Calling ticket experts! - holy grail find?

[EYECOLLECTVINTAGE]

Good Afternoon (or morning to those on the West Coast).

I have come into possession of what I am hoping is an authentic ticket block from the 1932 World series from Wrigley Field.

Now a quick background on how I try to tell if something is authentic...

I assume all items are fake now unless I can prove otherwise.

Immediately upon opening the package, I smelled it. I was worried because it doesn't smell old....however it doesn't smell new either. It smells like nothing.

Now I tried not to let this effect my judgement because I have had items that smell old (as they should) come back fake and vice versa.

Next I attempted to match up all details on previous sold proof sheets (which I could not as they don't exist).

Next I went to a normal ticket and got worried because the top says TIER l BOX l SEAT. This was not consistent with my ticket.

Then I thought....... MAYBE I SHOULD COMPARE TO OTHER PROOFS??

Sure enough, that matched up as did all other details.

Next, I took the block to a friend that has been in the hobby for over 50 years and primarily deals with old paper. I figured this would get me the answer one way or another.

He looks at it... Looks some more... 15 minutes later....

He says if this is a fake it is amazing. The stock is right and consistent along with other factors he looks at such as dye etc.

The ONLY thing that worries him is this look is MINT.

Now I am asking for more eyeballs.

Maybe we can come to a conclusion? I will be happy to answer any and all questions. I am setting up for a show all day, but will check back periodically.

I hope that my hard work paid off.

[Dave Grob]

Not sure about saying that these proof sheets don't exist. You may want to do a bit more work on your own. I would suggest starting with Heritage Auctions, 2012 where they sold a number of these as a single lot (including 1932, 1935, 1938, and 1945 Cubs Wrigley Field). Legendary Auctions also has sold a number of these over the years as well..

Dave Grob

[conor912]

I'm no expert, but I agree the condition is scary. More specifically, the evenness of the wear. Hope it works out for you, though. Great eye appeal either way.

[EYECOLLECTVINTAGE]

Originally Posted by Dave Grob

Not sure about saying that these proof sheets don't exist. You may want to do a bit more work on your own. I would suggest starting with Heritage Auctions, 2012 where they sold a number of these as a single lot (including 1932, 1935, 1938, and 1945 Cubs Wrigley Field). Legendary Auctions also has sold a number of these over the years as well..

Dave Grob

Email sent Dave

[Bpm0014]

Honestly, you did some great homework. A lot of people would simply "buy" those and then come on here and ask for an opinion. And that's what turns off some of the hobby veterans on here. I like that you did some homework, provided details, and then came here for more help.

[Dave Grob]

https://sports.ha.com/itm/baseball/1...151218-44152.s

Not that hard to find.

Dave Grob

[EYECOLLECTVINTAGE]

Not sure how that went so cheap!! Maybe no one else could find it either haha. I've seen just game 3 proof go for double

Thanks for the link though Dave. Good to know it exists. Think mine is that one actually!

[Dave Grob]

Stephen,

Yours and the one Heritage had (the link I provided), are clearly not the same.

Dave Grob

[EYECOLLECTVINTAGE]

Dave I obviously didn't mean the same exact one literally. You really made a presentation piece to make me look bad lol

[EYECOLLECTVINTAGE]

Ok so here are some thoughts I want to share regarding these tickets and maybe I am opening up a can of worms, but I am confident in my assessment so here it goes.

I had SGC look at this sheet this past weekend and they are good 1000%.

As far as value, I had someone at the Hofstra show interested in these.

He asked what I wanted and I told him what I paid and said I obviously think they are worth more than that. He then tells me he would think these are worth anywhere from 4500-7000 which I agreed with, however he wanted to call a few people.

He called 3 top ticket people in the industry (some whom are probably members here) and they mostly agreed that these are 2500-3500 at most and not very uncommon.

Here is what I am having some trouble grasping....

1. So this guy is a huge long time Ruth collector whom has a large collection from signed balls to gamer bats. He has never seen this before.

Everyone I have shown this to (dealers included) have never seen this before, but somehow it's not an uncommon item?

I am having a lot of trouble with this evaluation both in regards to scarcity and value.

Here is why...

I searched worthpoint, google and many other sites and came up with nothing.

It wasn't until Dave shared that 2012 heritage link where is was sold as part of a lot that I even knew another existed.

These are not common. There are barely even many single ticket proof documented sales or in the population report for PSA (I know that the Pop report doesn't mean as much), BUT PSA has only graded 9 Game 3 Proofs and 6 Game 4 Proofs and at the same time 7 Full Game 3 Tickets and 4 Game 4 Tickets.

These seem almost equally scarce with the information given.

I did a worthpoint and google search going back to 2013 (obviously the market has rocketed since then) and here is what I found.

GAME 3

October 12 2016 - Game 3 Proof PSA - $3350.05
April 22 2015 - Game 3 Proof PSA - $2250
March 05 2015 - Game 3 Proof PSA - $5000
December 4 2014 - Mile High Game 3 Proof PSA - $1,535.76
December 31 2013 - Game 3 Proof - $5750


GAME 4

December 18 2013 - Game 4 Proof PSA - $801
August 22 2013 - Game 4 Proof PSA - $4000


GAME 5
​​​​​​​
This game does not trade often, but when it does, it commonly sells in the $150-$300 range as it is a mere novelty.


Now these are single game proofs. These are factual sales. Look at the gap between sales.

I am sure I may be missing a few that did not pop up.

Given this information, how can one value this sheet at $2500-$3500?

You can break these down and get the following..

GAME 3 = $3577.12 average (including that mile high anomaly) $4087.50 without it.

Game 4 = I would estimate this game to be worth at least $1300 as I will not attempt to average only 2 numbers with one being $4000 and one being $800.

Game 5 = Let's say $250.

With that low Mile High anomaly included, one could reasonably expect sell the 3 tickets broken down for $5127.12.

If you take out the Mile high ticket, you would be at $5637.50

ALSO. Keep in mind there are no documented sales in 2017 yet and we are definitely in a BULL ticket market right now as is evidence from all ticket sales of all sports and years.

NOW... do we not add anything for this being a high grade complete sheet? does the scarcity add no value?

Ok even if it doesn't (which I disagree with) look at the above numbers. It is simple math.

Value is subjective, however numbers don't lie. $2500 would be taking the lowest sales from each ticket ever.

There it is. I am done, just dislike how people are number blind when it comes to opinions.

[Forever Young]

Originally Posted by EYECOLLECTVINTAGE

Ok so here are some thoughts I want to share regarding these tickets and maybe I am opening up a can of worms, but I am confident in my assessment so here it goes.

I had SGC look at this sheet this past weekend and they are good 1000%.

As far as value, I had someone at the Hofstra show interested in these.

He asked what I wanted and I told him what I paid and said I obviously think they are worth more than that. He then tells me he would think these are worth anywhere from 4500-7000 which I agreed with, however he wanted to call a few people.

He called 3 top ticket people in the industry (some whom are probably members here) and they mostly agreed that these are 2500-3500 at most and not very uncommon.

Here is what I am having some trouble grasping....

1. So this guy is a huge long time Ruth collector whom has a large collection from signed balls to gamer bats. He has never seen this before.

Everyone I have shown this to (dealers included) have never seen this before, but somehow it's not an uncommon item?

I am having a lot of trouble with this evaluation both in regards to scarcity and value.

Here is why...

I searched worthpoint, google and many other sites and came up with nothing.

It wasn't until Dave shared that 2012 heritage link where is was sold as part of a lot that I even knew another existed.

These are not common. There are barely even many single ticket proof documented sales or in the population report for PSA (I know that the Pop report doesn't mean as much), BUT PSA has only graded 9 Game 3 Proofs and 6 Game 4 Proofs and at the same time 7 Full Game 3 Tickets and 4 Game 4 Tickets.

These seem almost equally scarce with the information given.

I did a worthpoint and google search going back to 2013 (obviously the market has rocketed since then) and here is what I found.

GAME 3

October 12 2016 - Game 3 Proof PSA - $3350.05
April 22 2015 - Game 3 Proof PSA - $2250
March 05 2015 - Game 3 Proof PSA - $5000
December 4 2014 - Mile High Game 3 Proof PSA - $1,535.76
December 31 2013 - Game 3 Proof - $5750


GAME 4

December 18 2013 - Game 4 Proof PSA - $801
August 22 2013 - Game 4 Proof PSA - $4000


GAME 5
​​​​​​​
This game does not trade often, but when it does, it commonly sells in the $150-$300 range as it is a mere novelty.


Now these are single game proofs. These are factual sales. Look at the gap between sales.

I am sure I may be missing a few that did not pop up.

Given this information, how can one value this sheet at $2500-$3500?

You can break these down and get the following..

GAME 3 = $3577.12 average (including that mile high anomaly) $4087.50 without it.

Game 4 = I would estimate this game to be worth at least $1300 as I will not attempt to average only 2 numbers with one being $4000 and one being $800.

Game 5 = Let's say $250.

With that low Mile High anomaly included, one could reasonably expect sell the 3 tickets broken down for $5127.12.

If you take out the Mile high ticket, you would be at $5637.50

ALSO. Keep in mind there are no documented sales in 2017 yet and we are definitely in a BULL ticket market right now as is evidence from all ticket sales of all sports and years.

NOW... do we not add anything for this being a high grade complete sheet? does the scarcity add no value?

Ok even if it doesn't (which I disagree with) look at the above numbers. It is simple math.

Value is subjective, however numbers don't lie. $2500 would be taking the lowest sales from each ticket ever.

There it is. I am done, just dislike how people are number blind when it comes to opinions.

I would agree with your assessment if numbers are accurate. Numbers do not lie. Also, people like to discount things they do not own.
That said, I would rather have a game used ticket stub than a full or a proof for the money any day. I am in the minority most likely. Nice pickup!

[steve B]

What sort of value were the dealers quoting? There's a big difference between "I'd be willing to pay X" and "I'd price it at X". I'd probably expect a price given between a dealer asking a question and another answering to be in the "I'd be willing to pay X" category.

No, rarity doesn't always carry a bonus. I really wish it did, as I have a number of collectibles that are really quite rare, but hardly any of them even get to even the level of the single tickets, or comparable but more popular even if more common items. If you entirely disagree, and have loads of extra money lets talk!

By the way, that's proven right in your numbers.

Game three and four and yes, even game 5 tickets should be equally rare. All would have been printed in the same quantities. Games 3 and 4 even had almost the same attendance.
"Proofs" would have also had the same quantity printed, since they came together on a sheet.

And yet, the prices are quite different!
Game 3 had a famous event, and brings more. Game 4 was the final game, so it's popular, and poor game 5 wasn't needed and is worth far less.

Lets check the PSA pop reports to see just how rare the proofs might be. It's a flawed number, but will at least tell us something.
Game 3 proof - 9
Game 3 full - 7
Game 3 stub - 68
Game 3/A full - 3

Game 4 proof -6
Game 4 full - 4
Game 4 stub -60
Game 4/B full - 4

Game 5 proof -2
Game 5 Full - 2

No graded sheets, which leads me to think that PSA won't grade the sheet. There's no reason the sheets of proofs should have been separated, other than to get them slabbed.
I'm not sure if the slabs mean much for ticket collectors, from what I've read here probably a lot less than with cards.

If the dealers only think it's worth maybe $3000, and heritage couldn't be bothered to put it as it's own lot, things are starting to make more sense.
For a dealer to maximize profit. They'd have to split up the sheet and get each ticket graded. The wide difference in prices on the game 4 show just how thin the market is for that one as a proof. So a dealer pays say 3000, splits it up which is risky, pays grading fees, and shipping and then possibly shipping to an auction. Plus commission unless they get a special deal. Grading would be 150-300, depending on how they valued them for different service levels. (Not counting the game 5 which they probably wouldn't send in) So lets say they're all in at 3500 in costs.
Now lest figure a best case , average, and worst.
Best- 5750+ 4000+300 =10050, Jackpot!
Average using your numbers - 4077 + 1300+ 250 = 5627 Not bad. about a 2K payday for all that work and tying up their money for a while. But not bad.
Worst case - 1535 +801+ ? About a $1200 loss, and the game 5 ticket is still taking up space in the display case. And might be for a long time.

Or......They buy it for 3K, split it up, go with roughly average prices, and end up with maybe $1500 profit.
Or......They buy it for 3K, and flip it for $4500 to someone who either wants the sheet, or would split the sheet and keep the game 3 ticket selling the game 4 to cover some of the cost. Same profit, less labor/risk.

None of the last two scenarios would turn up in an internet search, but a big ticket dealer may have done it a handful of times.
---------------------------
A very rough guess on how many "proofs" might be out there. Figure an order from the Cubs for 42,000 tickets. (They ran almost 1000 over the published par capacity of 40,000 so they almost certainly would have bought a few extras. ) The printer needs to make some extra, to cover themselves in case some get damaged in the process. It's not really common, so maybe 1-2% lets round it to 500, figure a few losses in process, test pieces, other general printing goofs, maybe 450? Either they get sent to the Cubs, or were sitting at the printers, either way, most of them probably survived, taken home by people at the printers, or stuck on some supply room shelf at Wrigley. Even if half of them were lost over time I'd say 225 of something qualifies as "not all that rare"


Steve B

[EYECOLLECTVINTAGE]

Originally Posted by steve B

What sort of value were the dealers quoting? There's a big difference between "I'd be willing to pay X" and "I'd price it at X". I'd probably expect a price given between a dealer asking a question and another answering to be in the "I'd be willing to pay X" category.

No, rarity doesn't always carry a bonus. I really wish it did, as I have a number of collectibles that are really quite rare, but hardly any of them even get to even the level of the single tickets, or comparable but more popular even if more common items. If you entirely disagree, and have loads of extra money lets talk!

By the way, that's proven right in your numbers.

Game three and four and yes, even game 5 tickets should be equally rare. All would have been printed in the same quantities. Games 3 and 4 even had almost the same attendance.
"Proofs" would have also had the same quantity printed, since they came together on a sheet.

And yet, the prices are quite different!
Game 3 had a famous event, and brings more. Game 4 was the final game, so it's popular, and poor game 5 wasn't needed and is worth far less.

Lets check the PSA pop reports to see just how rare the proofs might be. It's a flawed number, but will at least tell us something.
Game 3 proof - 9
Game 3 full - 7
Game 3 stub - 68
Game 3/A full - 3

Game 4 proof -6
Game 4 full - 4
Game 4 stub -60
Game 4/B full - 4

Game 5 proof -2
Game 5 Full - 2

No graded sheets, which leads me to think that PSA won't grade the sheet. There's no reason the sheets of proofs should have been separated, other than to get them slabbed.
I'm not sure if the slabs mean much for ticket collectors, from what I've read here probably a lot less than with cards.

If the dealers only think it's worth maybe $3000, and heritage couldn't be bothered to put it as it's own lot, things are starting to make more sense.
For a dealer to maximize profit. They'd have to split up the sheet and get each ticket graded. The wide difference in prices on the game 4 show just how thin the market is for that one as a proof. So a dealer pays say 3000, splits it up which is risky, pays grading fees, and shipping and then possibly shipping to an auction. Plus commission unless they get a special deal. Grading would be 150-300, depending on how they valued them for different service levels. (Not counting the game 5 which they probably wouldn't send in) So lets say they're all in at 3500 in costs.
Now lest figure a best case , average, and worst.
Best- 5750+ 4000+300 =10050, Jackpot!
Average using your numbers - 4077 + 1300+ 250 = 5627 Not bad. about a 2K payday for all that work and tying up their money for a while. But not bad.
Worst case - 1535 +801+ ? About a $1200 loss, and the game 5 ticket is still taking up space in the display case. And might be for a long time.

Or......They buy it for 3K, split it up, go with roughly average prices, and end up with maybe $1500 profit.
Or......They buy it for 3K, and flip it for $4500 to someone who either wants the sheet, or would split the sheet and keep the game 3 ticket selling the game 4 to cover some of the cost. Same profit, less labor/risk.

None of the last two scenarios would turn up in an internet search, but a big ticket dealer may have done it a handful of times.
---------------------------
A very rough guess on how many "proofs" might be out there. Figure an order from the Cubs for 42,000 tickets. (They ran almost 1000 over the published par capacity of 40,000 so they almost certainly would have bought a few extras. ) The printer needs to make some extra, to cover themselves in case some get damaged in the process. It's not really common, so maybe 1-2% lets round it to 500, figure a few losses in process, test pieces, other general printing goofs, maybe 450? Either they get sent to the Cubs, or were sitting at the printers, either way, most of them probably survived, taken home by people at the printers, or stuck on some supply room shelf at Wrigley. Even if half of them were lost over time I'd say 225 of something qualifies as "not all that rare"


Steve B

What sort of value were the dealers quoting?

Dealers were not quoting anything. I am referring to the people whom this guy reached out to along with some other board members whom referred to their scarcity.

No, rarity doesn't always carry a bonus.

I am aware, but Ruth's called shot isn't the same as a scorebook from 1879 with players 99% of casual collectors wouldn't know.

No graded sheets, which leads me to think that PSA won't grade the sheet.

They do not grade sheets ever if they can't find in a T-3 holder

If the dealers only think it's worth maybe $3000, and heritage couldn't be bothered to put it as it's own lot, things are starting to make more sense.

The 2012 ticket market and the 2017 ticket market aren't even close in all honesty so that doesn't make sense.

If no one is buying tickets in 2012 (or paying up for them at least) what incentive does heritage have for making it it's own lot 5 years ago?


For a dealer to maximize profit. They'd have to split up the sheet and get each ticket graded. The wide difference in prices on the game 4 show just how thin the market is for that one as a proof. So a dealer pays say 3000, splits it up which is risky, pays grading fees, and shipping and then possibly shipping to an auction. Plus commission unless they get a special deal. Grading would be 150-300, depending on how they valued them for different service levels. (Not counting the game 5 which they probably wouldn't send in) So lets say they're all in at 3500 in costs.
Now lest figure a best case , average, and worst.
Best- 5750+ 4000+300 =10050, Jackpot!
Average using your numbers - 4077 + 1300+ 250 = 5627 Not bad. about a 2K payday for all that work and tying up their money for a while. But not bad.
Worst case - 1535 +801+ ? About a $1200 loss, and the game 5 ticket is still taking up space in the display case. And might be for a long time.

Or......They buy it for 3K, split it up, go with roughly average prices, and end up with maybe $1500 profit.
Or......They buy it for 3K, and flip it for $4500 to someone who either wants the sheet, or would split the sheet and keep the game 3 ticket selling the game 4 to cover some of the cost. Same profit, less labor/risk.

None of the last two scenarios would turn up in an internet search, but a big ticket dealer may have done it a handful of times.

You missed the point of my entire post I guess. I am not looking to sell to a dealer for resale. I am looking to sell to a collector whom does not have this in his collection and would have to spend over 5000 in order to buy these individually anyways.

[packs]

Cool tickets. No idea what the value is but I'm a little surprised a proof ticket would be valued so highly. I'd rather have a ticket that got a fan into a game. If given the choice, I'd prefer a ticket ripped at the door.

[Dewey]

I'm not sure why you are so worked up over the 2500-3500 valuation. The evaluators are either right and you won't get your asking price, or they will be wrong and you'll make your dough. The market will bear this out. Why not just see where the ride takes you? You agreed to the 4500-7000 range. Maybe you are not as far away as it appears, unless you overpaid.

This thread feels off to me from the get-go. It is as if you have a whale on a hook and you are panicking because he might get away, so you are trying to have a thread justifying your price to then show him. I am probably way off, but it just feels funky. I mean, if we started a thread for every valuation disagreement then we'd have a lot more reading to do. It's as if you don't trust the market and need validation for your price right now.

Steve's post was helpful, I thought. Rather than missing the point, it might point a way forward for you as a dealer if things don't work to your liking in the near term. And good luck with it. A cool item, for sure.

p.s. Stephen, it was not "obvious" to me that you did not mean you were trying to sell the exact same item as the 2012 Heritage piece. I appreciated Dave's clarification. Instead of accepting the helpful correction you made it personal and accused him of trying to make you look bad. That's the bad look for you.

[EYECOLLECTVINTAGE]

I'm not sure why you are so worked up over the 2500-3500 valuation. The evaluators are either right and you won't get your asking price, or they will be wrong and you'll make your dough. The market will bear this out. Why not just see where the ride takes you? You agreed to the 4500-7000 range. Maybe you are not as far away as it appears, unless you overpaid.

I totally agree with you here 100% I do not believe I overpaid however. Maybe I paid stronger than a dealer would pay, but when I see something unique I do not mind paying up a bit.

This thread feels off to me from the get-go. It is as if you have a whale on a hook and you are panicking because he might get away, so you are trying to have a thread justifying your price to then show him. I am probably way off, but it just feels funky. I mean, if we started a thread for every valuation disagreement then we'd have a lot more reading to do. It's as if you don't trust the market and need validation for your price right now.

I have no whale on the hook and anyone that knows me at all would know that isn't my intention from this post. I HAD someone on the hook yesterday which is what I even said in the first post and due to what I feel is a horrendous evaluation I lost it. My original post today was simply to fire of some frustration while hopefully getting some either you are rights or I

Steve's post was helpful, I thought. Rather than missing the point, it might point a way forward for you as a dealer if things don't work to your liking in the near term. And good luck with it. A cool item, for sure.disagrees.

I understood where he was coming from, yet that was not my posts intention. I was referring to collectors not dealers.

p.s. Stephen, it was not "obvious" to me that you did not mean you were trying to sell the exact same item as the 2012 Heritage piece. I appreciated Dave's clarification. Instead of accepting the helpful correction you made it personal and accused him of trying to make you look bad. That's the bad look for you.


So rather than PM me you think the right thing to do is make a picture graph like I'm 4 years old? Honestly, If it's a bad look for me it's a bad look for me, but I'm not the type of person to kiss ass so to speak because someone is someone. If you speak condensing to me (which he did in his first reply) then I'm not gonna thank you for it.

[Snapolit1]

If you are having a hard time valuing it but are convinced someone is trying to short change you, why wouldn't you just give it to one of the great auction houses that advertise here and let the market determine it's value? Problem solved. If the guy your talking to wants it bad enough he will out pay everyone else for it.

[David Atkatz]

Originally Posted by EYECOLLECTVINTAGE

If you speak condensing to me (which he did in his first reply) then I'm not gonna thank you for it.

It's "condescending." (Or am I being condensing?)

[David Atkatz]

Originally Posted by Forever Young

That said, I would rather have a game used ticket stub than a full or a proof for the money any day. I am in the minority most likely.

Me, too. Proof tickets, as far as I'm concerned, have nothing at all to do with the game in question. And full tickets weren't there...
But a stub... Ahhhh, a stub...
It was there, in someone's pocket the whole time.
A piece of the event.

[EYECOLLECTVINTAGE]

Originally Posted by David Atkatz

It's "condescending." (Or am I being condensing?)

LOL obviously that was a mistake. I chose the wrong word when it gave me spelling suggestions.

[vintagebaseballcardguy]

Originally Posted by David Atkatz

Me, too. Proof tickets, as far as I'm concerned, have nothing at all to do with the game in question. And full tickets weren't there...
But a stub... Ahhhh, a stub...
It was there, in someone's pocket the whole time.
A piece of the event.

+1

Sent from my SM-G900V using Tapatalk

[T_Hamilton]

Originally Posted by vintagebaseballcardguy

+1

Sent from my SM-G900V using Tapatalk

as someone who owns a ticket tub from Ruth's called shot, I have to agree... stub over proof 8 days a week!

[frankbmd]

Originally Posted by EYECOLLECTVINTAGE

LOL obviously that was a mistake. I chose the wrong word when it gave me spelling suggestions.

I’m so glad I learned the language and how to spell before it was invented to give me suggestions.

[RedsFan1941]

Originally Posted by frankbmd

I’m so glad I learned the language and how to spell before it was invented to give me suggestions.

i don't like your convalescing tone.

[EYECOLLECTVINTAGE]

Love where this thread is going. Very educational and productive.

[71buc]

Originally Posted by EYECOLLECTVINTAGE

Love where this thread is going. Very educational and productive.

Hang in there Stephen. I too prefer stubs for reasons already mentioned. I think the sheet of proofs is very cool and rare. I have no idea of its value but agree with others that the market would be the best barometer of value. You seem to get beat up in many posts. I respect your resilience.

[Snapolit1]

Pretty basic Net 54 thread.

I think I found the hold grail. Holy sh**. Can anyone help me?

Well, I'm not sure. Have you consider this.

Yes I have, I think mine is better/rarer/more special.

It's nice, but I don't think it's that great.

I do. I think you are wrong. Here's why.

I also think it's not that great.

Ditto. Nice but probably not the holy grail.

What the heck is wrong with all you people and why are you all attacking me.

[EYECOLLECTVINTAGE]

Originally Posted by Snapolit1

Pretty basic Net 54 thread.

I think I found the hold grail. Holy sh**. Can anyone help me?

Well, I'm not sure. Have you consider this.

Yes I have, I think mine is better/rarer/more special.

It's nice, but I don't think it's that great.

I do. I think you are wrong. Here's why.

I also think it's not that great.

Ditto. Nice but probably not the holy grail.

What the heck is wrong with all you people and why are you all attacking me.

very informative. Thanks for adding more great info to this thread.

[conor912]

Originally Posted by David Atkatz

Me, too. Proof tickets, as far as I'm concerned, have nothing at all to do with the game in question. And full tickets weren't there...
But a stub... Ahhhh, a stub...
It was there, in someone's pocket the whole time.
A piece of the event.

Tickets have got to be the only collectible in the world worth more to collectors torn in half than whole.

[Scott Garner]

Originally Posted by conor912

Tickets have got to be the only collectible in the world worth more to collectors torn in half than whole.

Conor,
Although I can definitely see the argument for both sets of reasoning, full tickets to historic events typically do bring much higher sale prices due to their relative scarcity.

It stands to reason that fewer full tickets exist to vintage events since most tickets were used to gain entrance and thus were ripped.
As a collector, I always look to find the full ticket to the event because I find that a full ticket has the complete graphic content that is otherwise lost to time.
That being said, I will also collect the stub since, as David A. previously mentioned, it was in attendance of the actual game.
There are great arguments for both and this is what's great about collecting. Not everyone collects the same thing...

[Dave Grob]

Some thoughts on general pricing data, and these tickets in particular… and this is NOT directed at anyone in particular.

In instances when you have small populations or sample sizes, the relevance of each individual data point (ticket, jersey, card, bat) becomes less relevant/more sensitive. This is not an opinion, but a core component of statistical analysis. With small populations and sample sizes, it is also essential to know these samples in detail; specifically it is even a true sample size, or have some of these items been offered more than once within the same sample. This is key since if collectors are actually seeing the same item often offered more than once, this creates a false read on true rarity. This can lead to lower prices realized since the collector might assume, “Well, if I miss it here, I’ll just get the next one that comes along.” I alluded to this in a previous post on Brooklyn Dodger “Welcome Banners.”

As for the specific data on these proofs as previously offered by Stephen:

GAME 3
October 12 2016 - Game 3 Proof PSA - $3350.05
April 22 2015 - Game 3 Proof PSA - $2250
March 05 2015 - Game 3 Proof PSA - $5000
December 4 2014 - Mile High Game 3 Proof PSA - $1,535.76
December 31 2013 - Game 3 Proof - $5750
GAME 4
December 18 2013 - Game 4 Proof PSA - $801
August 22 2013 - Game 4 Proof PSA - $4000
GAME 5
This game does not trade often, but when it does, it commonly sells in the $150-$300 range as it is a mere novelty.

General Observations
- The highest prices paid/realized are from the oldest examples, not the most recent.

- There is a huge difference in prices between the games, with Game 3 obviously commanding the most money.

- Full sheets are not candidates for grading/encapsulation.

Why these factors may not automatically translate into a much higher price for the sheet as being offered and priced today.

1. The highest prices are oldest. This could suggest that the strongest buyers have already obtained what they were looking for and are likely not interested at all, regardless of price. Use of even the low average of $3,577 for Game 3 as a pricing metric fails to acknowledge that this figure is in fact higher than the price on the two most recent sales.

2. When collecting tickets, there appear to be fairly strong differences and preferences for stubs, full tickets and proofs. It could be that the proof is seen as the least desirable of the three. Here you have to be careful in applying an otherwise macro trend (ticket prices are going up), to a subset of the larger group that may not have same macro-level appeal.

3. The collector interested in a proof, may not be interested in one from Game 4 and or Game 5, and as such, is not willing to pay a premium for what he wants, while absorbing the acquisition of items he does not want.

All of this creates a couple of courses of action.

1. If the goal is strictly to provide the maximum return on investment, separate the tickets and have them graded/encapsulated and then sold individually. This maximizes the possibly demand for the Game 3 ticket and works to satisfy what may be the collector’s preference for graded/encapsulated product.

2. Keep the sheet as is and hold onto it until a buyer is found at a more palatable sales price.

Dave Grob

[EYECOLLECTVINTAGE]

Originally Posted by Dave Grob

Some thoughts on general pricing data, and these tickets in particular… and this is NOT directed at anyone in particular.

In instances when you have small populations or sample sizes, the relevance of each individual data point (ticket, jersey, card, bat) becomes less relevant/more sensitive. This is not an opinion, but a core component of statistical analysis. With small populations and sample sizes, it is also essential to know these samples in detail; specifically it is even a true sample size, or have some of these items been offered more than once within the same sample. This is key since if collectors are actually seeing the same item often offered more than once, this creates a false read on true rarity. This can lead to lower prices realized since the collector might assume, “Well, if I miss it here, I’ll just get the next one that comes along.” I alluded to this in a previous post on Brooklyn Dodger “Welcome Banners.”

As for the specific data on these proofs as previously offered by Stephen:

GAME 3
October 12 2016 - Game 3 Proof PSA - $3350.05
April 22 2015 - Game 3 Proof PSA - $2250
March 05 2015 - Game 3 Proof PSA - $5000
December 4 2014 - Mile High Game 3 Proof PSA - $1,535.76
December 31 2013 - Game 3 Proof - $5750
GAME 4
December 18 2013 - Game 4 Proof PSA - $801
August 22 2013 - Game 4 Proof PSA - $4000
GAME 5
This game does not trade often, but when it does, it commonly sells in the $150-$300 range as it is a mere novelty.

General Observations
- The highest prices paid/realized are from the oldest examples, not the most recent.

- There is a huge difference in prices between the games, with Game 3 obviously commanding the most money.

- Full sheets are not candidates for grading/encapsulation.

Why these factors may not automatically translate into a much higher price for the sheet as being offered and priced today.

1. The highest prices are oldest. This could suggest that the strongest buyers have already obtained what they were looking for and are likely not interested at all, regardless of price. Use of even the low average of $3,577 for Game 3 as a pricing metric fails to acknowledge that this figure is in fact higher than the price on the two most recent sales.

2. When collecting tickets, there appear to be fairly strong differences and preferences for stubs, full tickets and proofs. It could be that the proof is seen as the least desirable of the three. Here you have to be careful in applying an otherwise macro trend (ticket prices are going up), to a subset of the larger group that may not have same macro-level appeal.

3. The collector interested in a proof, may not be interested in one from Game 4 and or Game 5, and as such, is not willing to pay a premium for what he wants, while absorbing the acquisition of items he does not want.

All of this creates a couple of courses of action.

1. If the goal is strictly to provide the maximum return on investment, separate the tickets and have them graded/encapsulated and then sold individually. This maximizes the possibly demand for the Game 3 ticket and works to satisfy what may be the collector’s preference for graded/encapsulated product.

2. Keep the sheet as is and hold onto it until a buyer is found at a more palatable sales price.

Dave Grob

Dave,

THANK YOU! now that is informative and very very helpful. It's good when you take into account things as such and yes you make great points. I agree with a lot of what you are saying if not all of it.

My only thing is, I do not think these pop up often. Aside from your Heritage example which was included in a lot, were you able to find any other sheets offered for sale from this series?

Thanks again for this post. It opens up a real discussion.

[packs]

What would the ticket grail be? I've got to think Lou Gehrig's debut would be a grail.

[Dave Grob]

Stephen,

Please don’t take this as a poke in the eye, but I think you are missing the point of what I took the time to lay out. My apologies if I was confusing. Assuming for the sake of argument, the only two examples out there are yours and the Heritage example. If this were a fact (which I am not saying it is), it does not change or effect the likely perceived market value or likely demand for the item in question as suggested above. Rarity, whether it be numeric or condition based, does not always translate into enhanced value over comparative items for any number of reasons. That is what I had hope was the “take away” from my previous post.

Is there a way to change this dynamic? There could be, but this requires that demand be created for the artifact/item in question. This can come though educational efforts (convincing collectors/the industry that the item is undervalued in a way that makes objective sense to them). In short, growing the number of collectors who would want what you are selling. In this case, numeric or condition based rarity might not be enough.

Offering comparative pricing data may not be enough since it appears (only an observation), that demand for the whole sheet may not be as strong as for the eaches. The dynamic might also change though the application of industry wide pressure. By this I mean the demand for grading/encapsulation of odd size product like this. I don’t think this will likely happen since this would require a market strong enough to justify the additional cost of creating new holders. For the most part, grading/encapsulation is based a volume business model. As such, there is little incentive to invest money in developing a supporting infrastructure for low density items.

I really don’t have anyone more thoughts or information on this particular topic. Maybe others do.

Dave Grob

[Sophiedog]

Those WS tickets are really cool. There's probably a very limited market as well. I think the best way to get your price for them is to list them on Ebay with best offer and be prepared to let them stay there until an acceptable price comes along...could take awhile. If you consign them with an auction house you would have to have a reserve to protect yourself as the right buyer may not see it in the month or so that the auction runs.

[Republicaninmass]

Holy grail? Id have to think the Addie Joss Benefit 7/24/11 game featuring the "all stars".


Least it would probably be mine

[Fballguy]

The number of grumpy, old men on this forum always cracks me up.

Nicely done. Now go scare the neighborhood kids off your lawn.

[EYECOLLECTVINTAGE]

Originally Posted by Fballguy

The number of grumpy, old men on this forum always cracks me up.

Nicely done. Now go scare the neighborhood kids off your lawn.

lol

[71buc]

Originally Posted by Fballguy

The number of grumpy, old men on this forum always cracks me up.

Nicely done. Now go scare the neighborhood kids off your lawn.

As a grumpy old man you made my day with that comment.

[Snapolit1]

Amazing how one person always seems to end up with the same response that he then gets ticked off at, no? I tell a friend of mine who ends up fighting with basically every waiter, gas station attendant, person at CVS, toll taker etc. that he encounters that just possibly, and it’s only a possibility of course, that’s maybe he’s the problem. Of course the thought has never crossed his mind.

[HRBAKER]

Originally Posted by Snapolit1

Pretty basic Net 54 thread.

I think I found the hold grail. Holy sh**. Can anyone help me?

Well, I'm not sure. Have you consider this.

Yes I have, I think mine is better/rarer/more special.

It's nice, but I don't think it's that great.

I do. I think you are wrong. Here's why.

I also think it's not that great.

Ditto. Nice but probably not the holy grail.

What the heck is wrong with all you people and why are you all attacking me.

Spoken (or typed) like someone who has been here a while..

[HRBAKER]

Originally Posted by Snapolit1

Amazing how one person always seems to end up with the same response that he then gets ticked off at, no? I tell a friend of mine who ends up fighting with basically every waiter, gas station attendant, person at CVS, toll taker etc. that he encounters that just possibly, and it’s only a possibility of course, that’s maybe he’s the problem. Of course the thought has never crossed his mind.

Stop being a grumpy old man.

[EYECOLLECTVINTAGE]

I love when people with no facts join a discussion with negativity. Like seriously absolutely nothing at all to add to the discussion aside from opinions which are backed with nothing.

we should start a section here called "The Mush Room".

If you are negative and not fact based you get locked in the bathroom aka the mush room for 24 hours like Mush.

[steve B]

Only if we also get an "opinion shop" area where people can go after they've checked everywhere else.
My expert friend says it's real
PSA/SGC/random other expert says it's real.
Dealer at random show says it's real

What do the experts here think?

How about price?
I did research
I asked a dealer who asked some other people.

What do you guys think?

Nah, the whole lot of you are old and crazy.
Who do I ask to get the opinion I want?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LoF_a0-7xVQ

[bnorth]

Originally Posted by steve B

Only if we also get an "opinion shop" area where people can go after they've checked everywhere else.
My expert friend says it's real
PSA/SGC/random other expert says it's real.
Dealer at random show says it's real

What do the experts here think?

How about price?
I did research
I asked a dealer who asked some other people.

What do you guys think?

Nah, the whole lot of you are old and crazy.
Who do I ask to get the opinion I want?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LoF_a0-7xVQ

LOL, Steve it seems like you have read some of Stephens threads before.

[Snapolit1]

Originally Posted by steve B

Only if we also get an "opinion shop" area where people can go after they've checked everywhere else.
My expert friend says it's real
PSA/SGC/random other expert says it's real.
Dealer at random show says it's real

What do the experts here think?

How about price?
I did research
I asked a dealer who asked some other people.

What do you guys think?

Nah, the whole lot of you are old and crazy.
Who do I ask to get the opinion I want?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LoF_a0-7xVQ

Always bogus question posing as a request for information. What it is is a request for validation and nothing more. Basically your wife asking "do I look fat in this?". Only one answer is being sought.

[EYECOLLECTVINTAGE]

Originally Posted by steve B

Only if we also get an "opinion shop" area where people can go after they've checked everywhere else.
My expert friend says it's real
PSA/SGC/random other expert says it's real.
Dealer at random show says it's real

What do the experts here think?

How about price?
I did research
I asked a dealer who asked some other people.

What do you guys think?

Nah, the whole lot of you are old and crazy.
Who do I ask to get the opinion I want?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LoF_a0-7xVQ

See if you would re read my original post, you would see I didn't ask once for a value. I actually never asked anyone for a value. I came to my own conclusion on that. Never did I say anyone here is old and crazy. More alternative facts.

I came here asking for opinions on authenticity.

Dave then proceeded to crap on me and tell me do more homework because it's not hard to find (meanwhile there was only one other sheet sale ever documented and it was in a lot in 2012 and not titled what I was looking for).

Then I came back here explaining how I lost a deal because "experts" valued it at 2500-3500 when broken down they are worth over 5K.

Then it turned into why stubs are better than proofs (not sure how or why that started)

I don't know if you have been actually following this thread, or just forming opinions based on the most previous post.

I think this thread has run it's course.

Tickets are real, and worth what someone will pay.

Done and Done.

Why do people come on here seriously so angry and just nasty?

It seriously is mind boggling to me and makes this hobby unenjoyable.

You all complain about oh the hobby isn't what it used to be etc. etc.

I can almost guarantee it's because when young guys try to get involved, a bunch of the more "experienced" guys have to try to show who's genitals are bigger.

Instead of oh wow thats a nice find, 99% of the people who wrote in this thread just plain hated.

[EYECOLLECTVINTAGE]

Originally Posted by Snapolit1

Always bogus question posing as a request for information. What it is is a request for validation and nothing more. Basically your wife asking "do I look fat in this?". Only one answer is being sought.

Thats exactly what it was. You need to go in the mush room

[Snapolit1]

Tickets are real, and worth what someone will pay.

Done and Done.


Gee, . . . .so what was the point of any of this? You needed your gentitals massaged by a board of angry old men?

[EYECOLLECTVINTAGE]

The point was I was looking for judgements on authenticity as I'd never seen this sheet before and couldn't find it.

I do appreciate your wisdom though on many subjects here. You seem very knowledgeable in many areas of the hobby.