|
#51
|
|||
|
|||
17 new Hall of Famers!
Posted By: howard
Why argue about Simmons and Carter when we all should be wondering what the heck Rick ferrel and Ray Schalk are doing in the Hall? |
#52
|
|||
|
|||
17 new Hall of Famers!
Posted By: David Vargha
Maybe I missed it, but who are the seven with cards and would you also be kind enough to list their cards for us? |
#53
|
|||
|
|||
17 new Hall of Famers!
Posted By: rp60
Most of these games where played either before or after the season..And while it seems obvious that the black players had more to prove. White players played not for the honor and pride of the white race, but rather for a pay check.. |
#54
|
|||
|
|||
17 new Hall of Famers!
Posted By: Colt McClelland
I live in Kansas City, and one of the local news channels just aired a local press conference where Buck made a few comments. As some earlier posts on this thread suggested, Buck was all about being positive and supporting the 17 who got in. He said he would be in Cooperstown to support the 17 new members. He was basically every bit the great ambassador we've come to know and love. He said that God's been very good to him, so don't shed a tear for old Buck. I love this guy. I think he will get in someday, as he should. I just hope he's still alive to enjoy it. |
#55
|
|||
|
|||
17 new Hall of Famers!
Posted By: Chris Counts
Here's a quote I just found from Minnie in response to today's announcement ... |
#56
|
|||
|
|||
17 new Hall of Famers!
Posted By: warshawlaw
HOF voting is more about perception than specific statistics. Puckett, Joss, Youngs, Koufax, Dean all prove that point, as do Mattingly, Sutton, Blyleven, John. |
#57
|
|||
|
|||
17 new Hall of Famers!
Posted By: Max Weder
My thoughts on the HOF announcement: |
#58
|
|||
|
|||
17 new Hall of Famers!
Posted By: Ryan Christoff
Max, |
#59
|
|||
|
|||
17 new Hall of Famers!
Posted By: Rhys
I am not going to comment on whether I agree or disagree with the recent inductions. |
#60
|
|||
|
|||
17 new Hall of Famers!
Posted By: Scott Gross
On HOF topic: |
#61
|
|||
|
|||
17 new Hall of Famers!
Posted By: Paul
I didn't realize Robert Peterson died before today's announcement. That is sad. Does anyone know why he cast his votes in advance? I thought the idea was that the committee would meet, discuss the candidates and base their votes at least partly on the discussion. Did he know he was going to die? |
#62
|
|||
|
|||
17 new Hall of Famers!
Posted By: Kenny Cole
Ray Brown, Willard Brown, Mendez, Mackey, Hill, Cooper, Torriente. |
#63
|
|||
|
|||
17 new Hall of Famers!
Posted By: howard
While it may or may not be true that Newk would have been brought up three years earlier (I suspect he was held back one or two years) what actually hurt him more was his two years of military service and the awful season he had the year he returned. That combined with the year or two he missed in the late forties might have cost him close to a hundred wins. |
#64
|
|||
|
|||
17 new Hall of Famers!
Posted By: tbob
What a frigging bad joke. Awful... |
#65
|
|||
|
|||
17 new Hall of Famers!
Posted By: Bryan
The one good thing about Effa's selection is that it does answer the question of who is the worst HOF selection. |
#66
|
|||
|
|||
17 new Hall of Famers!
Posted By: barrysloate
Bob- you alluded to the problem when you referenced "politically correct." I've always suspected that a large number of players got in due to politics- having the right connections in the veterans committee, or being courted by a group of influential "lobbyists" who were close to the voters. No doubt players like Mays and Aaron get inducted no matter what, but too many marginal players have gotten in for all the wrong reasons. Yes, Effa Manley may have made a contribution to the Negro Leagues but maybe the time had finally come to have a woman in the hall. |
#67
|
|||
|
|||
17 new Hall of Famers!
Posted By: Brian H (misunderestimated)
Its hard to quibble with some of the choices in the 17 without knowing what the critera was...If its just solely on Negro/Pre-Negro League "black ball" contributions I guess I can stand Minnie and Buck not making it -- although it will greatly diminish from the induction ceremony itself since Bruce Sutter will be the only living inductee and both Minnie and Buck are among the finest and most admirable living ex-ballplayers as human beings (as opposed to Pete Rose, for example) |
#68
|
|||
|
|||
17 new Hall of Famers!
Posted By: Mike
I said Kirby had 2000 hits in his first 10 seasons. You come out and tell me that I am wrong. And then correct me by saying he had 1996 ? Come on....Pretty close to 2 Grand. And I do not have Kirby on a pedestal. I live in the Twin Cities, and have had plenty of contact with him. Both at the garbage dome, and in the community. I was simply spouting stats. I put very few people on pedestals. The ones I put up there are family and friends. Not athletes. I have thousands of cards. I collect them because I love the cards, the game, and the history. Yes, Puck belongs in the hall. He easily would have had over three thousand hits if he wouldn't have been beaned. But I suppose we could go back and pick out the dozens of other players who don't belong. |
#69
|
|||
|
|||
17 new Hall of Famers!
Posted By: Ryan Christoff
Here is a checklist of all the cards of the newly elected HOFers that I am aware of: |
#70
|
|||
|
|||
17 new Hall of Famers!
Posted By: RP60
Simmons, Hodges, Minoso, Santo, Oliva, Rice, Parker, Dawson, Carter, Gossage, just to name 10 worthy off the top of my head...Such a large appointment of negro league players should not suprise anyone, since MLB and the HOF have adopted an apologist approach to all matters concerning race in baseball past and present.. |
#71
|
|||
|
|||
17 new Hall of Famers!
Posted By: Chad
Make an argument why a single one of the 17 elected don't deserve it. Seriously. These guys aren't in for political correctness, they're in because they're great players. Willard Brown was a great player. Ray Brown is one of the greatest pitchers of all time. Period. To say these guys are getting their due now because of political correctness or as an apology is just pure, unadulterated BS. Effa Manley and Alex Pompez are the only iffy choices, but they're not without their merits. As for the rest, I defy you to make a rational argument why they don't belong. |
#72
|
|||
|
|||
17 new Hall of Famers!
Posted By: RP60
I dont think the people posting (myself included) feel that these players are not worthy..What I find interesting is the size of the group, and a woman included in a non-playing or managing role..Then again the HOF or MLB have never been even handed. |
#73
|
|||
|
|||
17 new Hall of Famers!
Posted By: Chad
Yes, it's stupid. But 25 years from now, what does it matter? They're in. Does anyone care that King Kelly got elected to the HOF in a mass group? Many of these players should have been in decades ago. It's about time they rectified that. As for Manley, there are plenty of executives/pioneers in the HOF who didn't play. She's the weakest inductee, but she's not without a case. It's not an unreasonable selection. I would rather Home Run Johnson or Buck or Dick Redding had been elected, but people need to understand how hard, allmost impossible it was, to keep a franchise stable in the Negro Leagues. And it was the fact that there were a few stable franchises that made various incarnations of the Negro Leagues possible. The Monarchs, the Grays and the Eagles were all able to do it, and all three of their operators are in the Hall. I would have only voted for Posey and Wilkinson, but I can see the committees point on Pompez and Manley. They're not enshrinees out of left field. |
#74
|
|||
|
|||
17 new Hall of Famers!
Posted By: David Vargha
Thanks for the list, Ryan! |
#75
|
|||
|
|||
17 new Hall of Famers!
Posted By: Ryan Christoff
rp60, |
#76
|
|||
|
|||
17 new Hall of Famers!
Posted By: pete
1. Tommy Lasorda "HAD" to have gone in as a manager since he sucked as a player. |
#77
|
|||
|
|||
17 new Hall of Famers!
Posted By: Chad
But equating negro league players with minor leaguers, women ballplayers and "band" ball players is pretty condescending. They were major league caliber players who weren't allowed to play against whites. But more than that, the Negro Leagues WERE a major league, especially when the top teams played each other. The Homestead Grays would have been the best team in MLB in their dynasty years. They don't deserve to be marginalized with a special section. And thankfully, they won't be. |
#78
|
|||
|
|||
17 new Hall of Famers!
Posted By: Wesley
There certainly seems to be a lot of backlash to the HOF admitting seventeen members at the same time by special committee vote. Time will tell but these recent entrants to the Hall may one day be seen as no different than players who gain entry by regular ballot. Perhaps in the long run they will be viewed as the same as regular ballot inductees rather than similar to veteran committee selections, managers, umpires, journalists and other special entry members who are honored in Cooperstown. Like Chad said, in twenty-five years maybe it will not matter. |
#79
|
|||
|
|||
17 new Hall of Famers!
Posted By: barrysloate
There are more than a few baseball historians, as well as former players, who actually felt the Negro League players were in fact better than the major leaguers! When they played barnstorming games, the major league teams always sent mediocre players. The thinking was if the major leaguers won, that would prove their superiority; and if the black players won, well, there was a built-in excuse that they weren't beating the best players anyway. If the majors sent their best players and lost, that would be a devastating blow to segregated baseball. |
#80
|
|||
|
|||
17 new Hall of Famers!
Posted By: Mark
"The thinking was if the major leaguers won, that would prove their superiority; and if the black players won, well, there was a built-in excuse that they weren't beating the best players anyway. " |
#81
|
|||
|
|||
17 new Hall of Famers!
Posted By: jay behrens
The reason so many players got elected at one time is because this is a one-time, special election. This will never happen again and the only way a NeLer can get in now is via the VC like every other ball player. |
#82
|
|||
|
|||
17 new Hall of Famers!
Posted By: identify7
I can understand rookie card collectors not accepting pre-rookie cards because the player was not yet a MLB rookie. |
#83
|
|||
|
|||
17 new Hall of Famers!
Posted By: Matt Goebel
I think part of the problem is that people think of it as the "Major League" baseball Hall of Fame, when it is in fact the "National" baseball Hall of Fame. No where at all is it limited to Major Leaguers. |
#84
|
|||
|
|||
17 new Hall of Famers!
Posted By: warshawlaw
The election just made my collection a whole lot messier to complete. I try to get autographed tribute cards of the NLers (e.g. Perez Steele, etc.). How the *&*&% am I supposed to do that for most of these guys??? The idiots at the HOF are so inconsiderate of us collectors! J/K |
#85
|
|||
|
|||
17 new Hall of Famers!
Posted By: pete
that i didnt mean the caliber of negro ball players wasnt as high as the major league players, because its obvious that there are a lot of negro leaguers that deserve the honor, probably more than we know of, but the fact that it was a different league, just like minor leaguers or the women ball players...on the band ball players i think that a special section that highlights their careers like jackson and rose particularly, then point out the reason WHY they arent in the hall |
#86
|
|||
|
|||
17 new Hall of Famers!
Posted By: Brian
The only three HOF cards I own are Dihigo, Dandridge and now Ray Brown. I am damned glad I bought my 1945/46 Caramelos Felices set when I did. |
#87
|
|||
|
|||
17 new Hall of Famers!
Posted By: Julie Vognar
Effe and Minnie and Buck and all of em. Sutter's O.K. too. HOOOOHAAA (diNiro). |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
FS: Various Hall of Famers | Archive | 1920 to 1949 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 1 | 05-05-2009 02:48 PM |
More Hall of Famers | Archive | 1920 to 1949 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 0 | 04-25-2007 08:05 PM |
Various Hall of Famers | Archive | 1920 to 1949 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 1 | 04-24-2007 05:58 PM |
Hall of Famers | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 16 | 03-07-2005 07:07 PM |
NO new Hall of Famers.......... | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 9 | 02-28-2003 11:02 AM |