NonSports Forum

Net54baseball.com
Welcome to Net54baseball.com. These forums are devoted to both Pre- and Post- war baseball cards and vintage memorabilia, as well as other sports. There is a separate section for Buying, Selling and Trading - the B/S/T area!! If you write anything concerning a person or company your full name needs to be in your post or obtainable from it. . Contact the moderator at leon@net54baseball.com should you have any questions or concerns. When you click on links to eBay on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network. Enjoy!
Net54baseball.com
Net54baseball.com
ebay GSB
T206s on eBay
Babe Ruth Cards on eBay
t206 Ty Cobb on eBay
Ty Cobb Cards on eBay
Lou Gehrig Cards on eBay
 Baseball T201-T217 on eBay
Baseball E90-E107 on eBay
T205 Cards on eBay
Baseball Postcards on eBay
Goudey Cards on eBay
 Baseball Memorabilia on eBay
Baseball Exhibit Cards on eBay
Baseball Strip Cards on eBay
Baseball Baking Cards on eBay
Sporting News Cards on eBay
 Play Ball Cards on eBay
Joe DiMaggio Cards on eBay
Mickey Mantle Cards on eBay
Bowman 1951-1955 on eBay
Football Cards on eBay

Go Back   Net54baseball.com Forums > Net54baseball Main Forum - WWII & Older Baseball Cards > Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions
Reload this Page Is it just me or do these seem undergraded ???
Register NEW Chat! Who's Chatting FAQ Calendar Mark Forums Read

View Poll Results: Undergraded ???
Yes 6 11.32%
No 16 30.19%
Graded just right 31 58.49%
Voters: 53. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 10-31-2015, 01:44 PM
Joshchisox08's Avatar
Joshchisox08 Joshchisox08 is offline
J0$H B^ck!ey
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: C0nn3cticu+
Posts: 1,943
Default Is it just me or do these seem undergraded ???
I used to think SGC was the more consistent of the grading companies but these couple leave me scratching my head.

Thoughts ?

Just added Danny Murphy MC ??? Trimmed ??? If so not sure why it got a numerical grade or even past a 10/1
Attached Images
File Type: jpg img240.jpg (77.3 KB, 247 views)
File Type: jpg img241.jpg (76.8 KB, 248 views)
File Type: jpg img268.jpg (78.4 KB, 246 views)
File Type: jpg img269.jpg (77.7 KB, 244 views)
File Type: jpg img294.jpg (77.7 KB, 175 views)
File Type: jpg img297.jpg (76.6 KB, 175 views)
__________________
429/524 Off of the monster 81%
49/76 HOF's 64%
18/20 Overlooked by Cooperstown 90%
22/39 Unique Backs 56%
80/86 Minors 93%
25/48 Southern Leaguers 52%
6/10 Billy Sullivan back run 60%

237PSA / 94 SGC / 98 RAW

Excel spreadsheets only $5
T3, T201, T202, T204, T205, T206, T207, 1914 CJ, 1915 CJ, Topps 1952-1979, and more!!!!

Checklists sold (20)

T205 8/208 3.8%
Last edited by Joshchisox08; 10-31-2015 at 03:42 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 10-31-2015, 01:55 PM
iwantitiwinit's Avatar
iwantitiwinit iwantitiwinit is offline
rob.ert int.rieri
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: NC
Posts: 2,458
Default
Devlin looks to have a small amount of paper loss on the back above the word "series". If it does no matter how small it's an incomplete card and deserves no more than a three in my opinion despite a nice front.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 10-31-2015, 02:08 PM
Joshchisox08's Avatar
Joshchisox08 Joshchisox08 is offline
J0$H B^ck!ey
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: C0nn3cticu+
Posts: 1,943
Default
Quote:
Originally Posted by iwantitiwinit View Post
Devlin looks to have a small amount of paper loss on the back above the word "series". If it does no matter how small it's an incomplete card and deserves no more than a three in my opinion despite a nice front.
That's a valid point however it's microscopic portions of the card lol.
__________________
429/524 Off of the monster 81%
49/76 HOF's 64%
18/20 Overlooked by Cooperstown 90%
22/39 Unique Backs 56%
80/86 Minors 93%
25/48 Southern Leaguers 52%
6/10 Billy Sullivan back run 60%

237PSA / 94 SGC / 98 RAW

Excel spreadsheets only $5
T3, T201, T202, T204, T205, T206, T207, 1914 CJ, 1915 CJ, Topps 1952-1979, and more!!!!

Checklists sold (20)

T205 8/208 3.8%
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 10-31-2015, 02:10 PM
Stetson_1883's Avatar
Stetson_1883 Stetson_1883 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Worldwide
Posts: 1,036
Default undergraded
Scott looks at least like a 3.5. Delvin's a 4.

I just purchased this "4" tonight
Attached Images
File Type: jpg b.jpg (76.9 KB, 225 views)
__________________
MyStore: http://royce-classic-vintage-cards.ebid.net/

Smooth Transactions ezez420.frankbmd.northviewcats.t206hound.Beatles Guy.team-of-rivals.LukeLyon.ValKehl.Double-P-Enterprises.Hcom24.midmo.pow323.Tolstoi.WillowGrov e.Dougscats.t206Collector.cammb.pclpads.Jobu.eseho mbre.BocaBirdman, 38Goudeyman and many more
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 10-31-2015, 02:14 PM
bnorth's Avatar
bnorth bnorth is offline
Ben North
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: South Dakota
Posts: 9,830
Default
Quote:
Originally Posted by Joshchisox08 View Post
That's a valid point however it's microscopic portions of the card lol.
SGC will only give a 3 at best with paper loss. I had a NrMint Babe Ruth that I bought from a fellow board member that had a speck of paper loss on the right border and it got a 3.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 10-31-2015, 02:23 PM
Pat R's Avatar
Pat R Pat R is offline
P@trick R.omolo
member
 
Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 3,327
Default
The Scott could be a high 3 or low 4 I agree with Robert on the Devlin because of the paper loss.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg img146.jpg (76.8 KB, 214 views)
File Type: jpg img147.jpg (76.6 KB, 216 views)
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 10-31-2015, 03:41 PM
Luke's Avatar
Luke Luke is offline
Luke Lyon
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Seattle
Posts: 3,944
Default
If I sent those in I'd be hoping for a 4 on Devlin and a 3.5 on Scott. Nice cards no matter what the slip of paper says!
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 10-31-2015, 03:48 PM
swarmee's Avatar
swarmee swarmee is offline
J0hn Raff3rty
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Niceville FL
Posts: 6,916
Default
The Hoffman has a big '44' written in blue crayon on the back. That could be the reason for the downgrade.
__________________
--
PWCC: The Fish Stinks From the Head
PSA: Regularly Get Cheated
BGS: Can't detect trimming on modern
SGC: Closed auto authentication business
JSA: Approved same T206 Autos before SGC
Oh, what a difference a year makes.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 10-31-2015, 04:37 PM
kmac32's Avatar
kmac32 kmac32 is offline
Ken McMillan
Member
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Ponte Vedra, Florida
Posts: 2,506
Default
Maybe on the Devlin SGC 40 but otherwise spot on.
__________________
Favorite MLB quote. " I knew we could find a place to hide you". Lee Smith talking about my catching abilities at Cubs Fantasy camp.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 10-31-2015, 05:44 PM
pokerplyr80's Avatar
pokerplyr80 pokerplyr80 is offline
je.sse @rnot
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: California
Posts: 3,914
Default
Each card seems to have an issue that justifies the grade. I think all three are about right.
__________________
Successful transactions with peter spaeth, don's cards, vwtdi, wolf441, 111gecko, Clydewally, Jim, SPMIDD, MattyC, jmb, botn, E107collector, begsu1013, and a few others.
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 10-31-2015, 05:58 PM
glynparson's Avatar
glynparson glynparson is offline
Glyn Parson
Member
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Blandon PA
Posts: 2,184
Default These cards
absolutely look correctly graded. They have nice eye appeal for their grades but all have issues some fairly serious which dictates their grades. I could honestly see the Devlin getting a lower grade before i could see any of the others grading higher. I wouldn't drop over if i sent the Devlin in and got a 30 or 35.
Last edited by glynparson; 10-31-2015 at 06:01 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 10-31-2015, 06:33 PM
Joshchisox08's Avatar
Joshchisox08 Joshchisox08 is offline
J0$H B^ck!ey
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: C0nn3cticu+
Posts: 1,943
Default
Quote:
Originally Posted by glynparson View Post
absolutely look correctly graded. They have nice eye appeal for their grades but all have issues some fairly serious which dictates their grades. I could honestly see the Devlin getting a lower grade before i could see any of the others grading higher. I wouldn't drop over if i sent the Devlin in and got a 30 or 35.
Just when I thought I had the lower grading down to scale haha. I guess I'm good at a 1-2.5 and not so good at 3 and above. Lots of homework to do. That's why I asked for everyone's help!!!

Thanks for the responsed.
__________________
429/524 Off of the monster 81%
49/76 HOF's 64%
18/20 Overlooked by Cooperstown 90%
22/39 Unique Backs 56%
80/86 Minors 93%
25/48 Southern Leaguers 52%
6/10 Billy Sullivan back run 60%

237PSA / 94 SGC / 98 RAW

Excel spreadsheets only $5
T3, T201, T202, T204, T205, T206, T207, 1914 CJ, 1915 CJ, Topps 1952-1979, and more!!!!

Checklists sold (20)

T205 8/208 3.8%
Reply With Quote
Reply

« Previous Thread | Next Thread »


Thread Tools
Display Modes
Linear Mode Linear Mode

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Undergraded Cards: Show Yours GasHouseGang Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) 25 02-02-2014 12:30 PM
Undergraded??? wolfdogg Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions 17 02-15-2013 06:51 AM
Undergraded? Chicago206 Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions 21 03-25-2010 01:10 AM
Undergraded???....lets see 'em wolfdogg Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions 31 12-01-2009 09:38 AM
Truly undergraded or trimmed? Archive Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions 7 05-15-2008 09:31 AM


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:16 AM.

RSS - Contact Us - Home - Archive - Top

ebay GSB