Net54baseball.com Forums
Page 2 of 2 1 2
Show 80 post(s) from this thread on one page

Net54baseball.com Forums (http://www.net54baseball.com/index.php)
-   Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions (http://www.net54baseball.com/forumdisplay.php?f=2)
-   -   T206 Tinker To Evers To Chance Grade Opinon (http://www.net54baseball.com/showthread.php?t=227415)

Psal3891 08-23-2016 03:02 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by vintagetoppsguy (Post 1576049)
After seeing the larger scans, my opinion is a 3.5 to 4 on the Evers. Still too hard to tell on the Tinker. It looks like it has some kind of mark or surface indention on the left border, just above the bat. I can't tell if it's on the card or the holder. If it's on the card, I'll say a 2.5 or 3.


It's on the case

Psal3891 08-23-2016 03:45 PM
Thanks everyone. One last question
 
Well I've got everything from 2.5-4.5. I still think its def 4-5 so im where I started lol. Correct me if i'm wrong but it seems they grade Carporals less strict then they do Piedmont. Being it's less common? I'm assuming from what I see on ebay but its quite distiguished what they accept for Carporal vs Piedmont. Some Piedmont look like a whole grade higher with the same grade in my opinion.

T206Collector 08-23-2016 03:51 PM
I still think diamond cut on the Evers - looks to me like the 1975 Topps examples in the shared thread.

I now think the Tinker is trimmed at the top. Hard to tell from scans of the face, but I don't like that cut.

Good luck and keep us posted!

iwantitiwinit 08-23-2016 03:55 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Psal3891 (Post 1576036)
Now I do, bnorth just explained to me what it is but it's not trimmed as much as you all wish it was, it's not. ;)
Why do you think we wish it was. You asked our opinion and we are giving it to you. Personally after looking a bit closer I think the Evers is trimmed the rounding of the corners especially the upper left looks like it was trimmed after the rounding. I could be wrong. Also, you mention u got it from someone who got it from.."his grandfather". I'm always a little leery of that statement unless u know the individualpersonally. Either way sounds like u got a decent deal regardless.

Luke 08-23-2016 04:24 PM
No Chance that Evers gets even a 3.5 after seeing the close up pic. Just a nice looking VG card. Tinker will probably grade higher.

btcarfagno 08-23-2016 04:57 PM
The Evers has a slight notch in the right border. I would say 4 tops. Again...if not trimmed.

Tom C

nsaddict 08-23-2016 05:49 PM
It would be cool to see PSA do a larger holder for the trio, with individual flips. If there were enough interest they probably could do it. That would be a kick-ass display. Anybody good at photoshop and bored?

AddieJoss 08-23-2016 08:01 PM
Every card in a screw down holder is trimmed or fake!

njdunkin1 08-23-2016 08:27 PM
Good thoughts here from the Net54 members. Our consensus was voiced. If I have learned anything, it's that the majority of guys here are all well intended and speak honestly. If the average suggested is a 3.5, then it will hit pretty close to that grade unless trimmed. Either way, I'd go for it and get them graded. Can't hurt, right?
Regards,
NJ Dunkin

Scocs 08-23-2016 08:57 PM
No way the Evers gets an SGC 60. SGC 50/PSA 3.5-4 tops...

Jantz 08-23-2016 09:16 PM
I wouldn't be shocked to find that the Evers has been cleaned. The dark corners is a tell-tale sign.

The Evers is a 3. Maybe a 3.5 And if you want higher grades, tear some paper off the backs.

Billy5858 08-23-2016 11:11 PM
Im def am not an expert but I would be
Hesitant to buy these as raw cards which is my new passion.

Any time
I see an angled edge with one corner which is
less rounded than the other 3. I pause and pass

ullmandds 08-24-2016 05:32 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by jantz (Post 1576213)
the evers is a 3. Maybe a 3.5 and if you want higher grades, tear some paper off the backs.
thats funny!


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:26 AM.
Page 2 of 2 1 2
Show 80 post(s) from this thread on one page