|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
Sale Location:5 Arrowhead Ln Rolling Hills Estates, CA 90274 Sale Dates and Times: Thursday Sep 28, 9:00 am to 3:00 pm Friday Sep 29, 9:00 am to 3:00 pm Saturday Sep 30, 8:00 am to 12:00 pm They have multiple items "authenticated" by Ken Golden at Scoreboard. Are these all bad? Here's the web address if you want to look at the pictures. https://www.estatesale.com/sales/vie...=59cd1f41af997 I'll post a few for those that can't get to the link or if it disappears. I notice the Ruth ball seems to be gone from the listing. Maybe if some of it is good, someone can go cherry pick the good stuff. |
#2
|
||||
|
||||
Thanks for your opinion Brendan.
That's not an opinion. It's a fact. |
#3
|
||||
|
||||
That's what I meant! What about this other stuff they have? Is any of it real, or did this guy only collect fakes?
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
Joe D looks good to me as does the Ryan, the Mantle looks fishy (to be honest all Mantles look fishy to me,I'm paranoid) and I don't know Griffey Jr well enough to comment.
__________________
"The large print giveth and the small print taketh away."- Tom Waits Last edited by bravos4evr; 09-28-2017 at 12:02 PM. |
#5
|
||||
|
||||
I'd pass on the Mantle. That's a phony Scoreboard COA attached with it. If the COA was real I'd scrutinize the ball. No need if the COA is bad.
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
On Goldin/Scoreboard COA's what do we look for other than obviously copies that are off center, blotchy etc?
Is it the way the verbiage is printed? Someone said the DiMaggio is good on this post but the Mantle based on the cert may not be. Looks like COA's verbiage was organized differently? Street address on one and not the other? Spacing of paragraph? Thanks guys! |
#7
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
A real Scoreboard certificate will look like those in the estate sale (minus the one attached to the Mantle). Thicker paper (with a watermark I believe), nice sharp edges, not obviously photocopied, no blotchy signature (taken from an image from on the Internet), the item description not photoshoped in a different font, etc. If the COA is fake the item is certainly fake. Don't waste your time looking at it anymore. If the COA is real then you can start to compare the autograph to exemplars, etc. Last edited by MrSeven; 09-28-2017 at 09:01 PM. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
As for the DiMaggio, it could be authentic, but I need to see the full sig. |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Ruth ball...is it real? | ullmandds | Net54baseball Sports (Primarily) Vintage Memorabilia Forum incl. Game Used | 20 | 10-26-2015 07:34 PM |
Ruth 1933 All Star Ball Real or not? | Shoeless Moe | Net54baseball Sports (Primarily) Vintage Memorabilia Forum incl. Game Used | 0 | 11-05-2011 10:39 AM |
Local auctioneer with 1929 Babe Ruth auto ball - real or not? | RobertGT | Net54baseball Sports (Primarily) Vintage Memorabilia Forum incl. Game Used | 8 | 10-18-2010 08:08 AM |
Really WTB Ruth Autographed Ball | tlwise12 | Net54baseball Sports (Primarily) Vintage Memorabilia Forum incl. Game Used | 0 | 05-02-2009 05:05 PM |
Opinions on this Ruth autographed ball | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 11 | 05-25-2007 10:05 AM |