 |
|
||||||
 |
|
|||||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
||||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#1
03-01-2007, 02:45 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Question about 1933 Goudey Ruth
Posted By: Don
I have a 1933 Goudey Ruth (#144) that is very pale. I had always assumed that the card had just faded (by sunlight or whatever), although I did find it odd that it would fade evenly. But a couple of years back, I saw a similar card in a Huggins and Scott auction. It was listed as a print variation -- does anybody here have any additional info? 
|
|
#2
03-01-2007, 03:32 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Question about 1933 Goudey Ruth
Posted By: Bill
Card #144, Ruth was a double print. Since the Lajoie, #106, was not issued until 1934, the Ruth card was double printed to make up for the #106 loss. Whether that has anything to do with a variation I do not know.
|
 |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| 1933 Goudey RUTH SGC 20 | Archive | 1920 to 1949 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 0 | 04-04-2009 11:13 AM |
| 1933 Goudey Ruth Red | Archive | 1920 to 1949 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 1 | 08-15-2007 02:46 PM |
| Babe Ruth 1933 Goudey RC? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 14 | 06-04-2006 05:34 PM |
| Looking for a 1933 Goudey Babe Ruth #53 | Archive | 1920 to 1949 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 0 | 12-08-2005 08:43 PM |
| 1933 Goudey Ruth #53 | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 11 | 09-24-2004 07:19 PM |
Linear Mode
