![]() |
Quote:
This topic was covered extensively in the Sporting News 1981 Baseball yearbook. I never understood the rookie card thing. But fellow collectors fell for it. |
Quote:
|
And just as much for those couple of years where players made their 1st appearance in an update/traded set. Think 1984 Gooden, Puckett, Clemens, etc. Their 1st Donruss card would then be 1985. Man I miss those simpler days .
|
|
The ad that they feature in the video, I remember those types very well.
I used to spend hours scouring them and dreaming about getting the complete runs of the better players, but always finding that I couldn't afford the piles of $6 or $15 price tags (or something crazy high like $50 for an elusive card like a 67 B. Robbby), rather settling for 50 cent to $1 cards instead. Not sure I ever actually bought any though, as I would have been pre-teen at the time. I probably just circled those I wanted or filled out those order forms and never sent any money. Wasted opportunities there! Quote:
|
I thought this was fun: I recently had this exchange with some ass-clown on eBay re a 1926 Greiling Max Schmeling RC:
Him: I know that you “know your stuff” and the grading companies “consult you” but this is clearly not Carpentiers rookie. The ever abundant 1922-1923 Amalgamated Press Sporting Champions is. I replied: I completely agree: it is not Carpentier's RC. It is, however, Max Schmeling's. And FWIW Carpentier appears in the 1915 Cope's set so the 1922-23 cards are not even his first British issues. https://photos.imageevent.com/exhibi...ike%20drop.gif |
But...but, if we had never had the RC phenomenon, we couldn't still today enjoy the countless people who feel the need to point out that a '52 Topps #311 is NOT his rookie card!...:confused:
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:28 AM. |