NonSports Forum

Net54baseball.com
Welcome to Net54baseball.com. These forums are devoted to both Pre- and Post- war baseball cards and vintage memorabilia, as well as other sports. There is a separate section for Buying, Selling and Trading - the B/S/T area!! If you write anything concerning a person or company your full name needs to be in your post or obtainable from it. . Contact the moderator at leon@net54baseball.com should you have any questions or concerns. When you click on links to eBay on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network. Enjoy!
Net54baseball.com
Net54baseball.com
ebay GSB
T206s on eBay
Babe Ruth Cards on eBay
t206 Ty Cobb on eBay
Ty Cobb Cards on eBay
Lou Gehrig Cards on eBay
Baseball T201-T217 on eBay
Baseball E90-E107 on eBay
T205 Cards on eBay
Baseball Postcards on eBay
Goudey Cards on eBay
Baseball Memorabilia on eBay
Baseball Exhibit Cards on eBay
Baseball Strip Cards on eBay
Baseball Baking Cards on eBay
Sporting News Cards on eBay
Play Ball Cards on eBay
Joe DiMaggio Cards on eBay
Mickey Mantle Cards on eBay
Bowman 1951-1955 on eBay
Football Cards on eBay

Go Back   Net54baseball.com Forums > Net54baseball Main Forum - WWII & Older Baseball Cards > Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 12-30-2006, 10:18 AM
Archive Archive is offline
Administrator
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 58,359
Default What Was The Most Signifigant Find of 2006?

Posted By: Dan Bretta

The title says it all.

I'll go with Dave Levin's Indianapolis find of 217 Old Judge cards.

Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 12-30-2006, 10:39 AM
Archive Archive is offline
Administrator
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 58,359
Default What Was The Most Signifigant Find of 2006?

Posted By: Hal Lewis

Was the 1914 Cracker Jack set in Mint condition in 2006?

Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 12-30-2006, 11:24 AM
Archive Archive is offline
Administrator
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 58,359
Default What Was The Most Signifigant Find of 2006?

Posted By: Jay

That there is minimal whining as 17.5% becomes 20%

Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 12-30-2006, 11:43 AM
Archive Archive is offline
Administrator
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 58,359
Default What Was The Most Signifigant Find of 2006?

Posted By: barrysloate

While I can't compete with the two listed, my best finds of 2006 were the 1872 Boston composite photograph and the original family tobacco collection that included a T206 Plank, a square Ramly, and more than 300 Sovereign backs. However, since I found the Boston photo on ebay and somebody referred me to the tobacco collection, I'm not really sure I found anything. But they will have to do for now.

Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 12-30-2006, 11:48 AM
Archive Archive is offline
Administrator
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 58,359
Default What Was The Most Signifigant Find of 2006?

Posted By: Dan Bretta

Barry, didn't the owner of the Boston Composite photo sell a bunch more photos that seem to all have originated from Harry Wright? IIRC they all had some major water damage. All of those items combined are in my opinion a pretty major find.

Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 12-30-2006, 11:50 AM
Archive Archive is offline
Administrator
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 58,359
Default What Was The Most Signifigant Find of 2006?

Posted By: Joe_G.

Two of the three I was going to suggest have already been mentioned.

1) Deacon White Collection - not so much a find as all new material hitting the market, over $250,000 paid for the items, many unique.

2) Dave Levin Indy Find

3) Barry Sloate 1872 Boston Composite

All 3 are very significant in my mind, hard to rank them.

Best Regards,
Joe Gonsowski

Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 12-30-2006, 12:21 PM
Archive Archive is offline
Administrator
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 58,359
Default What Was The Most Signifigant Find of 2006?

Posted By: Bob

In my mind it has to be the M116 Sporting Life variation card of Bates Cincinnati. This is the first time this card has ever shown up and it appears legitimate and not just a printing defect like the "Nodgrass" or "Sharpe" T206 cards or the forgotten ink cards like the T206s without red printing.

Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 12-30-2006, 12:26 PM
Archive Archive is offline
Administrator
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 58,359
Default What Was The Most Signifigant Find of 2006?

Posted By: mark

M116 Sporting Life variation card of Bates Cincinnati



I think during the summer. If i recall it was a PSA 1 or 2. It went for around $800. I could be wrong, it has been 6 months. If anyone can correct me by all means do.

Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 12-30-2006, 12:56 PM
Archive Archive is offline
Administrator
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 58,359
Default What Was The Most Signifigant Find of 2006?

Posted By: barrysloate

Yes, the woman had about eight significant pieces that once belonged to George Wright. After I got the photo, a baseball historian friend told me that after Wright's death his home had a major fire. That would explain the water damage on all the pieces. Among the others she had were Wright's own photos of the Brooklyn Atlantics and the Unions of Morrisania, and a color advertising litho from Al Spalding's sporting goods store that had never been seen before. But the damage was so severe something like 25% was missing and nobody had any idea what the missing part looked like. She claimed she found all these items in a dumpster, salvaged them just for their frames, then discovered she had some pretty rare baseball material. She did her homework and got decent prices for them on ebay. If her story is true, that is the real definition of a find- she found them in the garbage!

Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 12-30-2006, 01:06 PM
Archive Archive is offline
Administrator
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 58,359
Default What Was The Most Signifigant Find of 2006?

Posted By: David Smith

Barry, which only begs the question, "What else was in the dumpster that she missed or was thrown out before and after what she found?"


David

Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 12-30-2006, 01:07 PM
Archive Archive is offline
Administrator
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 58,359
Default What Was The Most Signifigant Find of 2006?

Posted By: Dan Bretta

I forgot about the Deacon White collection. I wonder how many hobbyists knew about that collection before it came to market?

Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 12-30-2006, 01:13 PM
Archive Archive is offline
Administrator
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 58,359
Default What Was The Most Signifigant Find of 2006?

Posted By: barrysloate

David- what I wonder is how it all ended up in the garbage in the first place? I guess because much of it was in such poor condition, the previous owner may have thought what he had was worthless. And I agree that the Deacon White collection was among the best family collections to ever reach the marketplace.

Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 12-30-2006, 01:20 PM
Archive Archive is offline
Administrator
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 58,359
Default What Was The Most Signifigant Find of 2006?

Posted By: Zach Rice

The Boston CDVs are certainly my favorite of the finds posted above. The winner of the lot shared with my a picture of the Spalding after being slabbed by SGC. They did a great job on them and even labeled them as being from the George Wright collection.

Barry-would you happen to know why Johnny Ryan was included in the series of CDVs ? A quick look at his career stats says he didn't start playing until the season after (1873).

Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 12-30-2006, 01:32 PM
Archive Archive is offline
Administrator
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 58,359
Default What Was The Most Signifigant Find of 2006?

Posted By: barrysloate

Zach, that's a good question and I'm not completely sure why. Last year a complete set of Warren cabinets from 1872, all autographed, were auctioned by Sotheby's and Mastro and Ryan was in that group too. But there is no record of him playing with the team. The only thing I can think of is he was with Boston for a short time but never got into a game, possibly being traded or released rather quickly. However, during his short stay the team may have gone to the studio to have their pictures taken. I have no other explanation for it.

Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 12-30-2006, 01:33 PM
Archive Archive is offline
Administrator
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 58,359
Default What Was The Most Signifigant Find of 2006?

Posted By: David Smith

Barry, I wondered that too but then thought, A) it could have been stolen and the theif didn't know hwat they had or, more likely B) a family member or some other heir was cleaning out a closet or attic and found the itmes and had no clue what they were or how much they might be worth.

I am not married and have no kids and the only one with a real clue about what I have and what it might be worth is my Mother and that is because I have told her about my stuff and made a list of some of the more valuable pieces. If she were to die and the list were lost and then I were to die, my sister, niece and nephews wouldn't have a clue about my collection.

David

Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 12-30-2006, 01:39 PM
Archive Archive is offline
Administrator
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 58,359
Default What Was The Most Signifigant Find of 2006?

Posted By: barrysloate

I'm not completely sure the story of finding them in a dumpster is even true, but that's what she told me and she was a pretty straight shooter. We developed a short friendship and were emailing back and forth for awhile, so I will assume she was telling the truth.

Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 12-30-2006, 05:40 PM
Archive Archive is offline
Administrator
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 58,359
Default What Was The Most Signifigant Find of 2006?

Posted By: Ted Zanidakis

Early in the year, I received a call from a friend in Florida whose neighbor was interested in selling his
Grandfather's original Tobacco collection.

Upon contacting this fellow, I realized that this is "the stuff dreams are made of". So, went down there
and purchased 400+ T206 cards. Strangely, no Cobb's or CYoung's, but most of all the other HOFers,
tougher cards, and "all the usual Subjects".

This original collection was really interesting in that all the cards had Piedmont backs, except the 25
Southern Leaguers were Old Mill's. So, I was curious as to where this fellow's Grandfather lived when
he collected all these cards.....it was near the border of the Carolina's.

T-Rex TED

Reply With Quote
Reply




Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Best Acquisition for 2006 Archive Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions 39 01-02-2007 07:18 PM
The 2006 National Archive Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions 86 08-06-2006 10:58 PM
2006 National Archive Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions 18 03-03-2006 08:19 PM
? for those with 2006 Standard Catalog Archive Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions 2 12-29-2005 05:34 PM
2006 Standard Catalog Archive Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions 5 11-30-2005 12:43 PM


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:22 PM.


ebay GSB