Curious question

[yanks12025]

Question

Is a baseball signed by one player twice still considered a single signed baseball? One auto on the sweet spot and the other on the side panel.

[earlywynnfan]

I think so!

[joed25]

Personally I would not want a ball signed twice by the same player. I like the look of a single signed baseball.

[Runscott]

I think it would be cool to have a baseball with an early-career and late-career signature, if they are quite different: e.g - Mantle, Mays...Jeter (JOKE)

[Big Dave]

A single signed ball to me is one signed by a single person, not necessary one signature.

[yanks12025]

Thanks for the thoughts. Reason I ask cause I bought this twice signed DiMaggio ball from Leon's auction. I like how it's on a vintage ball and not like a 1990's show one.

[Scott Garner]

I may be wrong, but I believe that a twice signed Joe DiMaggio ball may be worth more than single signed, especially since it's vintage...

[thetruthisoutthere]

Originally Posted by yanks12025

Thanks for the thoughts. Reason I ask cause I bought this twice signed DiMaggio ball from Leon's auction. I like how it's on a vintage ball and not like a 1990's show one.

Brock, that is an awesome-looking baseball with two Joe D. sigs.

[David Atkatz]

Brock, there are a billion single-signed DiMaggio balls. Yours is worth more than any of those mass-produced ones. Because it's vintage.

[Scott Garner]

Originally Posted by David Atkatz

Brock, there are a billion single-signed DiMaggio balls. Yours is worth more than any of those mass-produced ones. Because it's vintage.

+1

[Runscott]

Originally Posted by David Atkatz

Brock, there are a billion single-signed DiMaggio balls. Yours is worth more than any of those mass-produced ones. Because it's vintage.

Yours is special, as there is a virtual collectible galaxy of baseballs, signed by billions upon billions of stars.

[I Only Smoke 4 the Cards]

I think they are double sided.