Originally Posted by Pat R (Post 1820089)

I think most people would take the 1.5 over the 2 even at the higher price.

Attachment 331502Attachment 331503

and that's not paper loss on the left border of the 1.5 is a print
flaw that is found on a few Johnson Portraits.

Attachment 331504

Originally Posted by bounce (Post 1820098)

not really, considering there was an underbidder that was $50 less

or is that a bogus bid? that bidder dropped in $1600 earlier on so doesn't really seem nefarious

it's really RedFan's fault, considering if he had just passed the other bidder would have won the card at just over $3700 and then we're not talking about it

it's a great card, and it's not an easy find in that grade with that eye appeal

it was steep, but we've gotten a reasonable explanation as to what happened, which is actually kind of cool if you ask me

if you're building a collection of cards like this, you'll never miss that $500 - just make it up somewhere else