NonSports Forum

Net54baseball.com
Welcome to Net54baseball.com. These forums are devoted to both Pre- and Post- war baseball cards and vintage memorabilia, as well as other sports. There is a separate section for Buying, Selling and Trading - the B/S/T area!! If you write anything concerning a person or company your full name needs to be in your post or obtainable from it. . Contact the moderator at leon@net54baseball.com should you have any questions or concerns. When you click on links to eBay on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network. Enjoy!
Net54baseball.com
Net54baseball.com
ebay GSB
T206s on eBay
Babe Ruth Cards on eBay
t206 Ty Cobb on eBay
Ty Cobb Cards on eBay
Lou Gehrig Cards on eBay
Baseball T201-T217 on eBay
Baseball E90-E107 on eBay
T205 Cards on eBay
Baseball Postcards on eBay
Goudey Cards on eBay
Baseball Memorabilia on eBay
Baseball Exhibit Cards on eBay
Baseball Strip Cards on eBay
Baseball Baking Cards on eBay
Sporting News Cards on eBay
Play Ball Cards on eBay
Joe DiMaggio Cards on eBay
Mickey Mantle Cards on eBay
Bowman 1951-1955 on eBay
Football Cards on eBay

Go Back   Net54baseball.com Forums > Net54baseball Main Forum - WWII & Older Baseball Cards > Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 01-11-2019, 10:29 PM
runred41 runred41 is offline
member
 
Join Date: Sep 2017
Posts: 88
Default Mendelsohn fake or real?...help please

Hi...let me preface this with that any cards I buy that is vintage and ungraded I consider a reprint and bought this card with that in mind close to 20 years ago. I didn’t even remember or realize I had it with the Burgess Nash back until I recently posted it on the Jim Thorpe thread that I’ve been posting my Thorpe collection on. I collect almost solely Thorpe items so when I bought it I considered it a reprint or fake and bought it as a reprint variation that I didn’t have in my collection. It’s obviously been trimmed all the way around. I have started wondering whether it could be an authentic card and best I can tell it might be a Mendelsohn M101-5. I am almost completely ignorant of early cards so other than what I’ve read about identifying fakes from that series I wouldn’t have a clue what to look for. I know the topic has been discussed several times. I’ve never even held a real one but did own a Famous and Barr back of Thorpe that was a PSA 3 but sold it roughly 10 years ago so I don’t even have it to look at. Would anybody enlighten me on the possibility (or not) about this card? Any thoughts would be appreciated! I’ll put one that has not been trimmed beside it to show how much trimming has been done. Thanks!








Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 01-11-2019, 10:54 PM
Brian Van Horn Brian Van Horn is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 6,032
Default

Sorry to say, but fake.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 01-11-2019, 11:01 PM
runred41 runred41 is offline
member
 
Join Date: Sep 2017
Posts: 88
Default

Thanks...I was under no delusion at all and enjoy having it as a part of my Thorpe collection anyway...gut feeling was that it was a fake and bought it as a reprint so didn’t see any harm in asking...just wanted to put it to rest before I stuck it back in my fire safe to store.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 01-12-2019, 08:01 AM
ruth_rookie's Avatar
ruth_rookie ruth_rookie is offline
“the bambino”
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2018
Location: Texas
Posts: 202
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Brian Van Horn View Post
Sorry to say, but fake.
What gave it away, Brian? I’ve only owned one M-101 (the Wajo, which was already slabbed) so I have a lack of experience with this issue that may have caused me to take a serious look at it, had it been un-trimmed and I was in the market for M101’s. What was the kicker for you?
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 01-12-2019, 10:21 AM
timn1 timn1 is offline
Tim Newcomb
Member
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Illinois
Posts: 1,036
Default A lot of things

There's a mottled quality to these fake Thorpes that is pretty easy to spot. Real Mendelsohns have a nice smooth glossy stock that doesn't look like that at all.

The other big giveaway is that with most M101-4/5 fakes, the black box around the picture is much heavier and also there is noticeably more white space between the box and the picture than there is on the real cards.

Note the real cards below for comparison:
Attached Images
File Type: jpg fake thorpes.jpg (77.3 KB, 152 views)
File Type: jpg m101-5 front.jpg (70.5 KB, 147 views)
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 01-12-2019, 11:01 AM
Brian Van Horn Brian Van Horn is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 6,032
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ruth_rookie View Post
What gave it away, Brian? I’ve only owned one M-101 (the Wajo, which was already slabbed) so I have a lack of experience with this issue that may have caused me to take a serious look at it, had it been un-trimmed and I was in the market for M101’s. What was the kicker for you?
Tim pretty much summed it up.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 01-12-2019, 11:07 AM
nolemmings's Avatar
nolemmings nolemmings is offline
Todd Schultz
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Phoenix
Posts: 3,720
Default

Also, Thorpe was issued as part of m101-5 only, and Burgess-Nash issued cards aligned with m101-4 only.

Sorry to belabor the topic, but the rampant stream of fake m101s is depressing, and I want to make sure the folks here don’t get burned. Most of what follows has been said before, but for the benefit of those who have not seen it:

Fake m101s are of two types–aged reprints and counterfeits. The Thorpes belonging to the OP are of the first type. They have the telltale wide space between the photo edge and the black box border, and as a result are cropped a little differently. Larry Fritsch created the set sometime last century, and all of these are m101-5-- I am unaware of any authorized m101-4 reprints. Tim pointed out the other differences with regard to stock, gloss and photo quality.

Here is an example, taken from ebay, alongside a genuine Thorpe–you can see a clear difference in spacing:



It won’t take long for a hobbyist to readily spot the gap just from scans, even if you do not collect them. In hand, the reprints are also noted as being made on thinner stock–the untampered Fritsch cards are translucent and are on white stock that has not toned and is not in any way “creamy”.

The more dangerous fake is the counterfeit, which copies an original and thus circumvents the telltale signs of the reprint. Here is a counterfeit Thorpe, now available on ebay.

I picked this one on purpose, because it is a copy of the same Famous and Barr card I just showed. You can tell by the surface wear on his chest, shown by some white marks, and a couple surface scratches on/near his left arm–these are in the exact same place and cannot easily be doctored when copying the original. Counterfeits will display the same flaws as the original, which makes them subject to photo match. Here is a thread about these that I posted more than three years ago:http://www.net54baseball.com/showthr...highlight=mack

Back to this Thorpe (credit that it is clearly being sold as not genuine), notice the near perfect centering. Even if the seller were to beat up the card in hopes of making it look more genuine, the centering would remain unless trimmed, as would the white marks unless creased significantly in just the right areas. Oh, and finally, the example I borrowed from ebay shows a Sporting News back, and Thorpe does not exist with that back, for the same reasons he cannot be found with Burgess-Nash. Perusing the Old Cardboard site on these cards will show possible front-back combinations, and will enable you to disqualify some fakes immediately.

It sucks that these fakes are on the market at all, even if identified as such (usually wrongfully called reprints when in fact they are outright counterfeits).
The best advice I can give on these is the same given by many others on a variety of different issues: handle cards you know to be the genuine article first and often–doesn’t have to be Thorpe, trust your instincts and perform the usual analysis before spending big: 1) is the seller reputable and move a lot of prewar material; 2) is the price too good to be true; 3) is the centering too nice? -many m101s, especially Thorpe and Ruth, are usually at least a little off-center; and 4) is the wear even and natural looking?, or instead, e.g., are the corners well rounded but the edges sharp and without any chipping.
__________________
If we are to have another contest in the near future of our national existence, I predict that the dividing line will not be Mason and Dixon's but between patriotism and intelligence on the one side, and superstition, ambition and ignorance on the other. - Ulysses S. Grant, military commander, 18th US President.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 01-12-2019, 11:35 AM
ruth_rookie's Avatar
ruth_rookie ruth_rookie is offline
“the bambino”
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2018
Location: Texas
Posts: 202
Default

Fantastic stuff, guys! I learn something new every day from this site.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 01-12-2019, 12:27 PM
runred41 runred41 is offline
member
 
Join Date: Sep 2017
Posts: 88
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by timn1 View Post
There's a mottled quality to these fake Thorpes that is pretty easy to spot. Real Mendelsohns have a nice smooth glossy stock that doesn't look like that at all.



The other big giveaway is that with most M101-4/5 fakes, the black box around the picture is much heavier and also there is noticeably more white space between the box and the picture than there is on the real cards.



Note the real cards below for comparison:


Thanks for all the great info.! So how was the gloss finish applied to these cards? Again..I bought these as counterfeits. Thanks in advance!












Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Reply With Quote
Reply



Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Another Real or Fake? timber63401 Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions 3 08-16-2010 07:25 PM
Are these real or fake.. Archive Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions 4 04-27-2008 08:12 AM
Real or Fake Archive Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions 7 02-07-2008 01:33 PM
Please help. Real or fake???? Archive Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions 20 12-30-2007 10:46 PM


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:23 AM.


ebay GSB