![]() |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Interesting about stamps. When I was a kid I loved collecting stamps. Me and my friend used to go to a JC Pennys which had a stamp counter. I loved it. Also went to the Long Island Stamp Dealers (LISDA) show once in a while. As a kid really exciting grown up stuff.
Me and my dad fell in love with the air mail zeppelin stamps. I always wanted him to buy a set of them, which at the time was the astronomical price of I think $900. Fast forward 45 years later. You can get a nice group of them on eBay for about ….. $900. Remarkable. Why haven’t stamps taken off. Americans have lost interest. I think stamps are amazing. I learned so much about America and even world history from collecting stamps. Damn good on identifying world flags even to this day. But as an investment … shit the bed. [/B] Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
I collected coins briefly as a kid. I recall having a complete set of Franklin halves. I still remember the 49S as being the "tough" one. Looked them up on ebay last week and they sell for the exact same price as they did in 1986 (or at least as I recall). I sold the set in 1986 and bought vintage cards...
If only I had done the same with PanAm and Apple stock. |
Quote:
Most of all, what does any of this have to with projecting card values? (I don't mean any of this in an arrogant way either. Genuinely interested in hearing collectors' opinions. Thanks) |
Thanks for sticking to cards, guys. Politics in today's world is a toxic subject.
And I feel good with my cards I have bought concerning their potential valuation. And if that doesn't happen I still have some cool baseball cards! https://luckeycards.com/e253cobb.jpg |
I wonder what happened to stamps and coins, stagnating or even declining in value, as opposed to other collectibles that have appreciated, some exponentially, over the years. I think stamps and coins are still popular, with millions of collectors and large conventions, so what explains the difference? Maybe they're just not as much fun or as interesting as the others? They were probably the earliest major collectibles, why didn't they at least keep pace?
|
Quote:
Hank, we've discussed The Glory of Their Times before. I would say that book has done for tobacco era cards what the 1952 Topps Mantle has done for post war cards. So, I would say, keeping interest (and value) alive for the old common baseball cards keys on keeping alive the history of the game during that era, through books and movies. |
Quote:
|
On stamps and coins...you gotta remember, there are people right now who are adults who probably have handled coins and/or stamps a handful of times in their lives.
OK, "a handful" is probably an exaggeration, but these days you can probably go MONTHS without touching either a stamp or a coin. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Interesting perspective, thanks for sharing. |
Quote:
https://static.tvtropes.org/pmwiki/p...zdypz_3534.png Seriously, take the political stuff to a political web site. We discuss cards here. |
Quote:
|
1 Attachment(s)
Quote:
Concerning hobby resilience, I will always like looking at this card, valuable or not. And since my daughter doesn't collect, I don't care as much what future generations do. As the OP mentioned, vintage has never let me down. . |
Damn, Leon, that is a great card.
|
I think book collecting is to some degree analogous to what happened to stamp/coin collecting. An aging collector group, young people who in many cases do not come into contact with the physical object (not that they don't read, just that they don't need a book to do so), and the realization that many items were considered "scarce" only because you had to buy them from a handful of dealers. With eBay and AbeBooks, you can pretty much get any book you want now. Maybe not in the condition you want, or in the edition, but for any book published since ca. 1970, probably 95% of the books you are looking for.
Like stamps and coins, the very rarest books will still be in demand and command high prices in an auction. But it's based almost entirely on rarity. You will pay more for better condition, but it's not like a Putnam team history in "like new" condition will sell for 100's of times more than a nice looking but technically very good copy. Many of the books I paid a premium for because of scarcity, edition, or condition are worth the same (or less) than they were 30 years ago (if I could sell them at all). It may not be an exact analogy, but it is an area of the hobby where there has been mostly a decline in value (especially if you take inflation into consideration). There simply is not enough demand to support the supply. There aren't a lot of stories of coming home from college to find that your books were thrown away and now you are chasing your childhood collection. |
I wonder these days if anybody reads anything that is not on a screen.
|
Future?
Sometimes I watch Antiques Road Show. Sometimes they repeat older shows and update the values of the items. Some go up in value and some have gone down. It depends on demand. For example, collectibles about Astronauts have gone up. Guitars have been a good investment. Items used by celebrities have gone up. Metal and Porcelain Signs have increased.
|
I will say that my daughter and son (27 and 24) prefer physical books, but maybe that's already too old a demographic to draw any conclusions from. Also, they grew up in a house where there were books on bookcases, so it was what they were used to.
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 07:46 PM. |