|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
And just because it's detectable doesn't make it unethical. So it seems like a good deal of people are on both sides of the fence...so who actually makes the call on ethics here? Ok, so some people believe that by cleaning a card, you take it out of it's natural state. How about all of the chemicals that every t-card absorbed when they were around cigarette smoke or maybe inside the package before opened? I mean, which chemicals are we going to allow? I think we have to put the ethics debate on hold until we actually know what we are talking about. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
__________________
T206's Graded low-mid 219/520 T201's SGC/PSA 2-5 50/50 T202's SGC/PSA 2-5 10/132 1938 Goudey Graded VG range 37/48 |
#2
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
Quote:
I'm on the fence primarily because I don't collect graded cards, so if I could not tell that the card had been changed, I wouldn't care; however, I also realize that some people do care, and they have every right to want their cards to not be touched by chemicals. Also, some cards end up in slabs, and I have to be aware of the implications of that for chemicalized cards.
__________________
$co++ Forre$+ Last edited by Runscott; 03-25-2014 at 03:41 PM. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
http://www.conservation-us.org/about...s#.UzIPbDeYaUk While I've had a few cards graded, I was against it initially. (Back when it was new) I don't believe the grade should include things like centering. Every item is made in some way, and a technical grade should indicate the state of preservation only My other opposition was that keeping something that degrades and releases an acid that hastens the degradation inside an enclosed container can't be good for it in the long term. Some prewar cards aren't prone to that, and will be fine. Others, and the immediate postwar cards are and may suffer in the long term. At some point for some objects we as a hobby will have to decide between loss and preservation. Some 20's strip cards have already become brittle enough to be fragile. Even deacidification may not save them at this point. I'd expect to see this happen to late 40's cards in another 20 years. It's already possible to see the beginnings of it on some. Poor storage is the primary problem, but eventually all things printed cardstock with a high wood pulp content will degrade. I'm occasionally amazed that the same group that sees trimming up the borders of a handcut card to make it look better as ok can be strictly against removing scrapbook residue or dirt. Alteration purely for profit is wrong, but somewhere along the line preservation and profit take the same path. Steve Birmingham |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
Lets also be honest if the above is a toll road with innocent preservation/disclosure being the south bound lane and profit/deception being the north bound lane....which do you think has more traffic jams in our hobby? Cheers, John |
#5
|
||||
|
||||
I'd say they had to install an EZ Pass lane headed northbound John.
__________________
Check out my aging Sell/Trade Album on my Profile page HOF Type Collector + Philly A's, E/M/W cards, M101-6, Exhibits, Postcards, 30's Premiums & HOF Photos "Assembling an unfocused collection for nearly 50 years." |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
Well played, Jeff. |
#7
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
John, so that was Leon selling cards in the median strip the other day.
__________________
FRANK:BUR:KETT - RAUCOUS SPORTS CARD FORUM MEMBER AND MONSTER NUMBER FATHER. GOOD FOR THE HOBBY AND THE FORUM WITH A VAULT IN AN UNDISCLOSED LOCATION FILLED WITH NON-FUNGIBLES 274/1000 Monster Number Nearly*1000* successful B/S/T transactions completed in 2012-24. Over 680 sales with satisfied Board members served. If you want fries with your order, just speak up. Thank you all. Now nearly PQ. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
i agree with Jay.....this is a very slippery slope......
cards, for the most part, are not unique (i think Jay said that too) and their respective value is based on availability and condition. i also find it very telling that on Dick's website he has 6 testimonials and nobody gave their last name. |
#9
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
__________________
Eric Perry Currently collecting: T206 (132/524) 1956 Topps Baseball (190/342) "You can observe a lot by just watching." - Yogi Berra |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
__________________
My new found obsession the t206! |
#11
|
||||
|
||||
The problem is that the toll booth is in the wrong lane.
__________________
$co++ Forre$+ |
#12
|
||||
|
||||
Don't you mean the Towle booth, Scott?
__________________
FRANK:BUR:KETT - RAUCOUS SPORTS CARD FORUM MEMBER AND MONSTER NUMBER FATHER. GOOD FOR THE HOBBY AND THE FORUM WITH A VAULT IN AN UNDISCLOSED LOCATION FILLED WITH NON-FUNGIBLES 274/1000 Monster Number Nearly*1000* successful B/S/T transactions completed in 2012-24. Over 680 sales with satisfied Board members served. If you want fries with your order, just speak up. Thank you all. Now nearly PQ. |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
I usually take a very long view of things. It's very true there are plenty of more modern cards around now. That will probably remain true in my lifetime.(The 52 mantle is a doubleprint after all, plenty to go around) I do think there's room to consider the very long term results of what we do today. That includes whether any cleaning done now will cause a larger problem later. Places like the LOC don't just do the preservation work on unique and valuable documents and art. They deacidify in the neighborhood of a million books and documents a year Obviously not all of it is rare, valuable or even interesting. http://www.loc.gov/preservation/scie...ss_deacid.html I'm sure some of my feeling that properly done preservation is ok comes from learning some stuff about non-card items where it's more critical. (more below, under the line if you want to ignore it -Being concise isn't a skill I have.) The word properly is critical here - Some of what's done may hide problems or create new problems- I'd have to know a lot more about exactly what Mr Towle does to figure out how to categorize it. And unfortunately it's a trade secret. Removing surface filth is obviously something I agree with, I've done it myself. The trick is in having limits. I probably could have cleaned the card I showed better. But I had problems with going farther. What I did was near the limits of my skill, and near the limits of what I felt was proper. I think removing tape is good if it can be done in a way that ends up neutrally- All adhesive gone and solvents neutralized. Water stains usually come with some degree of cardboard damage. removing the stain probably just hides the problem. Fixing the damage would I think be going too far. Scrapbook residue that can be removed easily should probably be removed. Some of the glues are acidic, and taking the long view should be removed. It's hard to know just where to draw the line sometimes. And I'm sure I might feel differently if my collecting was in a different price bracket. The 59 common I tried to save would go to recycling or my kids these days. I do think the TPGs need to change things- reverse the time factor, spend more time on detection of problems. If someone is spending more to have an expensive card looked at I think both the hobby and the submitter deserve a bit more time spent rather than simply bumping the 60 second look to the front of the line. Steve Birmingham ------------------------------------------------ Old newspapers suffer terribly from the nature of the paper they're on, and films can suffer from both the film itself and the sort of emulsion holding the image. As an example Technicolor should remain looking good for several more lifetimes. But it stopped production in the US in 1974-5 and in Europe and the UK in 1980 and 78. But most stuff that was needed inexpensively and quickly was done on Eastmancolor film introduced in 1952, and that stuff loses color easily. Television was distributed on film in the 60's-70's, so the NFL game of the week was on film, ALL Eastman, all fading to nothing but red. The world series highlight reels made by Coca-Cola are almost all Eastman color. And all faded. (I own the only Technicolor one I've ever seen, so there are a few out there.) Poor storage can cause the plastic itself to break down and release acetic acid, which accelerates the breakdown. Oddly home movie film was more likely to be Kodachrome than a commercial film. And Kodachrome is pretty much as good as Technicolor. |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Can this stain be removed? | HOF Auto Rookies | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 15 | 03-28-2013 01:18 PM |
Stain or Transfer | Bwstew | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 2 | 12-11-2012 04:21 PM |
33 Goudey gum stain? | mighty bombjack | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 2 | 10-12-2011 08:43 PM |
Letters in the stain | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 2 | 05-12-2008 09:39 AM |
Name that stain! (c'mon - it's FREE!) | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 10 | 08-25-2004 12:38 AM |