery forever unless someone finds some real proof. That seems like one needle in an Sears Tower sized haystack.

Off subject and thinking of those overstock black markered boxes gave me a fun memory.

I remember walking in the shop and the owner just got an overstock case of 84’ Topps Hockey to blow out. They barely sold that year, but my pocket had a crisp 20 and my young self walked out with 4 boxes.

It was fun to break and I set them aside. It wasn’t long before I became the neighborhood king for dropping jaws when I would be the young kid in Michigan who could fan out 30+ Steve Yzerman rookies, lol.

Fun times.

With the crazy prices being asked now, I can see someone making them. Especially the ones showing stars.

The one I bought is a 58, and has a High number on the back. At the time I bought it, the price I paid wasn't much different than buying a High number and a handful of commons.

I'd have to do a bunch of looking stuff up, but when they were first put out there, I think it was still fairly easy to pick up batches of commons from most years in fairly good condition. By the time the other years came around like 52s it didn't seem like it would be worth the effort for some sets.

What's interesting is that and lets just go with assumptions.
The first were repacks done sometime around the late 90's
Then there were more later.
And the same graphic is still available and being used for stocking shape repacks of various kinds today.
That's 20+ years if not more like 30 of the same graphics on a commercially available cellophane sleeve.
That's kind of impressive.
And who makes those wrappers shouldn't be much of a secret.

A quick internet search found nothing though, so the wrapping may only be available in bulk or the packer makes it themselves, indicating a bigger company.

I don't know how I missed the posts prior, or if they came in while I was making mine.

Anyway...

The ad with the stocking would seem to be the same stocking sleeve that's used now, more than 50 years later. That's really a surprise.

I wonder if any of those Christmas offers had Topps product numbers? Or if they were more generic.

Steve,

Which ad(s) are you referring to? There are three different pictures of three different stockings in posts #40, #43, and #54.

I think he's saying post #54 shows a stocking package from 1969 and post #43 shows a more modern package with about 50 years between the two.

Was thinking the same, but wanted to verify and not just assume.

Yes, 43 and 54 show very similar items.
And the link I posted in 33 for retrocandy online shows another that's out of stock but presumably currently available with the same cellophane stocking and different header cards.

So here are the new and old together. These do seem to have very similar wrapper graphics.