NonSports Forum

Net54baseball.com
Welcome to Net54baseball.com. These forums are devoted to both Pre- and Post- war baseball cards and vintage memorabilia, as well as other sports. There is a separate section for Buying, Selling and Trading - the B/S/T area!! If you write anything concerning a person or company your full name needs to be in your post or obtainable from it. . Contact the moderator at leon@net54baseball.com should you have any questions or concerns. When you click on links to eBay on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network. Enjoy!
Net54baseball.com
Net54baseball.com
ebay GSB
T206s on eBay
Babe Ruth Cards on eBay
t206 Ty Cobb on eBay
Ty Cobb Cards on eBay
Lou Gehrig Cards on eBay
Baseball T201-T217 on eBay
Baseball E90-E107 on eBay
T205 Cards on eBay
Baseball Postcards on eBay
Goudey Cards on eBay
Baseball Memorabilia on eBay
Baseball Exhibit Cards on eBay
Baseball Strip Cards on eBay
Baseball Baking Cards on eBay
Sporting News Cards on eBay
Play Ball Cards on eBay
Joe DiMaggio Cards on eBay
Mickey Mantle Cards on eBay
Bowman 1951-1955 on eBay
Football Cards on eBay

Go Back   Net54baseball.com Forums > Net54baseball Main Forum - WWII & Older Baseball Cards > Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 07-05-2017, 07:34 PM
Brian Brian is offline
Member
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: New York
Posts: 314
Default E95 Plank--PWCC auction

I waited for this auction to end, but I certainly hope that the winner of this lot does not mind an altered card for $700 (despite their claim that it is undergraded)--just look at his uniform--or gets his/her money back:

http://www.ebay.com/itm/1909-E95-Phi...%3AMEBIDX%3AIT

This is very disappointing, as I pointed this issue out to the seller no fewer than 4 times, and they said they would "look into it."

This is as much a TPG issue as it is an auction issue and is sad, IMO. The auction should have been cancelled or at least edited. I don't like to see anyone taken advantage of, ever.

Bri@n.D.y.n.l.a.c.h.t
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 07-05-2017, 07:43 PM
ullmandds's Avatar
ullmandds ullmandds is offline
pete ullman
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: saint paul, mn
Posts: 11,237
Default

Wowsers!!!
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 07-05-2017, 08:01 PM
Scocs Scocs is offline
Scott
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Posts: 462
Default

Talk about putting the "A" in Plank!
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 07-05-2017, 08:07 PM
vintagebaseballcardguy's Avatar
vintagebaseballcardguy vintagebaseballcardguy is offline
R0b3rt Ch!ld3rs
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Posts: 2,512
Default

I will confess to not seeing it at first, but once I did, well...I am speechless. This scares me honestly in that I am making the effort to learn prewar and begin collecting it. Education about what I am considering buying goes into that. Part of that education is not a blind reliance on TPGs. In the past, like a lot of collectors, there have been probably a few times that I didn't do my homework because a card was in a TPG slab, and I let them do my work for me. I could have been burned as a result, and I would have deserved it. Delving into prewar has forced me to really try and "know" the cards. This is a Grade A example of why.

Sent from my SM-G900V using Tapatalk
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 07-05-2017, 08:15 PM
irv's Avatar
irv irv is offline
D@le Irv*n
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2016
Location: Ontario, Canada.
Posts: 6,662
Default

I assume this is what it is suppose to look like, even though it's another PSA graded one?
Attached Images
File Type: jpg 1909-e95-philadelphia-caramel-eddie-plank-21501.jpg (77.6 KB, 868 views)
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 07-05-2017, 08:15 PM
RedsFan1941 RedsFan1941 is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Feb 2016
Posts: 1,207
Default

heavens to Betsy!
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 07-05-2017, 08:28 PM
Brian Brian is offline
Member
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: New York
Posts: 314
Default E95 Plank-PWCC auction

Yes, Irv. Nice card!

While it is true that a buyer should know what a card looks like before he/she plunks down $700, not everyone is born knowing what this card should look like, except maybe Leon (hi, Leon).

But this does not, IMO, excuse someone like the seller who has literally handled thousands of pre-war cards. Just sayin'.

Bri@n.D.y.n.l.a.c.h.t
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 07-05-2017, 08:32 PM
Peter_Spaeth's Avatar
Peter_Spaeth Peter_Spaeth is offline
Peter Spaeth
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 30,264
Default

Outstanding Plank with wonderful eye appeal for the grade. Boasts EXMT centering with well formed corners for the grade. The color and focus are deserving of a much higher grade. Deserving of attention.
__________________
My avatar is a sketch by my son who is an art school graduate. Some of his sketches and paintings are at
https://www.jamesspaethartwork.com/

He is available to do custom drawings in graphite, charcoal and other media. He also sells some of his works as note cards/greeting cards on Etsy under JamesSpaethArt.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 07-05-2017, 08:32 PM
orly57's Avatar
orly57 orly57 is offline
Orlando Rodriguez
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2014
Location: Miami
Posts: 979
Default

I see the staining and the letter A, but I don't understand exactly why you are saying it is altered. Do you mean it should have an (st or mk) qualifier? I am curious for my own edification. Here is a side-by-side of the card you are referring to (left) with Irv's card.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg F5FCE73F-9642-4810-882E-688B6F526315.jpg (63.1 KB, 845 views)

Last edited by orly57; 07-06-2017 at 01:04 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 07-05-2017, 08:34 PM
irv's Avatar
irv irv is offline
D@le Irv*n
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2016
Location: Ontario, Canada.
Posts: 6,662
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Brian View Post
Yes, Irv. Nice card!

While it is true that a buyer should know what a card looks like before he/she plunks down $700, not everyone is born knowing what this card should look like, except maybe Leon (hi, Leon).

But this does not, IMO, excuse someone like the seller who has literally handled thousands of pre-war cards. Just sayin'.

Bri@n.D.y.n.l.a.c.h.t
Brian, I got the picture from PSA's own site. I wish the card were mine!
https://www.psacard.com/cardfacts/ba...ie-plank/15673
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 07-05-2017, 08:42 PM
Brian Brian is offline
Member
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: New York
Posts: 314
Default

Orlando, either it is an extremely rare variation that I have never seen before (now that WOULD be cool), or the 'A' was put there on a card that looks like Irv's version. I have the card myself.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 07-05-2017, 08:45 PM
Peter_Spaeth's Avatar
Peter_Spaeth Peter_Spaeth is offline
Peter Spaeth
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 30,264
Default

It doesn't look much like the real logo.
http://www.ebay.com/itm/1909-E95-PHI...sAAOSw6YtZWDVs
__________________
My avatar is a sketch by my son who is an art school graduate. Some of his sketches and paintings are at
https://www.jamesspaethartwork.com/

He is available to do custom drawings in graphite, charcoal and other media. He also sells some of his works as note cards/greeting cards on Etsy under JamesSpaethArt.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 07-05-2017, 08:53 PM
irv's Avatar
irv irv is offline
D@le Irv*n
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2016
Location: Ontario, Canada.
Posts: 6,662
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Brian View Post
Orlando, either it is an extremely rare variation that I have never seen before (now that WOULD be cool), or the 'A' was put there on a card that looks like Irv's version. I have the card myself.
If you scroll down in the link I posted, you can view past sales. Although not 100% conclusive, I suppose, no other card has that "A" on his chest.
https://www.psacard.com/cardfacts/ba...ie-plank/15673
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 07-05-2017, 08:54 PM
Peter_Spaeth's Avatar
Peter_Spaeth Peter_Spaeth is offline
Peter Spaeth
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 30,264
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Scocs View Post
Talk about putting the "A" in Plank!
So is the proper grade MK or AUTH?
__________________
My avatar is a sketch by my son who is an art school graduate. Some of his sketches and paintings are at
https://www.jamesspaethartwork.com/

He is available to do custom drawings in graphite, charcoal and other media. He also sells some of his works as note cards/greeting cards on Etsy under JamesSpaethArt.
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 07-05-2017, 08:59 PM
Peter_Spaeth's Avatar
Peter_Spaeth Peter_Spaeth is offline
Peter Spaeth
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 30,264
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by irv View Post
If you scroll down in the link I posted, you can view past sales. Although not 100% conclusive, I suppose, no other card has that "A" on his chest.
https://www.psacard.com/cardfacts/ba...ie-plank/15673
If it were a variation it would be known.
__________________
My avatar is a sketch by my son who is an art school graduate. Some of his sketches and paintings are at
https://www.jamesspaethartwork.com/

He is available to do custom drawings in graphite, charcoal and other media. He also sells some of his works as note cards/greeting cards on Etsy under JamesSpaethArt.
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 07-05-2017, 09:00 PM
Brian Brian is offline
Member
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: New York
Posts: 314
Default

If it had been graded with "MK", I think that would be accurate, I guess. But one could make the argument for "Auth", too. Please don't get me started on grading issues.....
Brian
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 07-06-2017, 05:03 AM
Pat R's Avatar
Pat R Pat R is offline
P@trick R.omolo
member
 
Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 3,322
Default

Personally I think it might be a "variation", it doesn't look like someone
drew that on there to me. I haven't found an A's logo that looks like
it yet but here are some different ones in the T206 set,
A's.jpg
A's 2.jpg
A's 3.jpg
A's 4.jpg
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 07-06-2017, 05:20 AM
Econteachert205 Econteachert205 is offline
D3nn!s B@!!ou
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Rhode Island
Posts: 1,897
Default

I think it is a faint stamp mark.
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 07-06-2017, 06:13 AM
ullmandds's Avatar
ullmandds ullmandds is offline
pete ullman
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: saint paul, mn
Posts: 11,237
Default

im starting to agree that this "a" was likely not drawn in...maybe a stamp...or who knows maybe some form of variation?

also...I'm not so versed with this particular card to have noticed the "A" shouldn't be there at first glance...I had to look at comparables.
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 07-06-2017, 07:19 AM
Brian Brian is offline
Member
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: New York
Posts: 314
Default

It does look like a stamp, and that is why the card should have a qualifier.
Just hope the "winner" of that card reads this thread and gets his/her money back.
Reply With Quote
  #21  
Old 07-06-2017, 07:40 AM
Peter_Spaeth's Avatar
Peter_Spaeth Peter_Spaeth is offline
Peter Spaeth
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 30,264
Default

There appears to be something (ink or whatever) in the same color above and to the left of the letter A. I don't think the factory printed it that way.
__________________
My avatar is a sketch by my son who is an art school graduate. Some of his sketches and paintings are at
https://www.jamesspaethartwork.com/

He is available to do custom drawings in graphite, charcoal and other media. He also sells some of his works as note cards/greeting cards on Etsy under JamesSpaethArt.
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 07-06-2017, 07:48 AM
scooter729's Avatar
scooter729 scooter729 is offline
Scott S
Member
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Boston area
Posts: 2,618
Default

The card does look nicer than a 3, assuming there are no faint creases or anything we can't see in the scans.

Maybe it was submitted as a "no qualifier" card, so instead of getting a PSA 5 (MK), it got a PSA 3?

I probably would've graded it a 4, but wouldn't be the ugliest 5 I've ever seen by any stretch.
Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old 07-06-2017, 08:03 AM
Peter_Spaeth's Avatar
Peter_Spaeth Peter_Spaeth is offline
Peter Spaeth
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 30,264
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by scooter729 View Post
The card does look nicer than a 3, assuming there are no faint creases or anything we can't see in the scans.

Maybe it was submitted as a "no qualifier" card, so instead of getting a PSA 5 (MK), it got a PSA 3?

I probably would've graded it a 4, but wouldn't be the ugliest 5 I've ever seen by any stretch.
I suppose it's plausible, but I tend to think PSA would not give that card a 5 based on the corners.
__________________
My avatar is a sketch by my son who is an art school graduate. Some of his sketches and paintings are at
https://www.jamesspaethartwork.com/

He is available to do custom drawings in graphite, charcoal and other media. He also sells some of his works as note cards/greeting cards on Etsy under JamesSpaethArt.
Reply With Quote
  #24  
Old 07-06-2017, 08:22 AM
vintagetoppsguy vintagetoppsguy is offline
D@v!d J@m3s
Banned
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 5,981
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by scooter729 View Post
Maybe it was submitted as a "no qualifier" card, so instead of getting a PSA 5 (MK), it got a PSA 3?
I didn't think you could request "no qualifiers" on cards with marks?
Reply With Quote
  #25  
Old 07-06-2017, 08:33 AM
Scocs Scocs is offline
Scott
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Posts: 462
Default

Stamp +1
Reply With Quote
  #26  
Old 07-06-2017, 08:45 AM
scooter729's Avatar
scooter729 scooter729 is offline
Scott S
Member
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Boston area
Posts: 2,618
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by vintagetoppsguy View Post
I didn't think you could request "no qualifiers" on cards with marks?
Ah, not sure, so you certainly could be right....
Reply With Quote
  #27  
Old 07-06-2017, 09:35 AM
Iwantmorecards77 Iwantmorecards77 is offline
Todd
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 266
Default (MK)

I thought - at least at some point in the past - that there was an option to have the card graded without a qualifier. Here's another example below, with a pencil mark on the right border:


Reply With Quote
  #28  
Old 07-06-2017, 10:00 AM
darwinbulldog's Avatar
darwinbulldog darwinbulldog is offline
Glenn
Glen.n Sch.ey-d
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: South Florida
Posts: 3,231
Default

Looks like a PSA 3 (MK) or PSA 4 (MK). Possibly it's a straight 3 because of a "no qualifier" request, but I think with that much corner wear and with the stamp being as subtle as it is it's more likely they just missed it. Wouldn't bother me much either way, as I like period stamps on my cards; but I guess if no one else does I could get the card cheaper than $700.
Reply With Quote
  #29  
Old 07-06-2017, 10:26 AM
vintagetoppsguy vintagetoppsguy is offline
D@v!d J@m3s
Banned
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 5,981
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by darwinbulldog View Post
Possibly it's a straight 3 because of a "no qualifier" request...
Nope
Attached Images
File Type: jpg No Qualifiers.JPG (46.1 KB, 519 views)
Reply With Quote
  #30  
Old 07-06-2017, 10:35 AM
Snapolit1's Avatar
Snapolit1 Snapolit1 is offline
Ste.ve Na.polit.ano
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Posts: 5,760
Default

Isn't it amazing how much mystery and fog surrounds what these grading companies do, to the point that really knowledgeable people on this board who have been collecting for years don't understand exactly how these guys grade. Incredible. Great business model they've built.
Reply With Quote
  #31  
Old 07-06-2017, 10:42 AM
Peter_Spaeth's Avatar
Peter_Spaeth Peter_Spaeth is offline
Peter Spaeth
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 30,264
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Snapolit1 View Post
Isn't it amazing how much mystery and fog surrounds what these grading companies do, to the point that really knowledgeable people on this board who have been collecting for years don't understand exactly how these guys grade. Incredible. Great business model they've built.
Judging by CLCT's stock performance and PSA's market dominance I would say it is a pretty good business model.
__________________
My avatar is a sketch by my son who is an art school graduate. Some of his sketches and paintings are at
https://www.jamesspaethartwork.com/

He is available to do custom drawings in graphite, charcoal and other media. He also sells some of his works as note cards/greeting cards on Etsy under JamesSpaethArt.
Reply With Quote
  #32  
Old 07-06-2017, 11:47 AM
brianp-beme's Avatar
brianp-beme brianp-beme is offline
Member
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 7,532
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Pat R View Post
Personally I think it might be a "variation", it doesn't look like someone
drew that on there to me.
To me it looks like the 'A' was applied by a stamp.

Brian
Reply With Quote
  #33  
Old 07-06-2017, 01:01 PM
Brian Brian is offline
Member
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: New York
Posts: 314
Default

that explanation from the grading company is clear to me--clear as mud....
Reply With Quote
  #34  
Old 07-06-2017, 03:38 PM
swarmee's Avatar
swarmee swarmee is offline
J0hn Raff3rty
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Niceville FL
Posts: 6,902
Default

It's possible that it was judged a 5(MK) that was requested "No Qualifiers"; PSA reserves the right to leave qualifiers if they are egregious. However, we have had cases where pencil written numbers were still on the back of Mickey Mantle cards with no MK designation, and recently I graded a 1968 Topps card with obvious marker on the front and it got no MK designation, just a straight PSA 5.
It should have.

The other thought I had on this would have been a wet sheet transfer, but based on the gallery on oldcardboard.com, no other card in the set has a similar A. It does have the look of a stamp (because of the red color to the top left that resembles the corner of a stamp block). However, the placement of the stamp to me is just so good, that either the kid who owned it wanted to show he was on the Athletics, or it is a super-rare variation that will be worth thousands now that it's been found.
__________________
--
PWCC: The Fish Stinks From the Head
PSA: Regularly Get Cheated
BGS: Can't detect trimming on modern
SGC: Closed auto authentication business
JSA: Approved same T206 Autos before SGC
Oh, what a difference a year makes.
Reply With Quote
  #35  
Old 07-06-2017, 03:58 PM
ls7plus ls7plus is offline
Larry
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Southfield, Michigan
Posts: 1,765
Default

Personally, I think it would be quite interesting to examine it under a 16X loupe to see if the "A" is consistent with the card's other printed characteristics (the glass is half-full?).

Just sayin'.

Best wishes,

Larry
Reply With Quote
  #36  
Old 07-06-2017, 04:45 PM
Leon's Avatar
Leon Leon is online now
Leon
peasant/forum owner
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: near Dallas
Posts: 34,196
Default

I always thought this would have graded higher but whomever submitted it (before I got it) chose not to have the MK hence the 2.5. The little check mark on the back, near the bottom right side, is hard to miss?

__________________
Leon Luckey

Last edited by Leon; 07-06-2017 at 04:45 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #37  
Old 07-06-2017, 05:12 PM
ls7plus ls7plus is offline
Larry
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Southfield, Michigan
Posts: 1,765
Default

Very nice card from my perspective, Leon. Congrats on it!

Highest regards,

Larry
Reply With Quote
  #38  
Old 07-06-2017, 07:46 PM
Brian Brian is offline
Member
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: New York
Posts: 314
Default

Nice card, Leon.
The big difference, Leon, is that I WOULD buy your card with a mark (and a LOWER grade than the aforementioned Plank card in the original post), if it were for sale, but I would not buy the altered Plank that received a higher grade. Just sayin'...
Reply With Quote
  #39  
Old 07-06-2017, 08:27 PM
vintagetoppsguy vintagetoppsguy is offline
D@v!d J@m3s
Banned
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 5,981
Default

There is still some confusion about requesting no qualifiers. Please read post #29. It is a screen shot from PSAs website, "there are certain qualifiers that PSA will not remove such as MK."

It's right there in black and white. You cannot request no qualifiers when the card has a mark. If you see a card that has a mark but has no MK qualifier, PSA simply overlooked the mark.

Nice card, Leon. PSA missed the check mark. As for the card itself, it has several minor creases to warrant the grade of 2.5. The proper grade would have been PSA 2.5 MK
Reply With Quote
  #40  
Old 07-06-2017, 08:44 PM
swarmee's Avatar
swarmee swarmee is offline
J0hn Raff3rty
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Niceville FL
Posts: 6,902
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by vintagetoppsguy View Post
The proper grade would have been PSA 2.5 MK
There are no half grades with qualifiers. Either one or the other. Here is the marked card that PSA just gave a straight 5.

1968 Topps - [Base] #66.1 - Casey Cox (Yellow Team Name) [SGC*20]
Courtesy of COMC.com

As you can see, it has red scribble marker on the jersey and "blood tears" in both eyes. I was floored when it popped as an unqualified card. I think their website is wrong, and they do downgrade cards to remove MK qualifiers.
__________________
--
PWCC: The Fish Stinks From the Head
PSA: Regularly Get Cheated
BGS: Can't detect trimming on modern
SGC: Closed auto authentication business
JSA: Approved same T206 Autos before SGC
Oh, what a difference a year makes.

Last edited by swarmee; 07-06-2017 at 08:47 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #41  
Old 07-06-2017, 08:53 PM
vintagetoppsguy vintagetoppsguy is offline
D@v!d J@m3s
Banned
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 5,981
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by swarmee View Post
There are no half grades with qualifiers.
Tell that to PSA...

Reply With Quote
  #42  
Old 07-06-2017, 08:59 PM
vintagetoppsguy vintagetoppsguy is offline
D@v!d J@m3s
Banned
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 5,981
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by swarmee View Post
...they do downgrade cards to remove MK qualifiers.
Kind of like there's no half grades with qualifiers, huh?

Lots of misinformation in this thread. I blame it all in PWCC
Reply With Quote
  #43  
Old 07-07-2017, 03:42 AM
darwinbulldog's Avatar
darwinbulldog darwinbulldog is offline
Glenn
Glen.n Sch.ey-d
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: South Florida
Posts: 3,231
Default

The second they decided you could get a 1 with a qualifier but not a 10 with a qualifier they undercut their entire explanation for the qualifiers' purpose.
Reply With Quote
  #44  
Old 07-07-2017, 05:05 AM
swarmee's Avatar
swarmee swarmee is offline
J0hn Raff3rty
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Niceville FL
Posts: 6,902
Default

A 1.5 Fair is not actually a half grade in their opinion.

https://www.psacard.com/resources/gr...andards/#cards

Click on the box about half-point grades. It states "For example, there will not be cards graded PSA NM-MT Plus 8.5 OC or PSA EX-MT Plus 6.5 PD since the half-point is reserved for high-end cards within each grade."
So a 2.5(MK) is not possible, and actually won't fit on their Pop Report charts the way they're laid out, since there are separate fields for + (half-grades) and Q (qualifiers). However, since 1.5 FAIR gets its own column, it is not actually a half-grade and therefore, I guess, PSA allows qualifiers on them.
__________________
--
PWCC: The Fish Stinks From the Head
PSA: Regularly Get Cheated
BGS: Can't detect trimming on modern
SGC: Closed auto authentication business
JSA: Approved same T206 Autos before SGC
Oh, what a difference a year makes.
Reply With Quote
  #45  
Old 07-07-2017, 05:48 AM
cammb's Avatar
cammb cammb is offline
Tony. Biviano
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: NY
Posts: 2,461
Default

Why are we justifying the grade of PSA 3? I don't care how nice it looks. It has been tampered with and deserves an Authentic and nothing else
Reply With Quote
  #46  
Old 07-07-2017, 06:35 AM
Leon's Avatar
Leon Leon is online now
Leon
peasant/forum owner
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: near Dallas
Posts: 34,196
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by vintagetoppsguy View Post
...
Nice card, Leon. PSA missed the check mark. As for the card itself, it has several minor creases to warrant the grade of 2.5. The proper grade would have been PSA 2.5 MK
There are no creases or wrinkles that I can see under magnification. Try another answer please. Personally I think whomever submitted it got it done without the MK and a lower grade because of it. I know what their site says...
__________________
Leon Luckey
Reply With Quote
  #47  
Old 07-07-2017, 06:39 AM
vintagetoppsguy vintagetoppsguy is offline
D@v!d J@m3s
Banned
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 5,981
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Leon View Post
There are no creases or wrinkles that I can see under magnification. Try another answer please. Personally I think whomever submitted it got it done without the MK and a lower grade because of it. I know what their site says...
Look at the back. Right above "GEORGE" is a crease. Everything below "GOUDEY GUM CO. BOSTON" has many spider wrinkles.

A PSA 2.5 is accurate given the creases. I'm not knocking the card. I would love to own it. But it is graded accurately.
Reply With Quote
  #48  
Old 07-07-2017, 06:47 AM
Peter_Spaeth's Avatar
Peter_Spaeth Peter_Spaeth is offline
Peter Spaeth
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 30,264
Default

Let's stick with SGC, it makes so much more sense -- 50 55 60 70 80 82 84 etc.
__________________
My avatar is a sketch by my son who is an art school graduate. Some of his sketches and paintings are at
https://www.jamesspaethartwork.com/

He is available to do custom drawings in graphite, charcoal and other media. He also sells some of his works as note cards/greeting cards on Etsy under JamesSpaethArt.
Reply With Quote
  #49  
Old 07-07-2017, 06:50 AM
Leon's Avatar
Leon Leon is online now
Leon
peasant/forum owner
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: near Dallas
Posts: 34,196
Default

Admittedly there are some wrinkles (none go through both sides so to me they are wrinkles but they are there)..... still not sure about the check mark and why it still received a 2.5? Is a 2.5 card with a check mark still a 2.5?

Quote:
Originally Posted by vintagetoppsguy View Post
Look at the back. Right above "GEORGE" is a crease. Everything below "GOUDEY GUM CO. BOSTON" has many spider wrinkles.

A PSA 2.5 is accurate given the creases. I'm not knocking the card. I would love to own it. But it is graded accurately.
__________________
Leon Luckey

Last edited by Leon; 07-07-2017 at 06:51 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #50  
Old 07-07-2017, 06:54 AM
vintagetoppsguy vintagetoppsguy is offline
D@v!d J@m3s
Banned
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 5,981
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Peter_Spaeth View Post
Let's stick with SGC, it makes so much more sense -- 50 55 60 70 80 82 84 etc.
Failed attempt at sarcasm. SGC still lists the numeric 10 point grade on the flip (e.g. 55 = 4.5, 60 = 5, 70 = 5.5, etc) so what's the difference?

Don't you have another PWCC bash thread to start?
Reply With Quote
Reply



Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
PWCC Plank currently on eBay PSA 2 Topps206 Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions 61 09-10-2016 03:18 PM
Recent PWCC Auction Snapolit1 Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions 2 09-08-2016 12:50 PM
PWCC Auction Yet Again Yoda Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions 101 07-20-2016 11:02 AM
PWCC Auction Yoda Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions 98 02-13-2016 05:12 PM
Auction house Plank vs Ebay Plank PSA 5 Leon Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions 28 01-04-2013 12:35 AM


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 07:53 AM.


ebay GSB