|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
a few other tidbits...
Someone always wants the best of something. So, if you can attain the best (or it's one of the best), of a desirable item it should do well long-term. Aesthetics matter to collectors and not as much to registry folks (isn't it all about the number?). And of course there are registry guys that do want the best looking examples. But, I don't think registries, so far, take into account particular visual characteristics. I would guess that the majority of the highest grade pre-war cards don't look as nice as ones with lower technical grades. It can't be said enough; rarity doesn't equate to value. It's all about "demand". To the topic, another 100k card would be a nicer T205 Cobby..... . Quote:
__________________
Leon Luckey Last edited by Leon; 01-17-2024 at 08:53 AM. |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
PSA Sub question...quick and simple question | philliesfan | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 3 | 02-02-2023 11:53 PM |
Hobby question bowman and topps question 1950 to 1953 | Bigdah | Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) | 9 | 12-20-2016 06:55 PM |
1955 Topps Trivia Question - Updated with Question #2 | toppcat | Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) | 9 | 01-03-2012 07:51 PM |
SGC grading question (possible dumb question) | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 6 | 09-08-2006 12:36 AM |
Player question & a set question | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 4 | 11-13-2004 06:41 PM |