NonSports Forum

Net54baseball.com
Welcome to Net54baseball.com. These forums are devoted to both Pre- and Post- war baseball cards and vintage memorabilia, as well as other sports. There is a separate section for Buying, Selling and Trading - the B/S/T area!! If you give an opinion of a person or company your full name needs to be in your post. Contact the moderator at leon@net54baseball.com should you have any questions or concerns. Enjoy!
Net54baseball.com
Net54baseball.com
ebay GSB

Go Back   Net54baseball.com Forums > Net54baseball Main PreWWII Forums > Net54baseball Vintage (Pre-WWII) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 02-15-2007, 04:41 PM
Archive Archive is offline
Administrator
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 58,919
Default E92s - Relative scarcity of backs?

Posted By: JimB

Can those of you who have collected these throw out some guesses as to the relative scarcity of the different backs. I know the red Crofts candy is the toughest, but how tough is the blue compared with the black or red? How do they compare with Crofts Cocoa? What about Dockmans? How do you think they compare with other standard E sets from E90-1 - E106? Thanks,
JimB

Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 02-15-2007, 05:06 PM
Archive Archive is offline
Administrator
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 58,919
Default E92s - Relative scarcity of backs?

Posted By: barrysloate

Jim- you left out Nadjas. While I'm not an expert, here's my guess:

Nadja and Dockman are easiest
Crofts Cocoa and Crofts Candy black are tougher
Blue Crofts are tougher than blacks
Red Crofts- you can only get them from Leon- he has them all, that greedy

Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 02-15-2007, 05:42 PM
Archive Archive is offline
Administrator
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 58,919
Default E92s - Relative scarcity of backs?

Posted By: quan

hey jim i put the value of blue crofts about 3x over a regular black back, not sure about the red as leon has sold only one so we have to go case-by-case on those.

i never collected the dockmans (common backs/cartoony lithos) but they would fall in the e95/e93 in term of scarcity. since e92s/e101s/e102s were all printed at the same time/place i would guess just like the other 2 sets some e92s are harder to come by.

i'm sure if u email pete he can give you better info as he's been collecting the set for years.

Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 02-15-2007, 05:44 PM
Archive Archive is offline
Administrator
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 58,919
Default E92s - Relative scarcity of backs?

Posted By: Bruce MacPherson

I agree with Barry's list with one caveat. Although the Nadja St. Louis cards seem to be on ebay constantly, only a few non-St. Louis players show up. In fact other than one Wagner, I cant recall the last Nadja HOFer that showed up for sale (other than STL cards of Bresnahan and Wallace). I would put the non-STL players at or above the Crofts Cocoa.

Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 02-15-2007, 05:53 PM
Archive Archive is offline
Administrator
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 58,919
Default E92s - Relative scarcity of backs?

Posted By: Anonymous

Funny thing is Oldcardboard.com lists Nadja as being the most valuable back. Obviously crofts cocoa and almost all the Crofts candy are selling for more then the nadja backs. Is crofts candy, black font, selling for more then nadja too?

Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 02-15-2007, 06:05 PM
Archive Archive is offline
Administrator
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 58,919
Default E92s - Relative scarcity of backs?

Posted By: barrysloate

Bruce is correct that the Nadja St.Louis is plentiful compared to Nadja's from any other team.

Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 02-15-2007, 06:50 PM
Archive Archive is offline
Administrator
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 58,919
Default E92s - Relative scarcity of backs?

Posted By: JimB

Thanks for all the info guys.
JimB

Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 02-15-2007, 08:36 PM
Archive Archive is offline
Administrator
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 58,919
Default E92s - Relative scarcity of backs?

Posted By: Colt McClelland

Here is how I would rank them:

1. Croft's Candy Red
2. Nadja (non-STL)
3. Croft's Cocoa
4. Croft's Candy Blue
5. Croft's Candy Black
6. Nadja (STL only)
7. Dockman

I've owned all but the Croft's Candy Red variety, and have followed them fairly closely for about 4 years. The scarcity of the Nadja (non-STL) are not fully appreciated in my opinion because the Nadja (STL) are so much easier.

I would say group 1 is in a class by itself. Group 2 is in a class by itself also, although much easier to find than Group 1. Groups 3, 4, and 5 are very similar although Group 5 is slightly easier. Group 6 is then a step below, and Group 7 is by far the easiest.

However, I also believe that there are a certain poses that are tougher than others in a particular group. This is probably easiest to see in Dockman's because they are the most common.

Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 02-16-2007, 07:21 AM
Archive Archive is offline
Administrator
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 58,919
Default E92s - Relative scarcity of backs?

Posted By: leon

My experience is close to Colts on scarcity of these.....his was:

1. Croft's Candy Red
2. Nadja (non-STL)
3. Croft's Cocoa
4. Croft's Candy Blue
5. Croft's Candy Black
6. Nadja (STL only)
7. Dockman


Since this is only a backs discussion I don't put the Nadja's as high..with understanding that the non-STL Najdas are very tough but it's still the same back....my list...most difficult to least...

1. Croft's Candy Red
2. Croft's Candy Blue
3. Croft's Cocoa
4. Croft's Candy Black
5. Nadja
6. Dockman

The Cocoa and blue backs are close but I have personally seen a few more of the Cocoa's......Also, blank backs could be put in there and I would put them as number 2 if they are included....
best regards
leon

Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 02-16-2007, 08:01 AM
Archive Archive is offline
Administrator
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 58,919
Default E92s - Relative scarcity of backs?

Posted By: JimB

Any thoughts on numbers. I know there are only a handful of red Crofts Candys, but how many more blacks are there than blues? Three times as many? Two times as many. Any thoughts on how much tougher one is compared with the others?
Jim

Reply With Quote
Reply



Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
T206 -- Relative Scarcity or What Autographs Can Tell You Archive Net54baseball Vintage (Pre-WWII) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions 13 01-27-2009 07:27 AM
T205 backs -- scarcity? Archive Net54baseball Vintage (Pre-WWII) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions 21 02-27-2008 08:56 AM
Relative Rarity of T206 and T207 Blank Backs Archive Net54baseball Vintage (Pre-WWII) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions 11 06-08-2007 11:55 PM
Broadleaf 460 vs Wagner T-206s (relative scarcity) Archive Net54baseball Vintage (Pre-WWII) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions 11 06-18-2006 09:00 PM
Scarcity of M116 backs Archive Net54baseball Vintage (Pre-WWII) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions 10 03-21-2006 01:34 PM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:47 AM.


ebay GSB