|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
So PSA grades more harshly today than say, 10 years ago? As such, do PSA graded cards in newer slabs command a premium as the grade is considered more accurate?
__________________
****Southern League**** Old Mill (SL) PSA 3: 3/48 Old Mill (SL) PSA 4: 5/48 Hindu Brown: 1/34 ****NY Highlanders Team Set**** Basic Team Set: 13/28 Master Team Set: 13/315 |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Hopefully you're on to something here!!!
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
Tobacco stains on Polar Bear cards are acceptable as well are chunks of tobacco.
PSA got the grade right based on the overall condition of the card. Regardless of what PSA says, the condition of the card is VG-EX all day long. |
#4
|
||||
|
||||
Agree on this...
__________________
Leon Luckey |
#5
|
||||
|
||||
Every time I turn in a nice looking card with stains on it, it gets graded a 1 or 2. For example: 1953 Glendales. That Chase card is horrible , I agree.
__________________
Wanted : Detroit Baseball Cards and Memorabilia ( from 19th Century Detroit Wolverines to Detroit Tigers Ty Cobb to Al Kaline). |
#6
|
||||
|
||||
Let's see some of your 1s and 2s with stains and no creases, as that horrible Chase? I am guessing your 1s and 2s have some wrinkles or creases. That said the Chase should probably have ST on its flip.
__________________
Leon Luckey Last edited by Leon; 11-22-2017 at 07:43 AM. |
#7
|
||||
|
||||
Yes, there are many examples of newer graded cards selling at the high end of the spectrum compared to older graded cards. Some of it has to do with the grading adjustments, but some also has to do with the new tamper-evident cases. So it's not just the grade, it's the generation of flip (hologram or lighthouse) and the slab itself people are paying a premium for with a newly graded example.
__________________
-- PWCC: The Fish Stinks From the Head PSA: Regularly Get Cheated BGS: Can't detect trimming on modern SGC: Closed auto authentication business JSA: Approved same T206 Autos before SGC Oh, what a difference a year makes. |
|
|