Rule
 

I had to figure out how to adjust it. Like I said my first post. The point is you claim I did something wrong. All I did was go through the approval process and post. Then you say according to the rule......which I do not see. Obviously I commented on a company but I do not see that rule. I am willing to list my information anyway. By the way, rules should apply to everyone. I see people agreeing with comments with no name, then they are commenting. I also see others that comment without providing a name. Maybe you all know each other. New to forum. No agenda. Felt topic was important enough to comment on. I do not know the original person who wrote the post or what his history is. How many posts to ask me to put my name? If you agree with my comment or some of it, then fine. If not, okay.

The main rule of our forum is concerning accountability. I wrote the rules so there is no use cutting and pasting and trying to outmaneuver them. There is an all encompassing catch-all rule, for those cases. The rules are the same for everyone, and regardless of what is written here is the litmus test used for names..

Would I want to know whom it is saying something about me or my company? Or would I want to know who I am arguing/debating with? That is it. It is a very low threshold as I like to know who is saying stuff about me, towards me, or debating with me. Same rules for everyone. No doubt 100% don't get caught but if anyone PMs or emails me I will take care of it. I hope this helps explain the rule. And trust me, if someone jabs or pokes you, you will probably want to know who they are. Thanks for putting your name out here. We all believe this helps keep it real.

.

Rule/PWCC
 

When I posted, I did not know the settings had me as anonymous until someone responded to my post. It does not matter to me. On the other topic you discuss, I do not get into it as I know it has been discussed on other parts of the forum and I thought was not what the OP was discussing. I have my own opinions on it which would go off topic, including what ebay could do. I assume those have been discussed suggested already anyway as I saw some other discussions but they are long. I am not oblivious to the inevitability of it. No system is ever perfect. I use a buy it now model myself to avoid that whole mess. All that leads to is people asking how much I will take and then bidding up a similar card to the nearest dollar and if they lose tell me last one went for..........whether or not there is something inferior about the item, whether or not it ended at 5:00 a.m. on a week day, and ignoring they intentionally did not bid higher. If an item went low, they will try to argue it is fair market value and pressure a sale. The ebay system should not allow people to retract a bid and say entered wrong amount - this should never be allowed. The system should also not allow someone to keep bidding someone up in the small increments it does because it seems to indicate they did not really enter what they wanted. Ebay should ban more people and prevent them from opening new id's after banned. I assume this has been discussed. Might be more of a problem with the bidding system than the sellers that get criticized. It is a matter of more policing. Just as cutting down on people selling fraudulent items being sold by sellers and misleading listings. All sellers should block bid retractors and non-payers I think. All sellers who take consignments should probably have a list of a consignor's ebay account(s). But this is different than the federal case where the auction house knew the exact bids.

Bidding
 

Meant one should never be able to enter an amount and say wrong amount without reentering another bid. If one bids up and retracts a bid and then reenters lower, he has learned the bid. Now I am off topic.

Dude, you are a fool. I've posted my thoughts regarding ebay shilling plenty of times - whether or not you have noticed is completely irrelevant to me. Boring others by repeating those thoughts, as you have done in this thread with your own, is something I'm trying to avoid. There are plenty of people on this forum who enjoy conversing with you more than I do, meaning everyone, so go talk with them. I notice you are making a lot of friends in Ian's thread.

I'm through even reading your posts - you've given us nothing but rubbish since you joined. If you have a stupid response to my post that you think others here might read, than post away, but anything intended for me is falling on deaf ears.

[QUOTE=Runscott;1381143] There are plenty of people on this forum who enjoy conversing with you more than I do, meaning everyone, so go talk with them.

QUOTE]

Scott I think you could be wrong here. 90%+ of his posts seem like trolling attemps to me. The ones I can make any sense out of anyway.

There are a lot supportive posters on in Ians thread...i do see you making non subject related comments though on that thread.. I also see that you have said i say nothing but rubbish...that's a bit of a personal attack?...i never said anything of the kind directed against you....just food for thought.

Saying you wont respond to me anymore or read any more of my posts is something i could of said to you..but I realized I have done nothing wrong and thought it would be really just a joke and a game to say that because in actuality I really don't value what you say when you are attacking me and I not emotional about it..

..and to say figuratively put my hands to my ears and pretend I don't hear you seems a bit juvenile..so I didn't go there....looks like you did!

....I have been posting about issues directly relating to the thread..heck I started some of these threads...and you don't comment about the subject matter at all........

just because you may of talked about a subject matter in the past doesn't mean other members on the board know everything you know.....they do remake songs from today based on 1980s songs...new audience.......(im sure people will make jokes of this point I made)

Just because you believe I don't contribute anything worthy of you to read doesn't mean I shouldn't post anything (everything I say is rubbish you said)...not sure why you are emotional about it....enjoy life brother....don't be a hater...

[QUOTE=bnorth;1381152]are the remaining 10% of my posts terrific?

[QUOTE=1952boyntoncollector;1381162]I would not go as high as 10% being terrific. I would give you 5% as being ok kinda sorta in a big small way.

To keep it sort of on topic that PWCC sure does sell alot of cards don't they.

I...am...still...trying...to...figure...out...why. ..you...don't...use...punctuation...

His period key is permanently locked in ellipsis mode.
http://rvtwebsolutions.com/wp-conten...7/ellipsis.jpg

Coulllllllld be sooooomeooooone llllllllearned tooooouch typing ooooooon a typewriter and has a tremoooooor oooooooon their right hand ring finger...........

eh I like to talk about content not punctuation.......yes pwcc does a lot of business..

[QUOTE=bnorth;1381163]
Just curious what percent of your posts are at least ok in a kinda sort in a big small way?

Now that's funny, I think even Jacob would agree.

The Man in Black smiled.

[QUOTE=1952boyntoncollector;1381225]Maybe 25% at the most. Rest are just complete garbage.