|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
Amazing research Pat, thank you. It's overwhelming the amount of time and effort you've put into this, truly impressive and so important to the history of baseball cards.
Last edited by Casey2296; 01-30-2024 at 09:17 PM. |
#2
|
||||
|
||||
Pat,
Fantastic research. I scanned through this thread in it's entirety, and its nice to see a seven year journey come to a close, with a satisfying result! Reading the old posts from Ted, makes me think that he would have loved this as well. Have a great day. - James
__________________
Successful Deals With: charlietheexterminator, todeen, tonyo, Santo10fan Bocabirdman (5x), 8thEastVB, JCMTiger, Rjackson44 Republicaninmass, 73toppsmann, quinnsryche (2x), Donscards. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Well done Pat.
Do my eyes deceive or were all of the subjects based on Carl Horner studio photos printed on the outskirts of the sheets? That seems a strange quirk. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
I imagine you've already done this, but it looks like Dooin was printed earlier since the scratch and the other flaw on that last one are more strongly printed.
The weaker one may be from wear to the stone. Have you sorted the pairs by how clear the scratches are? That would probably give us a clear picture of which one of the pair was plate A and which was plate B. I'm still thinking the shorter one in the middle belongs to the right of the sheet. Having two clear layouts for P150 is incredibly impressive. |
#5
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
Hey Steve, I think at least in some cases it has to do with the inking. I have seen with the same subject/scratch with bold and weak scratches, I will see if I can find and post a couple of examples. I know that you and a couple of other people have questioned if the shorter scratch belongs on the end one of the longer scratches. I disagree for several reasons but I could be wrong. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
I've been trying to think of a way it could be proven, but can't come up with anything likely. I think if either end of that short scratch ends somewhere off the card, there would be a neighbor card with the actual end visible if it's on it's own. If those end on the card, then I'd think they belong pretty much as placed. It's one of those ones where I would be somewhat happy to be wrong because it would mean that the sheet layouts might in fact be complete base on the size. |
#7
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
Quote:
Last edited by Pat R; 01-31-2024 at 02:18 PM. |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Just wondering about printing techniques giving further insight to T206 page layout. | iwantitiwinit | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 15 | 09-05-2014 06:27 AM |
E92 or other E Card Set Layout | Jaybird | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 5 | 06-17-2012 07:00 PM |
1910 Baseball Sheet Music - Complete | IronHorse2130 | Baseball Memorabilia B/S/T | 1 | 12-30-2010 08:55 AM |
W504 Brroklyn Complete Sheet | jim | 1920 to 1949 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 0 | 02-17-2010 07:49 PM |
1948 LEAF complete on an uncut sheet | Archive | Boxing / Wrestling Cards & Memorabilia Forum | 15 | 08-24-2007 06:15 AM |