NonSports Forum

Net54baseball.com
Welcome to Net54baseball.com. These forums are devoted to both Pre- and Post- war baseball cards and vintage memorabilia, as well as other sports. There is a separate section for Buying, Selling and Trading - the B/S/T area!! If you write anything concerning a person or company your full name needs to be in your post or obtainable from it. . Contact the moderator at leon@net54baseball.com should you have any questions or concerns. When you click on links to eBay on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network. Enjoy!
Net54baseball.com
Net54baseball.com
ebay GSB
T206s on eBay
Babe Ruth Cards on eBay
t206 Ty Cobb on eBay
Ty Cobb Cards on eBay
Lou Gehrig Cards on eBay
Baseball T201-T217 on eBay
Baseball E90-E107 on eBay
T205 Cards on eBay
Baseball Postcards on eBay
Goudey Cards on eBay
Baseball Memorabilia on eBay
Baseball Exhibit Cards on eBay
Baseball Strip Cards on eBay
Baseball Baking Cards on eBay
Sporting News Cards on eBay
Play Ball Cards on eBay
Joe DiMaggio Cards on eBay
Mickey Mantle Cards on eBay
Bowman 1951-1955 on eBay
Football Cards on eBay

Go Back   Net54baseball.com Forums > Net54baseball Main Forum - WWII & Older Baseball Cards > Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 08-10-2017, 05:27 PM
bobbyw8469's Avatar
bobbyw8469 bobbyw8469 is offline
Robert Williams
member
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 9,050
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by MW1 View Post
Based on the centering and corner wear as well as the surface flaw/damage that runs through the "G" in "Kings," I would say the card is graded just right.
LMFAO...that is bad centering to you? That is bad corner wear to you? Not hardly....what you see through the 'G' is the spider wrinkle, which I am sure has been spooned out by now.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 08-10-2017, 07:35 PM
HawkFan70 HawkFan70 is offline
Ch.ris_Hel.mers
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2016
Location: Cedar Falls, IA
Posts: 181
Default

Wow - that Bobby Jones card is nice!
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 08-10-2017, 07:37 PM
bobbyw8469's Avatar
bobbyw8469 bobbyw8469 is offline
Robert Williams
member
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 9,050
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by HawkFan70 View Post
Wow - that Bobby Jones card is nice!
I thought so too Chris....I am well versed in the Sport Kings series.....If it wasn't for that spider wrinkle, that '5' had a real god shot at a much higher grade.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 08-10-2017, 08:27 PM
JamesGallo JamesGallo is offline
James Gallo
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Philly
Posts: 738
Default

Although these are both post war examples here are my thoughts. I sent in a 68 topps mantle that they had kicked back years ago as too short, this go around it got a 3.

I sent in 64 mantle that had several light none color breaking creases and they gave it a 1. A freaking 1 thats a poor. I assumed i missed a pin hole or paper loss but nope. The card should be a 2 all day.

As far as cracker jacks i have never felt that psa was consistent with them and even 10 years ago i would not buy a card in a psa holder without seeing it in person.

I do tend to buy the card often as i have picked up a couple low grade cards that present really well,

James G
__________________
WTB Boston Store Cards esp Ruth, Hornsby and 1915/16 UNC Strip cards and other Boston Store's too.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 08-11-2017, 11:33 AM
glynparson's Avatar
glynparson glynparson is offline
Glyn Parson
Member
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Blandon PA
Posts: 2,185
Default Mike

Mike is correct the Bobby jones is absolutely correctly graded. The card has excellent eye appeal which so often makes people think it should have a higher technical grade.

Last edited by glynparson; 08-11-2017 at 11:39 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 08-11-2017, 11:37 AM
bobbyw8469's Avatar
bobbyw8469 bobbyw8469 is offline
Robert Williams
member
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 9,050
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by glynparson View Post
Mike is correct the Bobby jones is absolutely correctly graded. It seems many have rose colored glasses when looking at their own cards. The card has excellent eye appeal which so often makes people think it should have a higher technical grade.
It got that grade because of the spider wrinkle...I get that. If auctioned now, if the wrinkle in the card is not gone, I have no doubt the card would have the PWCC-HE designation. I've seen '5's' in that set. That card doesnt look like a '5' (save for the wrinkle).
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 08-11-2017, 11:40 AM
glynparson's Avatar
glynparson glynparson is offline
Glyn Parson
Member
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Blandon PA
Posts: 2,185
Default

Save for the wrinkle but you can't it's there. No wrinkle I could see a 6 or 6.5 that's no 8.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 08-11-2017, 08:23 PM
MW1's Avatar
MW1 MW1 is offline
Mich.ael We.ntz
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Wisconsin
Posts: 305
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by bobbyw8469 View Post
LMFAO...that is bad centering to you? That is bad corner wear to you? Not hardly....what you see through the 'G' is the spider wrinkle, which I am sure has been spooned out by now.
It looks to me like someone already tried to remove it and only ended up removing some of the red on the Sport Kings banner--and blue background underneath it--instead.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 08-12-2017, 08:42 AM
CrackaJackKid CrackaJackKid is offline
Rowbeartoe Toemoss
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2016
Location: Kansas
Posts: 463
Default It's back.

I still can't see the justification in only a 2.5 but I used it is what it is. You guys agree or disagree?
Attached Images
File Type: jpg IMG_0972.jpg (77.4 KB, 355 views)
File Type: jpg IMG_0973.jpg (76.9 KB, 354 views)
File Type: jpg IMG_0974.jpg (69.7 KB, 356 views)
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 08-12-2017, 08:49 AM
bobbyw8469's Avatar
bobbyw8469 bobbyw8469 is offline
Robert Williams
member
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 9,050
Default

Well, the staining is there obviously, but the main thing I'm understanding is that in the past, the staining wasn't taken into account for the grades (as I'm guessing it's hard to get Cracker Jack's WITHOUT staining), while now they ARE taking stains into account.
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 08-12-2017, 08:56 AM
bobbyw8469's Avatar
bobbyw8469 bobbyw8469 is offline
Robert Williams
member
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 9,050
Default

I would be pissed though. VCP is all over the place on the card. The last PSA 4 sold in REA for $1560. The last PSA 2.5 sold in Love of the Game for $180. Don't know if the REA was abnormal or not, but that is quite a spread.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 08-12-2017, 12:03 PM
RedsFan1941 RedsFan1941 is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Feb 2016
Posts: 1,207
Default

I would say one of those prices is abnormally high and the other abnormally low.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 08-12-2017, 01:01 PM
CrackaJackKid CrackaJackKid is offline
Rowbeartoe Toemoss
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2016
Location: Kansas
Posts: 463
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by bobbyw8469 View Post
Well, the staining is there obviously, but the main thing I'm understanding is that in the past, the staining wasn't taken into account for the grades (as I'm guessing it's hard to get Cracker Jack's WITHOUT staining), while now they ARE taking stains into account.
The one that sold from LOTG was clearly cleaned of caramel stains. I think that played a role in the overall price.

As far as staining, yes it is impossible to get a 1914 CJ without staining unless it was snuck out the back door. All 14's were inserted inside the box.
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 08-14-2017, 01:12 PM
MW1's Avatar
MW1 MW1 is offline
Mich.ael We.ntz
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Wisconsin
Posts: 305
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by CrackaJackKid View Post
The one that sold from LOTG was clearly cleaned of caramel stains. I think that played a role in the overall price.

As far as staining, yes it is impossible to get a 1914 CJ without staining unless it was snuck out the back door. All 14's were inserted inside the box.
1914 CJ Factory Sets are rare but they do exist.
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 08-14-2017, 02:01 PM
CrackaJackKid CrackaJackKid is offline
Rowbeartoe Toemoss
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2016
Location: Kansas
Posts: 463
Default Agreed

Quote:
Originally Posted by MW1 View Post
1914 CJ Factory Sets are rare but they do exist.

Agreed but I don't believe there is any factory sets that have rounded corners and would only receive a 2 or 3 grade. They're all 8-10's. I could be wrong and someone please correct me if I am.
Reply With Quote
Reply




Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
PSA Review cardsnstuff Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions 8 09-24-2016 07:39 AM
Any luck with a PSA 'Review'? Kzoo Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions 21 07-24-2015 10:18 PM
2014 In Review Joe_G. Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions 8 12-28-2014 07:32 AM
55,56 topps raw review FS zachclose21 1950 to 1959 Baseball cards- B/S/T 4 06-05-2013 07:44 PM
PSA review question Archive Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions 14 06-01-2007 11:28 PM


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 08:22 PM.


ebay GSB