|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Should MELLO-MINT's be classified as an "R" set ?
Posted By: Ted Zanidakis
I have a few of these pretty gems; but, not enough to tempt me to put together this set. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Should MELLO-MINT's be classified as an "R" set ?
Posted By: leon
I am always good for 1!! |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Should MELLO-MINT's be classified as an "R" set ?
Posted By: JimB
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Should MELLO-MINT's be classified as an "R" set ?
Posted By: Jodi Birkholm
Mooney Gibson was from my hometown of London, Ontario. After all these years, still the best ballplayer to come out of our town of 450,000. It was less than 1/10th the size back when George was with the 1909 Pirates. In London, we call him "Mooney", but the encyclopedias list him as "Moon". He seemed to prefer his birth name, though, as he would only ever sign "Geo. Gibson" in a beautifully-flowing hand: |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Should MELLO-MINT's be classified as an "R" set ?
Posted By: Anonymous
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Should MELLO-MINT's be classified as an "R" set ?
Posted By: cmoking
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Should MELLO-MINT's be classified as an "R" set ?
Posted By: Bruce Babcock
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Should MELLO-MINT's be classified as an "R" set ?
Posted By: Ted Zanidakis
Thanks everyone, we now have 6 pictures. And, 44 more to go, to complete this set. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Should MELLO-MINT's be classified as an "R" set ?
Posted By: Matt
This Matty sold in the last REA: |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Should MELLO-MINT's be classified as an "R" set ?
Posted By: Ted Zanidakis
Since you guys are "Slow to Show" your Mello-Mints....here is my Dooin...... |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
Should MELLO-MINT's be classified as an "R" set ?
Posted By: Scott M.
Heres my lone type... |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
Should MELLO-MINT's be classified as an "R" set ?
Posted By: brian p
My only E105 is a Hartsell, which was just posted, so no low-grade show and tell. |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
Should MELLO-MINT's be classified as an "R" set ?
Posted By: John
Same one everyone else has..LOL |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
Should MELLO-MINT's be classified as an "R" set ?
Posted By: Rob D.
I know Leon already posted his Lajoie, but this is a (very) recent pick-up that I like a lot, so ... |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
Should MELLO-MINT's be classified as an "R" set ?
Posted By: Andrew
My one and only. . . |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
Should MELLO-MINT's be classified as an "R" set ?
Posted By: Jim Rivera
I have the same one as Scott M. -Hartsel |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
Should MELLO-MINT's be classified as an "R" set ?
Posted By: JimB
Bruce, |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
Should MELLO-MINT's be classified as an "R" set ?
Posted By: Dan Koteles
wow Bruce iszall I can say. Greg has one and the both of you are very lucky .AT one time I was missing the Matty - Wags batting-Cobb for the set. Brian or Greg has 2 really nice Benders in 5's. |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
Should MELLO-MINT's be classified as an "R" set ?
Posted By: Ted Zanidakis
Here we are 28 hours into this Thread and only 11 different E105 Subjects....I don't think |
#20
|
|||
|
|||
Should MELLO-MINT's be classified as an "R" set ?
Posted By: Bruce Babcock
|
#21
|
|||
|
|||
Should MELLO-MINT's be classified as an "R" set ?
Posted By: Ted Zanidakis
BRUCE B |
#22
|
|||
|
|||
Should MELLO-MINT's be classified as an "R" set ?
|
#23
|
|||
|
|||
Should MELLO-MINT's be classified as an "R" set ?
Posted By: Frank Wakefield
Here's my only Mello Mint... |
#24
|
|||
|
|||
Should MELLO-MINT's be classified as an "R" set ?
Posted By: S Gross
Wish I could contribute ............ but ............. I sold my only MM a while ago. ! |
#25
|
|||
|
|||
Should MELLO-MINT's be classified as an "R" set ?
Posted By: Ted Zanidakis
FRANK W and chiprop....thanks for your inputs....we are now at the 30% mark in our Gallery. |
#26
|
|||
|
|||
Should MELLO-MINT's be classified as an "R" set ?
Posted By: Ted Zanidakis
One of my favorite Mello-Mint action pix....new Gallery total = 16 cards |
#27
|
|||
|
|||
Should MELLO-MINT's be classified as an "R" set ?
Posted By: Ted Zanidakis
By ACC standards, isn't this MELLO-MINT set actually one of the first "R" sets ? |
#28
|
|||
|
|||
Should MELLO-MINT's be classified as an "R" set ?
Posted By: barry arnold
Ted, |
#29
|
|||
|
|||
Should MELLO-MINT's be classified as an "R" set ?
Posted By: fkw
Hi Ted, |
#30
|
|||
|
|||
Should MELLO-MINT's be classified as an "R" set ?
Posted By: cmoking
"I did notice something "odd" however: Of all the images shown so far, NONE have the "vertical packaging crease" Mello's were "supposed" to have." |
#31
|
|||
|
|||
Should MELLO-MINT's be classified as an "R" set ?
Posted By: boxingcardman
Add to the list of shoulda been an R the E282 Oh Boy Gum movie set. Going by the dates of the movies in the set, the set was very likely a 1930 issue. Most of the films with known cards were 1929 releases. The latest film release date I've found is for Welcome Danger, which released October 12, 1929. |
#32
|
|||
|
|||
Should MELLO-MINT's be classified as an "R" set ?
Posted By: Frank Wakefield
The answer, Ted, is yes. |
#33
|
|||
|
|||
Should MELLO-MINT's be classified as an "R" set ?
Posted By: Ed Hans
So are we also going to move the E92 Dockmans over to the "R" side? I always thought that the "E" designation stood for "early candy and gum" and the "R" was reserved post 1932 gum cards. On that basis, we should move the Rittenhouse cards to "R", but I personally would like to see the early candy AND gum cards remain as "E"s. |
#34
|
|||
|
|||
Should MELLO-MINT's be classified as an "R" set ?
Posted By: leon
I agree with Frank Ward......until Mello Mint becomes dated 1930 or later they need to stay as an E card...... |
#35
|
|||
|
|||
Should MELLO-MINT's be classified as an "R" set ?
Posted By: Ted Zanidakis
My Bridwell in the above scan has been folded....I have enlarged the scan and denoted the fold line. |
#36
|
|||
|
|||
Should MELLO-MINT's be classified as an "R" set ?
Posted By: Ted Zanidakis
I have no real interest in changing the ACC, as I do no have the expertise of a Burdick. |
#37
|
|||
|
|||
Should MELLO-MINT's be classified as an "R" set ?
Posted By: leon
I agree with most of your suggestions/statements.....though I am the lone hold out on the T213-1's....Burdick was a genius in getting as much correct as he did. I have been going over old hobby publications the last few days....What we learn in 1 day on Net54 could have taken years in snail mail....Can you imagine? |
#38
|
|||
|
|||
Should MELLO-MINT's be classified as an "R" set ?
Posted By: Ted Zanidakis
Here is CYoung......# 17 in our Gallery. |
#39
|
|||
|
|||
Should MELLO-MINT's be classified as an "R" set ?
Posted By: Ted Zanidakis
We lost the Wagner (throwing) scan....so, I'll show my E90-1 Wagner to maintain the pix in this Gallery. |
#40
|
|||
|
|||
Should MELLO-MINT's be classified as an "R" set ?
Posted By: MikeU
"To answer your question, "R" is for 1930+ Candy/Gum issues." |
#41
|
|||
|
|||
Should MELLO-MINT's be classified as an "R" set ?
Posted By: Dave Hornish
E cards may have been distro'd in packaging that allowed the purchaser to sight the card vs. R cards that were theoretically sealed up in an opaque wrapper. Also, E card dimensions are closer to T cards and 30's R's are closer still to the modern dimensions. |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
1929 R316 "Kashin Publications" Babe Ruth with "MADE IN U.S.A" | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 7 | 08-06-2022 02:27 PM |
T206 Old Mill "Single Factory Overprint" & Cobb "Red Hindu" & "Uzit | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 5 | 04-14-2009 06:28 PM |
How to tell the difference between "set 81" and "set 82" Exhibits? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 4 | 01-09-2007 11:20 AM |
John "Rowdy Jack" Joseph "Peach Pie" O'Connor ?? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 5 | 10-17-2005 11:58 AM |
Does a PSA grade of "miscut" or "cut too small" mean that the card is authentic? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 16 | 03-30-2005 01:23 PM |