NonSports Forum

Net54baseball.com
Welcome to Net54baseball.com. These forums are devoted to both Pre- and Post- war baseball cards and vintage memorabilia, as well as other sports. There is a separate section for Buying, Selling and Trading - the B/S/T area!! If you write anything concerning a person or company your full name needs to be in your post or obtainable from it. . Contact the moderator at leon@net54baseball.com should you have any questions or concerns. When you click on links to eBay on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network. Enjoy!
Net54baseball.com
Net54baseball.com
ebay GSB
T206s on eBay
Babe Ruth Cards on eBay
t206 Ty Cobb on eBay
Ty Cobb Cards on eBay
Lou Gehrig Cards on eBay
Baseball T201-T217 on eBay
Baseball E90-E107 on eBay
T205 Cards on eBay
Baseball Postcards on eBay
Goudey Cards on eBay
Baseball Memorabilia on eBay
Baseball Exhibit Cards on eBay
Baseball Strip Cards on eBay
Baseball Baking Cards on eBay
Sporting News Cards on eBay
Play Ball Cards on eBay
Joe DiMaggio Cards on eBay
Mickey Mantle Cards on eBay
Bowman 1951-1955 on eBay
Football Cards on eBay

Go Back   Net54baseball.com Forums > Net54baseball Main Forum - WWII & Older Baseball Cards > Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #101  
Old 08-25-2009, 07:29 PM
Basilone's Avatar
Basilone Basilone is offline
J0hn B@silone
member
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 34
Default

Like the man said....contact Joe O. and show him the evidence!

from the CU boards way back when...

scottsusor
Posts: 1452
Joined: Dec 2003
Wednesday April 21, 2004 5:30 PM

Since it appears that an awful lot of submissions (including mine) are having similar problems with undergrading of vintage (1950's and 1960's cards), I sent off an email to Joe Orlando yesterday, expressing my concern about what looks like either toughened standards or graders getting lazy. As he always does, Joe responded quickly and attentively. He restated what he said to me in Chicago -- that PSA has not consciously toughened any standards of grading in recent months. Unfortunately, that leaves open the other possibility -- that the graders are taking the easy (or speedy) way out by slapping a too-low grade on most cards then moving on to the next card. It may not be laziness -- it may be pressure to get through way too many cards in way too little time.

Anyway, Joe told me to send in some of the undergraded cards directly to him for review. I will be doing that shortly. I would advise anybody else that's getting hammered on grades to contact Joe and express your disappointment with what's been going on recently. The only way things like this will get worked out is for as many submitters as are affected to voice their perspective to Joe Orlando and then show him the evidence. He is very aware that undergrading hurts everybody -- PSA with reduced submissions, dealers who can't make a profit on their graded cards, and collectors looking to buy PSA cards that should be 8's and 9's. But just grousing about it here on the board does little good. You have to contact Joe and then show him the evidence.

Joe Orlando's email address is: JOrlando@collectors.com

Scott

Last edited by Basilone; 08-26-2009 at 04:57 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #102  
Old 08-25-2009, 07:42 PM
Peter_Spaeth's Avatar
Peter_Spaeth Peter_Spaeth is online now
Peter Spaeth
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 30,264
Default

Perhaps after that SS took matters into his own hands?
Reply With Quote
  #103  
Old 08-25-2009, 09:06 PM
Dakota Dakota is offline
member
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 2
Default

Yes Peter...that is exactly what happened.
Reply With Quote
  #104  
Old 08-26-2009, 08:40 AM
pwilk17 pwilk17 is offline
Peter Wilk
member
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 88
Default

Daniel- the work you and your team has done is fantastic. I was hoping you could post a reply as to where you see this going - Scott Susor needs to be dealt with - black listed and prosecuted - do you see this happening? Is he going to be allowed to continue his practice?
Reply With Quote
  #105  
Old 08-26-2009, 12:13 PM
WhenItWasAHobby's Avatar
WhenItWasAHobby WhenItWasAHobby is offline
Dan Marke1
Member
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Houston-area
Posts: 650
Default

pwilk17,

We are still pursuing civil action and criminal charges. I've asked eBay to ban him and the person I spoke to said that it would have to be reviewed by a department within eBay shortly.

Sadly, this guy, eBay ID "scottsusor" is still buying raw cards on eBay by the droves. Raw card sellers need to block him. It's obvious to me he has no intentions of quitting what he has been doing even though he's been exposed. That tells me he's just going to find people to submit to PSA for him and use others to sell on eBay for him. It's sickening.
Reply With Quote
  #106  
Old 08-26-2009, 07:48 PM
Peter_Spaeth's Avatar
Peter_Spaeth Peter_Spaeth is online now
Peter Spaeth
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 30,264
Default

Dan, despite your commendable work, I don't think PSA is likely to solve the problem nor do I think a boycott is likely to happen. Ultimately, if this (and other similar situations) is going to change, it is going to take law enforcement or private litigation.
Reply With Quote
  #107  
Old 08-30-2009, 03:12 PM
Peter_Spaeth's Avatar
Peter_Spaeth Peter_Spaeth is online now
Peter Spaeth
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 30,264
Default stay tuned

http://cgi6.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dl...&sort=3&_rdc=1
Reply With Quote
  #108  
Old 08-30-2009, 05:29 PM
Bobsbats's Avatar
Bobsbats Bobsbats is offline
Bob Hamlin
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: North Wales, Pa
Posts: 305
Default

Years ago there was a guy who would restore cards and place a small dot on the back to note the restoration. I haven't seen one of those dots in 15-20 years....It was just a matter of time before someone started getting their stuff done without the "dot" for a little extra cash.
The knowledge that is on this website in unbelievable. From the detailed work with this topic, to 19th century obscure question....if people dont know the answer here, the answer isn't known anywhere.
Reply With Quote
  #109  
Old 08-30-2009, 05:50 PM
Rich Klein Rich Klein is offline
Rich Klein
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Plano Tx
Posts: 4,476
Default The man you are referring to is Tom Faith

Regards
Rich
Reply With Quote
  #110  
Old 09-10-2009, 08:00 PM
botn botn is offline
Greg Schwartz
Banned
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 1,219
Default

Nice going Dan.
Reply With Quote
  #111  
Old 09-10-2009, 08:12 PM
Peter_Spaeth's Avatar
Peter_Spaeth Peter_Spaeth is online now
Peter Spaeth
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 30,264
Default

I suspect Mr. Scissors will find an alternative ID.
Reply With Quote
  #112  
Old 09-10-2009, 08:29 PM
botn botn is offline
Greg Schwartz
Banned
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 1,219
Default

And I am sure he will be exposed again. Just a matter of time. Sure that Dan has plenty on him and will find listings under the new ID. Then again I could see ebay lifting the suspension after 30 days. They seem to think that site violators get reformed after 30 days have lapsed.
Reply With Quote
  #113  
Old 09-11-2009, 09:41 AM
Jacklitsch's Avatar
Jacklitsch Jacklitsch is offline
Steve Murray
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Illinois
Posts: 1,739
Default

Susor made the NY Daily News

http://www.nydailynews.com/blogs/iteam/


September 9, 2009 8:21 PM By Michael O'Keeffe
Memorabilia world's opinion swayed on fraud
It wasn't that long ago that some sports memorabilia collectors would pull a Linda Blair and spew pea soup whenever the Daily News published a story that pointed out that their hobby was fraught with fraud. Some collectors, it seemed, preferred to bury their heads in the sand when confronted with evidence that their hobby had problems.

When our book about hobby fraud, "The Card," was published a few years ago, some of the guys at the card collector forum Net54Baseball.com acted like they were going through an exorcism. "The book portrays the whole hobby in a bad light," Net54Baseball moderator Leon Luckey grumbled. "The book sheds no new light on anything, is sensationalism at its worst, and is a piece of crap in my opinion."

"How sad that such a piece of rubbish gets published," a collector named Dan Markel added.

Maybe the fact that federal agents investigating allegations of shill bidding and other hobby fraud questioned industry executives and passed out subpoenas at the last two national sports memorabilia conventions. But a lot of Net54Baseball.com regulars - including Luckey and Markel - have become converts. Both now recognize that their hobby has significant problems

"A few years ago, fraud was a taboo subject," said Kevin Saucier, a collector who runs AlteredCards.com, a Web site to help fans protect themselves from the hustlers. "People just didn't talk about it. Now its come to the forefront of the hobby."

Markel, a collector who lives in Texas, is doing more than complaining about the hobby's crooks and con men. He led a group of collectors who conducted a lengthy investigation that concluded that a prominent eBay dealer was buying low-priced, low-grade cards, trimming them to enhance their appearance, and then submitting the doctored cards to PSA. When the cards came back with higher grades, the dealer, another Texan named Scott Susor, would sell the cards on eBay at premium prices.

Luckey recently posted the results of the investigation - called "The Markel Report" - on Net54Baseball.com.

Susor didn't return calls for comment, but his Houston-based attorney Bennett Fisher said Susor is an honest dealer who has never knowingly sold an altered card. "If they were trimmed, they were trimmed when Scott got them," Fisher said.

Susor considered filing a defamation lawsuit against Markel and others involved in "The Markel Report," but Fisher says a suit would be prohibitively expensive. "How much do you spend to fight something like this?" he asked.

Susor's eBay registration was pulled last week, which means he's no longer doing business on the Internet flea market, at least not under his own name. Spokeswoman Evonne Gomez declined to say if Susor had been banished because of The Markel Report. "I can't give specifics on this account because of privacy issues," Gomez said. "But the activity outlined on Net54 would not be tolerated by eBay.

"We have a very solid relationship with law-enforcement," Gomez added. "We take these kinds of allegations seriously."
Reply With Quote
  #114  
Old 09-11-2009, 09:54 AM
Leon's Avatar
Leon Leon is online now
Leon
peasant/forum owner
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: near Dallas
Posts: 34,199
Default actually

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jacklitsch View Post
Susor made the NY Daily News

http://www.nydailynews.com/blogs/iteam/


September 9, 2009 8:21 PM By Michael O'Keeffe
Memorabilia world's opinion swayed on fraud
It wasn't that long ago that some sports memorabilia collectors would pull a Linda Blair and spew pea soup whenever the Daily News published a story that pointed out that their hobby was fraught with fraud. Some collectors, it seemed, preferred to bury their heads in the sand when confronted with evidence that their hobby had problems.

When our book about hobby fraud, "The Card," was published a few years ago, some of the guys at the card collector forum Net54Baseball.com acted like they were going through an exorcism. "The book portrays the whole hobby in a bad light," Net54Baseball moderator Leon Luckey grumbled. "The book sheds no new light on anything, is sensationalism at its worst, and is a piece of crap in my opinion."

"How sad that such a piece of rubbish gets published," a collector named Dan Markel added.

Maybe the fact that federal agents investigating allegations of shill bidding and other hobby fraud questioned industry executives and passed out subpoenas at the last two national sports memorabilia conventions. But a lot of Net54Baseball.com regulars - including Luckey and Markel - have become converts. Both now recognize that their hobby has significant problems

"A few years ago, fraud was a taboo subject," said Kevin Saucier, a collector who runs AlteredCards.com, a Web site to help fans protect themselves from the hustlers. "People just didn't talk about it. Now its come to the forefront of the hobby."

Markel, a collector who lives in Texas, is doing more than complaining about the hobby's crooks and con men. He led a group of collectors who conducted a lengthy investigation that concluded that a prominent eBay dealer was buying low-priced, low-grade cards, trimming them to enhance their appearance, and then submitting the doctored cards to PSA. When the cards came back with higher grades, the dealer, another Texan named Scott Susor, would sell the cards on eBay at premium prices.

Luckey recently posted the results of the investigation - called "The Markel Report" - on Net54Baseball.com.

Susor didn't return calls for comment, but his Houston-based attorney Bennett Fisher said Susor is an honest dealer who has never knowingly sold an altered card. "If they were trimmed, they were trimmed when Scott got them," Fisher said.

Susor considered filing a defamation lawsuit against Markel and others involved in "The Markel Report," but Fisher says a suit would be prohibitively expensive. "How much do you spend to fight something like this?" he asked.

Susor's eBay registration was pulled last week, which means he's no longer doing business on the Internet flea market, at least not under his own name. Spokeswoman Evonne Gomez declined to say if Susor had been banished because of The Markel Report. "I can't give specifics on this account because of privacy issues," Gomez said. "But the activity outlined on Net54 would not be tolerated by eBay.

"We have a very solid relationship with law-enforcement," Gomez added. "We take these kinds of allegations seriously."
Actually Dan and I have always known there is/was fraud in the hobby. My beef with Okeefe was ONLY that he never brought the hobby out of the bad light he put it into with The Card. He quoted me after that, as that being my biggest issue with the book, and was correct. If he wants to say something else now then that is ok. BTW, I think it was already well known that the Wagner has problems so it's not like it was something new that we didn't already know. Besides that I think the book did shed some light on issues in the hobby...and that isn't a bad thing.
The only issue I have with this current blog post is he didn't go far enough with Susor and how much real evidence Dan and gang has on him. Maybe the whole story wouldn't have been as interesting? Regardless I still think Okeefe is doing a good job on helping to expose bad things in the hobby. I just figured I would comment since my name is thrown around a few times.....best regards
__________________
Leon Luckey
Reply With Quote
  #115  
Old 09-11-2009, 11:20 AM
Anthony S.'s Avatar
Anthony S. Anthony S. is offline
D.B. Cooper
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: San Francisco
Posts: 1,151
Default

Does Mr. O'Keefe buy suits off the rack, or does he have to have them specially tailored to accommodate those long arms with which he pats himself on the back? It's a shame he casts Dan extensive investigation in such a self-serving light. Wasn't necessary. I read and enjoyed "The Card," incidentally.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg 33.jpg (11.2 KB, 525 views)
Reply With Quote
  #116  
Old 09-11-2009, 11:31 AM
Peter_Spaeth's Avatar
Peter_Spaeth Peter_Spaeth is online now
Peter Spaeth
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 30,264
Default

It seems he may have missed the (to me) more interesting issue of why grading services fail to detect these alterations. I suspect it's a combination of they don't have time to look that hard for the $5 grading fee and the skill of the card doctors.
Reply With Quote
  #117  
Old 09-11-2009, 12:03 PM
botn botn is offline
Greg Schwartz
Banned
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 1,219
Default

Maybe he is too focused on shill bidding...
Reply With Quote
  #118  
Old 09-11-2009, 12:20 PM
calvindog's Avatar
calvindog calvindog is offline
Jeffrey Lichtman
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 5,494
Default

Susor considered filing a defamation suit! What a laugh that is. Why would it be prohibitively expensive when if he needed money he can just spend 2 bucks on a raw card and shave it into $1000? Better than a money tree. And my advice to fraudsters who want to sue people who out them: filing a lawsuit is a lot tougher than actually serving it apparently.

And that damn O'Keeffee: still writing negative articles about the hobby. What a sumbitch. Doesn't he know that our hobby bankrolls so many worthwhile humanitarian ventures? Search for the swine flu vaccine? Cure for AIDS? Eliminating all world hunger? Comeon, Mike, lay off the 'great' guys and do your job already!
Reply With Quote
  #119  
Old 09-11-2009, 02:05 PM
WhenItWasAHobby's Avatar
WhenItWasAHobby WhenItWasAHobby is offline
Dan Marke1
Member
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Houston-area
Posts: 650
Default The O'Keefe Blog.......

I agree with Leon’s assessment regarding fraud in the hobby. In fact, this investigation started before Mr. O’Keefe’s book, “The Card” was published. However, I’ll be the first to applaud Mr. O’Keefe for his coverage of many hobby related issues over the past several years. Leon is also correct in that this investigation was quite more expansive and thorough than what the article revealed. The study had diverse and extensive sources of scans and auction data of raw and graded cards won by eBay member “scottsusor” for evidence so that it would deflect any accusations of this being a one source conspiracy.

This brings me to my next point. As for the statements made by Susor’s attorney regarding that the cards were altered before his client received them - allow me to point out the utter absurdity of this assertion. First, you would have to believe that a significant number of raw card sellers on eBay, who generate large scans of mid-grade raw cards on their auctions, decided to conspire against their best raw card buying customer: “scottsusor”. The two ’63 Topps Jim King cards on page one of this thread would be a pair of many examples. You would also have to believe that when eBay member “scottsusor” won these cards, rather that just drop these mid-grade cards in the mail, these dealers would then have to go to painstaking efforts to alter these particular cards using some sophisticated paper modification techniques that if submitted to PSA, these cards would grade higher than advertised in raw form and be worth a lot more money in the marketplace. But no, rather than use these sophisticated alteration techniques to generate huge profits for themselves, they decided they wanted to facilitate some public spectacle that would humiliate and ban their best customer and only their best customer since one else has reported this problem. To compound the absurdity of this conspiracy, there were scans taken from eBay of graded cards “scottsusor” won, which later showed up for sale in different PSA holders with higher grades with a visually improved corner or a modified edge, etc. That’s how ludicrous this assertion is.

Also, I can’t help but mention that about two weeks ago I received an e-mail from Susor’s attorney. It used words such as “deformation” and stated that my allegations were "absolutely false", etc. So I called up the law firm out of morbid curiosity and talked to his attorney. This guy gave me his full assurance that all I wrote was false and he client was completely innocent. The funny thing was that the attorney wasn’t even sure how to pronounce his client’s last name, which made me burst out laughing saying, “How can you possibly convince me you even know anything about this guy if you don’t know how to pronounce his name?”

And yes Jeff, I too found the defamation lawsuit remark laughable.

Finally, I hope I’m not reading too much into the article, but the last line seems to imply that law enforcement had some involvement with the eBay ban, which would be great if that’s the case.

Last edited by WhenItWasAHobby; 09-11-2009 at 02:06 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #120  
Old 09-11-2009, 02:08 PM
Matt Matt is offline
Matt Wieder
member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Cleveland, OH
Posts: 2,358
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by WhenItWasAHobby View Post
And yes Jeff, I too found the defamation lawsuit remark laughable.
Maybe the idea of a defamation lawsuit is laughable, but I'd be more then a little concerned that his attorney threatened you with a "deformation" lawsuit.
__________________
To send me a Private Message, click here.
Please check out my albums.
Reply With Quote
  #121  
Old 09-11-2009, 02:16 PM
Jim VB's Avatar
Jim VB Jim VB is offline
Jim VB
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 2,090
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Matt View Post
Maybe the idea of a defamation lawsuit is laughable, but I'd be more then a little concerned that his attorney threatened you with a "deformation" lawsuit.
LOL! "Deformation" has a lower standard of proof, but a higher degree of pain.
Reply With Quote
  #122  
Old 09-11-2009, 03:24 PM
slidekellyslide's Avatar
slidekellyslide slidekellyslide is offline
Dan Bretta
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Lincoln, Nebraska
Posts: 6,122
Default

Obviously Susor's mailman is the culprit.
__________________
Looking for Nebraska Indians memorabilia, photos and postcards
Reply With Quote
  #123  
Old 09-11-2009, 03:27 PM
Potomac Yank Potomac Yank is offline
Joe P.
Member
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Virginia
Posts: 624
Default Deformation Lawsuit???

Dan, are you sure you weren't talking to the janitor?
Reply With Quote
  #124  
Old 09-11-2009, 03:42 PM
calvindog's Avatar
calvindog calvindog is offline
Jeffrey Lichtman
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 5,494
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by slidekellyslide View Post
Obviously Susor's mailman is the culprit.
I was actually thinking the same thing. It's fairly clear that Newman delivers Susor's mail.
Reply With Quote
  #125  
Old 09-11-2009, 03:58 PM
Anthony S.'s Avatar
Anthony S. Anthony S. is offline
D.B. Cooper
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: San Francisco
Posts: 1,151
Default

It's a shame JT Walsh is no longer with us as he bore more than a passing resemblance to Susor, and would have performer admirably in the inevitable big screen adaptation of the whodunnit mystery, "The Cards that Trimmed Themselves." As for who would portray the elves who magically appear in Susor's house every night and alter his cards unbeknownst to him, I'm thinking Vern Troyer and Elijah Wood.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg scottsusor.jpg (28.1 KB, 758 views)
File Type: jpg jtwalsh.jpg (8.4 KB, 755 views)
Reply With Quote
  #126  
Old 09-13-2009, 10:51 PM
WhenItWasAHobby's Avatar
WhenItWasAHobby WhenItWasAHobby is offline
Dan Marke1
Member
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Houston-area
Posts: 650
Default Another issue worthy of discussion from the New York Daily News Blog

There is one other crucial issue that I didn't discuss in my prior analysis of Mr O'Keefe's blog and that was following statement:

"....Houston-based attorney Bennett Fisher said Susor is an honest dealer......."

First off, as a practice I don't drag in other people's non-sportscard related activities on these types of message boards, but since the person of interest mentioned it himself on the Collectors Universe Board, then I think it's fair game to mention that he has a disc jockey business:

http://forums.collectors.com/message...92&STARTPAGE=2

Furthermore, in the communication I received from Mr. Susor's legal representation, it stated "....we are the attorneys for Susor Enterprises, Inc. and Scott Susor". So let's look at the website Susor uses to advertise his mobile disc jockey service, which is clearly identified with Susor Enterprises, Inc.

http://www.yourdjhouston.com/

Please scroll down and look at Reason #1 why his DJ business is superior to others:

"....and we are not part timers. This is our full time business....."

Just to be clear, this statement didn't show up immediately after being a Non-Registered User on eBay last week. As many others involved in this investigation will attest, this statement was there before this thread was started and electronic copies have been made to validate that. But in case someone decides to edit that website, please look at this internet archive website, "Wayback Machine", particularly in 2007 and 2008 and look at Reason #4 regarding this same DJ business in those two years:

http://web.archive.org/web/*/http://...djhouston.com/

It's also worth pointing out that this statement, "....and we are not part timers. This is our full time business....." wasn't used in their Nov. 2006 website or earlier. So it's clear that this current #1 Selling Point was deliberately added by design, while around that same time eBay member "scottsusor" receives POWER SELLER status and was grossing typically $10,000 to $15,000 a month by selling these tough to find, low pop commons and typically buying about 300-500 raw vintage commons a month on eBay too. It's also important to note that both the eBay entity, "scottsusor" and this DJ business identify themselves strictly as Scott and Doreen Susor.

So with his attorney vouching for his client's honesty, is it crystal clear that this eBay account is in no way a business, and that all of this buying and selling by "scottsusor" with a feedback of over 10,000 was just a time-wasting, money-losing hobby? If that's true, then Susor should now be thanking me that he's not longer allowed on eBay!

So if Mr. Bennett Fisher's client, Scott Susor, is as honest as Mr. Fisher claims on the widely viewed New York Daily News Blog, then why have I been harrassed by Mr. Fisher and his law associate claiming I've damaged Susor Enterprises, Inc. when this eBay Power Seller account, "scottsusor" is not even a business according to their honest client?

Has this been a case of brazen abuse of the legal system by several out-of-control, malicous attorneys who disregarded their client's honesty and attacked me over some inconsequential hobby issue?

Any input here would be greatly appreciated.
Reply With Quote
  #127  
Old 09-14-2009, 05:25 AM
Peter_Spaeth's Avatar
Peter_Spaeth Peter_Spaeth is online now
Peter Spaeth
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 30,264
Default

If they haven't taken legal action against you, and it strikes me as unlikely they will, I would just bravely ignore it.
Reply With Quote
  #128  
Old 09-14-2009, 07:46 AM
calvindog's Avatar
calvindog calvindog is offline
Jeffrey Lichtman
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 5,494
Default

No one is getting sued here. For what it's worth, I usually don't get too concerned about attorneys who can't spell the very cause of action that they threaten my clients with. Susor will just creep back into the slimy hole from which he came for a while and then re-emerge with a different ebay name. In the meantime, he and his lovely wife will be doing their mobile DJ work. What a class act.
Reply With Quote
  #129  
Old 11-09-2009, 11:13 AM
firefighterspot firefighterspot is offline
member
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 1
Default

I am 99% sure I have bought cards from him...I need to check back through my paypal account and see which ones I purchased.
(jpsaddiction on the 1968 list, and jparchitectus on ebay)

Last edited by firefighterspot; 11-10-2009 at 06:10 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #130  
Old 11-09-2009, 06:58 PM
leadoff4 leadoff4 is offline
member
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 21
Default

Good work Dan. I know Susor bought a '64 Pete Runnels PSA 8.5 off me on eBay about 2-3 months ago. He must have been banned just a few days after buying it. I wonder if it's in a 9 holder now???
Reply With Quote
  #131  
Old 11-10-2009, 05:34 AM
wilkcards wilkcards is offline
member
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 18
Default

Wow, fascinating thread; and with a happy ending, too!
Reply With Quote
  #132  
Old 11-10-2009, 10:51 AM
Exhibitman's Avatar
Exhibitman Exhibitman is offline
Ad@m W@r$h@w
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Beautiful Downtown Burbank
Posts: 13,043
Default

I don't know what a "deformation" action is but I bet it hurts, so you'd better watch out...I wonder, would he plead "slimder" or "label"?
__________________
Read my blog; it will make all your dreams come true.

https://adamstevenwarshaw.substack.com/

Or not...

Last edited by Exhibitman; 11-10-2009 at 10:52 AM.
Reply With Quote
Reply



Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
1924-25 Dominion Chocolate. Baseball cards DO exist! Archive Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions 9 07-20-2012 08:15 PM
% of Graded Vintage Cards Archive Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions 44 10-09-2007 04:45 PM
Trimmed cards graded as Authentic: how are they priced? Archive Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions 14 08-16-2005 11:17 AM


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:44 PM.


ebay GSB