![]() |
Somewhere earlier I read a quote from some dude saying
While there are questions of what constitutes an improper alteration I was like WTF improper alterations???? To me any/all alterations, adding or removing to a card, are Fraudulent and Not Good. What a downplay !!!! Come on Man.... Are we headed to this 1952 Topps Mickey Mantle 311 PSA Conserved 8 As compared to 1952 Topps Mickey Mantle 311 PSA Restored 8 Oh Right Joe Just Stop complaining...what a crock of Bull S |
Maybe just go back to qualifiers and add a couple.
The way as I remembered it back in the day: OC - Off Centered ST - Stain PD - Print Defect OF - Out of Focus MK - Marks QA - Questionable Authenticity Maybe add these BL - Bleached SW - Soaked with Water SC - Soaked with Chemical TR - Trimmed RES - Restored CA - Color Added If TPGs have a garuntee and bypass over their QA (Questionable Authenticity) then wouldn't all the wrong assessed grades be subject to something favorable for the customer? |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Would it be the 1970 hit "Vehicle?" Never heard of it. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
I could see them doing this ......would be a total disaster evaluating pricing Geez what a mess |
Quote:
I think it is going to take a new company with better technology to take on PSA and dethrone them as king (as least initially until this new company becomes just as corrupt over time and we're back where we started). |
Quote:
I don't know what if any impact the current FBI involvement will have on PSA, but I can say that based on my discussions with the FBI, I got the impression that they seem well aware of the limitations of the PSA business model. |
Quote:
The patent paperwork or link to it was posted here maybe a year ago by Peter Spaeth I believe? Several lawyers out of California and some former Microsoft engineers... |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Well, if you want to be a movie star I can take you to Hollywood But if you want to stay just like you are You know I think you really should |
The first Blood, Sweat, and Tears, with Al Kooper, was far superior.
|
Quote:
I remember it vividly blaring out of the speakers at the city pool when I was a wee lad. :) |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
This thread has become a bit hijacked. :)
|
Quote:
People are done.... Nothing will change PSA will continue to be at the top... people will continue to burn their money on altered cards in their holders it’s all about the grade... New grading company won’t happen Sell sell sell |
"Aside those listed here, every major auction I know of employs card doctors."
Its one thing to question auction houses on their knowledge of specific slabbed cards that are suspected of having been doctored, its another to make the accusation that they all actively employ card doctors. This is a statement that goes a little too far and IMO casts at least a little doubt on the veracity of the other claims made in the letter. |
Quote:
While PSA would no doubt be reluctant to take a second look at cards they graded and admit any problem, a competitor equipped with this technology would be more than happy to take them down. That would be their likely path to a greater market share. Nothing may happen this week or this month, but this story is far from over. I predict some enterprising soul will turn this hobby upside-down. There is a giant void that somebody is about to fill. |
"I'm the friendly stranger in the black sedan" Vehicle
|
Quote:
LOL so bad. |
Are the whales ready to reholder thousands of cards with a new company? Will the new company start a registry? They would have no reason to jump if it doesn't because it's about the competition and the number on the slab. It's going to be so much easier to accept "conservation and alteration".
Call me a cynic, but there is already a certain acceptance of fraud in this hobby. How many years in a row can the FBI arrest or hand out subpoenas at the National? The fake T206 autographs are already in the rear view mirror. Mastro, Allen and Rogers all went to prison, did that deter PWCC, Moser, SSS and the probably hundreds of other card doctors from forging onward with their fraudulent activity? Nope 2 out of 3 of them were set up at the National pretending it was business as usual. The hobby's white knight, the fiercest opponent of the fraudsters in the hobby who claimed his employment as PWCC counsel would be the best thing for the hobby is already minimizing PWCC's involvement in fraud that likely dwarfs Mastro and Allen. Yeah, things will change, but not how we want them to. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
I know for a fact some people are looking at it very seriously and significant sums are being raised as startup capital. And if the new model works and alterations can be detected, how can the floodgates not be opened? The money required to effectively market the new company and expose the IMO staggering percentage of vintage high grade alterations will be insignificant compared to the money required for the startup. Imagine the following. Once this happens this new company is set up at the National with a red portrait T206 Cobb in its "8" holder, and next to it is a PSA "8" of the same card. And next to both of these cards is last month's Forbes's magazine article heralding this new TPG and reciting statistics that out of a random selection of 454 T206 PSA "8s", 78% have been exposed by this new grading method as altered in one fashion or another and placed in "A" slabs. Which "8" T206 red portrait Cobb card do you think would sell for more at that juncture, the one in the PSA holder or the one in the new TPG holder? The whales can yell, kick, scream all they want, but that will not silence the market forces at play here. |
Quote:
|
I hope you are right, Corey.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Collectors can perceive their own collections any way they want, and if they feel that if the label says it's an 8, case closed, that's fine. But there's a huge problem with it: nearly every collector reaches a day of reckoning when it's time to sell. And at that point it's irrelevant what they think of their cards, as that burden falls solely on prospective buyers. And when the technology is employed to detect the altered cards, there will be unaltered cards that will set record prices, and a pile of damaged goods which will sell for ten cents on the dollar. Right now it's nearly impossible to distinguish the good from the bad, so a card labeled 8 will sell for an 8 price. But if you knew for sure the 8 was altered, you wouldn't pay anywhere near market value for it. And if there is any doubt that such technology will be implemented, let me ask you this: is there any area of our lives that isn't being affected by technology? So you know darn well this is going to happen. We don't know when, but I guarantee the new technology will eventually be the standard for this industry. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
They've already demonstrated they cannot be trusted, and that their only true loyalty is to shareholders and profits. As said earlier, any new TPG that enters the fray must provide a significant point of difference, in order to survive. They cannot just emulate what PSA is doing. Perhaps this includes a radically different grading scale, or simply deeming whether a given card is altered or original. In time, I believe that many collectors would embrace it. In other words, the time is ripe for a new VEHICLE, baby! Ps. Agree completely... great tune - great memories - cringe-worthy lyrics. :eek: |
Quote:
Excellent |
Quote:
|
Quote:
And as for Dan's point about the fake T206 Signed cards being behind us.... Sure people aren't talking about it as much anymore. But that's largely because of the new bigger revelations of PWCC/PSA taking hold. And even though the fake signed T206s are no longer at the top of the message boards, people DO remember it. And I believe these collectors are far more hesitant to delve into that arena now. I have seen very few examples (if any) since that news broke, and think it will be far more difficult now to get these examples past the autograph experts. Hopefully the card altering scandal will carry far more specific long-term ramifications for the TPAs, as well as jail time for those who have continually defrauded us. |
As I recall and someone can correct me if I am wrong or if events have changed anything, but didn't PSA commit to doing a thorough investigation and report back on its findings to all stakeholders? Did PSA commit to a timeline for doing this and have they issued any interim statements or findings yet?
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
BGS has no grade guarantee, so their buyers are just out of luck. Until they file lawsuits if they choose to. Class action that they are being duped by the appearance of having a fair grading company that is taking payola to give grades to the largest submitters would be one. They are getting skewered on Blowout.
https://www.blowoutforums.com/showthread.php?t=1297069 SGC is a small fry (submission numbers wise), but I believe they refunded the first few (unless the auctionhouse did instead) and then stopped refunding and closed their auto auth shop. They did recommend one scammed individual try to get restitution from the fraudster who submitted the card. Then they deleted the "Grade Guarantee" they used to have from their website. But I'm guessing they're still liable for the guarantee on the cards that were graded while it still existed. PSA was warned 15+ years ago that they were letting scammers submit cards, and stuck their heads in the sand and let the fraud continue. To me, that is complicit. |
Frankly, I'm stunned that PSA has not addressed the issue of the "trimmed" Wagner. It's been decades since the facts have come about regarding it's trimming. Why have they not recalled it or changed it in their database as altered???
They consistently point to that Wagner as the pinnacle of the hobby and a testament to their service yet everyone knows it's trimmed and therefore a fraud. Why they would make a fraudulent card the cornerstone of their business is beyond me. It just goes to show you how much they opt for marketing over integrity. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
I don't know who owns the "next best" Wagner in the PSA Pop Report, but if I owned it, I would make a big stink about the "trimmed" Wagner as it diminishes the value of the "next best" Wagner. Just my two cents. |
I'm not stunned, it's widely known and hasn't seemed to impact the cards value or ability to be sold.
IOW, the market has said it doesn't care up to this point. Certainly might be a perspective unique to this copy of this card. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
And the Ideas of March, I love Vehicle and most of the Jim Peterik catalog. Being from the Chicago area I think I have seen him anywhere from concerts to the local grocery store produce department giving a concert as a part of the store's grand opening. |
Quote:
An analysis of the altered vintage cards (to come to light so far) was conducted in one of the BO threads. Among other things it concluded that to date, nearly $1.8 million worth of fakes have been sold, with the breakdown by TPA as follows... PSA 95% SGC 4.5% BVG 0.5% |
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:38 AM. |