Opinions on the "GOAT" (Boxing)

[HasselhoffsCheeseburger]

You guys are pissing into the wind. The boxing pop report is chock full of gross errors that will never be fixed. There's a 1942 set they have listed as 1935 that has Joe Louis in it so people have been buying it since day 1 thinking they're getting a Joe Louis rookie. Not to mention that the Louis card is at least double-printed, possibly reprinted, that accounts for the vast majority of Louis examples out there.

Arthur

[Exhibitman]

Or this:



The mfg is Crack. The set is Sport. The word "figuritas" means large cards. They have it right in 1965 with "Crack Golazo Figuritas".

[HasselhoffsCheeseburger]

The '67 set Crack Campeon. The album says Figuritas Sport the same way we'd have an album that says sports cards. Most of the albums from that era have those generic titles on them in some way, shape or form. Which also helps screw everything up when someone provides one to PSA and says "here, see? the name of the set is Figuritas Sport."

[Exhibitman]

Maybe they thought Crack was a joke.

[HasselhoffsCheeseburger]

The funny part is that they just put on the flip whatever you write in your book. So for the '62 Cassius, instead of labeling it 1962 Po-Po, they put 1962 Po-Po Boxing Disc. I've abandoned all hope.

[Exhibitman]

Funny cause when I try to get them to slab something in my book they act like they don’t know what I am talking about.

[HasselhoffsCheeseburger]

Weird. I have a pretty high success rate just by putting in the comment section something like "cataloged in Adam W's book blah blah blah on page" and then other stuff if it pertains like "you've already graded one other example from this set" stuff like that. To be honest, I'm not sure I remember a time when I referenced your book that they didn't slab it.

I don't think they like you.