opinion on these HOFers please

[theshleps]

I am going through my duplicates and wanted your opinion on these before I decide what to do with them. Thanks so much Most of my autographs I am 100% comfortable with. These I have alittle hesitation. If anyone wants any, let me know
aaroncronin.jpg

giles.jpg

davis.jpg

[theshleps]

any help greatly appreciated

[theshleps]

anyone?

[khw]

ok davis not good , cronin not really , maybe good late sharpie but i wouldnt buy it , aaron maybe hard to see but looks similar to 70`s, the harridge and giles kinda weird one has a decent looking harridge the other decent giles , then each has what looks like a bad one , kinda rare to see those cards dual signed , i dont recall ever having one , kinda ask what came together?

[mr2686]

I'm not a fan of that Cronin, and I think Kirk is spot on in his analysis of the Harridge and Giles cards. I'd pass.

[theshleps]

Thanks Kirk. I think the Cronin and Aaron are good but not 100% +. I kind of agree with you on the Giles/harridge but hard to imagine why someone would forge one name especially Giles (in a flair pen). I have a 3rd one that is slabbed which I am attaching. To me these unslabbed ones look better than the slabbed especially the Harridge. What do you think? I want one for my collection. Can range from all good to all bad to all mixed so I am confusedzz 1957 Topps #100a Harridge Giles .jpg.

[khw]

i really dont think the harridge on the right is good , the card on the left the giles is way closer with a harridge that looks good so card on the right wouldnt make it because it does appear harridge was added to me , the slabbed one giles is dead on but the harridge is just a bad looking signature i guess. real but just not pretty. you could submit the one on the left but beware the vintage stuff just gets failed now and i doubt it would pass psa anyway, i doubt they would pass the slabbed one again. not real consistent anymore