Net54baseball.com Forums

Net54baseball.com Forums (http://www.net54baseball.com/index.php)
-   Autograph Forum- Primarily Sports (http://www.net54baseball.com/forumdisplay.php?f=31)
-   -   Babe Ruth? (http://www.net54baseball.com/showthread.php?t=166309)

travrosty 04-27-2013 08:10 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by thetruthisoutthere (Post 1120254)
The deal isn't done by a long shot.

I've been on the sidelines reading the name-calling and saving the screenshots for the day when I will address particular comments posted by a few members of Net54.



its been a couple more weeks, is this day ever going to roll around?

thetruthisoutthere 04-27-2013 09:04 AM

I will be posting as soon as things are back to normal here.

Richard, Shelly, Leon and Danny are already aware that my girlfriend's twenty-eight-year-old son passed away on Thursday night. There are no words to describe the loss.

gnaz01 04-27-2013 09:05 AM

Chris, truly sorry for the loss. You are right, no words can describe that feeling.

Leon 04-27-2013 09:28 AM

While I think this whole debacle could have been handled better I will vouch for Chris sending me a message a few days ago concerning the death in the family. A very young person passing away is tragic. Condolences to Chris, family and friends.

Wymers Auction 04-27-2013 12:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by thetruthisoutthere (Post 1123743)
I will be posting as soon as things are back to normal here.

Richard, Shelly, Leon and Danny are already aware that my girlfriend's twenty-eight-year-old son passed away on Thursday night. There are no words to describe the loss.

Sorry to hear that Chris.

earlywynnfan 04-27-2013 02:01 PM

My sympathies, Chris. Take care of your family. We can bicker about the much-less-important stuff later.

Ken

7nohitter 04-27-2013 02:58 PM

Chris,
Very sorry to hear....family trumps an autograph discussion any day.
Priorities people...

Andrew

Bestdj777 04-27-2013 03:41 PM

My condolences Chris. I couldn't imagine what you are going through.

mschwade 04-27-2013 04:33 PM

Prayers out to you and your girlfriend, Christopher, times like these remind everyone about the bigger picture.

chaddurbin 04-27-2013 04:45 PM

prayers to you and your loved ones chris...

slidekellyslide 04-27-2013 05:35 PM

Condolences Chris...very sorry for your loss...this stuff is small potatoes compared to real life.

Runscott 04-27-2013 05:53 PM

My sympathies also, Chris.

GrayGhost 04-27-2013 06:19 PM

Chris, my sincere condolences to you and your GF on this horrible thing. Means so much more than whether an autograph is real or not...God Bless.

jcmtiger 04-27-2013 10:39 PM

I don't really collect autographs, although I have a few that were signed at shows. So, I know they are authenticate. But these autograph fights are kinda crazy. It seems we have at least 4-5 experts on the board and they pretty much disagree on most autographs. I don't really know the complete name, but THETRUTHISOUTHERE or whatever the name is seems to be the expert of all experts according to his posts. So, he should be very wealthy authenticating autographs throughout the hobby. So, is he the guy to get for authentIcating my autographs? i am not being a smart ass, just want to know. I do have a couple of autographs that I thought about sending to PSA, but decided not to. A large print signed by Ali and Spinks in the 1980's. And a baseball signed by Tiger Woods in 1996. Both signed in person. But I was worried that they would come back not real. Then What? I did sell some autographs to someone on the board and I was satisfied with the results. He is one of the 4-5 experts on the board. The autographs were items I bought in the 1980's of early 1930's ballplayers. .


Joe

Joe

travrosty 04-27-2013 10:51 PM

psa will either say good or bad, so its a 50 percent chance. we have seen them give the thumbs up to the bad before, and the thumbs down to the good before, so send them money if you have money to spare, or keep your money. if you know it's good, that is good enough.

Wymers Auction 04-27-2013 11:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jcmtiger (Post 1124009)
I don't really collect autographs, although I have a few that were signed at shows. So, I know they are authenticate. But these autograph fights are kinda crazy. It seems we have at least 4-5 experts on the board and they pretty much disagree on most autographs. I don't really know the complete name, but THETRUTHISOUTHERE or whatever the name is seems to be the expert of all experts according to his posts. So, he should be very wealthy authenticating autographs throughout the hobby. So, is he the guy to get for authentIcating my autographs? i am not being a smart ass, just want to know. I do have a couple of autographs that I thought about sending to PSA, but decided not to. A large print signed by Ali and Spinks in the 1980's. And a baseball signed by Tiger Woods in 1996. Both signed in person. But I was worried that they would come back not real. Then What? I did sell some autographs to someone on the board and I was satisfied with the results. He is one of the 4-5 experts on the board. The autographs were items I bought in the 1980's of early 1930's ballplayers. .


Joe

Joe

Chris(thetruthisouthere) is the person we are referring to that had a recent death in the family.

thetruthisoutthere 04-28-2013 10:58 AM

I wanted to sincerely "Thank you" for your expressions of condolences.

My girlfriend's son leaves behind a three-year old daughter which is even more heart-breaking. My girlfriend's family, friends and myself are there for her and her granddaughter.

I cannot begin to imagine the pain of losing a son or daughter. I lost my mom twenty years ago and I still haven't gotten over it.

Again, I want to "Thank" those of you who posted messages of condolence. It really is very much appreciated.

earlywynnfan 04-28-2013 02:24 PM

Please take care of that little girl. As a teacher, I can assure you she needs a father figure in her life. Especially one who demonstrates that we all need to stand up and do the right thing every chance we get.

Ken

jgmp123 04-28-2013 02:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by earlywynnfan (Post 1124173)
Please take care of that little girl. As a teacher, I can assure you she needs a father figure in her life. Especially one who demonstrates that we all need to stand up and do the right thing every chance we get.

Ken

+1. So very true.

gnaz01 04-28-2013 05:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by earlywynnfan (Post 1124173)
Please take care of that little girl. As a teacher, I can assure you she needs a father figure in her life. Especially one who demonstrates that we all need to stand up and do the right thing every chance we get.

Ken

Chris,

As a father of a 10 year old boy, please do what is possible to comfort this young girl. She may not fully understand what is going on now, but when she grows up, she WILL remember the times you have spent with her and consoled her. Thanks for your leadership here. The "foolishness" that goes on here (I say that light-heatedly) pales in comparison to real life situations.

Greg

jgmp123 04-29-2013 05:05 AM

Some additional info on a "tell" and the ticket.

http://haulsofshame.com/blog/?p=19877#more-19877

travrosty 04-29-2013 07:34 AM

so why is it easy for a guy to show some details about a babe ruth sig but so impossible for others? that wasn't so hard.

HOF Auto Rookies 04-29-2013 07:54 AM

Hey Chris, I'm so saddened for your loss, loss is never easy. Especially for someone who has so much of their life left to live. I recently had a loss of an old high school friend a week ago, and I'm 26 and it's hard to fathom, and you ask yourself why.

I appreciate all you do here, and I help you and your gf's family find happiness and stay strong with your faith.

God Bless

Scott Garner 04-29-2013 08:19 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by travrosty (Post 1124383)
so why is it easy for a guy to show some details about a babe ruth sig but so impossible for others? that wasn't so hard.

Travis,

Perhaps I'm jumping the gun here and reading too much into this, but maybe Chris and Nash have been discussing the "Babe Ruth" signed 700th HR ticket.
It dawned on me that Chris might not have revealed the "tells" because of a pre-existing promise to Nash since he had planned on writing about it in his HOS.

Food for thought...

RichardSimon 04-29-2013 09:05 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Scott Garner (Post 1124394)
Travis,

Perhaps I'm jumping the gun here and reading too much into this, but maybe Chris and Nash have been discussing the "Babe Ruth" signed 700th HR ticket.
It dawned on me that Chris might not have revealed the "tells" because of a pre-existing promise to Nash since he had planned on writing about it in his HOS.

Food for thought...

You are going to get Chris banned from Heritage if they think he is working with Nash :D.
Chris and Nash do not discuss anything.

Scott Garner 04-29-2013 09:53 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RichardSimon (Post 1124405)
You are going to get Chris banned from Heritage if they think he is working with Nash :D.
Chris and Nash do not discuss anything.

Oh well, never mind then. Carry on... :)

David Atkatz 04-29-2013 10:04 AM

The other Ruth signature that Chris presented, allegedly by the "Michigan forger," shows none of Nash's three "tells." They could not be what Chris had in mind.

in another recent HoS column, Nash has presented two "tells" for mid-thirties, rushed, "ballpark" Gehrig signatures. It is a nice piece of work. But I have shown a genuine, correct-period Gehrig which exhibits one of the two. Tells are a guide--they are not ironclad.

Again, to his credit, Nash has presented an hypothesis, which can be tested. In this case I believe he is wrong.

it does not appear to me that the "a" in the ticket signature is "written backwards."

Ruth always doublebacked on the final stroke of the "h." This slight return stroke usually is horizontal, and goes over the left-to-right stroke. Usually, but not always. Nash's "arrowhead formation" appears occasionally in genuine Ruth signatures.

That leaves the short t-cross-stroke. Enough to disqualify the signature? I don't think so.

thetruthisoutthere 04-29-2013 07:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by HOF Auto Rookies (Post 1124387)
Hey Chris, I'm so saddened for your loss, loss is never easy. Especially for someone who has so much of their life left to live. I recently had a loss of an old high school friend a week ago, and I'm 26 and it's hard to fathom, and you ask yourself why.

I appreciate all you do here, and I help you and your gf's family find happiness and stay strong with your faith.

God Bless

Thank you, Brent. Very much appreciated.

I also want to "Thank" those who set private messages of condolence and another "Thank you" to those Net54 members who publicly expressed their sympathy. Thank you.

Runscott 04-29-2013 08:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by David Atkatz (Post 1124428)
The other Ruth signature that Chris presented, allegedly by the "Michigan forger," shows none of Nash's three "tells." They could not be what Chris had in mind.

This is really killing me.

Not picking on you David, and I know you hate talking about this ball, but since you and I are in total disagreement as to its authenticity, it's a good example to discuss. In your opinion, does this Ruth signature demonstrate any of Nash's 3 tells?

thetruthisoutthere 04-30-2013 05:07 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by HOF Auto Rookies (Post 1124387)
Hey Chris, I'm so saddened for your loss, loss is never easy. Especially for someone who has so much of their life left to live. I recently had a loss of an old high school friend a week ago, and I'm 26 and it's hard to fathom, and you ask yourself why.

I appreciate all you do here, and I help you and your gf's family find happiness and stay strong with your faith.

God Bless

Thank you, Brent. I appreciate it.

I again wanted to thank those who posted both public messages of condolence and private messages of condolence.

thetruthisoutthere 04-30-2013 05:11 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RichardSimon (Post 1124405)
You are going to get Chris banned from Heritage if they think he is working with Nash :D.
Chris and Nash do not discuss anything.

Richard is correct.

I have never communicated with Mr. Peter Nash or Mr. Ron Keurajian.

According to Mr. Peter Nash's website, he contacted Huggins & Scott on April 6, 2013.

I posted my Babe Ruth Ticket thread on March 31, 2013. I started the thread a few hours after I read about the auction on the Sports Collectors Daily website.

thetruthisoutthere 04-30-2013 05:17 AM

[QUOTE=rscheck;1123692]
Quote:

Originally Posted by thetruthisoutthere (Post 1120254)
The deal isn't done by a long shot.

Contra Mr. Williams contra. The deal is done, and the check is cashed. To quote someone MUCH smarter than me, "you are a strange sad little man". You sit in your moms basement with your pasty white skin and you throw out comments about things you know nothing about (and yes Mr Williams, you knew NOTHING about this particular ticket). I am not sorry I am one of 9,833,360 people (go ahead look it up) who live in Michigan, one of whom would appear to be some forger you seem to know a great deal about (I am not him). I am not sorry, through my dad, I was fortunate enough to meet a woman that was kind. I realize in the world you live in these two completely unrelated events could never take place. The reality is the story I told is true. There are still people out there that believe in honor and integrity and if I thought for a moment this ticket/autograph wasn't real I would have pulled it from the auction myself. You see mr Williams not everyone is out there just to make a nickel (or in this case 214,000 of them). You offered up no proof, or evidence about anything you ELUDED to. Heritage never had the ticket in their possession prior to its sale, this other grading company that you mentioned never had the ticket in their possession to grade it before it went to H&S. These are facts.indisputable, hand on the Bible in court, facts. I offered to speak to you , you left ONE message and didn't have the decency to leave your phone number. I came on the forum and answered ALL questions that were asked and yet you continue to sit in your moms basement and pass judgement on me, a man you have never met. You also declined to pass along "information" that you supposedly had. If that's the kind of hobby you are involved in I will stick to running where people say good morning when they see each other and offer advise (okay sometimes its the wrong advise but their heart is in the right place).

Having said all of that I now feel better.

Thank you,

Thank you, Rscheck.

Your comment is very telling.

thetruthisoutthere 04-30-2013 05:30 AM

I'm curious why no one questioned the consignors admittance that he has no problem recalling every step of the provenance of that Babe Ruth signed ticket that was gifted to him back in 1992, but yet he (Rscheck) is unable to remember her name.

Is anyone else puzzled by that?

rscheck 04-30-2013 05:41 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by thetruthisoutthere (Post 1124865)
I'm curious why no one questioned the consignors admittance that he has no problem recalling every step of the provenance of that Babe Ruth signed ticket that was gifted to him back in 1992, but yet he (Rscheck) is unable to remember her name.

Is anyone else puzzled by that?

Knowing I was given a gift vs remembering a name from 21 years ago...really? I remember I got a Chutes away for Hanukkah in 1977 but I cant remember the name of my second grade teacher....I guess I didn't go to second grade.

Chris while I find all this back and forth amusing I am truly sorry for your loss!

slidekellyslide 04-30-2013 05:41 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by thetruthisoutthere (Post 1124865)
I'm curious why no one questioned the consignors admittance that he has no problem recalling every step of the provenance of that Babe Ruth signed ticket that was gifted to him back in 1992, but yet he (Rscheck) is unable to remember her name.

Is anyone else puzzled by that?

No...this should be about the autograph only. Maybe he forgets his anniversary too? Provenance is hearsay, this is about the autograph. We know that you think it's bad, but tell us why. Is the "a" written backwards? Is the cross in the "t" too short?

Runscott 04-30-2013 08:34 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by thetruthisoutthere (Post 1124864)

Thank you, Rscheck.

Your comment is very telling.

He sounds like a wonderful guy. I'm surprised he didn't donate the ticket to charity.

Ahhh, what a beautiful Tuesday morning.

mr2686 04-30-2013 08:37 AM

I think I've understood everything on this thread except the part right after I'm curious what the members here think of this Babe Ruth?
:p

travrosty 04-30-2013 09:04 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by slidekellyslide (Post 1124870)
No...this should be about the autograph only. Maybe he forgets his anniversary too? Provenance is hearsay, this is about the autograph. We know that you think it's bad, but tell us why. Is the "a" written backwards? Is the cross in the "t" too short?

i would have to agree, it's back to autographs and if this one stinks, then people should say why if they claim to know.

slidekellyslide 04-30-2013 09:33 AM

The most frustrating thing about this thread is that Chris keeps going back to the provenance and is not dealing with what he thinks is wrong with the autograph itself. And showing a comparison to an Eddie Gaedel signature without saying a word about either one is not addressing anything. He's very open about discussing the provenance, but tight lipped about the signature. Why?

shelly 04-30-2013 09:47 AM

Open a backward a spaceing and the h trailing. Just a few things that might make you think that it is not authentic. There are to many things wrong to make me believe.
Hauls of Shame voiced concerns about the Ruth ticket to Huggins & Scott via Twitter on April 6 and again via email to Huggins VP Josh Wulken on April 10. When informed that we had spoken with an expert and well-known author who had indicated that he could not authenticate the Ruth ticket Wulken responded, “I have no idea who that is and everybody has opinions.
If you dont know who he is talking about go out and buy the newest book on forgeries.

Runscott 04-30-2013 10:09 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by slidekellyslide (Post 1124954)
The most frustrating thing about this thread is that Chris keeps going back to the provenance and is not dealing with what he thinks is wrong with the autograph itself. And showing a comparison to an Eddie Gaedel signature without saying a word about either one is not addressing anything. He's very open about discussing the provenance, but tight lipped about the signature. Why?

Yeah, I didn't get the Gaedel comparison.

My thinking on Ruth signatures, and it applies to this one: Any authentic Ruth-signed item has been around for 50+ years. Probably 50% (at least) of Ruth signatures on the market are forgeries, and many of those have LOAs. Everyone knows that if you want to sell a Ruth-signed item, it has to pass a TPA. So, if a Ruth-signed item shows up on the market with a new LOA, you have to ask why? At that point, all you have to go on is the provenance and the item itself. The ticket 'could' be good. The provenance is very shaky. If we manage to get over the ticket and the provenance, the autograph still has to pass.

This isn't about 'prove it is bad'. If it smells at all, and it's a 'Ruth', we generally discuss it in this forum, but...

There were much better ways for Chris to present his opinion - I won't speculate as to why he chose this route, but it was unfair to the consignor and the auction house.

shelly 04-30-2013 11:16 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Runscott (Post 1124974)
Yeah, I didn't get the Gaedel comparison.

My thinking on Ruth signatures, and it applies to this one: Any authentic Ruth-signed item has been around for 50+ years. Probably 50% (at least) of Ruth signatures on the market are forgeries, and many of those have LOAs. Everyone knows that if you want to sell a Ruth-signed item, it has to pass a TPA. So, if a Ruth-signed item shows up on the market with a new LOA, you have to ask why? At that point, all you have to go on is the provenance and the item itself. The ticket 'could' be good. The provenance is very shaky. If we manage to get over the ticket and the provenance, the autograph still has to pass.

This isn't about 'prove it is bad'. If it smells at all, and it's a 'Ruth', we generally discuss it in this forum, but...

There were much better ways for Chris to present his opinion - I won't speculate as to why he chose this route, but it was unfair to the consignor and the auction house.

Scott, just to give you a hint. Look at the bad Gadel, open a. Look at the good one closed. Look at the spaceing compare the bad one to the Ruth.
Just saying.

slidekellyslide 04-30-2013 12:26 PM

There are at least 4 open "a" Ruth signatures in the current REA auction.

shelly 04-30-2013 12:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by slidekellyslide (Post 1125049)
There are at least 4 open "a" Ruth signatures in the current REA auction.

And?:D

earlywynnfan 04-30-2013 02:26 PM

I'm confused; there are two long, painful threads going on right now. One is obsessing about the chain of provenance before we even want to talk about the auto.

The other doesn't have a line of provenance -- in fact, there is some serious provenance saying the piece cannot be legit -- and people are howling to disregard the provenance, just look at the auto.

Which is it??

Ken

travrosty 04-30-2013 02:40 PM

it's disfunctional threads and discussions.

snit54 instead of taking a look at autographs and provenance from a logical perspective and sharing information to get to the bottom of things.

Runscott 04-30-2013 04:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by shelly (Post 1125012)
Scott, just to give you a hint. Look at the bad Gadel, open a. Look at the good one closed. Look at the spaceing compare the bad one to the Ruth.
Just saying.

I saw that. No matter - as I said when Chris first posted the Gaedel images, the two Gaedels looked nothing alike; the two Ruths looked at least similar. In my opinion - a different forger.

As David stated, tells are not ironclad - I'm sure people who normally close their a's have left a few open.

shelly 04-30-2013 05:23 PM

Scott, Chris feels that bad Gudel is from the same person that did the Ruth ticket. You can make up your own mind. He was trying to show the open a on the babe and the open a on the other.

gnaz01 04-30-2013 05:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by slidekellyslide (Post 1125049)
There are at least 4 open "a" Ruth signatures in the current REA auction.

9 Ruth signatures have been withdrawn from REA :confused:

shelly 04-30-2013 05:57 PM

I would be willing to bet there might be a few more.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:15 AM.