PSA Pop Report Discrepancies - T206 Brown Washington Old Mill

[T206.org]

I saw the Brown Washington Old Mill in the B/S/T and wanted to check out the pop report at PSA, since I can't remember having seen this front/back combo before.

There's a card from 2012 that sold on eBay in a PSA 4:
http://www.cardtarget.com/cgi-bin/gm...&variation=225

But it doesn't show up here (only a 4.5 and a 6 do):
http://www.psacard.com/Pop/Detail.aspx?c=65132

And then even stranger is the cert for the 4 is verified by PSA, and says "none higher":
http://www.psacard.com/cert/10974488

What the heck?!

[bn2cardz]

Originally Posted by T206.org

I saw the Brown Washington Old Mill in the B/S/T and wanted to check out the pop report at PSA, since I can't remember having seen this front/back combo before.

There's a card from 2012 that sold on eBay in a PSA 4:
http://www.cardtarget.com/cgi-bin/gm...&variation=225

But it doesn't show up here (only a 4.5 and a 6 do):
http://www.psacard.com/Pop/Detail.aspx?c=65132

And then even stranger is the cert for the 4 is verified by PSA, and says "none higher":
http://www.psacard.com/cert/10974488

What the heck?!

The certification shows that card as a Chicago variant (obviously the card in the sleeve isn't of the Chicago variation). It does show up in the pop reports next to the George Brown, Chicago.

[bn2cardz]

Also according to t206resource.com the old mill should be on the Washington not the Chicago, so it looks like it was entered as chicago in error by PSA

[T206.org]

Good eye Andy, thank you.

[steve B]

Talk about an odd population! one each 6, 4.5, 4 mislabeled.

Hardly common, but no crummy ones. Strange.

Steve B