|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
This is not new news, it has been previously discussed. The arrangement of the 48 subjects that I have displayed here is by no means a singular grouping of these subjects. The 6 super-prints certainly exemplify this fact. They are repeated on subsequent series sheets (e.g. they are included again in the 66-subject Sovereign apple green sheet, also, T213, T214, T215 issues). TED Z . |
#2
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
[Edited] Just so that I make sure that we are discussing the same thing... I fully understand that between different series P350 vs S460 (superprints for example) that the layouts were different. Are you are saying that within a series (Piedmont 350 in this instance) that the layouts did or did not change? Last edited by t206hound; 08-15-2014 at 01:29 PM. |
#3
|
||||
|
||||
still curious
Curious as to the answer to my questions...
Last edited by t206hound; 08-15-2014 at 01:31 PM. |
#4
|
||||
|
||||
even more curious
Still waiting...
Are you are saying that within a series (Piedmont 350 in this instance) that the layouts did or did not change? If you believe they did not change, then it's been demonstrated that there are other cards adjacent to those that you say appeared together and therefore your assertion is incorrect. If you believe that they did change, then how can you assert beyond a reasonable doubt that they ever appeared together on a single sheet? Last edited by t206hound; 08-16-2014 at 12:41 PM. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Hey guys........
Quote:
Quote:
Man, you are one hyper dude ! FYI....we were away in Cape May since Friday for some Sun, Surf & Fun. Anyhow, there is really nothing more that I can add that will convince you that your "17" (or 34) myth is not the way ALC printed these cards. I have tried to explain the basis for the 48-subject arrangement that I posted.....but, it's either not registering, or you just do not understand where I'm coming from. TED Z . |
#6
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
My question still stands as it relates to this post: Quote:
So far, your theory holds with your 48 "Coupon" players appearing together twice on one sheet (Rossman, McBride, McIntyre and Hoffman). But then we have other Piedmont 350 miscuts where we see Rossman adjacent to Stephens and Jimmy Jackson under Hoffman. So now the question: How can those 48 players (from your image) be together when we know that Stephens and Jackson were on a sheet with four of them? |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Erick
Quote:
Fine, I will start with the fact that most of us T206 "dudes" appear to agree on......that whatever the size sheet, ALC printed the fronts first. Then, these pre-printed (blank-backed) sheets were hung up to dry....then stacked awaiting for orders from the various T-brand Factory's requesting T206 cards. In the 150 Series press runs, and the 350 Series press runs, the PIEDMONT brand cards were printed 1st. PIEDMONT cards represent approx. 50 % of the total population of T206's. SWEET CAPORAL cards represent approx. 30 % of the total population of T206's. So, I present the 48 - Major League subjects from the 1910 COUPON set as an example, as it suggests to us the structure of a very plausible sheet configuration. Note, that I said 48 SUBJECTS....which means ALC may have (and most likely) Double-Printed them producing a 96-card sheet. Furthermore, the 12 - 150-only subjects....the 48 Southern Leaguers....and, my "Exclusive 12" configuration, also suggest to us of how these cards were configured. Short of these 4 examples, it is difficult to figure out how all the other T206's were configured (or arranged) on printed sheets. Quote:
is adjacent with subjects other than the ones on my 48-subject arrangement. Quote:
I would like to know what T-brand backs are on these two adjacent situations ? TED Z . |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
All plausible except the hanging them up to dry. I've never seen a picture of that being done even then. Maybe in an art printer, but not in a high production environment. It takes way too much time and isn't really necessary.
This next bit is where I differ from pretty much everyone else. Because of time constraints I don't see any brand being produced first. Certainly portions of a series for some brands were done before others, but Getting it done would probably have required almost constant output for the bigger brands. And most likely running various portions on different presses at the same time. For example Monday- Print yellow Tuesday -Print yellow on press 1 and possibly brown or light blue on press 2 using the yellow produced day 1(Doing brown after yellow would be odd. The yellow /browns say it may have been done, but it's not typical) I've seen a few cards that seem to have been done on a multi color press, and a very small group with a flaw that I haven't figured out. I've been researching press patents today and I'm very close to tossing nearly every assumption I've made so far. I'm thinking I really need to get up to the local printing museum to see if they have anything related to ALC or perhaps a Hoe company catalog. Steve B |
#9
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
I don't know the back of the Stephens-Rossman, but as you state, it can only be one of four (five with Coupon). I thought I was told that it was Piedmont 350, but cannot find any documentation on that. The image below is from the T206 Neighbors thread. EDITED: I have confirmed that this card has a Piedmont 350 back. Which is my point... if they switched around configurations, there's no way to know which cards comprised an entire sheet. Last edited by t206hound; 08-18-2014 at 06:57 PM. |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Topics for discussion re: t206 Printing and errors | Clark7781 | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 16 | 04-17-2012 09:38 PM |
T206 Backs Discussion, Part 215,256,559 | usernamealreadytaken | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 4 | 04-16-2010 07:31 PM |
E cards - what size sheet to store raw? | tiger8mush | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 2 | 04-16-2010 12:46 PM |
T206 Printing Discussion | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 8 | 11-21-2007 06:01 AM |
For Discussion: Relative Values of T206 and T205 | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 3 | 06-02-2006 09:57 AM |