NonSports Forum

Net54baseball.com
Welcome to Net54baseball.com. These forums are devoted to both Pre- and Post- war baseball cards and vintage memorabilia, as well as other sports. There is a separate section for Buying, Selling and Trading - the B/S/T area!! If you write anything concerning a person or company your full name needs to be in your post or obtainable from it. . Contact the moderator at leon@net54baseball.com should you have any questions or concerns. When you click on links to eBay on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network. Enjoy!
Net54baseball.com
Net54baseball.com
ebay GSB
T206s on eBay
Babe Ruth Cards on eBay
t206 Ty Cobb on eBay
Ty Cobb Cards on eBay
Lou Gehrig Cards on eBay
Baseball T201-T217 on eBay
Baseball E90-E107 on eBay
T205 Cards on eBay
Baseball Postcards on eBay
Goudey Cards on eBay
Baseball Memorabilia on eBay
Baseball Exhibit Cards on eBay
Baseball Strip Cards on eBay
Baseball Baking Cards on eBay
Sporting News Cards on eBay
Play Ball Cards on eBay
Joe DiMaggio Cards on eBay
Mickey Mantle Cards on eBay
Bowman 1951-1955 on eBay
Football Cards on eBay

Go Back   Net54baseball.com Forums > Net54baseball Main Forum - WWII & Older Baseball Cards > Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #51  
Old 11-05-2009, 09:31 PM
Kenny Cole Kenny Cole is offline
Kenny Cole
Member
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Norman, OK
Posts: 1,393
Default

I don't guess that Wharton has a class that teaches class. Too bad.
Reply With Quote
  #52  
Old 11-05-2009, 09:44 PM
kmac32's Avatar
kmac32 kmac32 is offline
Ken McMillan
Member
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Ponte Vedra, Florida
Posts: 2,509
Default

The thing I found fun was Johnny Damon has a World Series ring from the Yankees and their rival the Red Sox. Not too many can claim that one.
Reply With Quote
  #53  
Old 11-05-2009, 09:47 PM
Neal's Avatar
Neal Neal is offline
Ne@l K
Member
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: US
Posts: 1,580
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by calvindog View Post
Without the late summer pickups of Lee and Pedro it's hard to imagine the Phillies even getting to the WS. My point being that success in one or two years is not guaranteed going forward. I agree the Phils have a great core but they've got some work to do to stay on top in the NL.
but the PHILLIES got those players, much like the Yankees did with CC, AJ, and Tex
Reply With Quote
  #54  
Old 11-05-2009, 10:01 PM
Jim VB's Avatar
Jim VB Jim VB is offline
Jim VB
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 2,090
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by kmac32 View Post
The thing I found fun was Johnny Damon has a World Series ring from the Yankees and their rival the Red Sox. Not too many can claim that one.


The only two I can think of are Damon and Hinske.
Reply With Quote
  #55  
Old 11-05-2009, 10:02 PM
PhilNap's Avatar
PhilNap PhilNap is offline
Phil Nap
Member
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: New York
Posts: 181
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jay Wolt View Post
So what was Jimmy Rollins supposed to say when a reporter asked him who will win the Series?
Of course he should predict his team to win it all.
He should take a page from the book of Jeter, Rivera, etc. He could have offered a confident response and not the cocky "5 games, 6 if we're nice". Don't think the Yankees didn't take note of such comments. At least the Redsox and their fans respect that they have a battle on their hands everytime they face the Yankees. The cockiness of Rollins and many Phillies fans just proved to be plain silly.
Reply With Quote
  #56  
Old 11-05-2009, 10:13 PM
nolemmings's Avatar
nolemmings nolemmings is offline
Todd Schultz
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Phoenix
Posts: 3,740
Default

Quote:
The only two I can think of are Damon and Hinske.
Ramiro Mendoza --not on the Bosox WS roster, but likely got a ring
Reply With Quote
  #57  
Old 11-05-2009, 10:27 PM
tothrk's Avatar
tothrk tothrk is offline
Bob.T*th
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Ohio
Posts: 212
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by PhilNap View Post
He should take a page from the book of Jeter, Rivera, etc. He could have offered a confident response and not the cocky "5 games, 6 if we're nice". Don't think the Yankees didn't take note of such comments. At least the Redsox and their fans respect that they have a battle on their hands everytime they face the Yankees. The cockiness of Rollins and many Phillies fans just proved to be plain silly.
Relax. No one is making you have dinner with the guy.
Reply With Quote
  #58  
Old 11-05-2009, 10:45 PM
PhilNap's Avatar
PhilNap PhilNap is offline
Phil Nap
Member
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: New York
Posts: 181
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by tothrk View Post
Relax. No one is making you have dinner with the guy.
Just sayin' J-Roll shoulda kept his mouth shut. Oh well, too bad for him. Works for me though. Yankees Win Thaaaaa Yankees Win !!!!!!
Reply With Quote
  #59  
Old 11-05-2009, 10:45 PM
ChiefBenderForever's Avatar
ChiefBenderForever ChiefBenderForever is offline
Johnny S
Member
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Lost in Connecticut
Posts: 1,261
Default

Jim,the Twins will pay Mauer the money and I think he will stay but if they don't bring any help besides triple A players he might say no thanks and leave. To play for the Yankees is the greatest challenge in baseball and he might just try it.
Reply With Quote
  #60  
Old 11-06-2009, 12:32 AM
thekingofclout's Avatar
thekingofclout thekingofclout is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 1,958
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by kmac32 View Post
The thing I found fun was Johnny Damon has a World Series ring from the Yankees and their rival the Red Sox. Not too many can claim that one.
The Bambino won three with the Sox and four with the Yanks...
Reply With Quote
  #61  
Old 11-06-2009, 05:30 AM
ullmandds's Avatar
ullmandds ullmandds is offline
pete ullman
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: saint paul, mn
Posts: 11,263
Default

I was Joe Mauer of the future for halloween this year...mainly to antagonize my fellow Minnesotans...I don't think it will happen, though. If the twins don't pony up the cash to keep Joe...and put some other high caliber talent on the field...they'll never advance past the first round of the playoffs...and there will be mutiny!
Attached Images
File Type: jpg mauer2.jpg (68.4 KB, 235 views)
File Type: jpg mauer1.jpg (72.8 KB, 235 views)
Reply With Quote
  #62  
Old 11-06-2009, 05:44 AM
howard38 howard38 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 635
Default

Wally Schang and Carl Mays and maybe some of the other guys the Sox traded to the Yanks around 1920 have rings w/both teams.
Reply With Quote
  #63  
Old 11-06-2009, 05:57 AM
calvindog's Avatar
calvindog calvindog is offline
Jeffrey Lichtman
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 5,521
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by PhilNap View Post
At least the Redsox and their fans respect that they have a battle on their hands everytime they face the Yankees. The cockiness of Rollins and many Phillies fans just proved to be plain silly.
I had the fortune of being in Boston during a Yankees/Sox playoff series and in Philadelphia this year during the World Series. The difference between the fans in Philadelphia and Boston is really striking.
Reply With Quote
  #64  
Old 11-06-2009, 05:58 AM
barrysloate barrysloate is offline
Barry Sloate
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Brooklyn, NY
Posts: 8,293
Default

Think of poor Mike Mussina. He joined the Yankees in 2001 and retired in 2008. He missed all the championships by one year on either end.
Reply With Quote
  #65  
Old 11-06-2009, 06:15 AM
J.McMurry's Avatar
J.McMurry J.McMurry is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 288
Default

If the Phils would have had better pitching they might have made it at least a 7 game series,but they were certainly the best team the National league had to put up against the Yanks this year.

some on here have said that they dont care for the modern game of baseball,but they love collecting pre-war BB cards. I'm like that in the fact that I dislike the modern day Yankees (except Jeter), but I love anything "historical" * Yankees and NYC. go figure.


* "historical" = pre 1970
Reply With Quote
  #66  
Old 11-06-2009, 07:43 AM
Jay Wolt's Avatar
Jay Wolt Jay Wolt is offline
qualitycards
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Gettysburg PA area
Posts: 2,940
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by barrysloate View Post
Think of poor Mike Mussina. He joined the Yankees in 2001 and retired in 2008. He missed all the championships by one year on either end.
I was thinking about the Moose too!
He retired last year after his 1st 20 win season, so if he chose to
he would have been welcome to join the team at the new stadium.
BUT it might have been at the expense of the Yankees signing Pettitte.
Reply With Quote
  #67  
Old 11-06-2009, 07:52 AM
whycough whycough is offline
member
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 47
Default 2009 Payroll Advantage

The Yanks: $201,449,000 The Phils: $113,004,000 Big win there also, Yankee fans.

Last edited by whycough; 11-06-2009 at 07:54 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #68  
Old 11-06-2009, 08:08 AM
calvindog's Avatar
calvindog calvindog is offline
Jeffrey Lichtman
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 5,521
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by whycough View Post
The Yanks: $201,449,000 The Phils: $113,004,000 Big win there also, Yankee fans.
Yeah, why even play the games? After all, in a best of 7 series, the most expensive players always play the best.
Reply With Quote
  #69  
Old 11-06-2009, 08:29 AM
whycough whycough is offline
member
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 47
Default Payroll

Jeff: All Yankee fans love to pooh pooh the advantage of the Yankee spending. You claim that the highest priced players don't always play the best, so why do the Yanks pay them? To cover up for poor management? To cover up insecurity? To level the playing field and be good sports?
Reply With Quote
  #70  
Old 11-06-2009, 08:30 AM
sportscardtheory sportscardtheory is offline
John Startleman
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 258
Default

Ever wonder why people hate Yankees fans so much? This douchey thread shows why.
Reply With Quote
  #71  
Old 11-06-2009, 08:38 AM
Leon's Avatar
Leon Leon is offline
Leon
peasant/forum owner
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: near Dallas
Posts: 34,382
Default well

Quote:
Originally Posted by whycough View Post
The Yanks: $201,449,000 The Phils: $113,004,000 Big win there also, Yankee fans.
$88,000,000 here, $88,000,000 there, can start to add up.
__________________
Leon Luckey
Reply With Quote
  #72  
Old 11-06-2009, 08:41 AM
JasonL's Avatar
JasonL JasonL is offline
Jason
Member
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: The Eastern Seaboard
Posts: 581
Default A Cubs Fan in Yankeetown...

I have to say that I try to have an open mind, but hear me out on this series of thoughts.
I grew up in Chicago, and I am a lifelong Cubs fan. I know suffering. I know what it is to appreciate a winning season. The couple of trips to the playoffs that I have witnessed were very special.
I have never liked the Yankees, but I have never disliked them with any true intensity either.
Until I moved out East. And I met the Yankee culture and the Mission Statement that explains any season without a title as a failure. I find that to be excessively hardcore and borderline subpar sportsmanship. Don't misunderstand - I get winning, and I certainly understand goals.
But in this case I also find it to be a gross perversion of your objective, because in a major league sport, the quality and success of your competition is important to your livelihood. This is different than the business world, so while many want to link the two and ask the skeptic "Why wouldn't you do everything you can to win?" - the real question at this point for the Yankees may be something closer to "Are we doing something special?" and I would argue that you most certainly are not doing something special. Not anymore. You are doing something rather ordinary. Since their first title, I think they've won nearly a third of the time.

Hearing the media and the fan base praise this team and this championship just rings so holllow, doesn't it? I mean, they've won 27 of these now, they have the highest payroll in the game that is designed to bring in a squad of mercenaries, and the only expectation is to win everything, all the time, all year long, and every year thereafter. So where's the upside in being a Yankees fan? think about it. All you've got is downside. What fun is that?

It's still an accomplishment. But it was an accomplishment that was paid for in full and fully expected.
YAWN! so what.
you know what I mean? It just seems so silly to celebrate this team and yet another championship with such wild enthusiasm.
I know I look at this with an outsider's lens, and from that of someone who hasn't won in a beyond overdue timeframe, so it's probably fair and right to call me a jealous loser. True enough.
But just so you know, Yankees fans, this looks totally absurd and disconnected with reality from the outside.

No offense meant. honest.
Just some frustrated thoughts from someone who must look into vintage cardboard and research to find a year when his team looked like a champion.
__________________
www.thetriple-l.com
Reply With Quote
  #73  
Old 11-06-2009, 09:34 AM
Jim VB's Avatar
Jim VB Jim VB is offline
Jim VB
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 2,090
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by whycough View Post
The Yanks: $201,449,000 The Phils: $113,004,000 Big win there also, Yankee fans.
I don't understand your meaning. Would you be happier if the Yankees kept their payroll at $115 million (or some other abritrary number) and just made an additional $85 million in bottom line profit? Should the money just go to George rather than the players?

The fact is that Steinbrenner has built a business that generates more revenue than his competitors. It wasn't that way when he bought the team.

The best players want to go to the Yankees because, yes, they know they'll make the best money in the business, but more because they know they'll be expected to win, AND they know that management will give them every chance to win, every year.

There are many other owners who have more money than the Steinbrenner family. They just choose to not spend it on their baseball teams. That's their choice, but the fans pay the price.

Anyway, if you don't like this system, suggest an alternative.
Reply With Quote
  #74  
Old 11-06-2009, 10:05 AM
calvindog's Avatar
calvindog calvindog is offline
Jeffrey Lichtman
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 5,521
Default

Amazing that the Yankees don't spread the wealth around to the other teams (oh wait, they do!) so that they reduce their chances of winning. You'd think that in today's society the Steinbrenners would be more sensitive to the plights of the other billionaire owners.
Reply With Quote
  #75  
Old 11-06-2009, 10:07 AM
base_ball's Avatar
base_ball base_ball is offline
Joe Jesselli
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: New York City
Posts: 174
Default

"It's not if you win or lose, it's how you march in the parade."
Reply With Quote
  #76  
Old 11-06-2009, 10:14 AM
calvindog's Avatar
calvindog calvindog is offline
Jeffrey Lichtman
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 5,521
Default

Jason, I'm not a Yankee fan so I can appreciate your points. Being a Yankee fan is probably more stressful than being a Cubs fan because the Yankees actually are expected to win as opposed to being mired in a culture of failure. I guess it depends on how you look at life: expecting success at every turn can be stressful but one tends to achieve success more often; hoping for the best but being at peace with failure usually produces the opposite results. Of course a zillion dollar payroll does help the former philosophy off the ground.

But to think that the Yankees are the only team which hires mercenaries is just not true as you fully know. Hell, the Brewers traded for Sabbathia last year just to get them into the playoffs. The Phillies did it this year with Pedro and Cliff Lee. At least the Yankees kept their team intact at the trading deadline and didn't have major contributors join the team with two months left in the season.
Reply With Quote
  #77  
Old 11-06-2009, 10:27 AM
Jim VB's Avatar
Jim VB Jim VB is offline
Jim VB
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 2,090
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by calvindog View Post
Amazing that the Yankees don't spread the wealth around to the other teams (oh wait, they do!) so that they reduce their chances of winning. You'd think that in today's society the Steinbrenners would be more sensitive to the plights of the other billionaire owners.
There is not widespread demand for additional revenue sharing because the lower level team don't want to be forced to actually spend the money they receive.

The current system has two components revenue sharing: national TV money and a luxury tax. This creates a financial dis-incentive for bad teams to get better. Cleveland, Pittsburgh, Florida and KC, for example, have most of their payroll covered by shared money. If I remember right, the Pirates, playing in a new, publicly funded stadium, make a profit before they sell even one ticket. Their payroll is lower than the amount of money they receive from the league. Yet each season, we hear that they must sell or trade their best players for financial reasons.

Take a page from European League Soccer.

I would consider taking the 30 MLB teams and putting them in two divisions. A 20 team Major League and a 10 team "AAAA" league. Each year, let the top two "AAAA" teams move up and the bottom two Major League teams move down. The lower league gets no national TV games (or money). They get no All-Stars. They get their own playoffs, but no shot at a World Series, just their own league championship.



Then you'll see who wants to get better. They bad owners, who don't care, will be out in no time.

Last edited by Jim VB; 11-06-2009 at 10:29 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #78  
Old 11-06-2009, 10:34 AM
JasonL's Avatar
JasonL JasonL is offline
Jason
Member
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: The Eastern Seaboard
Posts: 581
Default Jeff, indeed that was refreshing

Quote:
Originally Posted by calvindog View Post
Jason, I'm not a Yankee fan so I can appreciate your points. Being a Yankee fan is probably more stressful than being a Cubs fan because the Yankees actually are expected to win as opposed to being mired in a culture of failure. I guess it depends on how you look at life: expecting success at every turn can be stressful but one tends to achieve success more often; hoping for the best but being at peace with failure usually produces the opposite results. Of course a zillion dollar payroll does help the former philosophy off the ground.

But to think that the Yankees are the only team which hires mercenaries is just not true as you fully know. Hell, the Brewers traded for Sabbathia last year just to get them into the playoffs. The Phillies did it this year with Pedro and Cliff Lee. At least the Yankees kept their team intact at the trading deadline and didn't have major contributors join the team with two months left in the season.
to see that they tried to keep the team intact and win with what they had...and it worked. And yes, everyone hires the big guns, or tries to if they can. Your thoughts on stress and success are spot on, of course. Perhaps that is why the Cubs have such a huge fan base...being a Cubs fan is about more than just winning a game or a season. It's not the win that defines you, it's the experience.

I will say this, though, and it runs a little counter to my original post...but then again maybe it doesn't. I enjoyed this year's team more than I have in the past, as they actually seemed to form a team, and I enjoyed the pies in the face and any sign that they had individual personalities. That stuff resonates more with me, as a fan.
__________________
www.thetriple-l.com
Reply With Quote
  #79  
Old 11-06-2009, 10:45 AM
calvindog's Avatar
calvindog calvindog is offline
Jeffrey Lichtman
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 5,521
Default

Jason, I agree regarding this year's Yankee team: they were likeable. Even ARod with all the crap he went through actually seemed human; I was thrilled that he did well. As a Dodgers fan growing up I loathed the Yankees in the late 70s because they were easy to hate (any team with Reggie is especially easy to hate). This year's team seemed to have a lot of fun and was filled with regular guys who played hard. Look at Mark Teixeira: has there ever been a zillionaire baseball player who is so likeable? (Apologies to Oriole and Sox fans, of course)
Reply With Quote
  #80  
Old 11-06-2009, 10:55 AM
Peter_Spaeth's Avatar
Peter_Spaeth Peter_Spaeth is online now
Peter Spaeth
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 30,418
Default

Why would you be thrilled that an admitted steroid-user, a guy who cheated serially on his wife, a guy whose self-centeredness knows no bounds, did well?
Reply With Quote
  #81  
Old 11-06-2009, 11:11 AM
forazzurri2axz forazzurri2axz is offline
Member
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 508
Default Bruces, if you were alive during the Nazi era,

...you would have turned in your parents for a quarter.---and maybe a boxing card of Schmeling.--your stupidity makes our stomachs turn.
Reply With Quote
  #82  
Old 11-06-2009, 12:13 PM
calvindog's Avatar
calvindog calvindog is offline
Jeffrey Lichtman
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 5,521
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Peter_Spaeth View Post
Why would you be thrilled that an admitted steroid-user, a guy who cheated serially on his wife, a guy whose self-centeredness knows no bounds, did well?
That sounds like a description of half the guys on the Red Sox last championship team! Seriously, I felt bad for the guy; he was just pathetic and was clearly suffering. How often can one witness a career renaissance in just a three week period?
Reply With Quote
  #83  
Old 11-06-2009, 01:54 PM
slidekellyslide's Avatar
slidekellyslide slidekellyslide is offline
Dan Bretta
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Lincoln, Nebraska
Posts: 6,122
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by forazzurri2axz View Post
...you would have turned in your parents for a quarter.---and maybe a boxing card of Schmeling.--your stupidity makes our stomachs turn.
If I had known that Dorskind was that hardcore of a Yankees fan I'd have told him before the last election that the Yankees only win World Series when the White House is occupied by Democrats....at least that has been true for their last 9 World Series wins.

I'm almost certain this little factoid will sway him to vote Obama in 2012.
__________________
Looking for Nebraska Indians memorabilia, photos and postcards
Reply With Quote
  #84  
Old 11-06-2009, 01:57 PM
autograf's Avatar
autograf autograf is offline
Tom Boblitt
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Louisville, KY
Posts: 2,011
Default

Another drive by posting by Bruce..........he comes here and makes an inflammatory post and then never revisits the train wreck..............predictable..........probably just sitting back stroking his white cat in his grey jumpsuit right now..........
Reply With Quote
  #85  
Old 11-06-2009, 01:59 PM
JasonL's Avatar
JasonL JasonL is offline
Jason
Member
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: The Eastern Seaboard
Posts: 581
Default AND, no doubt,...

Quote:
Originally Posted by autograf View Post
Another drive by posting by Bruce..........he comes here and makes an inflammatory post and then never revisits the train wreck..............predictable..........probably just sitting back stroking his white cat in his grey jumpsuit right now..........
talking to #2
__________________
www.thetriple-l.com
Reply With Quote
  #86  
Old 11-06-2009, 02:04 PM
Chris Counts's Avatar
Chris Counts Chris Counts is offline
Chris Counts
Member
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Bay Area, California
Posts: 1,679
Default

Dan, the Yankees didn't do too bad under Franklin D. Roosevelt as well, winning six World Series, including the all-time mark of four in a row ...
Reply With Quote
  #87  
Old 11-06-2009, 02:40 PM
Peter_Spaeth's Avatar
Peter_Spaeth Peter_Spaeth is online now
Peter Spaeth
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 30,418
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by calvindog View Post
That sounds like a description of half the guys on the Red Sox last championship team! Seriously, I felt bad for the guy; he was just pathetic and was clearly suffering. How often can one witness a career renaissance in just a three week period?
The dude is his own worst enemy and has exhibited bad character on far too many occasions for me to feel badly for him, even leaving aside that it's generally hard to feel sorry for someone that rich and talented.
Reply With Quote
  #88  
Old 11-06-2009, 02:55 PM
tbob's Avatar
tbob tbob is offline
Member
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 2,783
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Yankeefan51 View Post
As a lifelong Yankee fan, we take great pleasure in our latest victory.
Shouldn't it be "As lifelong Yankee fanS, we take great pleasure in our latest victory?" Otherwise you are referring not to your Dorskind group but using the royal "we" and looking silly.
Reply With Quote
  #89  
Old 11-06-2009, 02:58 PM
Anthony S.'s Avatar
Anthony S. Anthony S. is offline
D.B. Cooper
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: San Francisco
Posts: 1,151
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by tbob View Post
Shouldn't it be "As lifelong Yankee fanS, we take great pleasure in our latest victory?" Otherwise you are referring not to your Dorskind group but using the royal "we" and looking silly.
Multiple Personality Disorder can be very taxing on proper grammatical usage.
Reply With Quote
  #90  
Old 11-06-2009, 05:26 PM
ChiefBenderForever's Avatar
ChiefBenderForever ChiefBenderForever is offline
Johnny S
Member
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Lost in Connecticut
Posts: 1,261
Default

Money can buy a lot of things but it can't buy you love,and can't buy championships.
Reply With Quote
  #91  
Old 11-06-2009, 05:31 PM
HRBAKER's Avatar
HRBAKER HRBAKER is offline
Jeff
Member
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Somewhere
Posts: 5,255
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by tbob View Post
Shouldn't it be "As lifelong Yankee fanS, we take great pleasure in our latest victory?" Otherwise you are referring not to your Dorskind group but using the royal "we" and looking silly.
Maybe during his tenure he didn't concentrate on grammar.
Reply With Quote
  #92  
Old 11-06-2009, 05:46 PM
Republicaninmass Republicaninmass is online now
T3d $h3rm@n
Member
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 8,185
Default

Money cant buy everything, but it can buy something big enough to pull up next to it
Reply With Quote
  #93  
Old 11-06-2009, 07:36 PM
tedzan tedzan is offline
Ted Zanidakis
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Pennsylvania & Maine
Posts: 10,053
Default Yankees Chanpionships/U.S. Presidents

Since a recent comparison was alluded to in a prior post here....here is the rest of the history....
of the Yankees AL Championships vs. U.S. Presidents.

World Series Champs annotated by **


1921......Harding (Republican)
1922......Harding (Republican)
1923......Coolidge (Republican) **
1926......Coolidge (Republican)
1927......Coolidge (Republican) **
1928......Coolidge (Republican) **
1932......Hoover (Republican) **
1936......Roosevelt (Democrat) **
1937......Roosevelt (Democrat) **
1938......Roosevelt (Democrat) **
1939......Roosevelt (Democrat) **
1941......Roosevelt (Democrat) **
1942......Roosevelt (Democrat)
1943......Roosevelt (Democrat) **
1947......Truman (Democrat) **
1949......Truman (Democrat) **
1950......Truman (Democrat) **
1951......Truman (Democrat) **
1952......Truman (Democrat) **
1953......Eisenhower (Republican) **
1955......Eisenhower (Republican)
1956......Eisenhower (Republican) **
1957......Eisenhower (Republican)
1958......Eisenhower (Republican) **
1960......Eisenhower (Republican)
1961......Kennedy (Democrat) **
1962......Kennedy (Democrat) **
1963......Kennedy (Democrat)
1964......Johnson (Democrat)
1976......Ford (Republican)
1977......Carter (Democrat) **
1978......Carter (Democrat) **
1981......Carter (Democrat)
1996......Clinton (Democrat) **
1998......Clinton (Democrat) **
1999......Clinton (Democrat) **
2000......Clinton (Democrat) **
2001......Bush (Republican)
2003......Bush (Republican)
2009......Obama (Democrat) **

AL Championships = 40
World Series Championships = 27


TED Z

Last edited by tedzan; 11-06-2009 at 07:57 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #94  
Old 11-06-2009, 08:10 PM
prewarsports prewarsports is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 1,547
Default

Money CAN buy you championships.

Give the Royals Half a Billion Dollars to sign all the big free agents over the next few years and I bet they become one of the elite in Baseball.
Reply With Quote
  #95  
Old 11-06-2009, 08:11 PM
calvindog's Avatar
calvindog calvindog is offline
Jeffrey Lichtman
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 5,521
Default

Are there any fans of any team but the Yankees that don't wish their team could and would spend all the money needed to win a championship?
Reply With Quote
  #96  
Old 11-06-2009, 08:27 PM
baseballart's Avatar
baseballart baseballart is offline
Max Weder
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Vancouver BC
Posts: 1,137
Default

I can think of a few fans ;-)

Last edited by baseballart; 11-06-2009 at 08:30 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #97  
Old 11-06-2009, 09:59 PM
Jim VB's Avatar
Jim VB Jim VB is offline
Jim VB
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 2,090
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by prewarsports View Post
Money CAN buy you championships.

Give the Royals Half a Billion Dollars to sign all the big free agents over the next few years and I bet they become one of the elite in Baseball.

Well, when Royal fans begin to show up to the games in the numbers the Yankee fans do; when they show a willingness to pay the same ticket prices; and/or watch the games on TV and attract advertising revenue at the same rate the Yankees do; then you have a right to complain.


However, they have never done that. The team just collects the revenue sharing and luxury tax money and pockets it.

Small market teams can, and do, compete in MLB. Twins seem to do a great job of it every year.


Edited to add: http://www.sportsbusinessdaily.com/article/132600

Read the first article. I bet KC clears enough from MLB and revenue sharing and luxury tax money to cover their entire payroll.

Stop using money as an excuse for poor management.

Last edited by Jim VB; 11-06-2009 at 10:05 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #98  
Old 11-07-2009, 03:53 AM
sbfinley's Avatar
sbfinley sbfinley is offline
Steven Finley
Member
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Nashville, Tn
Posts: 1,465
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jim VB View Post
Well, when Royal fans begin to show up to the games in the numbers the Yankee fans do; when they show a willingness to pay the same ticket prices; and/or watch the games on TV and attract advertising revenue at the same rate the Yankees do; then you have a right to complain.


However, they have never done that. The team just collects the revenue sharing and luxury tax money and pockets it.

Small market teams can, and do, compete in MLB. Twins seem to do a great job of it every year.


Edited to add: http://www.sportsbusinessdaily.com/article/132600

Read the first article. I bet KC clears enough from MLB and revenue sharing and luxury tax money to cover their entire payroll.

Stop using money as an excuse for poor management.
You can blame poor management all day. But do not blame KC fans.
Reply With Quote
  #99  
Old 11-07-2009, 07:59 AM
Jim VB's Avatar
Jim VB Jim VB is offline
Jim VB
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 2,090
Default

I would never blame the fans directly for the problems of the team. I only ascribe "blame" to them in that they have accepted the status quo and are still willing to allow management to continue down the same paths.

I have respect for all fans, but especially like those, like the season ticket holders of the Cleveland Browns, who try to fight back.


Back in the early 1970's, Steinbrenner bought a team that was in total disarray. They had been bad for 10 years. They lost money. They didn't sell a lot of tickets. They put a poor product on the field. He invested his own money and took big dollar chances. Some worked out fine. Some he was forced to eat. He built the Yankees back to a financial powerhouse.

Fast forward 35+ years and he has the highest revenue team in the league. They draw in the neighborhood of 4,000,000 fans a year, despite ridiculous ticket prices. They have the richest TV deal of any team. And they are a team that expects to be competitive, if not win, every year.

I've asked this before and no Yankee haters ever answer, but what should he do with the money coming in? He continues to plow it back into the team. Should he just hoard it? Should he just record the profit and move on? Or should he continue to demand excellence from his players, coaches and team administration?

He already contributes big dollars ($40.0 - $50.0 million a year) into the weaker teams in the league. Many of them (not all) just sit on it. In 2003, the Marlins used something like $10.0 million (George's luxury tax money) to bring their entire organization and their families up to NY for the World Series (two trips). Yet when the season was over, they had to break up the team for financial reasons.

Look at this spreadsheet:
http://spreadsheets.google.com/pub?k...XT3cpPRtt9qIGw

Three and four years out, some of these teams have zero payroll obligations! Their management thinks this is the way to run a sound business? The fans should be outraged.


(By the way, this spreadsheet and many more can be found at:
http://mlbcontracts.blogspot.com/200...678860040.html

It's a terrific site that allows you to look, in detail at the salary set-up ov every team.)
Reply With Quote
  #100  
Old 11-07-2009, 08:08 AM
barrysloate barrysloate is offline
Barry Sloate
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Brooklyn, NY
Posts: 8,293
Default

It's hard to argue with the Yankees' success this year. They seemed to do everything right. The three big acquisitions were among the best in one season in baseball history. The team was exciting to watch and won with great regularity. Even if you don't like the Yankees, and see them as a bunch of bullies, they had a magnificent year.

And it would be nice, and in fact should be mandatory, that if small market teams collect luxury taxes from the Yankees and the like, they should not pocket that money but use it to improve the team. I'm sure the spirit of the luxury tax was to keep some semblance of competitive balance, and not just make those owners a little richer.
Reply With Quote
Reply




Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Lots of e98s available in the upcoming week or two.... Archive Pre-WWII cards (E, D, M, W, etc..) B/S/T 4 03-13-2008 05:34 PM
T206 Lots Archive Tobacco (T) cards, except T206 B/S/T 12 10-03-2007 11:32 PM
REA question regarding ungraded lots Archive Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions 5 04-09-2006 03:01 PM
Looking for T206 bulk lots (commons) for my first set! E95 too. Archive Tobacco (T) cards, except T206 B/S/T 5 02-22-2006 08:07 PM
Goodwin & Co Auction T-210 lots Archive Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions 3 10-20-2005 06:40 PM


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:11 PM.


ebay GSB