1952 Topps Mickey Mantle PSA 8 in PWCC Auction

[Dpeck100]

Originally Posted by Republicaninmass

My opinion...

Dont delude yourself. Its Brent's card. Like any crook he was going to try the ultimate caper, only now it's getting sold to pay his attorney.

So what you are saying is he bought it in the Heritage auction and now is forced to liquidate it to pay attorneys fees. Correct?

[Republicaninmass]

Originally Posted by Dpeck100

So what you are saying is he bought it in the Heritage auction and now is forced to liquidate it to pay attorneys fees. Correct?

Makes as much sense as "this will all blow over"

Sent from my SM-N950U using Tapatalk

[Dpeck100]

Originally Posted by Republicaninmass

Makes as much sense as "this will all blow over"

Sent from my SM-N950U using Tapatalk

Do you still collect autographed cards?

I assume you do.

[Snapolit1]

Here’s a crazy idea .... how about just deciding based on their track record that you will stop doing business with PWCC (if you ever did). Chronicling on a daily basis their alleged fraud for your remaining time on this spinning orb seems a little wasteful.

[wondo]

Originally Posted by Snapolit1

Here’s a crazy idea .... how about just deciding based on their track record that you will stop doing business with PWCC (if you ever did). Chronicling on a daily basis their alleged fraud for your remaining time on this spinning orb seems a little wasteful.

+1

[Republicaninmass]

Originally Posted by Dpeck100

Do you still collect autographed cards?



I assume you do.

Sure do, but narrow it to Only SGC graded t206s with shaky signatures.

Sent from my SM-N950U using Tapatalk

[ullmandds]

Originally Posted by Dpeck100

So what you are saying is he bought it in the Heritage auction and now is forced to liquidate it to pay attorneys fees. Correct?

this is certainly possible!

[bobbyw8469]

Originally Posted by Dpeck100

So what you are saying is he bought it in the Heritage auction and now is forced to liquidate it to pay attorneys fees. Correct?

What would the card need to reside in a '10' holder? sharper corners?? It's a big gamble, but if you have done all this "so far", I don't see why not.

[Dpeck100]

Originally Posted by bobbyw8469

What would the card need to reside in a '10' holder? sharper corners?? It's a big gamble, but if you have done all this "so far", I don't see why not.

Yes the lower left corner is clearly an issue.

There are lots of quick flips that take place in trading cards that work and many that don't.

I just think it is very speculative to assume that this is Brent's card and he is selling to pay for his potential legal issues.

[Peter_Spaeth]

I must be missing this, why do people think it's Brent's card? Is it because nobody would consign it to him in this environment?

[MULLINS5]

Originally Posted by Peter_Spaeth

I must be missing this, why do people think it's Brent's card? Is it because nobody would consign it to him in this environment?

For me it's just an educated guess. Could be wrong.