|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
This guy must have a relative grading at PSA
Posted By: dan mckee
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
This guy must have a relative grading at PSA
Posted By: Nick
Is that a pair of tears I see in the upper right hand side border )one at the middle of the cap and one at th ebottom of the ear)? |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
This guy must have a relative grading at PSA
Posted By: Michael Peich
Dan--We saw better looking 206s in that tobacco/caramel lot at the Hunt Auction on Saturday, and we thought they were beaters! Groan, Mike |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
This guy must have a relative grading at PSA
Posted By: joe brennan
Hmmmmmmm....WIWAG ? |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
This guy must have a relative grading at PSA
Posted By: Anonymous
doubt it was wiwag material...that cert # is from last week. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
This guy must have a relative grading at PSA
Posted By: David Vargha
WIWAG ? |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
This guy must have a relative grading at PSA
Posted By: joe brennan
My guess would be Wild Turkey. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
This guy must have a relative grading at PSA
Posted By: jay behrens
For those of you that don't know, the whole WIWAG scandal center around modern cards. I am not aware of any vintage cards that were swapped out. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
This guy must have a relative grading at PSA
Posted By: Texas Ted
Not to defend this card or the seller by any means, but it is possible that either or both the surface of the scanner or the plastic holder have dirt, smudges, flaws or some other issue that change the look of the card. I guess it would be hard to judge what it really looks like unless holding it in your hand. While I try to remember to clean the surface of my scanner periodically, dirt happens. I have also done scans only to discover later that a cat hair or something else was on the top loader, but made the card look different. In the interest of handling cards as little as possible, I do not remove from the top loader to make my scans. And of course, that is not possible with graded cards. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
This guy must have a relative grading at PSA
Posted By: John
LOL, Funny stuff "Uncle Joe is my T206 Crawford done yet?" |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
This guy must have a relative grading at PSA
Posted By: dan mckee
You are right Ted, probably the scanner. Look here, the scanner he used on this PSA 4 makes it look like there is paperloss on back. Darn scanners. |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
This guy must have a relative grading at PSA
Posted By: Peter Spaeth
These anti-PSA (or anti-grading) posts are really getting boring. So in the countless thousands of cards they have graded they have made some mistakes, there's no news there. Yet every time someone sees one they feel obliged to post about it as if it is some great revelation. Why? |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
This guy must have a relative grading at PSA
Posted By: dan mckee
I will post what I like, if you don't like it, don't read it. Yawn that! Why? Because for being experts, they shouldn't be partial. |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
This guy must have a relative grading at PSA
Posted By: John
Peter; |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
This guy must have a relative grading at PSA
Posted By: Josh K.
I agree John - frankly, I kind of like reading these posts. |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
This guy must have a relative grading at PSA
Posted By: Peter Spaeth
I respect people who choose not to grade their cards and I understand their reasons. I would hope they are consistent in that they do not submit them when they decide to sell them, but that is another topic altogether. More pertinently, it seems to me that if people were truly secure and comfortable in their decision they would not need to continually lash out bitterly at grading services. Noone is forcing anyone to accept grading or to buy graded cards, and I don't see people who prefer grading out there bashing overgraded or dubious raw cards with the same vengeance, if at all. By the way, Dan, what evidence do you have that this particular card is misgraded as a result of favoritism as opposed to mistake? |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
This guy must have a relative grading at PSA
Posted By: Anonymous
there's paper loss on the front too Danny. |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
This guy must have a relative grading at PSA
Posted By: Josh K.
I actually prefer grading. Still like these posts. Personally I think they serve a worthwhile purpose. |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
This guy must have a relative grading at PSA
Posted By: dan mckee
Peter, my point is that this seller has several cards blatantly over graded in my opinion. I do not consider the coincidences all mistakes. Could I be wrong? Hell yes, wouldn't be the first and won't be the last time. I bet if you took a poll here on this, the majority would agree with me. Any way, I must disagree with you. I hate slabbing but I slab the hell out of most of the ones I am selling and will continue to as long as there are people paying more for the stupid slabs. Hypocrit am I? I don't think so. If people are willing to pay more for a number assigned to a card than that is what I will give them. |
#20
|
|||
|
|||
This guy must have a relative grading at PSA
Posted By: John
Peter, |
#21
|
|||
|
|||
This guy must have a relative grading at PSA
Posted By: Peter Spaeth
Just my personal opinion of course, but it seems inconsistent on the one hand to disapprove of and affirmatively criticize grading services while at the same time using them to make more money on sales. I will leave the definition of words like "hypocrisy" to others. |
#22
|
|||
|
|||
This guy must have a relative grading at PSA
Posted By: dan mckee
I was too lazy to type all of what you did Peter, that is why I used the word towards myself. Seems perfectly logical to me. Feed the buyers! They pay for slabs, I will slab. Simple Math. John, that is a nice no-red Bresnahan portrait! how much? slab it and I will buy it! |
#23
|
|||
|
|||
This guy must have a relative grading at PSA
Posted By: John
Ahhhh Opinions |
#24
|
|||
|
|||
This guy must have a relative grading at PSA
Posted By: Peter Spaeth
I certainly agree with you John that grading is no panacea and that it has its own set of issues. My only original point was that I don't see every misgraded card as a newsworthy event the way others apparently do. |
#25
|
|||
|
|||
This guy must have a relative grading at PSA
Posted By: jay behrens
Only the seriously egregious errors gets pointed out, like Hinie Wagner being labeled as Honus, and other simple major mistakes that even a novice collector of pre-war cards should be able to spot. |
#26
|
|||
|
|||
This guy must have a relative grading at PSA
Posted By: tbob
Besides the obvious ("if I had submitted that Johnson T205 I would have gotten a 2 at best") there is the problem that someone might buy a T205 Johnson PSA 4 back unseen, depending on PSA's published grading standards only to be terribly disappointed when they got a look at that back. Just asking for a little consistency... |
#27
|
|||
|
|||
This guy must have a relative grading at PSA
Posted By: dan mckee
Peter, if I posted all of the grading mistakes I see, I would expect you to be bored and I would be here all day. I posted the 2 in this thread to point out that this seller, or whoever submitted the cards he is selling, was shown favortism by the grading company. My opinion. Your exageration that I post every mistake I see is funny. |
#28
|
|||
|
|||
This guy must have a relative grading at PSA
Posted By: Texas Ted
RE:"You are right Ted, probably the scanner. Look here, the scanner he used on this PSA 4 makes it look like there is paperloss on back. Darn scanners." |
#29
|
|||
|
|||
This guy must have a relative grading at PSA
Posted By: Peter Spaeth
Dan, I was not referring only to you in my observation that "people" seem to take a savage delight in posting PSA mistakes. It was a more general observation about the prevalence of these threads. Also Dan your original post was limited to the Crawford, and you only later mentioned the second card in response to Texas Ted's post about the scanner, so I think you may be engaged in some revisionism as to your purpose. |
#30
|
|||
|
|||
This guy must have a relative grading at PSA
Posted By: dan mckee
Good point Peter, that 2nd link was later added. Sorry Ted, I apologize, I just couldn't resist. You had me rolling with the scanner theory. Please forgive me. Nothing personal I assure you. Take care, dan. |
#31
|
|||
|
|||
This guy must have a relative grading at PSA
Posted By: dan mckee
Bob, you may be able to receive a 2 from that Johnson but I can guarantee you that I get a 1 on a good day! |
#32
|
|||
|
|||
This guy must have a relative grading at PSA
Posted By: WP
Dan, |
#33
|
|||
|
|||
This guy must have a relative grading at PSA
Posted By: Rick
The nice thing about being a new guy vs an old timer is that I lack the comparison between the before and after of Graded cards. |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
relative value of kahns cards | Archive | Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) | 3 | 06-18-2013 01:03 AM |
T206 -- Relative Scarcity or What Autographs Can Tell You | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 13 | 01-27-2009 06:27 AM |
Relative value for different Cobb caramel cards | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 24 | 12-13-2005 01:32 PM |
Help with estimate of relative availability of T cards | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 2 | 05-31-2004 12:46 PM |
Anyone know the relative rarity of E-98's? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 11 | 02-14-2003 08:34 AM |