![]() |
Oh, PWCC has a vault? Didn't Al Capone have a vault too? Where's Geraldo Rivera?
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Where do we go from here Peter? eBay allowed this nonsense to grow. |
Quote:
Sent from my SM-G960U using Tapatalk |
I have been saying these for years....EBAY doesn't give a shit, period.....
|
Quote:
|
FWIW, it was reported on Blowout that Gary Moser's ebay account, whitman111 which became ricky-leo, is now "No Longer A Registered User"
Doesn't mean he's off eBay, but maybe they do care about it a little with the FBI involvement. I wonder if the FBI was tipped off about the odd sales history outages that eBay seemed to cause? |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Prepare to have the PWCC product sprayed into the wild. |
Hmmmm.... if it's who I think you may be describing, wasn't he telling us back in 2016 just to have fun?
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Sent from my SM-G960U using Tapatalk |
Quote:
"Forensic document examiners, also often referred to as questioned document examiners, are forensic scientists who are responsible for using a number of scientific processes and methods for examining documents—whether written, typed, or printed—related to a crime scene investigation. Forensic document examiners should not to be confused with graphologists, who are handwriting analysis practitioners that claim to be able to discern personality characteristics based on handwriting features. Graphology is largely viewed as a pseudoscience in the eyes of the scientific community. Forensic document examiners, on the other hand, are skilled forensics scientists with a demonstrated expertise in applied questioned document examination. They are handwriting experts, as well as experts in other areas of document examination, including machine printing processes; and obliterated, indented and erased entries. The most common type of questioned document examination involves identifying the authorship of a written letter. It is also common for forensic document examiners to determine if an item originated from the same source as a known item, determine when a document was produced, and decipher information on a document that has been erased, hidden, or obscured. Forensic document examiners may perform the following: Examine documents for signs that they have been forged or altered Compare signatures and handwriting through handwriting analysis to determine the authorship of documents Examine typed documents and link them to specific machines or computers (printing process examinations) Decipher the contents of documents that have been partially destroyed or altered Compare fractured or cut-edge comparisons on a variety of surfaces, including paper and tape Examine incidents of indented writing Perform alternate light source examinations to determine ink discrimination, alterations, and/or enhancements Forensic document examiners commonly work in local, state or federal crime labs. A number of these professionals work through private investigative companies, although this type of work is generally geared toward civil cases. Forensic document examiners are also often called to testify as experts in criminal cases".* *crimesceneinvestigatoredu.org |
Quote:
I absolutely agree. I couldn't care less about what number is assigned to a card. I leave the aesthetic opinions up to my own eyes. I don't need a third party for that. I want a grading company to confirm that a card is authentic and unaltered. I guess we're all waiting for a reliable company to provide that service. |
Quote:
|
PWCC has their vaunted vault (please use "vaunted vault" going forward when referring to the "vault":D) at the National consisting of high grade cards in modest display cases on several easels that are not secured to the floor. They do have a uniformed guard however. Once the show closes each evening the vault is moved to an undisclosed location with the uniformed guard. At the conclusion of the show the vaunted vault will be transported back to Oregon in a used Brinks Truck recently purchased by PWCC. The truck is festooned with a variety of stickers to misdirect highway bandits regarding the truck's contents.
The National display is so innovative in concept that it will be set up the same way at their Oregon edifice. After all, what's good for the hobby is good for the lobby.;):eek: |
Quote:
Maybe it's just a side effect of the number of crooked autograph authenticators that claim to be "forensic document examiners" (See the autograph section for more info) In a general sense, they could probably identify some bad alterations, but getting it right on an alteration that's done well? That takes specific specialized information, which I don't believe most of them have. It wouldn't be hard for them to get it, but the specialized info isn't something they just know. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
PWCC and owners of altered cards now going on the offensive against message boards.
https://www.blowoutforums.com/showpo...postcount=4160 Will be interesting to see if this kind of thing actually makes it into court. Would be interesting to see Beckett graders called in as "expert" witnesses and then get shown a mountain of trimmed cards in their slabs proving them wrong. |
Probably the last place I would go to have something re-examined is the place that is accused of getting it wrong the first time and which stands to take a big financial hit if it can be shown they erred. This comment is not intended to single out Beckett, but is simply to make the point that in order for a re-examination to have significant meaning, it needs to be conducted by a company that has no economic stake in the outcome.
|
Quote:
|
|
Quote:
|
I was wondering they were gonna start threatening the people who out their crimes.
|
Quote:
You can start at post 6547 (page 262) re the Giannis card... Start at the beginning of you want to read a horror book |
Quote:
Now that's funny stuff...sitcom material, really |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Having Beckett re-review the card is like consulting the doctor who committed malpractice for a second opinion. Common sense alone dictates that you take the card to someone else. Talk about a conflict of interest. This is criminal. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
But yeah i assume some 'trims' may not be easy to prove were trimmed. |
I think what will loose it for the compliment is the same excuse the TPGs always use: it’s just an”opinion,” everyone can have one.
|
The truth can't be libelous...
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Anyone else wondering ...
... if a certain swindler is high on drugs most of the time? I can't help but make certain behavioral connections to the biography of that sleazy Belfort dude in The Wolf Of Wallstreet.
|
Best part about that letter is the “investor” that deems the card is now worth half based on the thread at BO. The implication is that the discussion itself is what hurts the cards value as opposed to the alleged alteration.
Which of course is ridiculous, the investor obviously believes that the alteration occurred and that the card has an AUTH value, hence the 350k. And FWIW, I don’t blame PWCC for playing this game where they send the cards back to the TPG. Card was graded in 2006. Lots of shenanigans with PWCC but this is clearly on the TPG. |
Quote:
https://youtu.be/sxAk3B_zS5k?t=84 |
You guys all obviously forgot
PICTURES AREN'T EVIDENCE! also, it's apparently "...stemming from the publc message board statement...". PUBLC - got it. :) |
and one more thing - can you not just put that card next to another one from the set, ok another one of the lebrons for that matter, and figure out that it's short?
anyway...back to the beginning of the 20th century for me. |
It is my understanding that the pwcc letter was not sent to blowout, but rather was provided to (one or more) investors in an effort to validate value and to disclose the situation.
|
Reminds me of the six phases of a big project:
1. Enthusiasm, "Hey, PSA is here to save the day" "Never get cheated" 2. Disillusionment, "Wait, those cards look strange, altered almost" 3. Panic, hysteria and overtime, "Oh crap, I've got high grade PSAs in my collection" 4. Hunt for the guilty, BODA hard at work, unearthing evidence 5. Punishment of the innocent, "PWCC: Here's a letter from my lawyer, stop looking for dirt" 6. Reward for the uninvolved. We'll see. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Looks like the card owner contacted Brent with concerns, Brent suggested the card go back to Beckett, Beckett confirmed grade, Brent then writes a letter saying he believes the card has lost half if it's value due to Blowout (not specifically named) and now the owner wants talks about the card's alterations to stop. Brent didn't have to put anything about value in the letter, all he had to do was say the card checked out, but instead he wants his customer to put heat onto the message board. Unprofessional and petty.
|
Quote:
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:57 PM. |